大衛科波菲爾電影英文影評

❷ 供獻大衛科波菲爾的英文讀後感150字左右

比較精彩的片段:天色開始轉暗了，我關上了窗子（大部分時間里，我都頭倚在窗檯上那麼躺著，哭一陣，睡一陣，茫然地朝外面看一陣），這時鑰匙轉動了，默德斯通小姐拿了一點麵包、肉和牛奶進來。她把這些東西放到桌子上，用那典型的堅定神情看看我就出去了，並在身後把門又鎖上。天黑下來好久了，我還坐在那兒，心想不知還會不會有人來。當看來那晚已無來人的可能性時，我脫衣上了床。在床上，我開始滿懷恐懼地想以後我會遭遇到什麼。我的所為是不是犯罪行為？我會不會被抓起來送進監牢？我到底是不是身陷被絞死的危險中了呢？情節感想：〈呵呵我個人的讀後感與體會〉這段主要講的是小大衛科波菲爾在童年時的悲慘遭遇，那是他的母親體弱多病，又受父親的折磨，連小大衛科波菲爾也受到了殘酷的牽連。讓人為小大衛科波菲爾的悲慘遭遇深感同情，不過不也是這些苦難造就了以後他堅強的性格與不屈不撓的品行，也使我明白苦難讓人成長，也讓人成熟，讓我們更加透徹的對待生活，對待人生。苦難這是多麼大的一筆財富啊！是熱的一生所必不可少的

❸ 大衛科波菲爾「讀後感」（英文版）

《大衛 科波菲爾》It is the same as read other novels of Dickens' too to read" David Copperfield", People feel every personage --From protagonist to warder not speaking --It is ready to appear , lifelike. This because Dickens very much can play up angry to a great extent Atmosphere, the method is that the detail is delineated. At the time of writing to Mr.Murdstone teach David such as him, have published a question in this way: "If I go to the cheese shop to buy 4,000 pieces of extra quality cheese in Gloucester ……" he will it shows to be" extra quality cheese of Gloucester" in detail only, but this set off appear personality of Mr.Murdstone vividly even more just --Mechanical, intend to embarrass David. He describes David's banquet, each kind of vegetables is not described well at all in it, Whether and this it make people unable to feel even more vivid too,like in among. Can enter silk enter and dect detail of describing, it is obvious Dickens one outsight and realize strength better people more like this. He draws support from his pen Tell reader abundant impression of him whether make readers rise and fall of the happiness, anger, grief and joy with him.
Many child on reading the book, think book this for what child write .Because of Dickens Colored attention, in a lot of places , he comes to describe the personage and things in terms of a child, Enable child to appreciate thoroughly, feel that this is written for them .But,walk out people childhood after at the time of the book not stressed, can find these every one far than staying by we the memories for being heavy, make even more by people a sentimental book. .Novel lovely nurse Peggotty, harsh cruel and ferocious stepfatherMr.Murdstone and seemingly serious but good-natured old woman of aunt, Leaves the unforgettable impression on readers .The protagonist's growth road is bumpy and indignant, full of twists and turns or ups and downs Have fully shown difficulty and bitterness that ordinary people seek survival under the abominable environment .

❹ 《大衛科波菲爾》的英文讀後感。

自己用英語寫不清楚，網路上找的又都一個樣，沒意思。找一個漢語的，自己修改，滿意了，再用google翻譯成英語
http://translate.google.cn
我以前都這么做的，哈哈。
越短的讀後感越難寫。樓上那位...

下面這個給你參考：
"David Copperfield" David's life's joys and sorrows through the hero, multi-level revealing the true face of society at that time, highlighted the performance of money on marriage, family and social corrosion. The formation of the novel in a series of tragedies are caused by money. Maude Stone, David's mother is a fool to marry her coveted property; Emile Korea's elopement is the lure of money can not afford; Weikefeier a pain, Helmut despair, and both are undesirable consequence of the money. The despicable sheep is the next step in terms of money the temptation to degenerate, and finally come to life in prison for their despicable ends. Dickens is from a humanitarian idea, exposed the evil of money, thus opening a "Victoria Golden Age," a beautiful curtain, revealing the hidden truth about the subsequent social.

❺ <<大衛.科波菲爾>>的英語觀後感(200)字

《大衛 科波菲爾》
It is the same as read other novels of Dickens' too to read" David Copperfield", People feel every personage --From protagonist to warder not speaking --It is ready to appear , lifelike. This because Dickens very much can play up angry to a great extent Atmosphere, the method is that the detail is delineated. At the time of writing to Mr.Murdstone teach David such as him, have published a question in this way: "If I go to the cheese shop to buy 4,000 pieces of extra quality cheese in Gloucester ……" he will it shows to be" extra quality cheese of Gloucester" in detail only, but this set off appear personality of Mr.Murdstone vividly even more just --Mechanical, intend to embarrass David. He describes David's banquet, each kind of vegetables is not described well at all in it, Whether and this it make people unable to feel even more vivid too,like in among. Can enter silk enter and dect detail of describing, it is obvious Dickens one outsight and realize strength better people more like this. He draws support from his pen Tell reader abundant impression of him whether make readers rise and fall of the happiness, anger, grief and joy with him.
Many child on reading the book, think book this for what child write .Because of Dickens Colored attention, in a lot of places , he comes to describe the personage and things in terms of a child, Enable child to appreciate thoroughly, feel that this is written for them .But,walk out people childhood after at the time of the book not stressed, can find these every one far than staying by we the memories for being heavy, make even more by people a sentimental book. .Novel lovely nurse Peggotty, harsh cruel and ferocious stepfatherMr.Murdstone and seemingly serious but good-natured old woman of aunt, Leaves the unforgettable impression on readers .The protagonist's growth road is bumpy and indignant, full of twists and turns or ups and downs Have fully shown difficulty and bitterness that ordinary people seek survival under the abominable environment .

❻ 電影《大衛 科波菲爾》的英文觀後感，誰知道

《大衛·科波菲爾》英文讀書筆記/讀後感
If Charles Dickens created his child hero Oliver Twist for his sympathetic commiseration of orphans and his discontent of the ill-functioning society, we could say that he created his other child hero David Copperfield for a completely different reason. Critics consider "David Copperfield" as Dickens' autobiographical novel that unmasked a great account of Dickens' early childhood upbringings. It is often said that it is impossible to understand a great classic work without understanding the writer first. To read "David Copperfield" is to understand Charles Dickens, which will further deepen the understanding of Dickens other works.

The Theme
Honestly speaking, I consider "David Copperfield" a bit dry in terms of plot development and dramatic climax comparing to "Oliver Twist". I understand that this has to do with the fact that this is a semi-autobiography that had to carry some purpose of relating to the realities in Dickens childhood. Another attributed reason is that unlike "Oliver Twist", "David Copperfield" is a bilngsroman, that is, a novel that develops a character from childhood to althood. It is understandable that climax is hard to be defined or to be captured when writing a bilngsroman where story is defined by time progress rather than events.
As Dickens' earlier works were published serially, his writings were also finished serially, either weekly or monthly, according to the needs of publications. It was not until the rather cool receipt of his "Martin Chuzzlewit" that Dickens started considering taking upon a more constructed writing style with numbered plans in plot development. "David Copperfield" was thus proced under such constructed and well-planned writing, which, I believe, added special dramatic affect to the stories. The repetitive reappearance of several important characters in David Copperfield's life confirms the reality in which we all experience the re-acquaintance with people we've met and that the relationship is strengthened with each re-acquaintance. Writing constructively, rather serially, gave Dickens the opportunity to cultivate each of these characters, their relationship with David Copperfield and the impact they have on David Copperfield. Instead of introcing minor characters that were forgotten later on, Dickens gave each character a purpose of existence in the story, which also engaged readers into the story and added flavor to the plot.
The story of David Copperfield ended in the most beautiful merriness, with David finding the true hero of his life - himself. However, an interesting question that we should ask is, has Charles Dickens let his own kindness take over the realism that fictional works should bring forward to the readers? Many critics seem to think Dickens plot his story to make the readers feel good, rather than show the reader what human life is really like. I don't think I have read enough of Dickens' works to pass any judgment, but I do like to point out that, as a writer, I do believe that a story to express realism makes a greater echo in readers' hearts than a story to please.

