電影聖誕頌歌英文讀後感

1. 誰能幫我寫一篇英語讀後感，要300字的，關於《聖誕歡歌》的

本書是狄更斯最受推崇的一部短篇小說。故事並沒有落於俗套地為我們描寫爐邊夜話和風雪之夜,而是突出了當時的社會問題。主人公是一位商人,一生只知攢錢,毫無人性。但在聖誕夜受到教益,改變了自己的人生。

《聖誕頌歌》於1843年問世，也是狄更斯最受推崇的一部短篇小說。故事並沒有落於俗套地為我們描寫爐邊夜話和風雪之夜，而是突出了當時的社會問題。主人公斯克魯濟是一位商人，他成天與錢櫃、賬本和發票打交道，一生只知道攢錢，毫無人性。他剋扣員工的工資，拒絕外甥的問候和祝福，不施捨分文給窮人。然而，平安夜出現的三個精靈帶領他回到了過去、現在和未來的一些生活情境，並讓斯克魯濟從自製的陷阱和枷鎖中解脫出來，領悟到聖誕節的意義和生活的意義。他在聖誕頌歌奏響時開始了自己新的人生。 《教堂鍾聲》於1844年問世。小說的主人公是一位名叫托比的腳夫。此人因為肉體和精神上的摧殘而認同了富人對他們「天生就是壞人」的看法。銅鍾精靈讓他在新年鍾聲敲響之前做了一場噩夢。他終於認清了富人的偽善和自己應處的立場。作者抨擊了壓迫者，鼓舞了被壓迫的民眾。當教堂鍾聲敲響的那一刻，他終於擯棄了謊言而投奔了真理。

2. 根據下列要點寫一篇關於《聖誕頌歌》100詞左右的英語書評

Major themes

The story deals extensively with two of Dickens' recurrent themes, social injustice and poverty, the relationship between the two, and their causes and effects. It was written to be abrupt and forceful with its message, with a working title of "The Sledgehammer." The first edition of A Christmas Carol was illustrated by John Leech, a politically radical artist who in the cartoon "Substance and Shadow" printed earlier in 1843 had explicitly criticised artists who failed to address social issues. Dickens wrote in the wake of British government changes to the welfare system known as the Poor Laws, changes which required among other things, welfare applicants to "work" on treadmills, as Scrooge points out. Dickens asks, in effect, for people to recognise the plight of those whom the Instrial Revolution has displaced and driven into poverty, and the obligation of society to provide for them humanely. Failure to do so, the writer implies through the personification of Ignorance and Want as ghastly children, will result in an unnamed "Doom" for those who, like Scrooge, believe their wealth and status qualifies them to sit in judgement on the poor rather than to assist them.

Scrooge 「embodies all the selfishness and indifference of the prosperous classes who parrot phrases about the 『surplus population』 and think their social responsibilities fully discharged when they have paid their taxes.」

3. 《聖誕頌歌》讀後感怎麼寫

在寫《聖誕頌歌》的讀後感時可講述說書中主要想表達的內容，結尾的時候加入自己一點感想即可。

範文：

今天讀了《聖誕頌歌》這本書。

書中講述了史克魯齊是一個心地冷酷、性情刻薄的守財奴，在聖誕前夕，他拒絕施善，討厭快樂的慶祝。

於是，他已故的合夥人馬利的靈魂來看望他，警告他將象自己一樣在死後飽受折磨，擺脫這一命運的一線希望在於三個幽靈對他的訪問。

果然，昔日聖誕精靈、今日聖誕精靈、來日聖誕精靈分別帶著史克魯齊見證了他昔日的墮落，他的雇員和外甥今日的快樂以及他來日遭人唾棄的孤獨的死亡。史克魯齊從中獲得了感召，終於醒悟，並最終成為一個充滿愛心，樂善好施的人。

