⑴ 求一篇200字电影《后天》的观后感
今天，妈妈带我去看了一部很好看的电影，名字叫做“后天(Thedayaftertomorrow)”，“后天”是部灾难片。
第一个出现灾难的是日本的东京。有一天，有一个叔叔他下班去喝酒，他喝了一会儿就下冰雹了。他家人给他打电话，话还没说完，他就被冰雹打死了。世界各地还有很多类似的灾难，我还要给大家说的是：美国纽约出现了水灾，是最严重的国家。有些人被饿死了，有些人被冷死了。因此，我们就应该保护小草，小树，不能伤害他们。
⑵ 电影名将之后观后感的主要内容748568
动作电影《名将之后》是由杨勇导演，视频内详等明星主演的一部国产电影。
村里小胖遭同是留守儿童的石磊欺负，小胖朋友毛蛋相传岳飞的后人，出头复仇未果反被羞辱，为争一口英雄气节，毛蛋，小胖王福三人篝火结拜，私密铸枪，后大事未成，伙伴以及对手都被父母接到城市，离开自己玩闹的家乡
⑶ 奥斯卡电影 《后裔》 英语观后感、急求!!!!!
The Descendants was a pleasant surprise. As a series of character studies, the cast rises above what could have been a fairly pedestrian tale of loss and discovery (in other words, the movie that you expect to see after viewing the trailer). George Clooney plays a fellow (Matt King) trying his best to be a nice guy in the face of conflict. His portrayal as a man trapped between doing the right thing and the thing he wants to do is the central theme of the movie played out against the backdrops of business, family and death.
The supporting cast was excellent as a collection of family and friends caught in much of the same dilemma as Matt, but coming to terms with it in far different ways. Special mention to the ever interesting Robert Forster and Beau Bridges (and those decadent eyebrows).
A special word about the King family. The trailer would leave us to believe that the two children are spoiled rotten offspring. In fact, they love their father and rally to his support when needed. Even the elder daughter's stoner boyfriend ends up as an important aspect of Matt's trip to resolve his "dilemma".
Finally, a word about George Clooney's award-nominated performance. Mr. Clooney is that odd kind of actor that everyone knows gives good performances, but that is probably discounted because he is a bit too cute. Perhaps that is why we're so comfortable with him blowing things up and being a tongue-in-cheek tough guy in the movies. In this film, he showed the torment and conflict of his character clearly and simply, without flourish and flash and the result was satisfying in the extreme.
⑷ 看完英文电影之后的观后感
获70年代奥斯卡奖的<飞跃疯人院>，我去年看的，很好。我也写了篇观后感。《飞跃疯人院》：越黑暗的地方也越靠近光明 几十年前的电影，自己现在才知道，真的该嘲笑一下自己。可是看完了这部电影，我却怎么也笑不出来了,真的很压抑。这部电影很深刻，有机会还是要再看看的，真的还想再看一遍。
故事的大部分情节是在疯人院这个狭小阴暗的地方展开的，里面有各式各样的人，像是一个社会的缩影，折射出当时的世态炎凉。我们看了是心痛的，我很同情那些“病人”，在我看来，他们真实，富有人情味，他们向往自由，却处处受到牵制。他们并不是不正常，只是心里总有一道跨越不过的坎。而片中的权威者——瑞秋护士，是伪善的，面对处于弱势的他们，她总是一副冷峻的表情，她总以他们心里最薄弱的东西来吓唬，威胁他们，以此来巩固自己的绝对权威。让我觉得那些所谓“疯子”的灵魂比她的更加高尚。
主人公麦克墨菲是一直在追求自由的，他为了不进警局而假装精神病患者，他以为那里是自由的。可是事与愿违，疯人院里的一切都由不得自己做主，吃药，治疗，睡觉......里面有着严格的规章制度。影片的前部分还是很多彩的，麦克墨菲使得疯人院里的病人重新获得了活力，应该说是麦克墨菲唤醒了他们内心一直被压抑的人性和欲望。他们知道要反抗，知道要让瑞秋护士修改那一成不变的制度，他们会对着并没有开的电视狂欢，他们会逃出去出海钓鱼，当他们抱着自己钓的大鱼回来的时候，真的很为他们高兴，他们会一起打牌，打球，还会和墨菲打赌，虽然每次都会输......
