泰國電影homestay影評

『壹』 關於生死停留（Stay）的結局

這部《Stay》是N年以前看的了，現在才想起來要寫觀後感什麼的。男主角是Ewan McGregor，即星戰前傳里演歐比旺的那個帥哥，也是《逃出克隆島》、《大魚》和《紅磨坊》里的主角，他出演過的最重要的作品，應該是《猜火車》；另外一個男主角是Ryan Gosling，一個頗具頹廢氣質的小帥哥，不過不知道還出演過什麼電影；女主角是Naomi Watts，代表作《穆赫蘭道》，沒看過穆赫蘭道的不要緊，看《金剛》就知道她是誰了。

最新影片,電影影評

《Stay》講的是一個處於生死之隙的人在一時之間產生的幻覺，但是不看到最後是明白不過來的。Ryan Gosling飾演的是一個有心理障礙的藝術系大學生，有自虐的傾向，跟Ewan McGregor飾演的心理醫生說他要在星期六晚上自殺。醫生為了幫助他，就開始調查他生活的方方面面，Naomi Watts是 醫生的畫家女友，也曾患有嚴重的抑鬱症，割完自殺過，被他救了下來。醫生調查到大學生的上一個主治醫生也患上了嚴重的抑鬱症，同時發現大學生有驚人的預言 能力，而且還治好了失明已久的老人。星期六越來越近，醫生卻陷入越來越深的謎團——他找到大學生的母親，回來後卻被告知她早已死去；他在大學生的錄音機上 聽到自己的聲音；他的女友在自己的畫作後面發現大學生的名字；醫生尋找大學生的女友時陷入時空的怪圈…… 於是，醫生心裡越來越緊張、思維越來越混亂，最後分不清楚什麼是真實什麼是幻覺……

這是一部比較典型的心理懸疑驚悚劇，時空錯亂、邏輯矛盾的各種謎團。空房間里行狀詭異、莫名其妙就開始頭上冒血的老婦人這種橋段雖然從《閃靈》開始就已經被用爛了，但是偶爾穿插一下還是能起到一點渲染的作用。情節中加入了大量的細節上的暗示，包括路人母子的問答、尋找戒指的動作、不知何處傳來的耳語、莫名 其妙的錄音機留言等等等等都是那種可以讓你再看完結局之後恍然大悟「哦，原來這里有用意的」。選擇的場景，場景的布置與設計都相當能烘托影片所需要的那種氣氛。

值得好好留意一下的是本片的剪輯，一開始可能有點眼花繚亂，有點看MV的感覺，但是那種帶眩暈的流暢感，從不可能處完成場景的轉換，是十分吸引人的。而且在匪夷所思的場景轉換中，會自然地產生一種時空跳脫甚至混亂的感覺，對傳 達影片的敘事表達以及情節暗示都有很大的幫助。如果這部片是按照正常的手法來進行剪輯銜接，敘事轉換之間根本就傳遞不出「幻覺」的味道。

有看家說，這部電影比較失敗的是最後把什麼都抖落出來，太過直白，但是相信很多看過的人，都會覺得，要弄清楚這個「直白」其實還是要費點腦筋的。

網上有傳聞說這部電影有兩個結局，但是經Ewan McGregor自己親口證實這部電影在與官方以及投資方協商上映時，確實曾被要求另外拍攝一個結局，但是導演驕傲地拒絕了，所以並沒有另外一個結局。這個導演就是拍《Finding Neverland》的那一位，兩片的風格確實是天差地遠，而且據說《Stay》這種黑暗與死亡題材才是該導演的長項，他的名字是Marc Forster，以後要多留意一下他的電影。

推薦大家看一下。海報上有一句話：Between the worlds of the living and the dead there is a place you』re not supposed to stay. 應該可以幫助理解電影的主題。