讀完這篇文章，我明白了做人要充滿愛心，樂善好施，不能心地冷酷，性情刻薄。當這個世界充滿愛，世界就會更美好。

4. 你想要什麼樣的人生---電影《聖誕頌歌》觀後感

[你想要什麼樣的人生?---電影《聖誕頌歌》觀後感]你想要什麼樣的人生?---電影《聖誕頌歌》觀後感作者：武志紅活著的時候，我的注意力從未走出我們的賬房，從未走出這個小范圍，現在面臨的是無止境的旅程，你想要什麼樣的人生?---電影《聖誕頌歌》觀後感。一直都在走在找，沒有休息，沒有安寧。我糊塗啊！我糊塗啊！我看不透自己的人生！虛度一生，我好苦啊！--摘自迪斯尼動畫片《聖誕頌歌》電影《聖誕頌歌》海報。假如，你突然能擁有了一個機會，可以清晰地看到你的過去、現在和你的未來，你還會像現在這樣生活嗎?迪斯尼最新推出的動畫片《聖誕頌歌》就描繪了這樣一個故事。故事中的男主人公埃比尼澤斯克里奇是一個超級守財奴，"令人討厭，吝嗇、冷酷、沒有人性"。但在1983年的平安夜，他先後遇到了四個異靈--他已逝的合夥人雅各布馬里的鬼魂、聖誕過去之靈、聖誕現在之靈和聖誕未來之靈，從而看到自己的過去、現在和未來比雅各布馬里還要恐怖的命運。這奇異的經歷令斯克里奇一夜劇變，從吝嗇鬼變成了一個仁厚、寬容、寬容而熱情的慈善家。這部影片改編自英國小說家查爾斯狄更斯的同名作品，正是因為狄更斯的這部傑作，才有了"Merry Christmas"這句流行語，並且聖誕節中的許多祝賀節日的儀式也是因為他這部小說才開始廣為流傳。超一流的小說家都有一種能力，他們所編織的故事，假如從心理學理論推論的話，你會發現完全站得住腳。寫過《雙城記》、《霧都孤兒》和《大衛科波菲爾》等名著的狄更斯毫無疑問是超一流的小說家，而他在《聖誕頌歌》中所勾勒的故事，並不僅僅是一個虛幻的神鬼故事。譬如，可以說，如果有非常優秀的心理治療師，能夠幫助斯克里奇這樣的人清晰地看到他的過去、現在和未來，那麼，他勢必會從一個守財奴變成一個樂善好施的人。一切都是鬼話，只有錢可靠影片一開始就刻畫了斯克里奇的超級守財奴形象。他的合夥人馬里去世了，而斯克里奇作為"唯一的遺囑執行人、唯一的財產管理人、唯一的財產受讓人、唯一的剩餘財產受贈人、唯一的朋友和唯一的送葬人"，為馬里操辦了葬禮。馬里和斯克里奇都是"好生意人"，懂得節省每一枚硬幣。但是，操辦葬禮的牧師像斯克里奇伸出手索要相關費用時，臉上鬼魅的笑容令斯克里奇心驚，那隻手則像魔鬼的手，要扼在他的脖子上。他不甘心地給了一枚硬幣，那隻手仍沒有落下來，他只好又給了一枚硬幣。牧師的手總算落了下來，但斯克里奇心理失衡了，他突然間將手伸向馬里的屍體，乾脆利落地將覆蓋在馬里眼睛上的兩枚硬幣取了回來，並狠狠地從嗓子里逼出幾個字來："兩便士，兩便士也是錢！"在死者的兩隻眼睛上各放一枚硬幣，這個傳統源自古希臘。古希臘的錢幣上有眾神的雕像，將這樣的錢幣覆蓋在死者眼睛上，是讓眾神通過死者的眼睛看到死者清澈的一生，從而幫死者更好地安息。也有一個比較俗的說法稱，死者的靈魂在渡過冥河時，要將兩枚硬幣交給船夫做船資，否則就會成為無所歸依的孤魂野鬼。不管什麼傳說，斯克里奇都不吃那一套，他寧願拿回那兩枚硬幣，好讓內心找到平衡。再說，有什麼比錢更可靠嗎?不僅如此，斯克里奇還認為，關於聖誕節的種種說法也是鬼話。聖誕節?聖誕節是什麼玩意?每個人都可以在聖誕節得到上帝的保佑，每個人在這一天都應該相互關愛?憑什麼?！這是騙人的把戲。斯克里奇只信金錢，金錢是唯一能給他帶來快樂、滿足和安全感的東西。除此以外一切都見鬼去吧。也許是這種信仰讓他身上透著一種殺氣，他走在路上時，乞丐都不敢找他乞討，唱頌歌的人都會被凍得停下來，小孩子見了他也不再調皮而只想逃走，甚至連狗遇見他都要落荒而逃。馬里去世的時候如此，7年後的聖誕節仍然如此。也不是誰都不敢接近斯克里奇。他的事務所有一個叫鮑勃克萊奇特的小職員，每周拿15先令。克萊奇特謹小慎微，擔心失去這份勉強可以養活一家人的工作，所以一直沒有離開斯克里奇。斯克里奇的侄子弗雷德也是例外。