片中的几位主人公演的都很出色，看不出任何造作。看完这部影片，酋长在我心中的形象是高大的，正如他高大的身躯。他因为受到他父亲的影响，他觉得只有不说话才可以活下去，所以他一直装聋装哑，疯人院里没有人知道。可是他却告诉了麦克墨菲，并决定和墨菲一起逃出去。那一晚，墨菲和他本可以逃出去的，可是他们喝醉了，看到这里，真的为他们可惜，多么好的机会啊，就这么错过了。比利是个不可缺少的角色，当他末尾从房间急急忙忙出来后，他敢和瑞秋护士大胆交谈了，我们很兴奋，他居然不结巴了，可是当瑞秋护士再一次提起他的母亲的时候，可怜的比利又变得结巴了，他恳求她不要告诉他母亲，可是她依旧是那副冷酷无情的嘴脸。比利自杀了，血流了满地......我不懂，医院本是救人的地方，可是在那个疯人院，进去了就再也出不来了，医生和护士对待病人真的很残酷。他们完全不顾病人的感受，尽管马提尼在被拖去电击前，叫了好多个“No”,可是结果是不变的。马提尼，比利，甚至是聪明的麦克墨菲，墨菲最终被做了脑部手术，变成了完完全全的白痴，没有记忆，也没有感情。这让我不禁怀念刚开始那个有着许多点子，并为疯人院带去希望的墨菲。最后酋长做出了一个惊人的举动，墨菲死了，酋长是带着墨菲的灵魂走的吧！他砸碎了窗户，逃出了那个黑暗的地方，大步奔向了光明。其他病人也都惊醒了，他们大概懂得了一些什么......
看完后觉得社会真黑暗，可是在自由和性命之间，我们还是会选择性命，就好比是社会适应我们还是我们适应社会一样，我选择后者。对未来，对社会，我们还是要充满希望的，因为毕竟还有个酋长。 真的很好的一部电影，大家可以看一看。
⑸ 电影《后天》的观后感
片名《The Day After Tomorrow》无疑是个警示：温室效应将导致地球灾难，环保问题需政府重视，人民自觉。2004年的老电影，教育意义不用赘述，世界早已关注并执行。今天推荐这部电影，纯粹是为它强烈的视觉美感所震撼，让我一度忘记高科技的效用。其空前的想象力和磅礴气势，迄今无人超越。它是后继者朝拜跟模仿的经典。《The Day After Tomorrow》，绝对是灾难片的巅峰之作。
故事伊始在南极洲拉森冰川，一望无际的冰面，远处尽头的霞光。几个黑点是勘测队所在地。半分钟内横生变故。队员站立的地面蓦地下陷，深渊深不可测。镜头拉远，茫茫的冰川一分为二。尽头，仍然是一无所知的霞光。
与此同时，印度新德里开始飘雪；苏格兰平原下陷，都是很好玩的创意。东京，却开始下冰雹。拳头大小的冰雹，突如其来地砸在车窗、屋顶上。重重的、圆圆的，火花跟晶莹没有丝毫的烂漫气息，因为行人逃避不及，死于灾难。
最类似的天灾电影有1997年的《龙卷风》和1996年的《天崩地裂》。在描述群众夺路而逃的前半个小时是灾难片的重头戏，某些大胆想象如果成功即是传世经典。譬如《龙卷风》，就有女主角开车过程中，一只奶牛被龙卷风席卷上天，然后对准镜头直飞过来。在《The Day After Tomorrow》里，选景在纽约。十个路口塞车，象征环保问题迫在眉睫。毫不知情的男主角下车，发现天空颜色阴暗，数以万计的鸟仓惶逃散；圈养的动物惊恐不安，灾难前夕的恐怖预兆酝酿十分精彩。
影片进行到25分钟，出现了第一个龙卷风。太酷了！我们见过太多成型的龙卷风，却从没见识它的形成过程。城市上空压得低低的云层，好像拥有极大的魔力，如吸尘机一样将地表灰尘向上牵引。霎时，浅色的尘粒连接天地，由散乱变得有序，逐渐成型。时尚顶级城市纽约，矗立成排高楼的背面，是成群结队的龙卷风。灾难效果简单到不可思议，反正街上车多，那么就直接将汽车卷上去摔下来。特别之处是快，摔得快，冲击力狠。
影片第30分钟，人们还未在骤变中醒觉，我们迎来了该片的传世经典：一名男子缓缓推开隔壁的门，发现自己站在悬崖边缘，大楼的另一边不见踪影。对面的大楼全是断壁残垣，而更大的龙卷风正在形成。音乐徐徐响起，空灵的女声缥缈、遥远，透着死寂。
