『壹』 《飞屋环游记》电影的观后感
飞屋环游记 观后感
《UP》怎么会翻译成《飞屋环游记》我是想不通的啦，不过看电影，“飞屋环游记”也还算贴切。
影片开头，我就一直在猜谁将会是影片的主人公驾驶着飞屋去旅行，小男孩？小女孩？看着看着，怎么味道变了？在不知不觉中，在一根根领带的变换中，在储蓄罐一次次的砸碎中，在高楼大厦一座座平地起中，心情时而欢喜，时而浪漫，时而忧伤，最后变得沉重，短短几分钟的影片，过完了人的一生。婚姻的忠诚、浪漫；生活的平淡、挫折在简单的爱中诠释尽。锋回路转，这不是影片的结束，而是真正的开始。
由小女孩变成的老婆婆先离开由小男孩变成的小老头，从此，老头儿在充满幸福回忆的小屋里孤单地等候老去。除了回忆还是回忆，除了思念还是思念。
当四周的现代建筑物即将吞噬掉这小屋时，老头儿捍卫的不只是这小屋，更是对妻子、对以往幸福生活的怀念。面对社会的强势，他选择了逃离，去追寻和妻子共同的梦想——仙境瀑布。刺激的旅程开始啦——
有了追求，人才会有精神。老态龙钟的糜糜老头在屋子由几千个气球飞起来的刹那变得精神抖擞，意气风发，充满了力量，一下子好像年轻了许多。
贯窜整个影片的意念是——执着。对梦想的执着追求，契而不舍，何时行动都不算晚。小女孩的梦想是去仙境瀑布探险，夫妻俩的一生都在为这个梦想做准备。一次次的现实挫折让他们的梦想一次次无限期的延后，最后只剩下老头儿了，他依旧没有放弃他们共同的探险梦想，老头儿带着角角落落都是幸福回忆的小屋一个人上路了。
小胖子小罗，也是一个执着的家伙，从他出场自我介绍就可以看出这执着劲堪比老头的固执。为了得到一个帮助老人的徽章他意外地被带上了飞屋，跟着老头一起探险。
孤独。老头儿很孤独，小罗也很孤独。老头儿是因为没了心爱的人而显得特别孤单；小罗是因为没有父母的陪伴而孤单，得到徽章只是为了能让爸爸陪伴一会儿。两个孤单的人一起互相陪伴，互相鼓励，互相补充，世界才显得圆满、充实。一老、一少、一狗坐在街边数汽车，这是电影的结束画面，也是人类渴望的和谐。
拖了这么久，终于把《飞屋环游记》看了，也终于给出了今年暑期档大片中第一个满分。激动啊！真是部又感人又有趣，娱乐性强又内容充实的大杰作，今年我的个人TOP·10终于有冠军了！内牛满面~内牛满面啊~
好了，擦干鼻涕眼泪哈喇子，我们切入正题。两遍，至少两遍，像这样在仅仅90多分钟里压缩了大量内容的经典，一遍是很难过瘾的。在这短短的90分钟里，高浓度地压缩了大量内容，全片几乎处处是亮点，既有感人的情感戏，又有搞笑的幽默戏，精致的动作戏，科幻成分（比如那些很“哆啦A梦”狗项圈），密林探险，娱乐元素样样不缺，而且每一样都如同被导演施了魔法，情感戏必定催泪，幽默戏必定搞笑，完全无一遗漏，每次必定命中红心，一击必杀。
而影片的内涵呢？让我们先来回顾一下皮克斯近年的作品。众所周知近年来皮克斯总会在动画中加进些深邃的东西，使得影片富有韵味，老少咸宜。这在《美食总动员》和《机器人总动员》中可谓达到了极致。《美食总动员》中，通过雷米对梦想的追求引发人们对“何为人？”这一定义的思考，甚至牵引出了“劳动造人”这一恩格斯理论（雷米为腾出双手做料理而直立行走）；《机器人总动员》通过让瓦力长时间劳动后获得人的感情这一情节，重申“劳动造人”这一观点的同时，对科幻经典《2001太空漫游》中的思想有了进一步的诠释，从《太空漫游》中猩猩抛向天空的骨头，人类开始制造机器，到《机器人总动员》中胖船长站起来反抗机器，两部作品完整地画了一个圈，将内涵升华到“人类进化”的史诗层面上。
这些内涵之深邃，使得这两部片子不论到何时都可以称的上是经典，但问题就是这些东西虽好，但实在太哲学，太艺术，高度高得有些远离生活了，换而言之，它们是“神”而不是“人”。在这一点上，《飞屋环游记》可以称得上是皮克斯的回归：影片的内容就像早年的《玩具总动员》一样贴近生活，没有深奥的哲学，没有复杂的理论，有的是一段段有趣又感人的故事中，通过阐述“勇敢追逐梦想”的主题，从而迸发出一种振奋人心的力量。而这样力量，正是在如今这个人们越来越不相信梦想的时代所需要的。从这一点上讲，《飞屋环游记》是一部更加接近“人”的影片，也比《美食》，《机器人》更具观赏性（注意这里单指观赏性，与品质无关）。