不管斯克里奇多麼冷漠，弗雷德都想去祝福和擁抱舅舅，想讓他火一般的熱情融化舅舅身上散發著的冰冷。他闖進舅舅的事務所，快樂地喊道："舅舅！上帝保佑你！""鬼話！"斯克里奇不耐煩地反駁。"聖誕快樂！"弗雷德繼續歡快地祝福舅舅。"你有什麼快樂的?你這么窮。"斯克里奇嘲諷說。"你怎麼這么悶悶不樂?你這么富有。"弗雷德反問，但神情已黯淡下來。沒什麼好快樂的，斯克里奇繼續說，他討厭聖誕節，"聖誕節意味著沒有錢也可以買東西，意味著又老了一歲，錢卻沒有多一分。""聖誕節一起吃飯吧，舅舅。"弗雷德執著地邀請。"除非我死了。""但為什麼?你為什麼這么冷酷?舅舅。""你為什麼結婚?""因為我愛她。""因為，你，愛，她?"斯克里奇眼神變得更犀利起來，弗雷德終於受不了想逃了，但在逃之前，他還是擁抱了舅舅並再次大喊"Merry Christmas！"熱情似火的弗雷德似乎沒有融化舅舅哪怕一丁點的冰冷。接下來，當有人來事務所中為窮人募捐時，斯克里奇無比冷血地說："沒有監獄嗎…勞動救濟所還開門嗎…我想你知道該怎麼安排他們了…(窮人如果活不下去)那就去死好了，正好可以減少多餘的人口。"和弗雷德一樣，募捐人也落荒而逃。不過，斯克里奇的心也並不是全然冰凍著的，他還有一個小縫隙能透露出一點人味。盡管極其不甘心，但他還是忍受著"不公平"感的折磨，給克萊奇特放了一天的"帶薪假"。斯克里奇的心是如何一點點凍結的一個傳說稱，上帝一次動了惻隱之心，想從地獄中救一個惡鬼出去，但卻在他心中發現不了一毫善念，只好作罷。也許正是因為斯克里奇對克萊奇特還有那麼一丁點的惻隱之心，所以上帝決定派四個異靈到斯克里奇的家裡來點化他。第一個到來的是馬里的鬼魂。他拖著幾道長長的鐵索，鐵索的盡頭是沒有用的錢箱，對著被嚇得半死的斯克里奇喊道："苦啊！我好苦啊！"為什麼這么痛苦?"馬里"無限懊悔地說："活著的時候，我的注意力從未走出我們的賬房，從未走出這個小范圍，現在面臨的是無止境的旅程。""一直都在走在找，沒有休息，沒有安寧。我糊塗啊！我糊塗啊！我看不透自己的人生！虛度一生，我好苦啊！"斯克里奇安慰說，你的人生也有亮點，"你一直是一個好生意人。"孰料這正是"馬里"痛心之處，他的下頜都在悲嘆中掉了下來，"生意?我的生意本應該是為人類做貢獻，本應該是慈善、寬容和仁慈。"最後，"馬里"對老朋友說"你還有一個機會，一線希望擺脫我的命運"，將有三個靈魂過來找他。"馬里"臨走時還將斯克里奇拖到了窗戶前，斯克里奇看到，窗外有無數鬼魂在懊悔地大喊大叫，其中許多鬼魂在拿錢箱砸自己的頭顱，還有一個鬼魂在對著街邊一個無家可歸的乞丐喊："抱歉，我幫不了你啊--"斯克里奇被嚇得躲在床上。但當聖誕日來臨的鍾聲敲響時，第一個異靈--聖誕過去之靈如期而至，他帶著斯克里奇回到過去。與過去取得鏈接，在心理治療中是一個很重要的工作。因為，我們總是因為過去太痛苦才將心關閉，本來我們想關閉的只是和某幾件痛苦往事的鏈接，但最終我們關閉的，卻是心的整個通道，從而失去了與其他人乃至萬物的鏈接。例如，斯克里奇的事務所和家都有幾把鎖，而他鎖上門後總是不放心，還要進行檢查。但是，他真正要鎖住的是什麼呢?小偷，還是內心的恐懼、無助和受傷感?在治療中打開這些鎖相當不易，通常要等心理醫生與來訪者建立起深度信任的關系，這時來訪者的心鎖才會脫落，內心隱藏著的一些回憶才會涌現。異靈是不需要這樣做的，他直接將斯克里奇帶回到童年即可。但當站在家鄉時，斯克里奇落淚了。聖誕過去之靈問他："你的臉上是什麼?眼淚嗎?""不是！"斯克里奇回答說，"是眼裡進沙子了。"這時斯克里奇還在堅持一份虛假的堅強，這份堅強曾幫助他防禦過去的痛苦所帶來的無望，觀後感《你想要什麼樣的人生?---電影《聖誕頌歌》觀後感》。的確，他的童年是非常不幸的。一個聖誕節，偌大的學校，孩子們都回家團聚去了，只有"一個孤獨的孩子，正靜靜地留在這里"。老斯克里奇感慨說"我那時的聖誕節不快樂"，但是，小斯克里奇的心並沒有完全凍結，他一個人坐在空盪盪的教室中時，嘴裡還在哼唱著聖誕頌歌。