⑴ 求電影《勇敢的心》英文簡介
翻譯一下吧：
【原片名稱】Braveheart
【中文譯名】勇敢的心
【出品年代】1995
【首映日期】1995年5月24日
【出品公司】福克斯（20th Century Fox）派拉蒙（Paramount）
【國家】美國
【類別】劇情（Drama）戰爭（War）浪漫（Romance）動作（Action）
【影片長度】177 Mins
【導演】梅爾·吉布森（Mel Gibson）
【主演】梅爾·吉布森 Mel Gibson .... William Wallace
詹姆斯·羅賓遜 James Robinson .... Young William Wallace
Sean Lawlor .... Malcolm Wallace
Sandy Nelson .... John Wallace
James Cosmo .... Campbell
Sean McGinley .... MacClannough
Alan Tall .... Elder Stewart
Andrew Weir .... Young Hamish Campbell
Gerda Stevenson .... Mother MacClannough
Ralph Riach .... Priest #1
Mhairi Calvey .... Young Murron MacClannough
Brian Cox .... Argyle Wallace
Patrick McGoohan .... Longshanks, King Edward I
Peter Hanly .... Edward, Prince of Wales
蘇菲·瑪索 Sophie Marceau .... Princess Isabelle
【獲獎】
演第68屆奧斯卡最佳影片、最佳導演、最佳攝影、最佳音樂、最佳化裝五項大獎。
【劇情簡介】
在威廉.華萊士還是孩子的時候，他的父親，蘇格蘭的英雄馬索.華萊士在與英軍的斗爭中犧牲了。幼小的他在伯父的指導下學習文化和武術。光陰似箭，英王愛德華為鞏固在蘇格蘭的統治，頒布法令允許英國貴族在蘇格蘭享有結婚少女的初夜權，以便讓貴族效忠皇室。王子妃伊莎貝拉是個決斷的才女，她知道這道法令會讓英國貴族有意於蘇格蘭，但更會激起蘇格蘭人民的反抗。年輕的華萊士學成回到故鄉，向美麗的少女梅倫求婚，願意做一個安分守已的人。然而梅倫卻被英軍無理搶去， 並遭殺害，華萊士終於爆發了。在廣大村民高呼「英雄之後」的呼喊聲中，他們揭竿而起，殺英兵宣布起義。
蘇格蘭貴族羅伯想成為蘇格蘭領主，在其父布斯的教唆下，假意與華萊士聯盟。華萊士殺敗了前來進攻的英軍，蘇格蘭貴族議會封他為爵士，任命他為蘇格蘭護國公。華萊士卻發現這些蘇格蘭貴族考慮.的只是自己的利益，絲毫不為人民和國家前途擔心。愛德華為了緩和局勢，派伊莎貝拉前去和談。但由於英王根本不考慮人民的自由和平等，只想以收買華萊士為條件，和談失敗了。伊莎貝拉回去後才發覺和談根本就是幌子，英王匯合了愛爾蘭軍和法軍共同包圍華萊士的蘇格蘭軍隊，她趕緊送信給華萊士。大軍壓境之下，貴族們慌作一團，華萊士領兵出戰，混戰一場，短兵相接中，他意外發現了羅伯竟與英王勾結，不禁倍受打擊。伊莎貝拉為華萊士的豪情傾倒，來到駐地向他傾吐了自己的真情，兩人陶醉在愛情的幸福之中。英王再次提出和談。華萊士明知是圈套，但為了和平著想，他依舊答應前去。在愛丁堡布斯設計了陰謀抓住華萊士，並把他送交英王。羅伯對父親的詭計感到怒不可遏，華萊士終於被判死刑。伊莎貝拉求情不成，在英王臨死前，她告訴英王她懷的不是王子的血脈，而這個孩子不久將成為新的英王。
華萊士刑前高呼「自由」震憾所有人。幾星期後，在受封時，羅伯高呼前為華萊士報仇的口號，英勇地繼承華萊士的遺志對抗英軍。
【賞析】
1995年的影壇幾乎完全被《勇敢的心》所佔領。梅爾·吉卜森成為該年度的最大贏家。《勇敢的心》一舉奪得了奧斯卡最佳影片、最佳導演、最佳攝影、最佳音樂、最佳化裝五項大獎，並以之席捲全球，所向披靡。在當今影壇娛樂片盛興，技術電影一味追求消遣、刺激和高票房的同時，《勇敢的心》大膽創新，起用了沉重壓抑、憂郁憤悶的歷史題材，將公元十三世紀的蘇格蘭人民大起義這一重大歷史事件搬上銀幕，以宏偉壯闊的氣勢為影片贏得了史詩巨片的稱號。在影片中我們看到蘇格蘭的山脈、森林和村莊，凄婉的風笛和蘇格蘭人民在貧困痛苦中發出的反抗的凄厲的呼號，人們感受到了真實的生活和歷史。同時梅爾·吉卜森除飾演男主角外也自任導演，他在影片的結構上，也沒有忽視人們的欣賞心理。在刀光劍影鐵血爭戰中，纏綿著溫柔的愛情主題，讓人體會到英雄傳說的盪氣回腸的鐵血柔情。這無疑為古裝歷史片取得了更大的市場。《勇敢的心》同時也沒有擺脫好萊塢技術電影的框架，龐大的攝影隊遠度重洋的實地拍攝；啟用三千人，二百匹馬的宏大戰爭場面；影片拍攝的長周期，都造成了影片的高投入，甚至比預算高出了一倍。所幸影片上映後賣座率空前，票房收入遠遠超出投資，總算以圓滿收場。
⑵ 電影勇敢的心，英文觀後感
I
remember seeing this movie for the first time in late 2003, and I was
impressed. I saw it again last night, and I was even more impressed. The
acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant. For me, all my guesses
were incorrect. Everything that happens in this movie in unpredicted.
The last half hour itself was highly unpredictable, and it had a
powerful message. When a scene was meant to be dramatic, they did a
great job at it. I don't know about everybody else, but the ending did
make me cry. The message the movie sent kept me thinking for a while.
The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable, there was barely
any faults or anything wrong with the movie. For a movie of 1995, they
did a great job.