The Language
The more I read Charles Dickens' works, the more I am convinced that his works, his language, to be more specific, need to be appreciated only by imaginative minds. I am not advocating this because I am an immediate admirer of old British language style, I sincerely believe that it would be beneficial for people to appreciate more of beauty of the literate language used in Dickens' writings, or any old British writer's writings for that matter.

❼ 大衛科波菲爾英文讀後感150字

大衛科波菲爾的讀書筆記
看了《大衛科波菲爾》，忽然發現了這個世界的瘋狂，也看到了金錢的力量——它既能夠幫一個人完成願望，但是，同時它也能讓一個人家破人亡。狄更斯正是從人道主義的思想出發，暴露了金錢的罪惡。
大衛科波菲爾是個可憐的孩子，他沒有父親。然而，更意想不到的事情發生了，摩德斯通娶了大衛的母親，做了大衛的繼父。但他異常暴虐，不僅僅監視著大衛和他母親的一舉一動，還在看不順眼的時候鞭打他。因此，繼父不僅僅沒有使他享受到父愛的溫暖，反而比原來更加痛苦！更可惡的是，他與學堂勾結，在大衛身上繫上一塊告示：「當心他，他咬人。」這僅僅是正因大衛在不屈服他的毆打時做的唯一的自我反抗，咬住了堵住他的嘴和手，一種本能的行為。摩德斯通就用如此卑鄙的手段對付一個小孩，之後，他的母親被摩德斯折磨而死，
大衛成孤兒了，也失學了，但也沒能喚起摩德斯通精神的良知。但他在辟果提一家人中重新感到了溫暖與快樂的味道，他們家人的心靈是純潔和熱情的，不含任何雜質的。
十歲時，他被摩德斯通強迫到一家油漆公司幹活，一個月只有六先令，但是每一天卻要工作十幾個小時，他有幸結識了米考伯先生。他熱情、真誠，追求自由，被貧困包圍卻始終充滿樂觀主義與對完美生活的嚮往，而大衛則盡自己的微薄之力支持米考伯一家走過一段艱苦的歲月，他懷著一顆忠實的心給了米考伯許多力所能及的幫忙，他們彼此感謝。多麼善良的孩子。

❽ 誰知道電影《大衛 科波菲爾》的觀後感啊（英文200個單詞）

David Copperfield is the novel that draws most closely from Charles Dickens's own life. Its eponymous hero, orphaned as a boy, grows up to discover love and happiness, heartbreak and sorrow amid a cast of eccentrics, innocents, and villains. Praising Dickens's power of invention, Somerset Maugham wrote: "There were never such people as the Micawbers, Peggotty and Barkis, Traddles, Betsey Trotwood and Mr. Dick, Uriah Heep and his mother. They are fantastic inventions of Dickens's exultant imagination...you can never quite forget them.

❾ 大衛科波菲爾英文評價

最最全面的大衛科波菲爾英文官方網站http://www.davidcopperfield.com/#
進去後選擇enter full force，
然後選擇biography(自傳）

❿ 狄更斯小說《大衛科波菲爾》人物分析（英文版）

The story is told almost entirely from the point of view of the first person narrator, David Copperfield himself, and was the first Dickens novel to do so.

Critically, it is considered a Bilngsroman and would be influential in the genre which included Dickens's own Great Expectations (1861), Thomas Hardy's Jude the Obscure, Samuel Butler's The Way of All Flesh, H. G. Wells's Tono-Bungay, D. H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers, and James Joyce's Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.

As a bilngsroman, it has one major theme throughout, the disciplining of the hero's emotional and moral life. We learn to go against "the first mistaken impulse of the undisciplined heart", a theme which is repeated throughout all the relationships and characters in the novel.