又一個聖誕節時也是如此，已是少年的斯克里奇還是獨自一人坐在空盪盪的教室中，但情形已有改觀，妹妹范尼跑過來找他，興奮地喊著："埃比尼澤，埃比尼澤，我來帶你回家。"原來，斯克里奇之所以不能回家，是酒鬼爸爸不喜歡他，但這個聖誕節前爸爸變得和藹了，范尼求爸爸讓哥哥回家，他答應了。這時，妹妹還可以敲開少年斯克里奇尚未徹底冰凍的心，但她的兒子弗雷德卻無法敲開老斯克里奇的心。這並不是因為痛苦在日益累積，而是因為他想逃避這些痛苦而逐漸將心關閉，而錢是幫助我們將心關閉的最佳工具之一。又一個聖誕節時，斯克里奇已是青年，他在一個事務所做學徒，師傅是一個快樂的人。在平安夜，他們把事務所騰空，舉辦盛大的舞會，而斯克里奇的愛情正是在這個聖誕節中降臨了。那一刻，他的生命似乎被愛情的光芒照亮了。但愛情也恰恰是令斯特里奇的心徹底關閉的一個關鍵。多年後的又一個聖誕節，斯特里奇已是精乾的成年人，但妻子對他說"我要解除婚約"，因為"別的東西取代了我在你心目中的位置。""什麼東西?"斯克里奇問。"金錢。"妻子回答說。斯克里奇不想離婚，但他不肯直接表達這個意思，而是反問："我發出要解除婚約的信號了嗎?""語言上沒有。"妻子回答說。"那哪裡有?""你變了的靈魂，還有生活方式，而且我對你的愛已經不重要了。"妻子逼問他，如果你像現在這樣富有，而我還是一個貧窮的女子，你會愛我嗎?斯克里奇繼續反問："你以為我不會嗎?"妻子則繼續說："你一切都以金錢來衡量，我給你自由，希望你在你選擇的生活方式中找到幸福。"她轉身而去。心化開了，就可以看到別人的痛苦了這一段對話中，他們都是脆弱的。斯克里奇一定不是相信金錢比她重要，但他卻沒有底氣坦承。看著呈現在自己眼前的這一個聖誕節的畫面，斯克里奇痛苦起來。處於這個令他無比懊悔的節點時，他的心不敢打開，他咆哮著，讓過去之靈帶他走，最後他用帽子將過去之靈的光芒罩住，用盡了全身的力氣。他也是這樣對待他過去的痛苦的。他勝利了，過去之靈的光芒完全不見了，那些痛苦也看不到了。這時，他的臉上露出了一絲特別的微笑，帶著苦楚。但突然間，過去之靈的帽子像火箭一樣將斯克里奇擊入虛空，最後又徹底消失，斯克里奇開始墜落，沒有任何憑借。這一幕也有很強的象徵意義。內心藏著太多痛苦的人，非常害怕失控，而從空中向下自由墜落，是他們最恐懼的事情之一，不知有多少人對我說過這樣一句話："失控，等於死亡。"徹底的失控並不會帶來死亡，反而常常帶來自由。當斯克里奇與自己的過去取得鏈接後，他就可以睜開眼睛，全然地看到自己現在的生命狀態了，也包括可以看到其他重要人物的存在了。在心理治療中，我屢屢發現，一旦與過去的痛苦取得了鏈接，一個人就可以更好地感受別人的感受了。斯克里奇也是如此。他從虛空中墜落，結果不是死亡，而是來到了聖誕現在之靈的空間中。聖誕現在之靈帶著他，"從天堂的角度"去審視自己所在的世界中的一切，而他開始看到窮人的苦。他質問現在之靈，"你為什麼要關閉窮人一周只能吃一頓像樣的飯的地方?"最觸動斯克里奇的，是他的小職員克萊奇特一家。他們非常貧窮，但家裡充滿了溫情，他們過聖誕節時有一隻烤鴨就滿足了。並且，在進餐前，克萊奇特竟倡議為斯克里奇祝酒，盡管太太很不情願，但他們還是一起祝福了他。斯克里奇心中的堅冰徹底融化了，他注意到克萊奇特的兒子小蒂米好像生了重病，於是憂心忡忡地問現在之靈，小蒂米是不是會死掉，你能為幫他嗎?現在之靈回答說，小蒂米的確大事不妙，但為什麼要幫助他呢，"如果要死那就死好了，可以減少多餘人口。"這正是斯克里奇以前的言語，現在再聽到如此冰冷的話，斯克里奇痛苦起來。現在之靈又帶他來到弗雷德家裡。一樣的，盡管弗雷德用字謎游戲開舅舅的玩笑，但當他倡議為舅舅祝酒時，所有人都舉杯祝福斯克里奇。聖誕節就要過去了，現在之靈的壽命即將結束。他給斯克里奇看了人類的兩個孩子，男孩叫無知，女孩叫貪婪，他們兩個一遍又一遍在斯克里奇耳邊重復他過去的話"沒有監獄嗎?沒有勞教所嗎?"現在之靈在大笑中而來，也在大笑中死去。接下來，斯克里奇最恐懼的聖誕未來之靈出場了。斯克里奇對未來之靈說，他很恐懼，但他還是做好了准備，准備在未來之靈的陪伴下去看看自己的未來。