谎言之地电影的结局

⑴ 电影 《活埋》 结尾 疑问

看了这部片子两遍，感觉意义很深刻。我同意楼主的第一个想法：美国政府并没有真正的去解救男主角。理由如下：
一、电影细节中有这样的片段，当男主角不停的向美国政府求救时，美方故作镇定、煞有介事的询问了一些问题，但是都未有什么实质上的举动；当听到劫匪所要男主角的现时录像时，美国政府方面的声音才是真正的介意的声音，因担心一旦这样的视频传播出去，对美国政府将在国际事务关系上造成十分不利的影响。故在那之前的谈话营救应属虚造。
二、伊拉克的绑架者的动机并不是金钱，其处于自身的民族情结，向作为美国公民的男主角索取的是他在棺材的现状视频，意义就在于发泄民族仇恨和向世界公开本民族的报复，此伊拉克公民已将仇恨不局限于美国士兵军官，而是扩展到了全体的美国公民。所以，即使最后此人拿到“赎金”、得到视频，他也不会将男主角放过。以此可解释为何最后男主角发了视频却未得到伊方消息的情节。
三、电影最后，棺材里面不停的加速漏沙，同时，美国政府方面在电话中说正在挖掘，并且电话中传出挖沙声，男主角的希望再一次被点燃。然而，当男主角完全被沙掩埋、窒息无法应答时，电话对面的嘈杂声戛然而止，最后一句是美国政府方面清晰的一句：I'm sorry.Paul.I' so sorry.毫无先前的喘息声，沉着冷静，一听就是从办公室那样的安静舒适环境里发出的，所以营救的声音也是伪造的，并没有救援队过来营救男主角这样的“平民”。
四、男主角先前打的各通电话都是从不同职业、不停人群的角度表现人世之冷漠，到了美国政府驻伊人质营救小组这通电话时，对方的严肃认真态度着实让我们松了口气，感觉到男主角真的能够逃出苦海回到家乡。但是细想一下，这部电影是要彰显美国政府的伟大吗？为何美国领事馆都不会沾手一丝半点的事情，这个解救小组却突然间来了个大转弯呢？其实，解救小组的负责人只不过是在用他常用的方式来欺骗这个可怜的、已无生还希望的男主角，因为这种事情他已见多不怪了，起初说Mark没死是为给这个可怜的人希望，不让他做出听从于绑匪的行为而伤害美国利益，最后“营救”时说是Mark，救错了，也只不过是给男主角一点心理安慰：不只是他一个美国公民死于这样的非命。
五、绑匪其实自己心知肚明，男主角拿不到钱，也得不到美国方面的帮助，因为先前的Mark已经足够证明。他想要的就是那段视频，之前的那些要求和恐吓都是在给男主角施加心理压力，从而能够完全听命于绑匪的要求。
六、电影的主题应为表现美伊战争后的双方百姓的生活变化与影响。伊方的政治混乱及战后萧条，给电影中那位伊拉克人的所为提供了依据。而男主角是一个处处以自己利益为中心（影片中，可从美国领事馆、CRT公司领导、各路接线员的态度上看出：事不关己，高高挂起；推脱推卸责任）的国家的公民，用他的悲剧来最好的诠释这一主题思想再好不过。然而，直至最后美国政府都在进行着自己的谎言，骗人以希望，但最终选择的仍是残酷地、完全出自自身利益不顾及人道主义的解决方式，这恰好影射了美伊战争中，美国冠冕堂皇的各种发动战争的借口：不论话说得怎样、理由找的又如何，做得事情终究是残忍的。
整部电影，通过一部手机、几段谈话，反映出了一个国家、一个民族、甚至整个现实社会的影像，男主角最后由希望之巅猛跌到失望之谷，全然不知自己被玩弄欺骗，着实是个绝妙的讽刺！

⑵ 关于美国电影《谎言之下（WHAT LIES BENEATH）》剧情的问题！

Claire Spencer (Michelle Pfeiffer) enters a new phase of her life after a serious car accident leaves gaps in her memory. She is married to the renowned scientist Dr. Norman Spencer (Harrison Ford). Shortly after arriving in a new lakeside house in Vermont that once belonged to Norman's scientist father, her daughter Caitlin leaves home to go away to college. One day when Claire is working in the garden she hears loud sobbing coming from over the fence. It turns out to be her neighbor, Mary Feur (Miranda Otto). She seems terrified and Claire is very concerned, thinking that her husband is beating her. Norman tells her not to worry. Claire wakes in the middle of the night, and looks out of the window. She sees Mary's husband Warren (James Remar) dragging what looks like a body bag out into the boot of his car. By the time Claire had woken Norman, there was nothing left to see.

