豆瓣英文經典電影

『壹』 好萊塢經典電影英文短影評

以下是《2012》的影評The world is ending in a matter of hours, yet justice and humanity don』t penetrate through the brain-shells of politicians. In order to save their own lives, the government officials keep the secret from the rest of human kind and also lets the man whose knowledge saves their lives die. This is the premise of 2012.But if the viewer is a Tibetan or someone who is aware of the Tibetan culture and the sensitivities of Tibetan issue, one could feel that the justice and humanity are not occurred in the director』s thought either.There is a scene long enough to mention that takes place in Tibet. In fact the last human beings die there and the new seed of the future human race starts at the neck of Mount Everest, 「The People』s Republic of China」 the movie calls it. Perhaps what no movie reviewer noticed or saw the importance of mentioning is that the prophetic fictitious story of the movie not only makes a statement that Tibet is completely a part of China, but also it totally misrepresents the core culture of Tibetan people. A Tibetan woman killing animals in Tibet is taboo, it never happened except ring the Cultural Revolution when some women were forced to do so. Women killing chickens in the Chinese market is an everyday event, but a Tibetan woman killing a CHICKEN reflects the director』s cultural ignorance and it makes the movie even more ridiculous.And in real life ethically speaking, Mr. Emmerich failed to hire Tibetan actors who can speak their own language. All the actors who play Tibetan characters are Chinese very poorly pretending to be Tibetans. Their Tibetan is hundred times worse than Zhang Yi』s memorized English or Leonardo DiCaprio』s Swahili (well I can imagine!).

『貳』 推薦英文電影

..
推薦電影我喜歡，我可是非常喜歡電影的。恐怖的我也不喜歡，別的都喜歡呢，聽你說喜歡威爾史密斯的，有一部感覺不錯，不知看過沒《我是傳奇》，挺好看，而且有兩個結局。
說到他我就有點想說幾個他的電影，個人覺得好的，雖然你可能看過。
《當幸福來敲門》
《我，機器人》
《黑超特警組》1~2
《漢考克》
算了，不說了，這些你一定看過。
我還是推薦點別的吧。
我喜歡看原音的電影，推薦你幾個劇情的先：
《天使愛美麗》
《漫長的婚約》
《一個人的奧林匹克》
《火柴人》
《十一羅漢》
《十二羅漢》
《十三羅漢》
《苦兒流浪記》
《天氣預報員》
《戰爭之王》
《海上鋼琴師》
《肖申克的救贖》
《救贖》
《天堂電影院》
《音樂之聲》
《楚門的世界》
然後是那個科幻的，動作的，中外都有，雖然你說要英文電影…可是我真的覺得好，才會推薦你。
《加勒比海盜》1~3
《決戰中的較量》
《未知死亡》
《叢林奇兵》
《虎膽龍威》1~4
《極限特工》
《石破天驚》
太科幻的就不推薦了。
噢，對了，你說的經典動畫片也可以，嘿嘿，我很喜歡。
《瑩火蟲之墓》
《聽見濤聲》
《料理鼠王》
《泰若星球》
《幽靈公主》
《獅子王》
雖然動畫片很多，我還是只推薦我認為經典的，。
說了這么多，祝你看的開心就好了。絕對不是我復制的，我可是用手機上網回答的。算了，不說這些題外話。
最後說一句，你在問題里說的那電影我還沒看過呢。

『叄』 好看的英文電影有哪些能不能推薦幾部

好看的英文電影有《本傑明·巴頓奇事》、《尋夢環游記》、《廊橋遺夢》、《怦然心動》、《綠皮書》、《水形物語》等。

1、《本傑明·巴頓奇事》

是一部啟發人思考，值得品味的經典之作。由大衛·芬奇執導，凱特·布蘭切特和布拉德·皮特主演，講述了一個返老還童的逆生長奇異故事。影片拍攝手法和敘述方式和《阿甘正傳》有異曲同工之妙。通過不斷的回憶展現了主人公傳奇的一生，探討生死和愛情這兩大永恆的主題。

6、《水形物語》

影片的背景設置在冷戰時期，註定了它整體的灰色基調。女主艾麗莎是個平凡的啞女，遇到了被關在實驗室里的半人半魚怪異生物。兩個孤獨的生命隨著時間推移產生了奇妙的感情，彼此救贖。