『貳』 求《precious》 電影英文影評~

I should start out by emphasizing that I disagree with much of the criticism the film has been receiving. A common disparagement condemns the movie as "emotionally manipulative" and "superficially inspirational", much like other films that fall into the category of the "inspirational dramas" depicting stories of indivials overcoming obstacles and hardships that many people seem to hate. Well, I personally found that the film portrays a reality far too bleak and dismal and brutal for it to possibly be considered "inspirational"; in addition, while the film ends on somewhat of a high note, even that is laced with misery and becomes the lesser of two evils for the protagonist. Another criticism of the film – and of the book it is based on – is from the opposite end of the spectrum, and blames the film for portraying TOO bleak a situation to the point of exploitation. I personally found the scenario portrayed in the film to be strikingly realistic, and I think that people who are too ignorant to realize that such a grim existence can feasibly be led in 21st century America need a serious wake-up call.

One aspect of the film that deserves all the praise in the world is its cast, specifically the performances of its lead actresses and the surprising and unexpected quality of these performances considering the particular thespians involved. First and foremost, we have the breakout role of Gabourey "Gabby" Sidibe, portraying the overweight, twice-pregnant and illiterate protagonist, Precious. The performance is a revelation both because of how convincingly Sidibe reacts to and interacts with her brutal day-to-day existence, but also because of how completely removed it is from the first-time actresses' actual life. It's always impressive to see a performer convincingly convey difficult and profound emotions that they probably would never feel themselves in their real lives, but for a first-time actress to convey these emotions is particularly incredible. Precious' life is populated by three prominent alt characters; two of which see past her daunting exterior and genuinely want to help her, and one who does the exact opposite. Mariah Carey plays a social worker who takes a personal interest in Precious' case and, in the film's most dramatically gut-wrenching scene, makes a genuine attempt to bridge the gap between the teenager and her monstrous mother. Carey has only ever acted in two or three other films, including the atrocious vanity project "Glitter", but in this role, she de-glams, puts on a convincing and raspy accent and actually manages to deliver a surprisingly well rounded and convincing performance. Paula Patton plays another alternate mother figure in Precious' life, her teacher at her alternate school who takes a particularly personal interest in Precious, to the point of letter her stay at her home when she has nowhere else to go. Unlike Mariah Carey, Patton never did anything to totally remove my confidence in her acting abilities, but then again, she's never actually given what can really be considered a "good" performance, which is what makes her tender and genuine turn in this film most impressive. But the scene-stealer is without a doubt Mo'Nique, probably one of my LEAST favorite "comedic" performers who totally redeems herself and manages to deliver a frighteningly convincing performance, incredibly transforming herself into Precious' villainous, sadistic and purely evil mother. It is an incredible and difficult and extremely brave performance, and is even more impressive considering that it's coming from the star of "Phat Girlz".

The performances are rich and incredible enough to hold up dramatic scenes, but not the narrative as a whole, which, as I mentioned before, suffers from a series of bad directorial choices made by director Lee Daniels. The film's biggest flow is emotional inconsistency: in an attempt to portray Precious' inner feelings, Daniels injects strangely conceived fantasy sequences at key dramatic moments in which Precious imagines herself as a glamorous and famous personality. While the intention of these sequences is clear, their abruptness just totally jolts the audience out of the emotional flow of the film, and they just seem out of place. For a similar reason, Daniels chooses to set grim and dramatic scenes to oddly inappropriate songs and musical cues, which once again just feel forced and out of place, and interrupt the emotional resonance of the scenes. Other than that, the film just seems poorly done at times, or simply unfinished: the cinematography is inconsistent and often features zooms and loss of focus that don't feel like stylistic choices but rather just like mistakes. In addition, the editing is quite disjointed at times, and many cuts interrupt musical cues in the middle or otherwise are just so sudden and jumbled that they completely ruin the dramatic flow. Finally, I just felt that while many separate scenes work wonderfully and are emotional and genuinely gut-wrenching, they are just too loosely connected for the film to actually carry a consistent dramatic arc throughout, as it jumps between Precious' brutal home life to her newfound support in her classroom to her day-to-day activities to her inner fantasies. For example, a major dramatic reveal near the end of the film end sup completely ignored and thus irrelevant to the dramatic arc. As I mentioned earlier, the performances are absolutely spectacular, but the inconsistencies in the film's tone and its jumbled and odd editing take away from what otherwise could have been a genuinely affective film.

有好幾部電影都叫precious，你看看是不是這部，要是不對的話，把電影的年份和主演告訴我

『叄』 電影《fly away home》 英文影評700字

What do we have, if we don't preserve nature's wonders? What do you do with a flock of Canadian goose eggs, after the mother has been driven away by subdivision builders? Why, you hatch them, raise them, build an ultralight that looks like a giant goose, and teach them to follow you south to North Carolina.

Amy (Anna Paquin) is living with her mother in New Zealand, when an auto accident kills mom and forces Amy to go live with her eccentric father (Jeff Daniels) in Canada. A 13-yr-old, she does not adjust well, but her life changes when she finds those abandoned eggs. She hatches them in the barn, with the help of a light, and they "imprint" on her. She feeds them, sleeps in the bathtub so they can have the bathroom, swim in the toilet, they follow her everywhere.

Warden tries to clip their wings, the law, but Amy hits him over the head with a pot, dad chases him away. Geese grow, learn how to fly, dad says they can't stay, need to migrate, hits on the idea that they will follow her in a plane. Being a handyman, sculptor, and inventor, he builds the goose-looking ultralight and teaches her to fly. The geese follow her.

They plan a 4-day route, 2 planes, first stop at an airforce base near Niagra Falls, NY, creates a "scramble" and a little havoc. Second day, their geese follow some wild geese and land in a pond, near where hunters are shooting geese. Next morning, Amy uses her special "call" to round up all hers, and they take off again. The news media catch on, start to track her route, and anticipate their next landing. Dad has a rudder problem, crashes in a cornfield, Amy has to continue alone, makes it to the construction site as they were ready to destroy it.

Although a fictional account, the story is based on real migratory patterns of geese, and the imprinting and following a vehicle is real. The real stars of this film are the geese, from pecking out of their shells, to following Amy all over, to their flight with the ultralight, to their playfulness in the water after they reach their destination. Seeing that wonder of nature, from egg to alt in such a short time, is extremely moving for me.

Anna Paquin is so perfect in her role, and seems so natural with the geese. Jeff Daniels' role as her father seems just perfect too. Mary Chapin Carpenter's "10,000 Miles", both at the beginning and at the end, is beautiful and haunting.

Caleb Deschanel's cinematography of flying geese is more than merely uplifting, like the film, it is extraordinary, and well deserved its Oscar nomination. This charming and delightful film is based upon the well-known fact that birds can 'imprint' on whoever or whatever is there when they hatch, and in this case it is the 14 year-old actress Anna Paquin. She was well worth imprinting on, as she is every bit as delightful as the film as a whole. Now that she is all grown up and glamorous, I wouldn't mind imprinting on her myself. - Give me an eggshell, quick! - The story is a wonderful fable about the girl who saves the goose eggs, hatches them, and becomes their Momma. They follow her around everywhere, but wild geese have to migrate, so she is faced with the dilemma: what to do at migration time? The girl's father is an eccentric, beautifully portrayed by Jeff Daniels. He is always tinkering with machines and likes to build what we now call 'micro-lites', tiny planes with engines that go 'put put' and carry a single person at low altitudes. So you guessed it, father and daughter get into their micro-lites and lead the geese south! Apparently, wild geese will follow a micro-lite if it is shaped like a goose. The story is a magnificent fable which is just believable, sensitively portrayed and with fabulous cinematography and special effects. It is what is called these days, amidst all the blood and gore and obsession with closeups of copulation, a 'family film', meaning no murders take place and people do something other than have sex all the time. (In a normal Hollywood movie it would be impossible to take the geese south because it would mean the director could not ask lots of actresses to take their clothes off.) Carroll Ballard directs this film really well. He is one of those rare directors who does not want to have all his characters mown down by machine guns or chopped to pieces by maniacs, and he does not want to invent unnecessary bath scenes where the girls show their tits so that he can get his jollies. He also likes animals a lot, and that is always a good sign that he might himself not be a monster like so many other directors are. Any normal person (and there still are some) would have to enjoy this film. It is what used to be called 'heart-warming'. In this era of cold hearts, we need that.