I absolutely guarantee this movie to anybody who
enjoys action and war with a bit of drama mixed in. One of the best, or
maybe even the best movie of the 20th century.
19 November 2005 | by Sheldon Eyzenga
(Canada)
⑶ 求勇敢的心觀後感一篇，英文的，300字左右
華萊士，終其一生都是一個鬥士，一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士，一個為了自由而斗的鬥士，一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士。他是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長，對他而言，真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞，他只是一種震嚇，一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後，他變得勇敢，敢於直面死亡了，面對他父親和哥哥的遺體，他變得如此平靜。再後來，他叔叔把他帶走，說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗，把他帶去接受教育，這個是他的故事的開端，也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情，這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫，一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘，一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因，他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了，這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神，一種本能的叛逆。但他們的愛情沒有維系多久，因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了，貴族殺了梅倫，這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線，因為這引發了華萊士的爆發，揭竿而起，各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀，包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在，根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤，讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈，她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺，因為失去了梅倫，他一直在為了他的信念作戰，皇後的美麗和善良感動了他，兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
⑷ 電影勇敢的心觀後感 英文的 謝謝了
《勇敢的心》影評
Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace. leader of the Scottish resistance forces ring the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule...
Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors...
Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen... Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country... In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes... Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous... He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert, the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them.' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps...
Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution...
Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks.' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil...
While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments...
Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart.' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive... Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that make the motion picture great... The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive... It is epic film-making at its glorious best...
Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression...