你願意有什麼樣的墓誌銘未來，是斯克里奇死去了。據佛教的說法，對於缺乏覺知力的靈魂，在生與死之間的空間中，命運之風就像暴烈的鞭子一樣，令這些靈魂無比恐懼，於是不斷地狂奔，而無形中就投胎了。狄更斯應該是基督徒，但電影中卻著力刻畫了這一幕。斯克里奇的靈魂被一輛來自地獄的拘魂馬車追逐。他逃命，中間兩次無意中投胎。一次躲過拘魂馬車後又逃了出來，但第二次他完成了投胎的過程，成了一個貧窮而可怕的家庭的嬰兒。那個家庭的男主人是一個可怕的、沒有一點情緒控制能力的暴徒，而女主人竟然是斯克里奇的傭人迪爾博太太。投胎到這樣的家庭已經夠可怕了，更可怕的是，似乎沒有人為斯克里奇之死有一點哀傷。迪爾博太太沒有，欠斯克里奇債務的一對夫妻沒有，相反他們都很開心。克萊奇特一家很哀傷，但他們是為小蒂米的離去而哀傷。"人之將死，其言也善"，因為，人在臨死的一刻，會突然間擁有一種能力看到自己的一生，那時無數人會無比懊悔，但悔之已晚。斯克里奇則不僅看到了自己過去的一生，還看到了可怕而荒蕪的未來。他未來的父親，要比他的酒鬼父親更要可怕。所以，當未來之靈將他帶到墓地上，讓他看到那塊銘記著"埃比尼澤斯克里奇"的墓碑時，斯克里奇恐懼到了極點，他拚命地問："什麼樣的人就有什麼樣的結局，如果人改變了，結局也會改變…告訴我還有改變的可能，改變做人就可以…我不會忘記從過去、現在和未來得到的教訓。"未來之靈沒做任何回答，他將斯克里奇推向地獄，斯克里奇不斷地向地獄墜落…但還好，這一切都像是一個夢，斯克里奇醒來後發現，他的確是墜落，不過是從床上墜落到地上。這時，恰恰是聖誕節的清晨。這一刻，他無比喜悅，他身輕如燕，他歡欣跳躍，雖然四個異靈都沒教導他該怎麼做，但他完全明白。他先給克萊奇特一家送去了一份禮物--有兩個小蒂米大的火雞。心打開後，他像"不良少年"那樣玩耍，他的氣場也打開了，他能注意到所有人的存在，帶著歡樂和他們打招呼。遇見募捐者時，他向他承諾捐很多錢，並由衷地謝謝他，因為他知道，看起來他是在幫助別人，實際上是在幫助自己，他為能有這樣的機會有充滿感激。他和路人一起唱聖誕頌歌，他還參加了弗雷德的晚宴。他倒沒有食言，他的確是在自己死過後才做到了這一點。第二天，他給遲到的克萊奇特加薪，還改變了工作方式，要和克萊奇特一邊喝酒一邊守著暖爐工作。他身上的殺氣消散了，他的心從如鐵堅冰變成了熱情的火焰，最終這團火溫暖了整個城市，他成為這個城市最會過聖誕節的人。司湯達的墓碑。最會過聖誕節的人正是狄更斯本人，他的這部作品教會了英國人乃至全世界怎麼過聖誕節，以至於他被稱為"發明聖誕節的人"，當他去世時，還多孩子問自己的父母，聖誕老人怎麼會死呢?有趣的是，這部電影在迅雷和豆瓣兩個網站上得到的評價截然不同。在迅雷上，它得到了9.7分的高分，而在豆瓣上，它只得到了6.8的分數。迅雷上，很多網友說被打動，而豆瓣上，很多網友說覺得電影像恐怖片，並且尤其不喜歡電影的說教意味。然而，作為一個心理治療師，我非常喜歡這部影片，一點都不覺得它是在說教。因為，假如這一切可以是事實怎麼辦?至少，在治療中我發現，當一個人能夠逐漸與過去鏈接時，他的心就會發生巨變，當一個人能夠學會站在別人的角度看現在的自己時，他的心也會發生相當的改變。至於看到未來，美國心理學家歐文亞隆在治療中常用一個技巧--設想一下你的墓誌銘，如果你現在死掉了，你的墓碑上會有什麼樣的墓誌銘，這個墓誌銘是你想要的嗎?許多哲學家也說，死亡是最嚴肅的哲學問題。這也是同一個意思，你死去的時候你的心會突然擁有一種能力，可以清晰地看到自己的一生。但那時，你已經沒有了改變的可能，如果是嚴重的懊悔，那該是什麼樣的折磨?我很喜歡《紅與黑》的作者司湯達的墓誌銘"活過、愛過、寫過"，更喜歡另一位忘記了名字的名人的墓誌銘：如果這就是生命，那好，請再來一次。你呢?你想要什麼樣的人生?--電影《聖誕頌歌》的鏈接：（）〔你想要什麼樣的人生?---電影《聖誕頌歌》觀後感〕隨文贈言：【人生舞台的大幕隨時都可能拉開，關鍵是你願意表演，還是選擇躲避。】