影片的出色，与导演彼特·道格特的才华是分不开的。影片的每一场戏，无论是温情还是搞笑，都恰到好处，多一分嫌长，少一分嫌短。剧情之流畅，拿捏之准确，导演功力可谓到了炉火纯青的境界。以“如彩虹般的气球将小屋拽上天”这一意象将“梦想”具象化的手法更是让人拍案叫绝。
当然还有出色的编剧。影片以老爷爷卡尔为主角，但故事却并未因此而显得暮气沉沉，相反，从被迫迁居到勇敢追梦，我们在卡尔身上看到了梦想的伟大力量和一种即使是年轻人也未见得拥有的朝气与活力，编剧聪明地运用了卡尔“年老体弱”这一特点，安排他下决心勇敢追梦后恢复活力，化弊为利地反过来衬托梦想的强大力量，用他的故事书写“梦想永不褪色”的传奇。而一老一少因“意外”结伴冒险，最后互相弥补了对方感情的缺失的故事，没有刻意的煽情，却在扎实叙事的过程中，逐步涌现出一种排山倒海的亲情力量，好一出动画版的《闻香识女人》！而两人片尾感人至深的一抱，便如同阿尔·帕西诺摇下车窗，说出“过来，儿子！”时一样伟大。
不仅如此，影片的每一个角色都可谓拥有灵魂，可爱逗趣的小胖小罗（这个中文译名不知谁译的，八成足球看多了），会说话的狗“豆豆”，大怪鸟“凯文”……没有一个不出彩的角色，就连“老伴艾莉”那几分钟的出场都很抢眼。尤其是小罗啊~那个“哆啦A梦”似的身材啊~一张堆满婴儿肥的胖脸上“小巧”的五官啊~还有搞笑的语言动作~我的妈妈咪呀！太可爱了~呜嘛~呜嘛~两边脸蛋子各亲一口，留下两个大口红印子~
影片的特效简直惊世骇俗，明明是动画片，却几乎和实拍看不出什么区别，再辅以3D效果，简直感觉深受就可以摸到飞屋。狗的毛发，小罗的脸蛋，“凯文”质感十足的羽毛，真的不敢相信这不是实拍的啊！！相比之下，《变形金刚2》那个被国人严重过誉，根本就是一坨坨铁块在那里滚的特效，简直应该找地方刨坑埋了！
影片也不是没有遗憾：作为卡尔偶像的理查德，同样是对梦想有所执着，和卡尔有许多共同的地方，“梦想的力量”这一主题在他身上也有所体现。而对他的处理，仍旧是简单粗暴地一死了之，而不是像《美食总动员》，《蜘蛛侠2》那样用梦想的力量去感化反派，令其从新审视自己的价值，从而完成对主题的第二次深化。就是因为如此，《飞屋环游记》仅以一步之遥，终究还是逊《美食总动员》一筹，不得不称之为遗憾。
当然，我这里有些吹毛求疵了，遗憾毕竟不是瑕疵，无法阻止我给它满分。对于这样一部经典，我相信今年很难再有比这更好的影片了。相信在明年的奥斯卡颁奖典礼上，我们会看到《飞屋环游记》满载而归的英姿。
『贰』 求一篇飞屋环游记的英文观后感和一本书的英文读后感
书的读后感
鲁宾逊漂流记：
Robinson Crusoe is a beautiful novel that was written by Daniel Defoe, it was first published in 1719. It was arguably the first novel to ever be published which is no suprise given the date! The book really is superbly written throughout and I found it a real pleasure to read. The novel is about 270 pages and contains an epilogue. Daniel Defoe is seen by many to be one of the most famous writers in English Literature and after reading this novel it is easy to see why; I would really recommend it.