『肆』 你覺著有哪些值得看多遍的英文電影

《貓鼠游戲》Catch Me If You Can，影片是真實事件改編，故事主角是FBI有史以來最小的頭號通緝犯。

從1964年到1966年之間弗蘭克通過喬裝醫生、律師、飛行員騙取了高達幾百萬的金額，在全美各地幾乎都留下他的犯罪足跡,FBI探員卡爾屢次被弗蘭克這個黃毛小子捉弄，一次次有驚無險的逃脫，上演一場精彩絕倫的貓鼠游戲...

影片在視覺表現力上非同一般，普拉達的華服，蒂凡尼的珠寶，一場場繁華繽紛的派對，給人以極盡奢靡之感。但在人們沉淪在紙醉金迷中，卻難掩其冷漠、喧鬧、虛假。神秘富豪蓋茨比終究也只是成了時代的犧牲品。

『伍』 好看的英文電影

歌舞青春（共四部）您可以放最後看 因為四部畢竟有點多！我怕影響到您採納的心情，不過說真的 是很好看

查理曼大地密碼（是尋寶的 蠻推薦）特好看。

要說感人的了：
我雖然是個男的 但是這兩部電影讓我哭的 淚如雨下。餐巾紙起碼1包
第一部：十個約定
第二部：心動奇跡（一共兩步）

答畢 望樓主採納。。

對了對了 別忘記咱的 加菲貓

這絕對不是我復制的，只是以前我回答過此類問題。

『陸』 豆瓣經典電影排名榜是怎樣的

《肖申克的救贖》 豆瓣：9.6分、《霸王別姬》豆瓣：9.6分、《這個殺手不太冷》豆瓣：9.4分、《美麗人生》豆瓣：9.5分。

《美麗人生》是一部義大利電影，講述了納粹時期的故事，影片的背景在歷史上非常悲慘，但電影卻為我們呈現了悲慘世界裡的希望。整個電影氛圍很稱重，但是又透露出為了希望和自由不願意放棄，生活中的小愛更是大愛。

『柒』 尋一部比較新或比較經典的英文電影，然後我要的是一篇該電影120詞左右的英文影評。只要是自己現在原創

Roman Holiday is a 1953 American romantic comedydirected and proced by William Wyler. It is a classic romantic comedy.It is talk about princess Anne and reporter Joe love story.Princess Anne met Joe,but she is dizzy at that time,so Joe takes her back to his house.Joe know that she is the princess and he want to hide his real information to Anne,since he want to take some private pictures of her.However he fall in love with Anne,so he give up his job and take the princess travel around Europe.The movie teach us that if you love someone truly,you should be honest to him or her,never hide the truth.

『捌』 豆瓣排行前十的英文電影

2012,我是傳奇,初戀的回憶,冰上公主,人生搖控器,暮光之城,歌舞青春系列,當幸福來敲門,海神號.

『玖』 求三部英文電影影評，盡量短！網上找的都好長...

2012 is a 2009 disaster film directed by Roland Emmerich. The film stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Danny Glover, Thandie Newton and Woody Harrelson. It was distributed by Columbia Pictures. Filming began in August 2008 in Vancouver.
The film briefly references Mayanism, the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, and the 2012 phenomenon in its portrayal of cataclysmic events unfolding in the year 2012. Because of solar flare bombardment the Earth's core begins heating up at an unprecedented rate, eventually causing crustal displacement. This results in an onslaught of Doomsday event scenarios plunging the world into chaos, ranging from California falling into the Pacific Ocean, the eruption of the Yellowstone National Park caldera, massive earthquakes, and Megatsunami impacts along every coast line on the Earth. The film centers around an ensemble cast of characters as they narrowly escape multiple catastrophes in an effort to reach ships in the Himalayas, along with scientists and governments of the world who are attempting to save as many lives as they can before the disasters ensue.
I think,it will be, for its audiences, one of the most satisfactory films of the year and it really can be called the "mother of all disaster movies".
《蜘蛛俠2》英語影評

『拾』 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的

珍珠港的影評

pearl harbour film review

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.

Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?

If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.

Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions