1. 急求電影《人猿泰山》觀後感……漢語英語都行！！！
《人猿泰山》英語觀後感236篇:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120855/usercomments
George of the Jungle 中文名是森林泰山。
3. 人猿泰山觀後感英文版
However, I want to say is" the Taishan" throughout the film reveal that excite people's mind, inspire people up the emotional guidance, let the audience imperceptibly of infection, and then wake up the sleeping enterprise. As the theme song to sing in the world: regardless of his change, in my heart, no matter what time, no matter in any place, any change.
The film is the social textbook, we in the film solidification, we in the movie to find their own direction.
4. 急求電影《人猿泰山》觀後感……漢語英語都行！！
希望我的回答對你有幫助O(∩_∩)O~~~記得及時採納哦~
覺得哪篇不好的你可以刪~
只是大概的，你可以適當自己添加，主要劇情啊，感受啊，我都列出來了，你看一下好了~
1871年，英國上校布賴頓帶著女兒凱蒂來到印度，一個印度青年納束與其妻子及兩歲的兒子莫基里成為他們的向導，為軍隊引路，凱蒂和莫基里成了好朋友。
一天晚上，一隻老虎偷襲軍營，納束不幸身亡，其子莫基里混亂中不慎落入萬丈深淵，被河水沖走，最後被野狼救起，從此莫基里在森林裡倖存下來，學會求生打獵的天賦本領，與動物為伍，過著野居生活。
光陰荏苒，在大自然的撫育下，轉眼間莫基里長大成為一個身強力壯的十七歲英俊少年，成為森林之王。 不料後來被人們發現後視為怪物，被將軍捉拿監禁於獄中……
幸而凱蒂憑借當初相送的手鏈認出了莫基里，將其解救出來，還教他各種禮儀想讓他回歸社會。
但是，凱蒂的未婚夫以她和她父親作為威脅，逼迫莫基里帶他們去尋找森林裡的寶藏。無奈之下莫基里只得順從，當凱蒂的未婚夫拿到了寶藏，得意忘形之時，寶藏的守護者----一條巨大的眼鏡蛇將其拖入水中……
結局：莫基里與凱蒂在森林裡翩翩起舞，相守永遠。
看《人猿泰山》有感
今天我到南京少兒科技培訓中心去觀看紅太陽推出的《人猿泰山》人偶劇，這個`劇團來自保加利亞，所以，這些人都是講英語的，整個片子都是用英語演的，我們只能通過兩邊的兩個小屏幕來閱讀的。
這個片子的內容是：一個孩子在叢林里，被狼群揀到了。狼群們收留了他，並給他取名為莫格利，它們讓灰熊巴盧教莫格利十年的動物森林法。漸漸的，莫格利長大了，除了他的外貌，他似乎就是一隻狼，由於老虎要殺了莫格利，所以，莫格利回到了一個人類的村莊，他還非常幸運的找到了自己的媽媽，他不僅這樣，還找到了一份很好的工作：放牧。有一天他在放牧的時候看到了一隻原來在森林的一隻狼兄弟狼兄弟對莫格利說：「老虎准備要殺了你，你一定要作好准備，以免受傷。」可是狼兄弟的話剛說完，老虎便從一個灌木叢裡面竄了出來，從肉墊里彈了四隻尖銳的指甲，它一邊向莫格利沖了過去，莫格利與狼兄弟和老虎糾纏了一會兒，他們很快就發現自己不是老虎的對手，於是莫格利就想出了一個辦法，他讓牛群生氣，於是它們就向老虎的那個方向沖過去，老虎被壓成了肉餅。可是這個村裡的人並不喜歡像莫格利這樣健壯的人，並開始欺負和嘲笑他，莫格利對村裡人的行為感到很不解，便又重新回到了森林。可是，雖然莫格利回到了森林。但是，村裡的人並沒有罷休，而是接二連三的拿莫格利的媽媽出氣，他們有時罵莫格利的媽媽，有時打莫格利的媽媽，他們不擇手段地欺負她。莫格利不知什麼時候知道了這個消息，便立刻和他的動物兄弟們商量，他們都表示同意。於是莫格利便立刻到了那個村莊，找到了他媽媽的家了，便又很快的帶著他的媽媽從村裡逃走，穿過樹叢，來到了另外一個村莊，把他的媽媽安定在了那，來到了另外一個村莊，把他的媽媽安定在了那兒，自己又回到了森林。最後他在森林裡又住了幾年，那一天他在森林裡的時候，突然看見了一位美麗的姑娘，他看了她一眼就喜歡上了那位美麗的姑娘，他們倆終於走到了一起，並離開了森林，來到了村莊，過起了他們自己的自由的生活。
我想：莫格利原來是人類，雖然在森林裡生活了幾年，但是他畢竟是人，不可能一輩子生活在樹林里；做不了一輩子的人猿，他有感情，他要結婚，要生子，他要過自己的生活。記得一個故事是這樣說的：兩對鳥在一棵樹上，有一天，上面那一對鳥看見下面的鳥不在，邊悄悄地到了下面一隻鳥的巢邊上，偷了它們的一隻鳥蛋，便到了自己家的巢，這一天，小鳥們都學會飛了，它們都飛上了藍天，而回來的時候，那隻被偷的鳥蛋孵出的小鳥，也回到了它真正的媽媽的懷抱里。
每個人或動物都是總要回到生他的地方。
5. 請問誰看過英文原版小說《人猿泰山》的
原版的小說寫的非常好，值得一看
6. 人猿泰山的英語翻譯
Disney Tarzan 隱藏摘要
人猿泰山
【摘要】 人猿泰山/Disney.Tarzan.