Characters in the novel generally belong to one of three categories: Those who have disciplined hearts, those who lack disciplined hearts, or those who develop disciplined hearts over time. Characters who fall into the first category include the mature and caring Agnes Wickfield and the selfless and forgiving Mr. Peggotty. The greedy, scheming Uriah Heep and the egotistic and inconsiderate James Steerforth are examples of characters who belong in the second category. Members of the third category include David Copperfield himself, who learns to make wiser choices in his relationships through personal experience, and his aunt Betsy Trotwood, who lacks consideration for others early on, but becomes less inconsiderate over time. Dickens uses characters and events throughout the novel as comparisons and contrasts for each other in terms of wisdom and discipline. A good comparison is Agnes Wickfield and Dora Spenlow: Dora lacks maturity and is unable to handle stressful situations, often breaking out in tears, while Agnes remains calm and collected even when troubled, yielding to her emotions only rarely. Another good comparison is Ham and Mr. Peggotty, and Mrs. Steerforth and Miss Dartle: The latter two become distraught at the loss of Steerforth, allowing it to trouble them their whole lives, while the former two bear the loss of Emily with dignity and reservation. Despite the premise of this work, Dickens does not give David Copperfield a stiff or unnatural feel, making this novel a supreme display of his genius at work.[citation needed]

Analysis of Major Characters

David Copperfield
Although David narrates his story as an alt, he relays the impressions he had from a youthful point of view. We see how David』s perception of the world deepens as he comes of age. We see David』s initial innocence in the contrast between his interpretation of events and our own understanding of them. Although David is ignorant of Steerforth』s treachery, we are aware from the moment we meet Steerforth that he doesn』t deserve the alation David feels toward him. David doesn』t understand why he hates Uriah or why he trusts a boy with a donkey cart who steals his money and leaves him in the road, but we can sense Uriah』s devious nature and the boy』s treacherous intentions. In David』s first-person narration, Dickens conveys the wisdom of the older man implicitly, through the eyes of a child.
David』s complex character allows for contradiction and development over the course of the novel. Though David is trusting and kind, he also has moments of cruelty, like the scene in which he intentionally distresses Mr. Dick by explaining Miss Betsey』s dire situation to him. David also displays great tenderness, as in the moment when he realizes his love for Agnes for the first time. David, especially as a young man in love, can be foolish and romantic. As he grows up, however, he develops a more mature point of view and searches for a lover who will challenge him and help him grow. David fully matures as an alt when he expresses the sentiment that he values Agnes』s calm tranquility over all else in his life.

Uriah Heep
Uriah serves a foil to David and contrasts David』s qualities of innocence and compassion with his own corruption. Though Uriah is raised in a cruel environment similar to David』s, Uriah』s upbringing causes him to become bitter and vengeful rather than honest and hopeful. Dickens』s physical description of Uriah marks Uriah as a demonic character. He refers to Uriah』s movements as snakelike and gives Uriah red hair and red eyes. Uriah and David not only have opposing characteristics but also operate at cross-purposes. For example, whereas Uriah wishes to marry Agnes only in order to hurt David, David』s marriages are both motivated by love. The frequent contrast between Uriah』s and David』s sentiments emphasizes David』s kindness and moral integrity.
While David』s character development is a process of increased self-understanding, Uriah grows in his desire to exercise control over himself and other characters. As Uriah gains more power over Mr. Wickfield, his sense of entitlement grows and he becomes more and more power-hungry. The final scenes of the novel, in which Uriah praises his jail cell because it helps him know what he should do, show Uriah』s need to exert control even when he is a helpless prisoner. But imprisonment does not redeem his evil—if anything, it compounds his flaws. To the end, Uriah plots strategies to increase his control. Because he deploys his strategies to selfish purposes that bring harm to others, he stands out as the novel』s greatest villain.

James Steerforth
Steerforth is a slick, egotistical, wealthy young man whose sense of self-importance overwhelms all his opinions. Steerforth underscores the difference between what we understand as readers and what David sees—and fails to see—in his youthful naïveté. David takes Steerforth』s kindness for granted without analyzing his motives or detecting his plicity. When Steerforth befriends David at Salem House, David doesn』t suspect that Steerforth is simply trying to use David to make friends and gain status. Though Steerforth belittles David from the moment they meet, David is incapable of conceiving that his new friend might be taking advantage of him. Because Steerforth』s plicity is so clear to us, David』s lack of insight into Steerforth』s true intentions emphasizes his youthful innocence. Steerforth likes David only because David worships him, and his final betrayal comes as a surprise to David but not to us.