影片第40分钟，飞行勘测队查看地形。因天气骤冷冻坏油管而坠机。一名雪地生还的机师推开机窗，正要庆贺生的喜悦，3秒内雪迹爬上他的脸，嘴还张着，人就冻死了。
电影海报是被雪地掩埋的自由女神像。虽然我更喜欢断壁残垣的那幅景象，但是理解政治意义的高度。尽管灾难遍及全球，自由女神像并没有遭到损坏，这大概也是影片的善意。她在影片出现过两次，都带来炫惑的美丽和震撼。一次是海啸，翻腾的海浪以魔鬼般的狰狞呼啸过来，她坚强而孤独地站立原地，头顶一道闪电，夺目惊心。这是一场神与魔的较量，但是信念已逐渐崩塌。另一次已接近电影的尾声，就是海报那幅。男主角他爹从帐篷出来，发现晶莹一片，女神像安静地半埋于地，手上的火炬仍不失尊严的高举，肃穆地哀悼，更多的是希冀。
诚然影片在故事脉络方面稍显单薄，结构上灾难情境较短，抗灾的篇幅过长。而抗灾两条线未免太容易：受灾群众只要在屋内躲避即可；救世英雄是南极勘测队员，只需走到纽约救儿子就成了。结尾当然粗糙，因为很多父亲都不是专业探险的，他们同样在屋顶得到直升机的救援。年轻的男主角Jake Gyllenhaal出演过《断背山》和《十二宫杀手》，在这里还稍显稚嫩。但是瑕不掩瑜，对于喜爱灾难电影的同好，《The Day After Tomorrow》是必修课。
⑹ 看电影后的观后感写一篇作文
今天下午我们小记者班的同学一起观看《功夫熊猫》。
这部电影的主人公是一只普普通通的熊猫。主要演义着这只熊猫通过自己的信心，浣熊师傅的信任，勤劳、刻苦的练习功夫，遇到困难不轻易放弃，最终练出一身好功夫打败了太郎。影片赞扬了这只熊猫相信自我，不轻易放弃，勤劳刻苦的奋斗精神。
在这部影片中给我印象最深的画面还是浣熊师傅在厨房发现熊猫只要有了食物，就会实现它原本不可能实现的事。浣熊师傅就利用食物了引导它学功夫。这一画面，给我的印象特别深。我深深的体会到浣熊师傅的用心良苦。师傅它以引食学功夫的方法来刺激熊猫学功夫的兴趣，熊猫也知道这是激起它学功夫的兴趣，但它没有放弃，而是更加勤奋和刻苦的坚持学下去。熊猫的这种不屈不挠的奋斗精神永远留在我的心中。同时我也从熊猫这种精神中想到自己的亲身经历的一件事。
那是一年寒假，妈妈认为我写日记方面很欠缺，便让我每天写一篇日记。我听后十分不情愿，每次三言两语就没了下文，最后彻底放弃了写日记，现在想起来都有些惭愧，与功夫熊猫中的主人公不能相比。
通过观看功夫熊猫，我明白了这些道理，世上没有不可能的事，凡事都要相信自己，遇到困难不要轻易放弃机会，在以后的学习上，时时牢记《功夫熊猫》这部电影，以影片中的主人公为榜样，认认真真的走好每一步，争取成为一名对社会有用的人。
⑺ 观后感：Ever After（是英语就太感谢啦～！）
1
Danielle De Barbarac (Drew Barrymore) lives alone with her father and their servants after the death of her mother, until one day her father brings home a new bride, the Baroness Rodmilla De Ghent (Anjelica Huston) and her two daughters, Marguerite and Jacqueline. When Danielle's father dies, the Baroness turns Danielle into a servant to wait on her and her spoiled daughters.
Danielle accidently meets young Prince Henry (Dougray Scott) when the Prince pilfers a horse from their manor in order to escape his parents restrictions. For her silence, he gives her coins, which she uses to pose as a courtier to buy back their old servant the Baroness sold to pay her taxes.
She meets Prince Henry again, but this time posed as a Lady, and Henry finds himself enchanted not simply by her beauty but by her intelligence and spirit. He becomes determined to know more about her, but first must find her for she keeps slipping away from him. In the meantime, Marguerite has set her sights on the handsome prince, with the help of her mother and a michevious courtier.
I won't give away any more of the movie, but absolutely must mention that there is a great deal of humor in this unique telling of the Cinderella story (take special note of the wedding chapel scene with the Spanish Princess). The acting is supurb and the script very tight and well written, the costumes are stunning, the scenery is breathtaking, and the photography brilliant.
Overall, this is a wonderful movie that softened even my cold, hard heart, allowing it to pump warm blood if only for the length of the movie. This is a love story without sappiness, a handsome hero with faults of his own, and a beautiful heroine who knows how to save herself. Enjoy!
2
This is a wonderful movie. The premise may be cliché, but this is much, much more than just another "Cinderella" movie. Its effects are really quite magical--it will make you laugh, it will make you cry, and it will totally immerse you in its spell. If you are human, it will proce a lump in your throat that will remain there for hours. Some people might call this a "woman's" movie, but I, as a man, will proclaim that it really touches my heart every time I watch it, and I freely admit that it does bring tears to my eyes. I need not go into detail describing the plot--it is a somewhat modernized Cinderella story, replete with the evil stepmother, charming prince, and angelic, mistreated heroine. Instead of a fairy godmother, there is Leonardo da Vinci--an unexpected but brilliant scripting decision, I feel. There are no magic pumpkins turning into horses and carriages, but there is magic; it is the magic of true love.
The entire cast is superb, particularly Anjelica Huston as the evil stepmother, but all of them are overshadowed by Drew Barrymore. Anyone who does not feel that Drew Barrymore is one of the greatest actresses of this and any other generation has obviously not seen this movie. I love all of Drew's movies, but I really believe this movie represents her finest performance. Even down to the most unimportant nuances of acting, she is simply brilliant. She is equally convincing as a peasant in the field as she is a royal courtier among the nobility of France. The emotion she is able to express to the audience is deep and amazingly real. I really can't say enough about her performance here.
All I can do is encourage you to experience this movie. I believe you will want to watch it more than once; it is just as fresh and moving the second and third time as it is the first. Don't dismiss it as a "sappy love story" or think its 16th century setting will make it hard to relate to. This is a story as old as time itself, really, and it is a story that will always be relevant to humankind. It celebrates the power of true love and shows all of us that dreams can indeed come true.