5. 《聖誕頌歌》 英文介紹 初一水平 別多100詞！

Today in 1843, Charles Dickens published "A Christmas Carol" in England.
The story is about sour and stingy Ebenezer Scrooge's ideological, ethical, and emotional transformation after the supernatural visitations of Jacob Marley and the Ghosts of Christmases Past, Present, and Future. The novella met with instant success and critical acclaim.
The book was written and published in early Victorian-era Britain when the country was experiencing a nostalgic interest in its forgotten Christmas traditions and at a time when new customs such as Christmas trees and greeting cards were being introced.

6. 求霧都孤兒 聖誕頌歌英文讀後感

To Regain the Nature of Goodness
-- Review of 『Oliver Twist』

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens』, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don』t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, 『The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose』, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people』s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their 『kindness』, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, 『Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.』

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those 『vermin-to-be』 to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.
這個是短的
Oliver Twist is the world's masterpiece, it tells the story of the 19th century occurred in a moving story of the masters of the book Oliver Twist is an orphan, he was born in the workhouse, was born near his mother died. Later, he was deemed to have been sent an item sent, had been tortured, until the last of the Brownlow met a kind old gentleman, this gentleman to take him, then had a good life. After reading this book, I can not calm the mood for a long time. Poor Oliver has lost loved ones in pain, the suffering by so many. Really do not know him under the thin body, with what kind of meaning has

回答者： PASHERS陶晉 - 經理 四級 2009-8-18 14:50
霧都孤兒英文版讀後感(英文)

To Regain the Nature of Goodness

—— Review of 『Oliver Twist'

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens', is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind？ The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don't think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, 『The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose', he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people's honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their 『kindness', they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, 『Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.'

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those 'vermin-to-be' to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness

7. 聖誕頌歌的英文感想,急呢! a christmas carol,100-200字

I think it's beautiful.If you listen to it,you will be excited.I awalys listen to it.When I unhappy.Then I get fun.

8. 聖誕頌歌 The Christmas Carol英語讀書筆記

<A Christmas Carol>This story represents a very original forces, the boss is very stingy done in a Christmas dream, then he changed his views and see how to use their money to help others, charity! I hate that mean the original owner, since he has so much money, but not always help others. Although money is very important, to live in this world money is totally unacceptable and if the money can live a life on, let the world, more people happy, they should spend the money to, because it values. Fortunately, the boss wake up later, the others will be happy to know the truth themselves happy to help a disabled child, for their family and their assistants together after a happy Christmas!
<聖誕歡歌>這個故事講的是一個原來很勢力,很吝嗇的老闆在聖誕節做了一個夢,從此他改變了他的看法,看是懂得用自己的金錢去幫助別人,做善事! 我討厭原先那個吝嗇的老闆,因為他自己雖有那麼多的錢,卻永遠不去幫助他人.雖然說錢是非常重要的,生活在這個世界上沒錢是萬萬不能的,可如果這一筆錢能就活一個生命,能讓世界上多一個人幸福,就應該去花這筆錢,因為它值.幸虧後來老闆醒悟了,知道了別人幸福自己才會幸福這個道理,幫助了一個殘疾的小孩,讓自己助手一家和自己一起過了個快樂的聖誕節!

9. 《聖誕歡歌》英文讀後感

這些都是你找不到的：

1
Do I need to give an introctory synopsis to this story? A Christmas Carol has been done over and over and over and... Whether it has been done as a movie, a stage play, or in a TV show (for example, I saw both "Quantum Leap" and "Highway to Heaven" do episodes based on it). The book has been read in many an English speaking school classroom. There is a reason for this. It's an excellent story that can be retold and reread constantly.

If you never had the chance to read the novel, do so at least once in your lifetime. Do not rely on all the adaptations available. There is still magic in Dickens' words. I had not remembered that Ebenezer started learning his lesson after the first ghost. Usually in adaptations it takes through the third ghost for him to realize the error of his ways.

As well as A Christmas Carol, which is a short novel, this edition also includes some of Dickens' short stories. Ghosts or supernatural occurrences are in most of them. This includes another one of Dickens' Christmas stories, The Haunted Man.

Now for the confession. I have not wanted to read Dickens since 7th grade when I read The Curiousity Shop for a book report. I wasn't sure I would care for the stories included with A Christmas Carol (which I have always liked) because of my distaste for Little Nell's story. The first of the other stories I read only reinforced my long held opinion. Finally, though, the man's storytelling brilliance showed through. I found most of the short stories and stage readings well done and leaving me wanting more. I guess I'll have to pick up one of his "masterpiece" novels next year. I may be glad I did.