The next day, Claire decides to investigate by taking a basket of flowers and wine to the house as a "Welcome Gift". After nobody answers the door she walks round the side of the house and makes a startling discovery; a woman's sandal with a dark stain on it... She collects the sandal, and returns to the front door to leave the basket there. Warren returns as she is leaving the basket, and Claire explains why she was there and asks where Mary is. Warren gives a vague answer which leaves Claire even more worried.

Mysterious events begin to happen in Claire's house when Norman is not there - a picture falling off the window sill, doors opening and closing themselves and the computer screen typing 'MEF MEF MEF' (Mary E Feur).Throughout the film a framed news paper clipping of Claire and Norman at a awards ceremony keeps mysteriously falling off tables and the glass breaks. At one point, Claire is running a bath and as she looks into the water she sees a second reflection over her shoulder. Claire then believes that Mary is dead, and is now haunting her.This prompts her to visit her husband at work in his lab. She chats to one of the scientists who explains the drug halothane which they are using in the lab. It paralyzes but leaves the victim completely conscious. Norman, of course, thinks that Claire is feeling a bit empty since Caitlin is at university and this is just an excuse to grab attention. Desperate for closure, Claire invites her best friend Jody to join her for a séance in her bathroom where she had seen the reflection of Mary. Claire proces the sandal she had earlier taken from Mary's house, and places it on the table. The Ouija board does not move, but a candle starts to flicker, then goes out. The dial on the Ouija board then starts to move slowly from M to F. Nothing else happens, so Claire and Jody break the Ouija circle and Claire puts the Ouija board in a cupboard downstairs under some sweaters, and asks Jody not to tell Norman about the séance which Jody tifully does not.

Claire returns to Norman's workplace, where she informs Norman of what she and Jody had done. Norman tells her that she is going crazy, and decides to take her home. As they are crossing a bridge, they meet Warren, and Claire starts accusing him of killing Mary. When Warren looks confused, a lady comes over and asks him what the problem is. It turns out to be Mary Feur, leaving Norman and Claire very embarrassed.

When Claire is once again downstairs in the dark, the picture falls off the windowsill again, and Claire removes the newspaper cutting from the broken frame. She notices the back of the cutting, where a missing person's report is. Half way down the report, a name is mentioned - Madison Elizabeth... The end is cut off as it was only a cutting from the newspaper. Claire searches the missing persons records for Madison Elizabeth F. There her name was - Madison Elizabeth Frank, MEF. She looks at the picture on the record, and it looked like the reflection that Claire had previously seen in the bath. As Madison had been a student at the University where Norman had been a lecturer, Claire decides to investigate by visiting Madison's mother. It turned out that Madison had never been found. Claire finds a lock of hair in Madison's room, and takes it, and also sees a photo proving that a strangely shaped key she had found at home was Madison's.

Claire returns home to Norman, and behaves to him as if she were Madison trying to sece him. She then looks into the mirror and sees herself drenched, standing in the doorway. She realizes she can see herself before the car accident, when she had caught Norman with one of his students. She is distraught and goes to stay with Jody who tells her that she had seen Norman with a young woman in a bar in the local arty town of Adamant just before the accident, but then decided it would be better not to tell Claire. After an unhappy phone call, Claire decides to go home. She finds Norman in the bathtube, apparently electrocuted, but he turns out to be alright. As he denies ever having been in Adamant, she visits the town and guesses the key unlocks a jewelery box she sees in a shop window. Diving into the lake by her house she finds the box. As she steps back into the house, Norman sees her. he notices the box and has to tell her everything.

He explains that he slipped, just once. He began a relationship with Madison and soon after realized his mistake: he loves Claire much more. But Madison was unstable and she threatened Norman that she would tell Claire, or worse, kill her. One day soon after the accident Norman came home to find her dead of an overdose of pills and a letter to Claire explaining everything. He put everything into her car and pushed it into the lake, burning the letter. He wanted to save his marriage, and his career. He and Claire then agree he should call the police and close the case. Norman makes a call from the house phone and goes off for a shower. Suspicious, Claire checks through the phone and the last called number is not the police. At that moment Norman presses a cloth containing halothane into her face and she is paralyzed. He places her into the running bath, for her to drown, unable to move, but completely conscious while she is paralyzed. He gives Jody a call, explaining that he would be sleeping at the lab overnight, so could she check on Claire in the morning? He leans over her to give her one final kiss, and notices a chain around her neck. He spins it around, and his face goes pale as he recognizes the pendant around her neck. A paranormal ghost jumps, making Norman scream and fall back into the mirror behind him. He collapses slowly on the floor, grasping at the bath on the way down. Claire pulls the plug out of the plughole with her foot, as the drugs are wearing off.

As she pulls herself up to the edge of the bath, Norman had vanished. Claire starts to crawl down the stairs, but there is still no one there, just blood marks all over everything. She picks up the phone, but it had been disconnected. The drug had almost all worn off by now. Claire starts walking towards the front door, picking up the keys to the truck on the way. She walks past Norman's body on the floor. As she gets in the truck, Norman starts running towards the door. Claire starts driving, but Norman manages to grab onto the edge of the truck. Claire needs to get to the middle of the bridge to get a signal on her mobile phone. As she reaches the middle of the bridge, he jumps into the front of the truck, and grabs the wheel. The truck veers into the lake. Claire can see the car where Madison's body is lying. Norman grabs Claire's leg so that she cannot escape, but the paranormal figure grabs Norman, dragging him to the bottom of the lake, and making him let go of her leg so she can float to the top and be safe.

In the Near Future: It is Winter and Claire is seen placing a single red rose on the grave of Madison Elizabeth Frank, but not the grave of Norman.

⑶ 《谎言侦探》全结局是什么

结局内容：绍清杀了何晓磊，因为三年前何晓磊4人在戚红梅唱歌比赛那天晚上，撞了绍清恋人的车（绍清是同性恋），并叫王广兴来顶罪（因何晓磊没有驾照，但会开车），之后因为发现绍清恋人吸毒，于是便把把死因归到她自己身上，但绍清仍然觉得是何晓磊的责任。绍清杀了何晓磊以后，改头换面，再别的地方重新开始生活了。

游戏评价：

作为AVG游戏，首先这个游戏的玩法是有创新的，它由两大部分组成：一是作为一个中间人（喵）通过类似微信的工具同游戏中多达910个主要角色聊天推进故事；二是阅读主人公的报告和日志，本游戏有两条主线，对应两位主人公，他们会随着聊天的进行更新文章来交代故事的进展，通过阅读文章找出其中的关键词，再利用关键词继续询问相关人员获得信息。

游戏将两大部分有机结合往复更替推进流程，游戏内文章篇章众多篇幅也不小，使玩家仿佛在阅读一本互动长篇悬疑小说，忽略两位主人公不管何时何地都会更新报告给玩家看的不合理性，

游戏在完全没有剧情推进选择权的情况下通过使用这样的游戏方式成功的提高了玩家的代入感和参与度，游戏的UI设计中规中矩但人设很不错，9个主要角色的人设插图和性格相得益彰使人物形象生动活泼。

⑷ 美剧《大小谎言》的结局到底说明了什么

砸了丈夫的所有玩具和收藏品之后，雷娜塔还欠多少钱？

《大小谎言》的大结局还有什么地方是你没看懂的吗？

⑸ 谎言的结局是什么

谎言，是为了达到某种目的，隐瞒事实真相，获取某种利益而说的话。
其不同点是：
1、释义不同。
善意的谎言往往是为了别人的利益，目的是取得一个好的效果；例如：亲人患了不治之症，为了减轻他的精神压力编造谎言。
真实的谎言一般是为了自己的利益，故意隐瞒真相，以达到混淆视听，混水摸鱼的目的。例如：有的同学逃学，编造谎言欺骗家人或老师。
2、心理不同。
善意的谎言是在不得已心理状况下被动的编造的，没有精神压力，不用担心被戳穿的后果。
真实的谎言是在一种心虚的心理状况下主动地完成的，有很强的精神压力，非常担心被戳穿的后果。
3、表现不同。
善意的谎言在说出口的时候起定神闲，神态自若；
真实的谎言在编造时显得苍白、慌乱。
4、后果不同。
善意的谎言被戳穿后也可以被人理解，甚至增加好感；
真实的谎言被戳穿后不但不能得到人们的理解，反而会增加对编造者的憎恨和厌恶