3This is the kind of movie that no self-respecting guy would admit to liking in front of his friends. Seeing as i have no self-respect and even fewer friends, i have no reservations in stating that i loved this one from start to finish. It is a clever and highly original retelling of the classic Cinderella story, set in France. The entire cast does an inspired job. Drew Barrymore hasn't been this endearing since "E.T." (or was it "Doppelganger" ? I keep confusing the two), Anjelica Huston is a fittingly loathsome stepmother and even the featured "prince charming" i found easy to stomach. Need i recount the (allegedly true) tale ? (daughter turned lowly servant turned pretend courtier turned princess) Check elsewhere !
The pre-feminist subtext is hard to overlook, but far from obtrusive. Couldn't help liking the not so evil second stepsister. No fantastic elements are introced: there is no evidence of sorcery, or a pumpkin anywhere to be found. Replacing the fairy godmother with Leonardo da Vinci of all people is a stroke of genius, adding to the credibility of the storyline. The payoff is thoroughly satisfactory, leaving you with a smile on your face. My fellow countryman Jeroen Krabbé (Barrymore's father) sees his acting career cut short as he is killed off within the first five minutes or so. The whole thing is accompanied by a great music score. Set aside your prejudice & suspend your disbelief.
4
Every once in a while, a movie surprises me. Such is the case with Andy Tennant's Ever After. Based on the lackluster previews, I was prepared for the worst, but, instead of getting a juvenile, pointless re-telling of the classic "Cinderella" fairy tale, I was confronted with a delightful re-interpretation. While I won't claim that Ever After is the best cinematic version of the fable, this is deft storytelling, and sure to be a hit with almost everyone who sees it (except, perhaps, unromantic cynics).
One of the most curious things about this movie is the PG-13 rating bestowed upon it by the MPAA. This is the third would-be family film in less than a month to carry that classification, and, while it is understandable in the case of the other two, Dr. Dolittle and Small Soldiers, I am at a loss to explain why Ever After was treated so harshly. Aside from a couple of mild swordfights, the evidence of a whipping (the actual event is not shown), and an inconsequential instance of profanity, there's nothing remotely objectionable about Ever After's content. Parents made wary by the PG-13 need not fret; this picture is entirely suitable for viewing by children of all ages.
Ever After's twist is that it's telling the "real" Cinderella story from which the Brothers Grimm fable was derived (the two famous fairy tale scribes make a brief appearance in a prologue that also features a cameo by the incomparable Jeanne Moreau). Consequently, there are no pumpkins, mice, magic spells, or fairy godmothers. The love story between a peasant girl and a prince is still at the core, although, in this case, "Cinderella" (whose name is Danielle), has the kind of progressive attitude that would be more at home in the 1990s than in the 1500s.
The broad strokes of the story are certainly familiar. After the tragic death of her father (Jeroen Krabbe), Danielle (played by Anna Maguire as a little girl, and Drew Barrymore thereafter) is consigned to a life of servitude for her cruel stepmother, Rodmilla (Anjelica Huston), and vain step-sister, Marguerite (Megan Dodds). Danielle has an ally in the household, her second step-sister, Jacqueline (Melanie Lynskey, last seen opposite Kate Winslet in Heavenly Creatures), but she's too meek to stand up to her mother. While Rodmilla, Marguerite, and Jacqueline enjoy as much luxury as their farm house provides, Danielle (bbed "Cinderella" by Marguerite for the cinders that always stain her clothing) is forced to scrub the floors, cook the meals, and feed the animals.
One day, when Danielle is picking apples, she spies a man stealing one of her step-mother's horses. It's actually Prince Henry (Dougray Scott), the heir to the throne of France, in the process of running away from his father because he is unwilling to be trapped in a loveless, arranged marriage. Mistaking Henry for a common thief, Danielle knocks him from the horse with a well-aimed apple. After she realizes who he is, she is apologetic, but the meeting leaves an impression on both of them. At the time of their next encounter, Danielle is posing as a countess in order to rescue a family retainer from debtors' prison. She engages the Prince in a spirited debate, and, although he thinks he recognizes her, he can't put a name to the face. Soon, he is scouring the countryside looking for her, and, although Danielle is attracted to him, she avoids contact, fearing that if he learns that she isn't a member of the nobility, he will shun her. Through all of this, there is a fairy godmother of sorts -- Leonardo da Vinci (Patrick Godfrey), who uses science, not magic, to smooth the path of true love.
