① 看英語電影愛國者2000的觀後感
看了《愛國者》，很受感動。影片講述的是一段美國獨立戰爭的歷史。主人公是一位議員和一群孩子的父親。一家人過得還算和-諧。作為父親，他在家裡有著相當的威嚴，而一群孩子也不是吃素的，他們的頑皮讓這位父親吃盡苦頭卻又無可奈何。但因其反對對英國作戰而被孩子們誤解，他們都有著自己的參軍夢，甚至遠遠聽到槍炮聲，他們也會熟練搬出槍以備不時之需。然而英軍的的到來改變了一切。在家園被毀又即將失去第二個兒子時父親終於爆發了，和兩個小兒子一起殲滅了一股二十一人的英軍，這讓人聯想到他當年的英姿，也讓他找回了自己潛藏的勇氣。在復仇和追求自由這兩條主線的引導下，主人公帶領著國民軍逐步走向勝利。
影片花了很大的手筆來闡述美國對自由的嚮往和因此付出的沉重代價，從激烈的議會討論，人們參軍的熱情，到家園的被毀，戰場上的慘烈犧牲。相信看過該片的決不會忘記那些古老而又獨特的戰爭場面，兩軍(正規軍)對壘都是以人員和武器作為籌碼，而這往往是英軍占優，美軍是即輸場面又輸戰爭，這看上去有點幽默的味道，完全是對現代戰爭的顛覆，看不到現代戰爭中的謀軍布局。而國民軍卻也會玩游擊戰，有一段時間竟被英軍稱之為「幽靈」，很有點中國特色的味道。但這確實是一支雜牌軍，就連教堂里的牧師也披裝上陣，只是不知道他在殺人之前會不會念上一句「上帝保佑」，其最後的犧牲卻也充滿了悲劇色彩。
雖然這是一部戰爭片，但是導演在戰爭之外的細節上有很好的把握，除了宏大的戰爭場面外，也不失暖暖的溫情，真實而感人。其中身為國民軍上校的父親與剛剛會說話的女兒的告別一段，導演處理得別具匠心，將主角在軍隊與家庭角色的矛盾和女兒對父親的理解盡融於女兒的呼喚和轉身的深情一抱之中，可謂感人至深。導演對種族矛盾的解構也是該片的亮點之一，最初白人對黑奴的歧視，通過戰爭的隱含功能最終達成了和解，「與你並肩作戰是我的榮幸。」將這對不大不小的矛盾融於對自由不懈追求的主題之中，也是對黑人在美國獨立戰爭中所做的貢獻的一種認同，他們也是美國歷史的創造者。
不能不說這是一部成功的影片，無論你對美國有如何的偏見，看了該片你卻不由的對那些為自由而戰的勇士們產生由衷的敬意，這確實是一個非凡的國度，這樣的民族沒有理由不屹立於世界強者之林。
然而相比之下，小時侯很喜歡的國產戰爭片，現在看來實在很少有深層次的東西，導演的思維極其狹隘，創作的影片只是對歷史的一種簡單重復。比如電影藝術大師斯皮爾伯格就將幾條命救一條命的價值問題帶入到影片〈〈拯救大兵瑞恩〉〉中，充滿了對人性的深入思考，從而使影片脫離了戰爭本身而得以實現主題的升華，像這樣的東西在中國的戰爭片里很難找到，不得不引起我們的反思。在根本上還得在思維的形式內涵上下一番工夫。
② 電影愛國者英文簡介
The movie takes place in South Carolina in 1776. Benjamin Martin, a French-Indian war hero who is haunted by his past, is a patriot who wants no part in a war with Britian. Meanwhile, his two eldest sons, Gabriel and Thomas, can't wait to go out and kill some Redcoats. When South Carolina decides to go to war with Britain, Gabriel immediatly signs up to fight...without his father's permission. But soon, Colonel Tavington, British solder infamous for his brutal tactiks, captures Gabriel and sentences him to be hanged. As Gabriel is taken away, Thomas tries to free him, only to be killed by Tavington, in front of Benjamin. Now, seeking revenge for his son's death, Benjamin leaves behind his 5 other children to bring independence to the 13 colonies.
Benjamin Martin is a South Carolina planter who is still haunted by his notoriously brutal past as a soldier in the French and Indian War. When the American Revolution comes, he chooses not to fight for the Continental Army because he wants to protect his family. But when the British Colonel Tavington threatens their welfare and kills one of his sons, he chooses to enlist. Martin becomes the leader of a makeshift militia, which consists of peasants, slaves, a minister, and assorted other irregulars. During the war Martin and his men discover that they will pay a steep personal price for their rebellion. But thanks to their courage and bravery, they are also destined to pay a pivotal role in turning the tide against the Redcoats.
兩種都是,請挑選.
③ 電影《愛國者》英文簡介
這個是最精闢的，如果你想知道更多，和我聯系 Peaceful farmer Benjamin Martin is driven to lead the Colonial Militia ring the American Revolution when a sadistic British officer murders his son.
④ 電影愛國者英文影評
ufiaixig，你是想問電影愛國者英文影評
這個你完全可以去搜索①嚇 YYTvO影視 你就知道了，
zndeci41
一般人我還真不會告訴滴~ 你懂 的~
求採納, 採納不會有孩子滴~~
dvmugd90
⑤ 求愛國者影評，英文的，300字
Brig. Gen. Francis Marion, the historical person that Mel Gibson's character is loosely based on was a true war hero and patriot. The ones who are denigrating his legacy are mostly British `historians' and those who are too stupid or lazy to do their own research.
Actually, Mel Gibson's Benjamin Martin is a composite of 3 historical characters: one of course was Francis Marion the `Swamp Fox'; another was an illiterate backwoods general, Daniel Morgan, who encouraged the militia at the battle of Cowpens (final battle enacted in the movie) to stand their ground against the British; and the third was a cavalry officer, William Washington, who pursued Tarleton after Cowpens and fought him in hand-to-hand combat, which they both barely survived.
Gen. Marion used tactics that the Brits termed `ungentlemanly' for warfare, but he got the job done, just as the Viet Cong did 200 years later against our own GI's. Marion knew, because of his lack of manpower, equipment, and experienced soldiers, he couldn't take on the superior British forces using outmoded and quaint European-style warfare (in fact, this idiotic style of warfare continued up until WWI). The movie depicts this very well. So Gen. Marion wisely used the only tactics left to him – hit-and-run, which he learned from fighting the Cherokees ring the French and Indian Wars.
The movie's villainous Lt. Col. Tavington, who is also loosely based on Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton, is not too far from the truth, though a little over the top.
It was ring the retreat of Waxhaws that Tarleton came to symbolize British cruelty in the Revolutionary War. Tarleton was seen as a "butcher" when American forces under Col. Abraham Buford laid down their arms in an attempt to surrender yet the British continued their assault. From then on, his reputation grew and `Tarleton's quarter', in effect, came to mean "no quarter".
In the tradition of the day, after the surrender at Yorktown, American officers hosted the defeated Cornwallis and other British officers at their respective tables. But no American invited Tarleton nor would any eat with him. Tarleton asked if the omission was accidental, and he was told that, indeed it was not, because of his past atrocities.
Tarleton lived a long life, condoning his use of total war – burning houses, destroying crops, the end justifying the means. He also would never admit to any fault at Cowpens, saying he was `outnumbered' and received inadequate assistance from Cornwallis. He wondered, "how some unforeseen event" could "throw terror into the most disciplined soldiers".
I didn't go into this movie for a history lesson but to be entertained, and I was, but after reading some of the inaccurate and illiterate reviews, I found it necessary to give a `history lesson'! The movie wasn't perfect – it was cloying and obvious at times, but I give it high marks for effort and for bringing to the screen an important part of American history that has received disparate treatment in movies, and I think Devlin & Emmerich can now be forgiven for Godzilla.
⑥ 關於電影《the patriot》愛國者的理解~幫忙回答下下面的問題~謝謝了
收到答案沒？我也需要
⑦ 電影愛國者的觀後感
看了《愛國者》，很受感動。影片講述的是一段美國獨立戰爭的歷史。主人公是一位議員和一群孩子的父親。一家人過得還算和諧。作為父親，他在家裡有著相當的威嚴，而一群孩子也不是吃素的，他們的頑皮讓這位父親吃盡苦頭卻又無可奈何。但因其反對對英國作戰而被孩子們誤解，他們都有著自己的參軍夢，甚至遠遠聽到槍炮聲，他們也會熟練搬出槍以備不時之需。然而英軍的的到來改變了一切。在家園被毀又即將失去第二個兒子時父親終於爆發了，和兩個小兒子一起殲滅了一股二十一人的英軍，這讓人聯想到他當年的英姿，也讓他找回了自己潛藏的勇氣。在復仇和追求自由這兩條主線的引導下，主人公帶領著國民軍逐步走向勝利。
影片花了很大的手筆來闡述美國對自由的嚮往和因此付出的沉重代價，從激烈的議會討論，人們參軍的熱情，到家園的被毀，戰場上的慘烈犧牲。相信看過該片的決不會忘記那些古老而又獨特的戰爭場面，兩軍（正規軍）對壘都是以人員和武器作為籌碼，而這往往是英軍占優，美軍是即輸場面又輸戰爭，這看上去有點幽默的味道，完全是對現代戰爭的顛覆，看不到現代戰爭中的謀軍布局。而國民軍卻也會玩游擊戰，有一段時間竟被英軍稱之為「幽靈」，很有點中國特色的味道。但這確實是一支雜牌軍，就連教堂里的牧師也披裝上陣，只是不知道他在殺人之前會不會念上一句「上帝保佑」，其最後的犧牲卻也充滿了悲劇色彩。
雖然這是一部戰爭片，但是導演在戰爭之外的細節上有很好的把握，除了宏大的戰爭場面外，也不失暖暖的溫情，真實而感人。其中身為國民軍上校的父親與剛剛會說話的女兒的告別一段，導演處理得別具匠心，將主角在軍隊與家庭角色的矛盾和女兒對父親的理解盡融於女兒的呼喚和轉身的深情一抱之中，可謂感人至深。導演對種族矛盾的解構也是該片的亮點之一，最初白人對黑奴的歧視，通過戰爭的隱含功能最終達成了和解，「與你並肩作戰是我的榮幸。」將這對不大不小的矛盾融於對自由不懈追求的主題之中，也是對黑人在美國獨立戰爭中所做的貢獻的一種認同，他們也是美國歷史的創造者。
不能不說這是一部成功的影片，無論你對美國有如何的偏見，看了該片你卻不由的對那些為自由而戰的勇士們產生由衷的敬意，這確實是一個非凡的國度，這樣的民族沒有理由不屹立於世界強者之林。
然而相比之下，小時侯很喜歡的國產戰爭片，現在看來實在很少有深層次的東西，導演的思維極其狹隘，創作的影片只是對歷史的一種簡單重復。比如電影藝術大師斯皮爾伯格就將幾條命救一條命的價值問題帶入到影片〈〈拯救大兵瑞恩〉〉中，充滿了對人性的深入思考，從而使影片脫離了戰爭本身而得以實現主題的升華，像這樣的東西在中國的戰爭片里很難找到，不得不引起我們的反思。在根本上還得在思維的形式內涵上下一番工夫。
⑧ 愛國者電影觀後感
誰沒有年輕的生命？誰不珍惜這寶貴的年華？誰不渴望幸福的生活？可是在戰場上，我們的英雄，卻用他們年輕的熱血與生命去換取了戰斗的勝利。
電影《上甘嶺》講的是志願軍在朝鮮戰場上抗擊美帝侵略者的一次戰役。在這場戰役中，八連已經在山上抗道里堅持戰鬥了一個月。由於敵人的封鎖，部隊嚴重缺水，戰士們的嘴唇都乾裂了。上級領導派來送水的小分隊，隊員們一個個犧牲。為了保存實力，八連戰士們又得下山去搶水。但是，戰士們剛裝好水，就被敵人的流彈打中了。後來，師長派人歷盡千辛萬苦才送上一些蘿卜，並特意送給連長兩個蘋果。雖然連長自己是那樣乾渴，卻把兩個蘋果分成許多片，分別送到全連每個戰士的手上……
看到這里，我的眼睛濕潤了。戰士們在那樣飢渴的情況下，沒有忘記自己的戰友，這種階級友愛是多麼高尚。他們真正做到了「我們的幹部要關心每個戰士，一切革命隊伍的人都要互相關心，互相愛護，互相幫助。」
我靜靜地坐在電視旁觀看。心裡卻久久不能平靜，心好像被無數的鋼針刺著一樣疼。我想起自己平時對同學的態度不好，心裡難受極了，感到自己臉紅，羞愧。
過去，我在班上算得上一個「吵架、打架王。」我不是找這個吵嘴，就是找那個打架，根本談不上團結友愛，互相幫助。記得有一次，一位同學在跑步的時候不小心踩了我一腳，他一邊跑一邊說：「對不起！」我卻故意刁難他，把他一推，大聲說：「對不起值幾個錢，你把我的鞋子弄臟了，你賠！」那位同學一邊道歉，一邊說：「我不是有意弄臟你的鞋，我幫你洗。行嗎？」可我還是要他賠，並舉起拳頭要打他。旁邊的同學聽到我的叫罵聲，圍了上來。了解情況後，個個都不滿意，眼睛怒視著我，好象說：「如果你再欺負這個同學，我們就去告訴老師。我一看這嚇人的架勢，不敢再說什麼，只好偷偷地溜跑了。
看《上甘嶺》的英雄們互相關心、互相愛護、互相幫助的情景；我明白了一個道理，同學和同學之間要團結友愛，而像我平時那樣，就會沒有朋友，會變成「離群之雁「。
電視演完了，爸爸和媽媽津津有味地談論《上甘嶺》電影中的精彩情節，可是我這個平時愛鬧的人，卻在一旁默默地思考著……
⑨ 電影《愛國者》的英文影評（200字左右）
Speaking of the "Patriot" movie, had to mention the American constitutional system and the founding spirit of democracy. See today, the U.S. constitutional system of democratic practice is more successful ~.
At that time a religious, self-control, sacrifice and dedication of the position under the U.S. founding fathers adopted the Jefferson's "separation of powers" (America's democracy, human rights, equal rights), and President Washington's "re-election does not more than twice "idea - is a democratic constitutional system with a high degree of religious belief in the morality of self-made democracy, it is a power of supervision and local autonomy is respected, the political system. The American spirit of freedom and democracy is now the world should also be a model of spiritual civilization and advanced representatives - perhaps this is the most humane spirit of the origin of it, because it highlights a "human spirit" of victory - and this is "personal heroism," the inevitable result.