The novel is actually a fiction autobiography about the man named Robinson Crusoe. He is a man who is the sole survivor of a shipwreck just off Venesuila and he encounters many things across his journey before actually being rescued. He is stranded on an island that is no way near any ships and the island is completely unihabited. Robinson Crusoe can't stand it at first but he then manages to make this horrible island into a paradise of his own. He was stranded on this island for 24 years with out any company but he then one day rescued a prisoner and things change. The novel is supposedly based on facts and so is a fictional novel.
I really found the plot line to be superb throughout the novel and I found it easy to follow. The novel is beautifully written and very well structured really adding to the excellence. If you like tropical island get away novels or films rather like "The lord of the flies" I would really recommend this novel. I hope this was useful and thank you very much for reading.
飞屋环游记的英文观后感
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for alts, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)
飞屋环游记的英文观后感2
In its opening stretch the new Pixar movie “Up” flies high, borne aloft by a sense of creative flight and a flawlessly realized love story. Its on-screen and unlikely escape artist is Carl Fredricksen, a widower and former balloon salesman with a square head and a round nose that looks ready for honking. Voiced with appreciable impatience by Ed Asner, Carl isn’t your typical American animated hero. He’s 78, for starters, and the years have taken their toll on his lugubrious body and spirit, both of which seem solidly tethered to the ground. Even the two corners of his mouth point straight down. It’s as if he were sagging into the earth.
More About This Movie
Overview
Tickets & Showtimes
New York Times Review
Cast, Credits & Awards
Readers' Reviews Trailers & Clips
View Clip...Buy From Amazon Skip to next paragraph
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Pixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures
Carl Fredericksen checking out some new neighbors in “Up.”
Multimedia
Interactive Feature
‘Up,’ Inside and Out
Related
Well-Rounded Boy, Meet Old Square (May 17, 2009)
Pixar’s Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy (April 6, 2009)
Enlarge This Image
Pixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures
Along for the ride is Russell, voiced by Jordan Nagai.
Eventually a bouquet of balloons sends Carl and his house soaring into the sky, where they go up, up and away and off to an adventure in South America with a portly child, some talking (and snarling and gourmet-cooking) dogs and an unexpected villain. Though the initial images of flight are wonderfully rendered — the house shudders and creaks and splinters and groans as it’s ripped from its foundation by the balloons — the movie remains bound by convention, despite even its modest 3-D depth. This has become the Pixar way. Passages of glorious imagination are invariably matched by stock characters and banal story choices, as each new movie becomes another manifestation of the movie-instry divide between art and the bottom line.
In “Up” that divide is evident between the early scenes, which tell Carl’s story with extraordinary tenderness and brilliant narrative economy, and the later scenes of him as a geriatric action hero. The movie opens with the young Carl enthusing over black-and-white newsreel images of his hero, a world-famous aviator and explorer, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer). Shortly thereafter, Carl meets Ellie, a plucky, would-be adventurer who, a few edits later, becomes his beloved wife, an alt relationship that the director Pete Docter brilliantly compresses into some four wordless minutes ring which the couple dream together, face crushing disappointment and grow happily old side by side. Like the opener of “Wall-E” and the critic’s Proustian reminiscence of childhood in “Ratatouille,” this is filmmaking at its purest.
The absence of words suggests that Mr. Docter and the co-director Bob Peterson, with whom he wrote the screenplay, are looking back to the silent era, as Andrew Stanton did with the Chaplinesque start to “Wall-E.” Even so, partly because “Up” includes a newsreel interlude, its marriage sequence also brings to mind the breakfast table in “Citizen Kane.” In this justly famous (talking) montage, Orson Welles shows the collapse of a marriage over a number of years through a series of images of Kane and his first wife seated across from each other at breakfast, another portrait of a marriage in miniature. As in their finest work, the Pixar filmmakers have created thrilling cinema simply by rifling through its history.
Those thrills begin to peter out after the boy, Russell (Jordan Nagai), inadvertently hitches a ride with Carl, forcing the old man to assume increasingly grandfatherly ties. But before that happens there are glories to savor, notably the scenes of Carl — having decided to head off on the kind of adventure Ellie and he always postponed — taking to the air. When the multihued balloons burst through the top of his wooden house it’s as if a thousand gloriously unfettered thoughts had bloomed above his similarly squared head. Especially lovely is the image of a little girl jumping in giddy delight as the house rises in front of her large picture window, the sunlight through the balloons daubing her room with bright color.
In time Carl and Russell, an irritant whose Botero proportions recall those of the human dirigibles in “Wall-E,” float to South America where they, the house and the movie come down to earth. Though Mr. Docter’s visual imagination shows no signs of strain here — the image of Carl stubbornly pulling his house, now tethered to his torso, could have come out of the illustrated Freud — the story grows progressively more formulaic. And cuter. Carl comes face to face with his childhood hero, Muntz, an eccentric with the dashing looks and frenetic energy of a younger Kirk Douglas. Muntz lives with a legion of talking dogs with which he has been hunting a rare bird whose gaudy plumage echoes the palette of Carl’s balloons.
The talking dogs are certainly a hoot, including the slobbering yellow furball Dug and a squeaky-voiced Doberman, Alpha (both Mr. Peterson), not to mention the dog in the kitchen and the one that pops open the Champagne. And there’s something to be said about the revelation that heroes might not be what you imagined, particularly in a children’s movie and particularly one released by Disney. (Muntz seems partly inspired by Charles Lindbergh at his most heroic and otherwise.) But much like Russell, the little boy with father problems, and much like Dug, the dog with master issues, the story starts to feel ingratiating enough to warrant a kick. O.K., O.K., not a kick, just some gently expressed regret.
飞屋环游记的英文观后感3
Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixar's cutting-edge output, the fact that the studio's 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldn't seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.
But what gives "Up" such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.
Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.
It's also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinema's past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of "It's a Wonderful Life" "The Wizard of Oz" and, more recently, "About Schmidt."
Boxoffice-wise, the sky's the limit for "Up."
Even with its PG rating (the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since "The Incredibles"), there really is no demographic that won't respond to its many charms.
The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the film's 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner).
Borrowing "WALL-E's" poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchino's plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.
Deciding it's better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included), determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
But he soon discovers there's a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai), and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.
Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter ("Monsters, Inc.") and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.
Between that Carl/Russell dynamic and Muntz's pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, "Up" ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably.
Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual "comin' at ya" razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.
There’s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar’s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.
It’s that good.
屋环游记的英文观后感4
The film - which was written by Bob Peterson (Finding Nemo, Ratatouille) and directed by Peter Docter (Monsters, Inc.) - delivers all the things we’ve come to expect from a Pixar animated feature: gorgeous visuals, a strong story rife with moral lessons and (gasp) good character development; humor both low-brow (for the kids) and high-brow (for the grownups), with strokes of bold wit and a dash of sagely wisdom for good measure.
And yet, UP also delivers something quite unexpected: Pixar’s most alt-oriented story yet, slyly disguised in a fantastic adventure tale.
UP tells the life story of Carl Fredricksen (the unmistakable voice of Ed Asner), a shy little boy who grows up in (1930s?) America, an era in which people pack into movie theaters to watch news reels about adventurous explorers like Charles Muntz, who travels the world on one epic quest after the next.
Young Carl Fredricksen idolizes Muntz: He spends his lonely days roaming his neighborhood pretending to be Muntz until one day he runs into Ellie, an energetic and fearless young girl (everything Carl is not) who idolizes Charles Muntz just as much as Carl does. Ellie and Carl cross their hearts then and there and swear to be great adventurers like Charles Muntz, and with that oath, theirs is a match made in heaven.
After that fateful first encounter, we get a truly beautiful montage of Carl and Ellie’s life-long romance. We see the young kids grow into a teenage couple; see them get married and buy a house, working day jobs (balloon vendor) while saving up for the kind of adventures they fantasized about as kids. We watch the couple deal with the ups and downs, joys and tragedies of life; and graally we watch them grow into old age, Ellie’s “My Adventures” scrapbook still unfilled, even as her time on Earth ends.
With Ellie gone, Carl becomes a disgruntled old man desperately trying to hold on to a house, heirlooms and a lost-love he cherishes. A physical confrontation with neighborhood developers leads to Carl being forced into a retirement home for the rest of his days - but before the old man will give in he decides to honor the oath he and Ellie swore as kids and take one last shot at adventure! Carl ties an impossible number of balloons to his house (working a balloon cart at the zoo was his job for many years), rigs a steering system and UP he goes!
『叁』 求一篇飞屋环游记的英文观后感，100字左右感激不尽。
There is love of people around,there is a dream to go to achieve,in fact,well-being has always been very simple.Becuse the love,Eille had their house flied with the many ballons to make their dream come true.Selfish,obstinate and mercilessly,but it changes when a boy's appearance.Eille feel the different love about take care of others and help others.Even though the house was missing,but the love exist forever.
『肆』 求英文动画片飞屋环游记的英文观后感。大概在60词左右。
There is love of people around, there is a dream to go to achieve, in fact, well-being has always been very simple.Becuse the love,Eille had their house flied with the many ballons to make their dream come true.Selfish,obstinate and mercilessly,but it changes when a boy's appearance.Eille feel the different love about take care of others and help others.Even though the house was missing,but the love exist forever.
『伍』 飞屋环游记 英文观后感 80 字翻译
I feel this is a very touching a cartoon! His wife is gone, he do more with cabin balloon to search for the slice of wonderland, has no intention of small and medium-sized Russell and he began the journey together. The hero Carl and ronaldinho have a moment of clinging to the heart. The last two people in trouble become good friends.
翻译：我感觉这是一部很感人的动画片！他妻子不在了，他弄好多气球带着小屋去寻找一片仙境，无意中小罗素和他一起开始了这段旅程。主人公卡尔和小罗都拥有着一刻执着的心。最后两人在患难之中成为了好朋友。
『陆』 求一篇《飞屋环游记》的英文观后感
Up is a slightly-left-of-center masterpiece. The emotional impact of the beautiful, wordless summation of Carl's life that opens the movie is the bass note that resonates through the whole film and is at least as affecting as the scene in Wall-E when he holds his own hands while watching Hello Dolly. The rest of the movie, of course, is breathtaking on just about every level, especially the tactile quality of all the characters and textures and the completely realized weather effects and action scenes. With no "new" technical milestones (fur in Monsters, Inc., water in Finding Nemo, realistic camera effects in Wall- E), the design is the main focus, from the hilariously stylized characters to the amazing setting of the tepui.
『柒』 飞屋环游记英文观后感
Flying is not the house is lonely
Used a vulgar phrase is used to describe the film characters.
Karl, Male, nail households living alone. Russell, M, Debating the Boy Scouts Youth. If we must in these two seemingly opposite to find a common ground between the two characters, then it is lonely.
Movie starts, Carl and Allie, met boys and girls, men and women of love, old man and old woman's dependence, a sense of Xiepikesi, in less than 10 minutes in length in the story of a warm without losing the extraordinary twists and turns story. Disney's routine use, it has to end, here are the subtitles of happy forever. Unfortunately this is Pixar, such as the fleeting years, God taking away the Carl's ribs, that were together for many years into memory. Carl and Allie The two are complementary, the former made less stiff, which is lively, colorful language, less Allie's harmonization, Karl all the more reticent indivial, eccentric character has become, if not an unexpected turn of events He would like the snail in his room slowly into the st of time.
Compared to Carl, a fight that and Tang Monk scarf and some even liked a little overweight children. But as the plot slowly started, the audience found that the glossy surface of the egg also has numerous splice below the scars left by the lack of fatherly desire to use all kinds of juvenile behavior to attract the attention of his father. Russell has been hanging in the chest of people felt a sad Medal of Honor, a row of heavy medals not for four points of beauty, not for the top ten outstanding, just to be able to see his father side.
Flying is the ancient ideal of the human. From the earliest of the birds flight feathers stains who expect the power to use firecrackers tied to the whim of the chair, to the Wright brothers that go down in history in 12 seconds. Flying the film is achieved through numerous balloons, which more or less, and also when the best ideas about our childhood, I believe many viewers see the balloon will be pulling up the moment the house knowing smile - "It kinds of things, I also fancied the ah. " Balloon will not only pull the house, they take with initiator Carl, hiding away under the eaves of Russell, out of the city's noise and the fetters of this world, into the dream of "Shangri-La." Sunlight through the colorful balloon shed the shadow of a dream, yet also seemed to weave magic scene. At this moment, whether for the realization of a dream to be extremely excited about Carl, or for grasping sand cone birds and the sky somehow be brought Russell, have gained a new life.
The other side of the cloud, where agreement
"Adventure is out there" throughout the whole movie. Charlie is a fantastic young Ersimanci their idol, and his motto has naturally become the motto of youth. That is it, leads Carl met Allie, leads two lives, to guide the flying house later adventures.