7. 我想要動畫片《人猿泰山》英文版的故事介紹，謝謝
人猿泰山動畫片故事介紹：
Tarzan, a fictional character created by Edgar Rice Burroughs, first appeared in the 1912 novel Tarzan of the Apes, and then in twenty-three sequels. He is the son of a British Lord and Lady, marooned on the coast of Africa by mutineers. His parents died when he was an infant, and he was raised by Great Apes of a species unknown to science. Kala is his ape mother. Tarzan (White-skin) is his ape name; his English name is John Clayton, Lord Greystoke (according to Burroughs; Earl of Greystoke in later, non-canonical sources, notably the 1984 movie Greystoke). As a young alt, he meets Jane, and when she returns to America he leaves the jungle in search of his true love. Tarzan and Jane marry, and he lives with her for a time in England. They have one son, Jack, who takes the ape name Korak. Tarzan is contemptuous of the hypocrisy of civilization, and he and Jane return to Africa where, both being immortal, they still live.
The Tarzan character
Burroughs has created in Tarzan an extreme example of a hero figure unalloyed with character flaws or faults. Tarzan is described by Burroughs as being Caucasian, extremely athletic, tall, handsome, and tanned. He has gray eyes. Emotionally, he is courageous, loyal and steady. He is intelligent and learns new languages easily. He is presented as always behaving ethically in all situations, according to Burroughs' definitions. He is deeply in love with his wife and totally devoted to her. Always the gentleman, in numerous situations where other women express their attraction to Tarzan, he politely and as kindly as possible declines their attentions. If presented with a situation where a weaker indivial or party is being preyed upon by a stronger foe, Tarzan will invariably take the part of the weaker party (and invariably, if eventually, win). In dealing with other men Tarzan is firm and forceful. With male friends he is reserved but deeply loyal and generous. As a host he is likewise generous and gracious. As a leader he commands devoted loyalty.
In contrast to all these urbane and sophisticated capabilities and characteristics, Tarzan's philosophy embraces an extreme form of "return to nature". His preferred dress is a knife and a loin cloth made from uncured animal hide. His preferred abode is a convenient tree branch which happens to be nearby when he desires to sleep. His preferred food is raw meat, killed by himself; even better if he is able to bury it a week so that putrefaction has had a chance to tenderize it a bit. Although Tarzan is able to pass within society as a civilized indivial, he prefers to, as Burroughs often puts it "strip off the thin veneer of civilization".
This philosophy was absorbed by countless fans, amongst whom was Jane Goodall, who describes the Tarzan series as having a major influence on her childhood. She states that she felt she would be a much better spouse for Tarzan than his fictional wife, Jane, and that when she first began to live among and study the chimpanzees she was fulfilling her childhood dream of living among the great apes just as Tarzan did.
8. 人猿泰山中的「泰山」英文是什麼
《人猿泰山》，Tarzan of the Apes
泰山，Tarzan
供參
9. 用英語簡述人猿泰山的內容
Tarzan was a small orphan who was raised by an ape named Kala since he was a child.He believed that this was his family,but on an expedition Jane Porter is rescued by Tarzan.He then finds out that he's human.Now Tarzan must make the decision as to which family he should belong to.
10. 急求人猿泰山觀後感英文版
1999年版動畫片人猿泰山(Tarzan)觀後感：
Without a doubt, this is the most visually impressive animated movie Disney has ever created. In the entire visual history of animated films, this one stands head and shoulders with the best, and above most. The concept of incorporating all or part of the actual person's face and mannerisms who provides the voice for an animated character (which Disney pioneered), has been raised to near art form in this movie. The casting of voices for the characters is excellent, and adds greatly to the impact of the animated performances. Indeed it adds immensely to the entire movie. The visual richness in this film is absolutely awe inspiring.