⑸ 誰給速度提供一篇[勇敢的心]的英文觀後感
Fighting? What's fighting?!What for? Every man in the world may go to fight,for peace,for freedom,or just for rage. These days I watched some excellent movies which received many awards in their times. Yesterday,I just finished watching Brave Heart.The excellent movie did gain tremendous achievements in those days .For instance,it was awarded Best Cinematography,Best Director,Best Effects, Sound Effects Editing,Best Makeup,Best Picture in Oscar (奧斯卡最佳影片、最佳導演、最佳攝影、最佳音樂、最佳化裝五項大獎) and so on. The acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant.Everything that happens in this movie is unpredicted,such as Murron's death,William's participation in the battle,the reneging of Robert which caused by his father actually,and so on. The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable.I do respect for those heroes's courage very much.However, I was shocked by their unjustice death.They did not deserve so miserable a way of dying!! I hate Robert's father.The old man is really rascal! He broke his son's promise to William not only once,and it's he who brought William to death! Fortunately,the young leader,Robert the Bruce,was able to lead the fight for the scots freedom at last.Thanks for his bravery and justice. In addition,I respect the courage of other captains as well,such as Hamish.They fight for their sire,their grate William Wallace,the macaulish! Furthermore,when Iooked deep into their eyes, it remind me of the fight between Naruto and carra.I was surprised to find the same meaning in the eyes of these brave fighters! I admire them! I am so aflame in my heart after watching the movie that I hardly calm down,let alone to go to sleep... Brave Heart,as valiant as heroes! I will treasure the precious movies up.
⑹ 《勇敢的心》劇情簡介的英文翻譯
Braveheart is a 1995 American epic/drama film directed by and starring Mel Gibson. The film was written for the screen and then novelized by Randall Wallace. Gibson portrays William Wallace, a Scottish warrior who gained recognition when he came to the forefront of the First War of Scottish Independence by opposing King Edward I of England (also known as "Longshanks", portrayed by Patrick McGoohan), and subsequently abetted by Edward's daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle of France (played by Sophie Marceau) and a claimant to the Scottish throne, Robert the Bruce (played by Angus Macfadyen).
⑺ 《勇敢的心》英文讀後感 100字左右
在《勇敢的心》中，出現了不少有意設計的意識形態的象徵符號，如蘇格蘭特有的薊、短裙和高地（實際上沒有證據表明十三世紀的蘇格蘭人穿的是短裙，華萊士也並非高地人，影片開頭時少年瑪麗安摘了一束薊花送給華萊士的情節在現實生活中是不可能發生的，因為那非要把手弄得血流不止不可），還有背景音樂中反復響起的風笛聲等等。雖然影片創作人員的初衷未必如此，但是它確實迎合了當下西方社會一些極右翼團體的非理性訴求。不管怎樣，也許正如法國著名的心態史專家莫里斯·哈布瓦赫所說「一個藝術家成功與否，要看他是否具有作為一個符號聚集點的能力，吸引那些與他的作品並不直接相關的各種情感」，在這個意義上，《勇敢的心》能捧回奧斯卡小金人並在全球大熱自有它的成功之道。也許只有歷史學家會對其表現出十足的不屑一顧，但受此片啟發並熱衷於「史詩巨片」的好萊塢也完全有理由對前者的「迂腐」表現得不以為然，繼續我行我素地拍下去，製造一個接一個的票房奇跡。
自己找GOOGLE翻譯成英文即可
⑻ 拜託了，急啊！勇敢的心 英文觀後感
Hills, bagpipes, mist, the word 「Scotland」 written along the bottom of the screen – it can only be one place. That』s right, Wales. Nah, only joking – as if anyone would ever make a film about Wales.
Mel Gibson both directed and starred in this tartan-clad epic about William Wallace, the legendary Scottish freedom fighter/terrorist who, even way back in the 14th Century, had already had enough of the English going on about winning the World Cup in 1966. So, armed with just some rocks, a few hundred muck-dwellers and an extremely peculiar accent, he led a nation to fight for freedom from English tyranny. Or something along those lines.