不会碍于诚信

⑹ 美国影片《谎言背后》到底结局是什么

结局是男主角被鬼魂拖下了湖底 女主角游了上来 得救了 这就是恶有恶报

记得采纳啊

⑺ 电影《不忠诱罪》的结局

看完《不忠诱罪》（又名《出轨》），不禁在想一个问题：心灵的背叛真的大于肉体的背叛吗？？肉体的背叛可以接受吗？？
男主人公爱德华一家的结局，恐怕每个看完的人都会在心理上都是沉痛本来的一家三口，丈夫朴实，孩子天真可爱，一家人其乐融融，而一切，都因为女主人公的出轨，成为了天外云烟。没了，一切都没了…… 她在心灵上背叛了吗？没有，她爱着自己的男人，爱着自己的孩子，爱着他们的家，可是……却一而再，再而三的和另外一个男人鬼混，而且还“不知廉耻”的将一个骗局继续下去，仅仅是为了满足肉体上的一时之乐！ ?!
什么是爱？爱是一种责任，不是嘴上说说，更不是曾经的山盟海誓，是要用实际行动去表示的！又联想到现在的女孩子：往往只限于男朋友的能说会道，所有不负责任的表现都被美丽的谎言堂而皇之所掩盖，在我接手（或者接触）的离婚案子中，短婚期的离婚率越来越来高，在诉状中的理由，都是“了解不够”（当然包括一点法律的因素在里面，具体看《婚姻法》）。我在这里也不是说在恋爱中不能浪漫，我承认我不是一个浪漫的人，而且现在还是单身，我只想向朋友们提一下：恋爱是美好的，但是，恋爱在某中意义上也是危险的游戏。在体验浪漫的时候，一定要保留一点理智。 最后，男女主人公在”激烈的“交锋”中，男主人公吼到“我尽心尽力地付出……，为了这个家，你又做了什么？你像是毫无要紧地将它丢弃一旁，为什么？为了这该死的家伙……以为我太了解你了……康妮，我了解你，却也该死的恨你，我不想杀他，我想杀的是你！”看着男主人公的泪水，我的心里也在流泪，谁说“男子有泪不轻弹“？”只是未到伤心时呀，爱情的神圣在哪里？这还是爱吗？

⑻ 电影不忠诱罪的结局是什么

因为他们停车的路口是警察局，是个开放式结局。

爱德华（李察·基尔）和康妮（戴安·莱恩）结婚11年、孩子9岁，依旧保持了相爱、默契、温馨的关系，可谓模范夫妻、幸福婚姻。一次龙卷风中的偶遇，使康妮受到了来自年轻书商的性诱惑，几番思想斗争之后，终于放纵了情欲。

爱德华了解书商和自己妻子偷情的始末。最后，他崩溃了，错乱之中，举起水晶球砸向书商。警察两次去家中调查，爱德华和康妮默契配合。最后，爱德华去警察局自首。车在警察局门口停下，康妮再次阻拦，两人拥抱，影片结束。

电影赏析：

从故事层面看，这个电影的主题很简明：不忠很可怕，后果很严重。这样的主题难免太过主流、太过概念化。幸亏故事的情节安排用了心，叙述节奏掌握得好，演员的表演也很有层次感，加上男主角帅、女主角美，使得电影还有不少可看之处。

在爱德华和康妮关于是否去自首的理由争论中，说来说去都是他们的婚姻、家庭、孩子，竟然没有一句关乎到书商生命价值的话。似乎，书商就是个该死的道德祭物。这倒是合了某些中国人对于“第三者”的道德义愤。只不过，这里的“第三者”是男性而不是女性。