2
This is one of Charles Dicken's most enring stories. The tale of Scrooge is so famous that the word has entered the vernacular as any miserly person who does not enter into the spirit of the season.

The tale of Ebenezer Scrooge is a fascinating look at the human psyche of a certain type of indivial, who is mean and lonely and ultimately not happy.

The ghosts of the past, present and future visit Scrooge and help him see how his behaviour has impacted on his life, and the way that he is treated by other people as a consequence.

An interesting story, and an enring classic that everyone should read!

3
This past December, I read Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol for the first time. Of course, I have seen the story done on stage a number of times (mostly as a child), and the various movies are a yearly Christmas tradition. (My favorite is Albert Finney's portrayal in the early 1970's British musical version "Scrooge.") But despite being very familiar with the story itself through stage and film, and despite having bought a of the book some years back, I had never taken the time to sit down and read the story.

So, having bought a new edition of the book after Christmas last year, I finally sat down in December and began the original story.

It was absolutely sublime!

As much as I love the film and stage adaptations of the story, the book was just wonderful. So full of color and imagination and description - you could fairly feel the 19th century London cold, the piles of apples and oranges on the street carts, the hawkers calling out to passers-by bundled head-to-toe in woolen coats and boots.

This really is the quintessential Victorian Christmas story. I suppose I'm only about 170 years late in determining that, but now that I have read the story, I can see why it was such an instantaneous hit with readers. It was so successful ring his lifetime, in fact, that Dickens began a tradition of writing Christmas stories every year. The edition of A Christmas Carol that I purchased last year has two other Dickens Christmas stories in it as well, although I have not yet dived into those two.

So I highly recommend this book. If you have seen any or most of the various Scrooge movies that have been made over the years, much of the book will be familiar, but there are a few scenes here and there that I have never seen re-enacted in a play or a movie, including a trip out to a mining colony on the coast of England, and a hovering ride over the English Channel to view Christmas on a Navy ship.

Even after all these years of watching movies and plays based upon this story, I was still moved, emotionally, while reading this book, particularly ring the scenes with the Cratchit family. And at the end, I almost felt a tear well up when Scrooge showed up on his nephew's doorstep for Christmas Lunch.

To end, let me quote one of the more poignant passages from the book. The Ghost of Christmas Present has just reminded Scrooge of his harsh words about how if the poor are going to die "then they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population." The Ghost quoted the same phrase after Scrooge expressed concern about whether or not Tiny Tim would die. The Ghost goes on to say the following:

"Man," said the Ghost, "if man you be in heart, not adamant, forbear that wicked cant until you have discovered What the surplus is, and Where it is. Will you decide what men shall live, what men shall die? It may be, that in the sight of Heaven, you are more worthless and less fit to live than millions like this poor man's child. Oh God! To hear the Insect on the leaf pronouncing on the too much life among his hungry brothers in the st."

That last line, in particular, strikes a powerful chord. How relevent, 170 years downstream, and in another country, for the self-righteous protestations of the wealthy American!

4
A Christmas Carol' was a 19th century novel written by Charles Dickens. Dickens concerns were poor children and how they were treated, he was mainly made aware of their terrible plight when he visited the Field Lane Ragged School' and was appalled at what he saw. Dickens had queries on how to release his concerns about the fate of the poor, considering procing them in the form of a pamphlet, but as he was the most popular novelist of the day he realised that more people would take notice of the poor if he wrote about them in a story. Dickens aimed his story at the wealthy, as they were the ones who could make a significant difference. Dickens wanted to make the wealthy realise what was happening and how bad it was.

The style Dickens wrote in was typical of the period because, around the 19th century most knowledge was accessed by writing, so Dickens incredible use of imagery was very effective in conveying his message and making A Christmas Carol' the popular novel it is. For example on the first page of the first stave Dickens uses a lot of complex sentences. "And even Scrooge was not so dreadfully cut up by the sad event, but that he was an excellent man of business on the very day of the funeral, and solemnised it with an undoubted bargain." This use of complex sentences is very good because complex sentences are very detailed and give a lot of information to the reader, and because readers take in the information, Charles Dickens gets his message across and this is through Dickens use of complex sentences and use of imagery.

The main character in A Christmas Carol' is called Scrooge. Scrooge is a stereotype of those who had power over those who didn't. Throughout the opening stave the character of Scrooge is established and it is quite clear what he is like. For example Dickens describes the character of Scrooge: "No wind that blew was bitterer than he". This (beautiful) use of metaphorical tells the reader a lot about the character Scrooge, and that he does not have a very good attitude or personality. This is shown especially because in the winter streets of London it is very cold and for Scrooge to be more bitter than the cold air just says that he is a mean and horrible person.