This time, the "Patriot" is indeed completed a "Root asked the source" of the classical regression. Because the spirit of American freedom and democracy after all, is "personal heroism" nurture the soil.
First, it should be said, the film's screenplay written pretty good, with plenty of lyrical narrative plot to seize the audience's sympathy for justice. Is a typical "driven to revolt" type of story. Benjamin Martin colonel who was once the wounds of war, trying to make up the moral standards of the past to suppress themselves and their families, expect the war to neutral survival. But in the current war in the form below, any person who holds to this idea only alleys; Moreover, the influence of patriotism by the eldest son Jeb Rio has decided to join the army, father, like son. Thus the father and son made some foreshadowing later guerrilla organization. The guerrilla war is undoubtedly more than the film "heinous" in conventional warfare (read some of these subjects who shared the movie ~) more emphasis on teamwork, operational skills and flexibility. So, after another exciting chapter ..., Colonel Martin to a fight for peace, national independence and freedom of the war caused a sensation.
The film further reflected the spirit of American freedom and democracy, and below this is a reminder issued by the public mind with personal heroism. And "public spirit" is the Western liberal democracy. The heroine of this film, not only in silent support behind the front men of their families. This seems to highlight the most "personal heroism," a feature film, is always to highlight the role of women in male roles, and set off. ("True Lies" is an exception).
The only drawback is the film's soundtrack very plain, the melody of the film subject's response is not perfect. In addition, the film is how to obtain R-rating? Another question might be worth a little look. Here I will not say more ~. ^ _ ^
"Lang," said the film should be magnanimous. For me, though the film back to life would have been sufficient. However, the image behind the return of human nature is the most exciting and gives a revelation. To the guitar lessons when QUE teacher this semester so that we really view films intended to show it, this has caused a number of people thinking.
Hope that the times in the context of her once again been confirmed.谷歌了一份，很粗糙，你可以修改一下