『肆』 電影《新世界》的影評

完全符合你標準的沒找到耶，只找到這兩篇，參考一下~

一、
記得安德烈·巴贊說過一句話，要更好地理解一部影片的傾向如何，最好先理解該影片是如何表現其傾向的。在第一次得到《新世界》的海報時，我就覺得這是部好片子，憑著自己的感性認知和直覺認為是，在海報的影響下我選擇地看了這部電影，看完之後有太多的感受，心情雖不是此起彼伏，但還是久久不能寧靜。

電影的景色很美，這也是能夠吸引觀眾的一個重要原因，一切都是那麼原始，那麼美麗。陽光、河流，青草，山石，女子的微笑與淳樸再加上那一個眼神的流露，則更加充滿了神秘氣息。我們不能不說法瑞爾的演技很棒，雖然有人說他表演時過冷淡，但我說，沉著和冷靜更能表現出對女子的至愛和關懷。我們始終很想回到那種世界，但真正身臨其境時會發現一切並不是你想像的那樣完美，在那裡，外人的出現讓那裡充滿了烏煙和瘴氣。

伯格曼說過，他的電影從來無意寫實，它們是鏡子，是現實的片斷，幾乎跟夢一樣。我想，如果擱到今天這必是說《新世界》無疑了，其實縱觀古今電影敘事手段，有《沉默的羔羊》壓抑的透不過氣來的電影，有《虎口脫險》讓你放鬆極致，笑觀歷史的電影，也有《晚安，好運》充分利用所有元素的電影，但沒有一部像《新世界》這樣平和無彩，卻能博得賞識。當然，這部片子並沒有開創這種敘述手法的先例，早些時候，一部叫《與狼共舞》的電影摘得奧斯卡桂冠時這種手段就立下了汗馬功勞，當然，我們並不能拿《新世界》同《與狼共舞》相比，不是相差太遠，而是各有其獨特之處。

剛才提到，影片的表述手法很平和，沒有一點波瀾起伏在其中，甚至到最後的戰爭都在情理之中，所以說，這部電影並不是只有景色能讓人津津樂道。影片的一開頭就給出了巨大的景觀，著重描寫自然生活，而並沒有任何敘事，彷彿大導演並沒有讓我們急於看到矛盾沖突的情節，到女子將主人公兩次救回時，男子的眼神都是同樣的迷離而充滿熱情。

這種電影最優之處則在於對人性的詮釋，當土著人的一次次寬容換來了數次的欺騙與傷害，他們沒有痛苦，反而和沉默，彷彿已經知錯，卻又選擇了逃避和原諒。我覺得，導演是在給我們傳達一個信息，在古代也好，在現代也好，人都應該與自然和諧相處，融為一體。人應該接近自然，靠近自然，去享受自然帶來的美好。而不是一味的陰謀、詭計來破壞自然，以及一切與原始自然有關的物質存在。

我留下腳印，讓後人來追尋。寫到這里，想起了女主角的一句話，Why dose this world have colors？

這樣一部夾雜著回憶、夢境和理念的電影，希望大家有時間可以看看。

二、
一個月沒有看電影,這還是第一次，在昨天終於把自己買的碟翻出來，隨手翻到《NEW WORLD》（新世界）。說起這部電影，真正吸引我的，還是封面及其以前看的電影介紹的片段。便猜想應該是部不錯的電影。然而當整部電影看完，才發現，這部電影與想像中的相去甚遠。