It』s actually fairly appropriate to be so vague about all of this, because nobody really knows all that much about the real Wallace (and most of what we do know comes from a poem). You could spend a lifetime picking apart the historical inaccuracies in the flick, and there would still be those who』d disagree with what you found.
Because of that, how much enjoyment you can get from this 177-minute beast depends largely on your willingness to accept Wallace as a charmer with biting wit and a permanently clean-shaven chin. As the sort of bloke beautiful French princesses would hand over national secrets to simply because of the way he looks at them. Or even just as a guy who doesn』t smell like moss.
The most breath-taking, if gruesome, parts of the movie are the incredibly lifelike battle scenes. Putting them together must have been an immense project to undertake, but you』ve got to hand it to Gibbers – he does it very, very well. He also makes a likable hero figure, providing you can put to the back of your mind the fact that he』s basically playing the original ned.
Personally I find the movie far too long, particularly as parts of it play like a TV advert for the Scottish Tourist Board. In one scene, for example, Wallace sprints to the top of a mountain and just stands there, kilt billowing, for no apparent reason. Anyone who』s ever worn a kilt will of course know that the last place you』re likely to linger is a-top a windy Scottish mountain. Talk about 「freedom」!!
2
Long before The Passion of the Christ, Mel Gibson directed another cinematic masterpiece, Braveheart. Filmed against the backdrop of majestic mountains and rolling meadows, it tells the historically-based (yet not entirely accurate) story of William Wallace, a common man』s warrior who led the Scottish people in rebellion against King Edward I, also known as 「Longshanks」. Written by Randall Wallace, an American tourist fascinated with a Scottish statue of his namesake, the script collected st in Hollywood for over a decade before Gibson made the brilliant decision to put it on the big screen. Just like The Passion, it』s a decision he would not regret.
Set in the 11th Century, Braveheart catalogues the struggle of Scottish serfs who labor under the brutal oppression of English occupation forces. Amidst these terrible conditions, William Wallace (Mel Gibson) falls in love with Murron MacClannough (Catherine McCormack). Insistent on not sharing his wife (a proclamation by the king gives local rulers 「first-night rights」 to new brides) Wallace secretly marries Murron. Nevertheless, an English knight assaults her, sparking a fight with Wallace. Fleeing the village, Wallace believes Murron has escaped and will soon meet him at a secret rendezvous point. But Murron is captured and executed by the king』s emissaries.
Angered by his wife』s murder, Wallace instigates a local rebellion, slaughtering all the king』s loyalists in his village. As his rebellion grows, a distraught Longshanks (Patrick McGoohan) dispatches his fabled Northern Army to destroy it. But the heroic Wallace delivers a stirring speech to rouse his men, while deploying an ingenious battlefield trick to defeat the king』s cavalry.
With the power and legend of Wallace growing day by day, Longshanks relies on his daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau) to broker a truce. But Isabelle』s power is limited, and Wallace realizes his people can only win freedom if backed by the Scottish nobles. Their appointed leader is Robert the Bruce (Angus MacFadyen) who vacillates between his own idealistic views and his father』s pessimistic pragmatism. Will the nobles join with Wallace? Will the Scots win their freedom? Only history tells us the answer.
With elaborate costumes, vivid battle scenes, and a noble hero as its focal point, Braveheart is more than your typical run-of-the-mill action movie. Part history, part Hollywood heroism - its timeless idealism strikes a cord with every viewer. In fact, the movie itself led to a revival in nationalistic pride that fueled the successful Scottish independence movement of the 1990s. It』s a testament to the strength and character of the real life William Wallace. A thousand years later, his enring legacy continues to transform the European landscape, and Mel Gibson captures the noble warrior』s passion with an awe-inspiring Academy Award-winning masterpiece.
3
BRAVEHEART is set in Scotland in the 1200s. It tells the true story of William Wallace who was a famous commoner who led his people in a rebellion against the English. The movie is of epic proportions, length and grandeur. We learn the entire history of William Wallace from the age of 8 until his death.