I look for little things, that normally get overlooked, as a guide for how devoted animators are to bringing quality to the screen. For a small example of this, check out the scene (pretty early in the film) where boy Tarzan asks Terk if he can come with him to play. Terk says no, because `...you can't keep up'. The next scene Terk comes through a group of ferns and starts talking to his friends. Check out the movement of the ferns behind Terk, and also when boy Tarzan comes through them. They are incredibly detailed and are constantly moving (realistically). All this requires time, money and talent and NO WHERE in this film is that scrimped on.
Deep Canvas, the new technique created by Disney, adds immeasurably to Tarzan. This film wouldn't be NEAR what it is without it. Normally for animation to occur where we follow the action `into' the frame or toward and away from you, the background has to be redrawn continuously because (for instance) elements get larger as you move toward them. This, In contrast to action that moves side-to-side where the background can be drawn once and only character cells need be redrawn. Its like moving `into' a painting, rather than back and forth across the canvas (hence the name probably).
Animators rarely do much action `into' the frame, because the time and cost involved is very great. Deep Canvas uses backgrounds, hand drawn into the computer, to "computerize" (to an extent) this process. This not only greatly reces the time and cost involved, but it also adds new tools at the animators disposal. Really, it allows the background to "come alive". It doesn't look computerized though, it looks like traditional animation. The technique resulted in many spectacular sequences in Tarzan. The scenes where he `surfs' the trees showcases just how awesome this new tool is. There is MUCH more to Deep Canvas than my over-simplified definition. There is MUCH to like in Tarzan... the visual lushness, excellent character animation and voice performances, the music (even if you aren't a Phil Collins fan, it's good) and it has an excellent sense of humor. It also shies away from the overly cute depictions of animals (as in Bambi) for more realistic ones which really took a big turn for the better in The Lion King. The sequences with babies and children (human and animal) and interactions between parent and child also rang very true, something else that began to really take off in The Lion King.
Some scenes are very powerful, and will rock even alts. One scene in particular comes to mind. Directly after the fight sequence with Sabor (the leopard), Tarzan does his traditional "Tarzan" yell. This raised the hair on top of my head. I have found myself watching this over and over again. It's just about as perfect as animation can get. The yell itself is new and fresh, not the traditional yell we have heard so many times before (which is great, but shows it's age). Tremendous power and emotion is translated by less than six seconds of screen time. You will feel yourself fighting back your own yell, or tears when you watch this.
Disney did so much right in this movie, but they continued one long, bad tradition. Which is the weak writing and casting of the villain. Indeed the whole conceptualization and portrayal of the antagonist in Disney films, including this one, needs a massive overhaul.
Alfred Hitchcock, above all others, understood how important the villain or antagonist was to a film. Hitch made the `heavy' attractive and intelligent. Often the villain was a much better person in most respects than the protagonist of the film, with only one fatal flaw marring him. The villain might be a person that you would really want as a friend or a lover, if it weren't for that ONE thing - which was a BIG thing, like he (or she) was a psycho or a traitor or a murderer. On one hand you wanted the `good-guy' to triumph, but you could identify with the villain and you often liked him more. Making the villain a desirable and multi-faceted character created incredible tension in the audience.
I mention all this because this is one area where Disney REPEATEDLY fails in it's animated films, and Tarzan is no exception. The anti-hero in Tarzan is one-dimensional, and we don't identify with him in any way. He is the `bad hunter', used often as a villain in recent Disney movies, e.g., Beauty and the Beast and Pocahontas. We are drawn into the way Tarzan himself is torn between his adoptive gorilla family, and his identity with the human race. This tension is well done in the film, in every way from the writing and casting to the actual animation of emotion. We aren't however, a bit drawn in by the antagonist of the film.
That aside, overall this film was GREAT. I loved it and anyone who likes animated films will love it too. Even if you don't like animation you will probably like this one. It far surpasses most if not all in recent memory. The only gripe I have is the cardboard cut-out villain. I long for more three dimensional antagonists that can get the audience thinking and emotionally involved in the struggle occurring on screen. Enrolling all the writers of the Disney animated movies in a college-level course on the films of Alfred Hitchcock could do WONDERS for their next projects. But that's about the only area where they need help. In every other way Disney is holding class, and all other feature animation studios could do well to sign up for a course or two.