荒蠻之地的土著領土，忽來掠奪的英國侵略者。由於地域和文化的差異，引起了沖突，而英國侵略者與土著公主產生情愫……

不得不承認，這部電影的確取景非常的美麗。流水潺潺，陽光，微風及半身的雜草，讓人有無限的遐想，而女主角的淳樸和善良，又使的女子更加的充滿魅力。然而，克林法瑞爾的演技實在不敢恭維，從頭到尾飾演的SMITH船長沒有一點感情色彩在裡面，只是影片開頭見到女主角流露出來的表情讓人可以感受他所表達的意思。

影片表現的很平和，中間幾乎沒什麼起伏，取景的自然使的影片有了唯一的看點，景色另人嚮往猶如世外桃源，這也許是影片唯一可以叫賣的地方。

這部電影的配樂，也與影片格格不入，一段單板的鋼琴根本無法表露自然的美麗和兩人之間神聖並超越國界的愛情心理。

也許，在我們對這部電影作反面評價的時候，不得不讓我想起凱文．克斯特納的《與狼共舞》，完美的場景，完美的劇情，完美的演員，而更完美的是表達人與自然之間的結合，這種結合在這部早期電影里表現的無暇。

看完電影，讓我們來想想女主角說的那句話：「Why dose this world have colors？」……

『伍』 請教電影《生死停留》(Stay)的劇情

影片表現手法十分怪異，而且凌亂，敘事結構也前後顛倒，絲毫沒有邏輯性，這似乎正好應片子意境，唯心虛幻根本就不用再想邏輯。既然是彌留時幻境，有人說，這個彌留時間未免過長，其實夢境想像是不可以用時間來衡量，不知你試過沒有，本人就曾試過半夢半醒之間模糊。似乎踏過千山萬水，似乎歷經林林總總。睜眼偶一瞟，原來幾分鍾而已，彈指瞬間、回首百年可能就有這方面意境吧。影片有過硬質量，遠非一些普通商業作品可比，畢竟有想法影片實彩鈴不多，而彩鈴有思想影片中又能兼顧娛樂性就更少，而且還有伊萬.邁奎格與娜奧米.沃茨這兩個介於商業與藝術之間出色演員出演更是值得你去欣賞。

再羅嗦一下，之前我一直沒搞明白，伊萬褲腿非常短，這種吊腿褲似乎不應穿著於這個年代人身上，後來彩鈴網上看到一個說法，也經較說過去。因為伊萬彩鈴對亨利進行搶救時是蹲下，而蹲下人褲腿自然是縮上去。而亨利憑借這個蹲下伊萬虛構影片中人，所以片中伊萬如此穿著就不足為奇.

『陸』 電影《幸福終點站》的英文劇情簡介和英文讀後感

電影《幸福終點站》的英文劇情簡介:

Viktor Navorski, a man from an Eastern European country arrives in New York. However after he left his country war broke out. Suddenly Navorski is a man without a country - or one that the U.S. cannot recognize, thus he is denied entrance to the U.S. However, he also can't be deported so he is told by the Security Manager that he has to remain in the airport until his status can be fixed. And also Navorski doesn't speak English very well, so he cannot talk to or understand anyone. But he somehow adapts and sets up residence in the airport, which makes the man who placed him there unhappy, as it seems he is in line for a promotion but Navroski's presence might complicate that. So he tries to get Navorski to leave but Navorski remains where he is. Navorski makes friends with some of the people who work in the airport and is attracted to a flight attendant he runs into whenever she comes in.

英文讀後感543篇:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0362227/usercomments

『柒』 跪求好心人分享借來的100天2018年上映的由 披納若·蘇潘平佑主演的免費高清百度雲資源

《借來的100天 Homestay》網路網盤高清資源免費在線觀看：

鏈接: https://pan..com/s/1EJgw3yQFp5NiZunHWrh4Bg

《借來的100天 Homestay》

導演: 柏德潘·王般

編劇: 柏德潘·王般、湯薩蓬·逖提拿坎、Jirassaya Wongsutin、艾卡斯特·泰叻他那、Abhichoke Chandrasen、森繪都

主演: 披納若·蘇潘平佑、切爾普朗·阿瑞庫爾、納帕猜·賈亞納馬、賴拉·邦雅淑、Suquan Bulakool、納塔西特·科蒂馬努瓦尼、塔內·瓦拉庫努婁

類型: 劇情、驚悚、奇幻

製片國家/地區: 泰國

語言: 泰語

上映日期: 2018-10-25(泰國)