So the text show what the character Scrooge is like. Dickens uses Scrooge to show one of the messages of the story. With great power comes great responsibility', and in A Christmas Carol' Scrooge is the character with the great power, and throughout the story it show the character Scrooge transform to take on his responsibility. Also in the text, Scrooge is described as "Hard and as sharp as flint, from which no steel had ever struck out generous fire;" What this tells us about Scrooge is that he is not only solid but he does not give anything away and he is self contained. To be reassured the character Scrooge is self contained the text also says: "Secret, self contained and as solitary as an oyster." Although this comments again on Scrooges characteristics and we are shown a ll, mean, horrible character there is a glimmer of hope because like an oyster Scrooge is very hard to open up, but maybe, just maybe there is a pearl that lies within Scrooges heart that is kind, caring and loving.

One of the things that make A Christmas Carol' what it is, are the spirits: the ghost of Christmas past, present and yet to come. The great thing about this use of character is that nobody can say what they have to look like, and also a sense of mystery is added to the story because they are ghosts and do not have a fixed appearance. Another clever thing Dickens does when writing A Christmas Carol' was setting the story around Christmas time. One of the reasons I believe he did this was to create a contrast between Christmas; a time of love and family and Scrooge; unloving and self contained.

The first Spirit; The ghost of Christmas past', in my opinion, is the most important out of the three spirits as it personifies memory. For example "It was a strange figure like a child: yet not so like a child as like an old man." So the spirits description suggests to us that the character Scrooges childhood experiences can come back to him if he allows them to. Also the spirit is described here as: "from the crown of its head there sprung a bright clear jet of light". Remembering that the ghost of Christmas past is the personification of memory this light symbolises the illumination that comes from ones past and the cap the spirit wears symbolises the ability everyone has to extinguish the light of memory, if he or she choose to do so, however at the end of stave two Scrooge tried to remove memories from the past but was unsuccessful: "though Scrooge pressed it down with all his might, he could not hide the light: which screamed form under it". That quote also shows Dickens intelligent use of words because if you Screamed' you are trying to escape. Other phrase Dickens used to describe the ghost of Christmas past are: "Its hair which hung about its neck and down its back, was white as if with age;"and "The arms were very long and muscular; the hands the same". Both of these quotes compliment Dickens use of imagery as they give you a clear picture in your mind of what the spirits properties are. One other phrase in the story Dickens wrote was: "It wore a tunic of the purest white; and round it waist was bound a lustrous belt, the sheen of which was beautiful." This says one thing, and that is that memory is pure, it can't be modified and it's free from any influence to change.

When the character, Scrooge meets the first spirit, the spirit starts to show Scrooge his past. Scrooge is taken to a country field and Scrooge himself recognises the place as it was where he spent his childhood. "'Good heaven' said Scrooge, clasping his hands together, as he looked about him. I was bred in this place. I was a boy here!'" There is an overwhelming flood of sensory connection with the place; this even brings a tremble to Scrooges lip and a tear to his cheek. This is evidence that in a moment, the past has become more alive to Scrooge than ever before. This shows already a big change in the character Scrooge has happened because this same character who could spare no time over his deceased business partner now tremble at the confronting memories of his youth. This evidence tell the reader that in a short time Scrooge has learnt lessons and that potentially as the story goes on Scrooge will learn more vital lessons

So next Scrooge was ready to encounter the second of the three spirits The Ghost of Christmas Present', and given Scrooges experiences with the last spirit he was prepared for anything. I believe the Ghost of Christmas Present personifies generosity and this is reflected in the spirits physical description. Its dark brown curls were long and free", "it's open hand" and "sparkling eye". These quotes give a good image of what the spirit could look like. Also the line: "Capacious beast" suggests the ghost is quite large, but as the story make the readers realise; the ghost not only is large in size but it has a large heart.

After analysing the spirits in A Christmas Carol' I have seen how Dickens message has been conveyed. Dickens has successfully used the character Scrooge and shown his transformation. By using the spirits to personify various aspects, Dickens has effectively shown the reader what they can be like. This is why the book is so popular now, because the message still applies today. Because in the current world there are those with much and those with nothing, it is the responsibility of those with much to help those with nothing. And to conclude this essay I would like to say that the story of A Christmas Carol' would not be held together without Dickens use of metaphors and imagery.

6
Well, I love it, simple as that. Despite the cold and callous ways of Ebenezer Scrooge there is warmth that springs fourth from the book. The writing is powerfully descriptive and gives the reader a real feel for London in that era complete with gas lamps, biting cold and the rich / poor divide. During the visitations of Marley's ghost and the three other spirits the fear that Scrooge feels practically leaps from the page. The language used is also laden with oldie worldly sayings and words which add to the sumptuousness of the tale, and the narrative is well paced so that the story moves apace. Each and every character is described to perfection be it the rotund and jolly Mr Fezzwig or the frail and crippled tiny Tim. I was amazed that my of the book was just ninety-two pages long and yet so much happens in the story no doubt thanks to the skills of Dickens making every word count. Above all else though A Christmas Carol is an enring story of hope over circumstance, of the ultimate good that lays in every man, woman and child, and of the joy that a little kindness can deliver.