1. 電影英語影評 80字左右 加上翻譯
冰雪奇緣
2. 要兩篇英文電影的影評，要求是英文，帶翻譯。。
"Spider-Man 3" to the large American-style American justice line, Stars and Stripes provides some background under a continuation of this tradition. Director of the Song and Dance Drama introction of a number of elements to make the movie tough transition soft lines. But many of them still exposed the inadequacies, such as the introction of the three opponents make films delicate enough. Although the three opponents makes the selling point of the film rich enough to describe the convincing. May is a long-time director of the restrictions on expression, that is to be regretted. The feelings expressed in the drama, the drama pm, because shear. Make no feelings lines, "Spider-Man 2" high. Directors may wish to use Parker and Harry's friendship elements to complement this part, it is regrettable that these were part of human nature to hide. After all, more than two hours of film shear Association inevitable lot of directors was reluctant to cut off part. Oh, the film overall is very strong. It should be said that the main thrust of expression is very delicate, very chewing head. Rhythm is still continuation of a rapid tradition. The taste is worth careful film. 《蜘蛛俠3》繼續了美式大片美國式的正義路線，星條旗下的背影延續了這個傳統。導演引入了一些歌舞劇的的元素力求使得影片硬朗的線條變的柔和。但當中還是露出很多的不足，比如三個敵手的引入使得影片的細膩不夠。雖然三個敵手使得電影的賣點豐富，可刻畫的不夠有說服力。可能是片長的時間限制了導演的表達，可不得不說是個遺憾。在感情戲的表達方面，戲分被剪切的所剩無幾。使得感情線路沒有《蜘蛛俠2》的飽滿。可能導演希望用帕克和哈里的友誼元素來補充這部分，但是很遺憾這些被人性的部分給掩蓋了。 review: Se jie (Lust, Caution) (Venice 2007) 影評《色戒》 因為字數限制，只貼網址給你： http://www.mtime.com/my/shengzi/blog/583312/
希望採納
3. 請翻譯一段英文影評
你可以用有道，或者其他軟體翻譯的 雖然不準，但也有點用的
4. 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的
珍珠港的影評
pearl harbour film review
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.
Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?
If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions
5. 英語影評，翻譯
I like action movies, I like action movies where】 【Forbidden Kingdom, which I like Jackie Chan, because he is so funny. I do not like the inside of the Jet Li, because he was cold
6. 英語影評翻譯
there are two place in this moive impressing me.
one is that cable's friend of Christianity.when the train passes by ,under the God's blessing,he survive.He pray quietly and lonely .When he knows Cable believing in Lord,It is relavity that the feeling of meeting his good partner and the happy feeling from heart.
the other one is that Cabled say deliberately or not in Catherine's bed that 「Who says I have to stop?」this express make people moving.
sure, love become promise , a decision,while love become a new habit,the man don't care how much he take out and how much he gets.
7. 好萊塢經典電影英文短影評
以下是《2012》的影評 The world is ending in a matter of hours, yet justice and humanity don』t penetrate through the brain-shells of politicians. In order to save their own lives, the government officials keep the secret from the rest of human kind and also lets the man whose knowledge saves their lives die. This is the premise of 2012. But if the viewer is a Tibetan or someone who is aware of the Tibetan culture and the sensitivities of Tibetan issue, one could feel that the justice and humanity are not occurred in the director』s thought either. There is a scene long enough to mention that takes place in Tibet. In fact the last human beings die there and the new seed of the future human race starts at the neck of Mount Everest, 「The People』s Republic of China」 the movie calls it. Perhaps what no movie reviewer noticed or saw the importance of mentioning is that the prophetic fictitious story of the movie not only makes a statement that Tibet is completely a part of China, but also it totally misrepresents the core culture of Tibetan people. A Tibetan woman killing animals in Tibet is taboo, it never happened except ring the Cultural Revolution when some women were forced to do so. Women killing chickens in the Chinese market is an everyday event, but a Tibetan woman killing a CHICKEN reflects the director』s cultural ignorance and it makes the movie even more ridiculous. And in real life ethically speaking, Mr. Emmerich failed to hire Tibetan actors who can speak their own language. All the actors who play Tibetan characters are Chinese very poorly pretending to be Tibetans. Their Tibetan is hundred times worse than Zhang Yi』s memorized English or Leonardo DiCaprio』s Swahili (well I can imagine!).
求採納
8. 求一篇影評 英文翻譯.
In fact, everyone can learn English well.
Recently read an article in the film My Fair Lady. Audrey Hepburn beauty at the same time, also thought of his bad English is it right? Can also become outstanding. Combined with the movie plot, I know for a fact that we can change our own poor english. Just need to find the method that everyone can learn English well.
So what kind of method is correct? The first point to have a right attitude. Set learning goals. In order to study for a test, in order to obtain employment and learning, and learning to love, or for other. A clear learning can become your motivation for learning English. Secondly to seriously, to the extreme care about every detail (. Don't let the native pronunciation of English pronunciation ) those to go to England or the United States to study people in the United States of America. Study for 7 years in 8 years or 10years. The pronunciation as a birth in the United States can not speak to speak fluent English in the10 years old child. Is our strange sounds do not feel strange, and even accustomed to this strange pronunciation. So to listen to their recordings, sure is it right? The correct pronunciation, and repeated practice. Just like in the movie Audrey Hepburn, a sentence repetition. Fast practice. Don't let the words into a sentence. But to make the sentence directly escape one's lips. Only in this way can speak fluent english.
1.we always used the" g" instead of "K" pronunciation. This will put the English localization.
2.pronunciation to natural not a word word into sentences. Because the sentence is coherent words together. The sentence is very blunt.