片長: 131分鍾

又名: 寄身100天、โฮมสเตย์

該片翻拍自2010年上映的日本動漫電影

《意外的幸運簽》，一縷無主幽魂，赫然發現自己附身在一名高中男生Min的屍首中，在外人眼裡他是個醫學奇跡，唯有這個「寄居靈魂」心知肚明，這是死神給他的考驗，要他在100天內找出令明死去的真凶，否則他將永不超生！「寄居靈魂」用盡方法投入Min的世界，感受Min的親情、友情及愛情，逐漸發現Min的死另有內情…

『捌』 求一篇英語影評，最好是最近的英語電影，大概在50詞左右，單詞難度最好在初一。

Movie review: 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows — Part 1'
Much of the plot of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" involves the attempt to find and destroy a series of Horcruxes, and if you haven't a clue about what they are or why they're important, you might as well stay home.

There is something different, however, about this Potter movie, and that is the words "Part 1" that end the title. Understandably distraught about "Hallows" being the last of the phenomenally popular J.K. Rowling novels, Warner Bros. has split the final effort into two films and is likely kicking itself for not having thought of that with the earlier books.

You don't make $5.7 billion in theatrical revenue, however, by being cavalier about your source material and the watchword for the "Potter" series in general, and this film in particular, is making the audience feel like it's in safe hands.

Though adventurous filmmakers like Alfonso Cuarón have made "Potter" films, David Yates, who directed the two previous epics as well as both installments of "Deathly Hallows," is not one of them.

Capable and dependable, he can be counted on to make solid albeit unsurprising films that believe in connecting the dots rather than creating risky excitement. When studio president Alan Horn said his priority for the series was treating the books "respectfully," he wasn't kidding.

Being respectful also means making sure you have quality people behind the camera (Steve Kloves has written almost all the screenplays and the new cinematographer is Oscar-nominated "Girl With a Pearl Earring" veteran Eardo Serra) as well as top acting talent in front of it. Even if you don't always have enough for them to do.

In fact, the Potter films are so loaded down with the best of British performers that Bill Nighy, who was added to the cast this time along with Rhys Ifans, wasn't really kidding when he commented, "For a while, I thought I would be the only English actor of a certain age who wasn't in a 'Harry Potter' film."哈利波特的 你刪刪改改就行了

『玖』 寒假作業 老師讓看一部原生英文電影 寫部影評 100詞左右 求高手指導

美國電影《當幸福來敲門》（The Pursuit of Happiness）取材真實故事。故事的主角就是當今美國黑人投資專家Chris Gardner。成功詮釋出一位瀕臨破產、老婆離家的落魄業務員，如何刻苦耐勞的善盡單親責任，奮發向上成為股市交易員，最後成為知名的金融投資家的勵志故事。該片獲得2006年奧斯卡最佳男主角提名。另有同名大陸電視劇和同名圖書。

觀後感：
幸福，我們是如此想享受它帶來的那片刻溫柔。當我們苦苦尋找幸福的時候，或許我們已經錯過了許多原本幸福的時刻。當我們費盡千辛萬苦獲得所謂的幸福時，你才發現幸福原來很簡單，簡單的讓你感受不到它的存在。 什麼是幸福？這個問題就如你問什麼是宇宙一樣。每個人在心中都有自己的幸福標准，只要達到了這個標准，你就是幸福的。別人的幸福不一定是你所想要的，而你自己的幸福未必對別人有用。幸福是自私的，只有自己才能體會那片刻的快感。如果非要給幸福下個定論，無非有兩點：一是和你相愛的人在一起；一是做你最喜歡的事情。