Everyone has had some lofty unrealistic ideals in the growth of these ideals in the real impact of graally fade, leaving only one last name, becoming synonymous with past regret. Go and live in Paradise Falls is a lifelong dream Carl couples, although many things have twists and turns, the time to go to Paradise Falls dragged valuable is that they never gave up the dream, even in the Ailey died Hou Kaer still untold and dangers in the post-arrival. "Flying Pixar" no Hollywood scene in the courage to save the world, not the main theme of the film made the image of higher grade, and no Korean in points and dragging points and the love tear gas, just like the same music on earth, cloud fine, light, exceptionally charming and fresh. Video is able to attract because it is beyond the general impression of the animation, not only do comedy for children, but alts can also appreciate and understand the fairy tale, nothing more than a firm conviction and unshakable commitment better move, in concrete under the repression of human nature seems numb.
Nirvana
Drawing attention to a finishing touch, the latter part of the film is the crowning touch to the series of tragedies. If Karl simply flew to heaven falls settled side, the movie can at best be quite creative, and not worthy of a place sublimation.
Kevin is a virgin forest of rare birds, because I like chocolate and and the odd old man, fat composition of the juvenile adventure team. And has lived in heaven is near the waterfall to catch Kevin Charles Ersimanci at all costs, in worship before him transformed as the big villain Carl. Mantz to fly in the burning house, the Carl Kevin chose to give up thoughts of the house to protect rally late wife. Own mysterious providence, paradise falls in lvl, Carl look at his dead wife left their adventure album, his surprise found Ellie in this adventure log covered with their happy marriage live photos, and some last words, "Thank you to bring my best life, now on your own journey right, love you Ellie." Looking back, though Carl and Allie has inspired dreams of their life, but life has graally become a burden to the burden Carl even gave up some of the good should enjoy Moreover, youth, adventure wish this would include with a trace of "Invincible Medic, brave fearless" means, as if the general insight, Carl no longer limited to the ideal year-round, set off the airship rescue Kevin Manz and Russell. Some el, the loss of buoyancy of the housing slowly fly into the clouds did not disappear. Although with a touch of nostalgia, but still, and Russell Carr said: "you know, it just a house" Remembrance into, but was already casting haze of confusion. More or less, and Karl has achieved the promise of the year, the following is the start of their own life.
Carl lost the old house has been flying airships, small Russell won the father and the feelings of friends, the house should fly the crash miraculously landed in a paradise waterfall. This is a play characters Nirvana, is also Pixar-style happy ending.
Outside the plot
Pixar 3D animation in the course of many years of accumulated rich technical background, in the "flying Pixar" in both dim light particle of effect, or many dynamic relationship between the balloon and the rain against the windows physical calculations, including animal hair of realism, they both looked beautiful. The audience while enjoying the plot obtained visual enjoyment.
『捌』 飞屋环游记英文影评
UP
Up is another must-see animated film from Pixar Animation Studios. It's about a cranky old man and an overeager Scout who fly to South America in a floating house suspended from helium balloons. Up is director Pete Docter's (Monsters, Inc.) second feature-length film, and features the voices of Edward Asner, Christopher Plummer, Bob Peterson and Jordan Nagai. It is the first Pixar film to be presented in Disney Digital 3-D.
Up is definitely one of the better Pixar efforts. It's about the grandeur and excitement of flight and adventure. The first ten minutes of the film about Carl Fredricksen and his life-long love Ellie are surprisingly touching. It's heartbreaking to see him lose his wife even at old age. With nothing left to do Fredricksen heads for South America, but he's not alone. Russell, a Wilderness Explorer trying to earn his "Assisting the Elderly" badge, has stowed away on the porch after being sent on a snipe hunt by Carl the day before. The relationship of father and son that forms between Fredricksen and Russell is completely believable. The filmmakers certainly know how to make a film with endearing characters. The animation is gorgeous. Several scenes in Up are some of the most memorable that I've ever seen in animated films. Like other Pixar films Up is also very funny. Thankfully, it's sweet humour instead of the gross humour that's present in many of today's Hollywood films. In conclusion, Up is another daring, unusual and beautiful animated film from Pixar that both children and alts will enjoy watching. I highly recommend it.
-----------------------------------------------
IMDB上观众的影评，可以根据自己的需要改一下
『玖』 飞屋环游记的英语观后感、不少于200字
飞屋环游记的英文观后感
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for alts, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)