Mel Gibson, in what I found to be his best role ever, plays the grown up Wallace. Gibson directs the movie as well. The story is full of fascinating history of which I knew little. I have a good English history background but was surprised at what little early Scottish history I knew. Wallace wants to live in peace and ignore the English atrocities he has witnessed, but circumstances force his hand, and he declares war on the English. His battle cry is freedom and many poor people follow him in his quest. The story itself is quite compelling, and the script is excellent.
The political intrigue among the Scottish nobles makes you wonder whose side they are on. As the story unfolds, you come to realize that they are only interested in enriching themselves and do not care about their own people. They constantly counsel Wallace to compromise his ideas in order to achieve some lesser, but more practical solution. His vision is a singular one of freedom for his people. I found myself thinking of Gary Cooper in THE FOUNTAINHEAD and the similarity between his role and that of Gibson's. All of the leaders who were the "wisest" urged constant compromise on their rising young stars in both movies.
Actually, the movie most like BRAVEHEART is GETTYSBURG for both had huge and realistic battle scenes with wave after wave of humans charging each other and dying. Of course, many people will compare BRAVEHEART with ROB ROY. They are both about old Scottish heroes, and in my book, BRAVEHEART wins hands down. Finally, you may find yourself thinking of the Judas story from the Bible except here the movie has a plethora of Judases.
One example of the quality of the script is that the writer manages to introce a very funny character without it seeming like merely a plot device, which of course it is. This character is a mad Irishman who steals every scene he is in with his dialog. I laughed out loud many times. Although there was little humor in this serious tale, there was just enough to keep me from ever tiring even though I had to stay seated for three hours.
Too often period pieces seem like merely exercises in style. I found QUEEN MARGOT to be one such movie. Here the wonderful costumes and set decoration feel totally authentic but in a natural way. I felt like I was actually in the thirteenth century where people's faces were frequently dirty and in general personal hygiene was minimal. When they made their kills in battle or in revenge, I could sense how close they were to animals then. The blood would splat on their faces, and they could just as easy have been wolves.
I have been to Scotland many times and it is gorgeous. In a low key but quite impressive way, the cinematography makes one feel the beauty and the isolation of countryside. The music with the recurring and haunting melody of the lone Scottish bagpipe sets a sad and yet serene tone and mood.
BRAVEHEART runs a long, but well worth it, 2:52. I would not want it shorten. It is rated R, but NC-17 would be more appropriate. It is THE goriest movie I have ever seen and that too I would not change because it allows one to vicariously live through what actual battles in that period would be like. Please be warned that you will see almost every part of the human body being chopped off or stabbed in one scene or another. Imagine any physical horror, and there is probably a scene of it in BRAVEHEART. Nevertheless, there was not one scene where I thought the violence was gratuitous. I would let older teenagers see the movie, but would be careful with impressionable younger ones.
4
When pagan Saxons invaded Britain pushing the native Celtic tribes back in the mountains of the west and the north of the country they couldn't have known what difficulties they leave to future generations. One of the difficulties were Scots, though they weren't much affected by the pagan invasion.
Throughout the history, Scots (as a tribe from Ireland was in 360 mentioned by Romans) had a changing luck in battles, whoever they fought. They had had many various allies and fought against many various enemies, including their former or future allies (politics).
Originally based in Ireland, the Scottish tribe later established their kingdom on the west coast and isles of today's Scotland (between years 501 and 503). Generally, they were never good friends with tribes which lived on the isle, called Britannia by the Romans, before them; perhaps because they came from Ivernia, today's Ireland...
The intolerance between the two sides resulted in many battles and rebellions. In 600, 300 Edinburgh horseman were killed by the English, in 1014 king Malcom II defeated the Danes, four years later another victory was won on the river Tweed, at Carham, against the army of Anglo-Saxons (particularly Northumbrians). On the other hand, king Duncan was defeated by the English and killed by famous character of the Scottish history, MacBeth, who is defeated in 1057 by Malcolm Canmore in the battle of Lumphanan etcetera etcetera.
Then, in the year of approximately 1272, William Walace is born in Ellerslie. He is fated to become one of the most important characters of the history of Scots. In age of twenty-five years, he kills sheriff (originally shire-reeve) of Lanark and a revolt is unleashed. Perhaps many Scots were waiting for a leader to emerge, because the same year Wallace defeats the English at Stirling Bridge.
His luck changed when he was defeated at Falkirk in 1298. In 1305, he is betrayed and executed brutally, his head being mounted on London Bridge.
That is a very rough outline of a life so very important, of the life of William Wallace, a thorough Scot, exactly the William Wallace about whom this movie is. His father was killed by the English, his wife was murdered by the sheriff of Lanark (which is a reason why the sheriff ended up equally) - no mercy could have been awaited from a man that had never seen mercy on the side of his enemies.
Braveheart is a heroic epic told compactly and relatively objectively, noticing everything important that most probably happened in the life of William Wallace. After all, it doesn't have to be historically exact - it is a legend and even if it was "only" a legend, it would be a most impressive one.
5
Back in 1995 when I first saw this movie I was wowed, it was a cinematic epic and one which I thoroughly enjoyed.... a few years later when I met my future spouse I was subjected to this movie on a weekly basis and now I cannot bare to watch it.
Anyway back to the movie, if you have been living under a rock and haven't seen it here's the basic story Mel Gibson plays William Wallace a Scottish highlander who leads his people in a uprising against the English monarch.
Now just so you know this film however "based" on historical events is completely inaccurate, Wallace was in actual fact a Scottish Noble (his family was rich), Wallace never had a wife, and the French princess Mel gets jiggy with would've been around 8 years old at the time, the only real truth in the movie was that he was hung drawn and quartered and he lead an uprising...the rest is Hollywood bullsh*t.
I'm giving the film 4 stars because if you are unaware of the historical inaccuracies and you haven't seen it 100 times you will be entertained, its a good movie.
⑼ 勇敢的心讀後感，中英文都要。
這是英文的：
Braveheart was a huge deal when it first came out. I never really watched the film properly until recently. As a frequent cinema-goer since my youth I was not a part of the mid-nineties cultural phenomenon that was Braveheart's release in Scotland. I did turn up at the the cinema, the old Odeon in Edinburgh, but the queue went round the block (the literal term for a blockbuster) and there was no way in hell I was prepared to wait for three hours on a gray September afternoon (a choice I came to regret). Every subsequent attempt since then was blocked. I never rented the video as I didn't want to watch in pan-and-scan. The fact that every single living Scottish person had seen it apart from myself really got on my nerves, and I was quite bitter about it. And then, as the fever died down, I just kind of forgot about it and moved on.
Watching it fully as an alt I think I probably enjoy it more now that I would have done as a teenager. It's certainly a huge epic right up there with the best of them. Mel Gibson captures the pretty side of Scotland wonderfully with his scope photography accompanied by James Horner's bittersweet score. The film never really feels three hours long, the time just disappears.
Nearly every notable Scottish actor (apart from Connery and Connelly) appears at some point. From the brilliant (Brian Cox) to the dreary and pretentious (Peter Mullan). Keep a lookout for Tommy Flanagan too, in one of his earlier roles.
The battle scenes are impressive, but I wish there were more gory. Gibson's first cut of the film was apparently bloodier, I wish it had remained intact. But despite the grim satisfaction of seeing the English aggressors getting splattered the fact that Scotland IS still ruled by England kind renders Wallace's bravery irrelevant. It may have been 700 years ago, but I hate the fact that he ultimately died for nothing. We DON'T have a country of our own, plain and simple.
這是中文（不是英文的翻譯）：
《勇敢的心》 觀後感
華萊士，終其一生都是一個鬥士，一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士，一個為了自由而斗的鬥士，一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士。他是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長，對他而言，真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞，他只是一種震嚇，一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後，他變得勇敢，敢於直面死亡了，面對他父親和哥哥的遺體，他變得如此平靜。再後來，他叔叔把他帶走，說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗，把他帶去接受教育，這個是他的故事的開端，也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情，這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫，一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘，一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因，他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了，這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神，一種本能的叛逆。但他們的愛情沒有維系多久，因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了，貴族殺了梅倫，這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線，因為這引發了華萊士的爆發，揭竿而起，各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀，包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在，根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤，讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈，她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺，因為失去了梅倫，他一直在為了他的信念作戰，皇後的美麗和善良感動了他，兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
再說說他的戰斗，華萊士開始戰斗的時候，是因為貴族殺了他的妻子梅倫，可以說是一個簡單的復仇行動，但事情一開始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是領導權掌握在一個聰明人的手裡。後來，他們起義得到了各地不斷的支持，這讓人看到了蘇格蘭的自由希望。一個方面是因為他們蘇格蘭的人受迫壓太久了，再加上華萊士所學的智慧，他們勢如破竹，這就很讓人，特別是愛德華心慌了。想盡辦法招安華萊士，最後還是利用了一個騙局把華萊士抓了。
最後，在砍頭台。這里是這部片的一個精華了，思想就是在這里的。行刑前，兩個小丑在那裡舞盡丑態，讓人發笑，但也是說明了英國人的行為恰恰就是兩個小丑所為。華萊士就刑，行人對這位英雄扔雞蛋、爛菜，恰恰說明了國民的麻木和愚昧。後來在刑台上，華萊士受盡了各樣殘酷的折磨，下面則是一片歡呼聲。華萊士就刑前，看到那個小孩在笑，可能這里也是一個希望的延續，把希望寄託給了後人。那聲振饋發聾的「freedom」讓人久久不能放下思想，激人不斷前進。可以說，在刑台這段，是鮮明的對比讓這個自由的精神體現的淋漓盡致的。一邊是鬥士、英雄，一邊是愚昧的國民；一邊是前進中的先鋒，一邊是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在這里體現了，代溝在這里產生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼？也許是真的，我們也該好好思量思量。
⑽ 急需電影勇敢的心英文影評一篇100到200字就行，要簡單易懂的最好是先寫的，謝謝啦！
The Review of Braveheart
I am deeply impressed by William Wallace』s courage and the efforts that the Scottish created to resume soverienty.It reminds me of my dream.Dream,whatever it is,really should be pursued heart and soul.Compared to Wallace,I am so lazy and passive.I watched it,giving free outlet to my thoughts and tears.
There are two scenes over which I really feel melancholy.The initial is when Meilun is buried. The same point happened when Wallace was yong,weeping at the death of his father.Tiny Meilun sent him a purple thistle .to console his sorrow.Even so,Meilun is dead now,no a single would send him a purple thist any much more.He has only himself in this world following losing the two persons he loves most.The second one particular is the very first war against England in the battlefield.,in which they were much weaker in regard to weapons and numbers.Confronted with immense difficulties,they had been not afaid,thinking we would drop.Instead,they fighted bravely and confidently.
Life will not usually be what we want. Wallace』s father died when he was a small boy.He did not want this tragedy transpire but it did take place,so he had to accept it；when his uncle came and would part him with his hometown,he obeyed with reluctance；moreover,his heart was broken facing the death of Meilan,but he had to accept it and be strong.Adversity leads to prosperity on situation that we can turn sorrow into strength.
Much as what is stated above,courage alone won』t guarantee success.Wallace』s uncle informed him :」you have to find out to use your thoughts,then weapons.」Being flexiable and conscious is even more critical,that is to say ,you know how to obtain your goal prior to you take actions.Additionally,it is worth notifying that pals are also extremely important in the pursue of dream.A life devoid of a pal is a life with out a sun.Wallace has Hamiss,who accompanied him to the end.
以上為整篇影評，你可以按自己的要求摘取某段或某句，這里的單詞也不算很生