Movies like Ever After, if fashioned with little skill, become curiosities for pre-teen girls looking for a summer afternoon at the movies. However, Tennant takes this familiar material and crafts a charming, captivating motion picture. He gives the villains a few human qualities, but still manages to make them despicable enough that we feel justified in cheering when they receive their comeuppance. The all-important romance is nicely-developed. Danielle and Henry are clearly fated to be together, but they have to overcome a number of obstacles along the way, including her dishonesty, her step-family's plicity, and his prejudice. Of course, everything turns out "happily ever after" (hence, the title), but, as in all romances, our enjoyment lies in observing the games played by the two smitten protagonists en route to that ending.
As good as the costumes and setting are, Tennant does not craft a flawless period piece. In fact, Ever After transpires in a pseudo-16th century that bears only a passing resemblance to the historical reality. Anachronisms abound, both in attitudes and in speech. The characters talk as if they are procts of the 1900s, not the 1500s, using idioms that, at the time, were centuries away from making their way into the language. Tennant doesn't appear to be bothered by these inaccuracies, but those who are sticklers for period detail may be distracted by this sort of thing.
Drew Barrymore, continuing to rehabilitate her once-tarnished image, proves that her winning turn as a romantic lead in the otherwise-dreadful The Wedding Singer was no fluke. As Danielle, she radiates tremendous appeal. Like Prince Henry, we are immediately taken not only with Danielle's beauty (which shines through the dirt on her face) but with her spirit. Speaking of the Prince, Dougray Scott (who can also be seen in this summer's Deep Impact) manages the difficult feat of making Henry likable rather than bland (blandness is often the unfortunate fate of the male leads in movies like this). Anjelica Huston and Megan Dodds turn on the bitchiness as step-mom and step-sister, and veteran actors Timothy West and Judy Parfitt have comical turns as the King and Queen of France. Patrick Godfrey's wise-but-humorous da Vinci is a delight.
Tennant, who showed skill at the helm of a romance with his last film, Fools Rush In, has found the right tone for this effort. The love story is wrapped around interludes of comedy, adventure, and drama. It never seems to matter that we know the entire story from the beginning -- the characters, not the plot, capture our attention. One concern I have about this film is that, because it's not high-profile, it has the potential to become lost in the summer crush. Here's hoping that enough viewers discover Ever After to give it a happy ending at the box office.
5
“Once Upon A Time…” begins the classic tale of Cinderella, hapless victim of a cruel stepmother and wicked stepsisters. This time do not look for fairy godmothers or magic pumpkins and mice, and Cinderella may not be the demure damsel portrayed by Disney. Cinderella, AKA Danielle (Drew Barrymore) is a spunky, independent young woman who reads Sir Thomas More's “Utopia” and dreams of running the estate of her deceased father sans stepmother and stepsisters. Prince Charming Henry (Dougray Scott) is a young man struggling to define his own identity in the midst of an arranged marriage and a domineering father. When the two meet, a twisted tale of class struggle, political power brokering and love mix in this retelling of the Cinderella classic called “Ever After: A Cinderella Story”.
A suprisingly well assembled cast along with some original additions to the Cinderella tale make “Ever After” captivating despite any previous exposure to the story. Anjelica Huston makes one mean stepmother, shockingly icy and venomous at times. So well portrayed is the wicked stepmother than you cannot help but be endeared to young Danielle. Drew Barrymore is a master of (acting) youthful innocence and her simple sweet smile was everything I needed to forget some of the racier characters she has played. Even the “bit parts” we filled with charming characters, from quaint country folk to legends from the annals of history. Don't expect history here though; remember this is a fairy tale (and at some points quite anachronistic) but a lively retelling of a well loved story.
“Ever After: A Cinderella Story” contains two instances of profanity, some violence, and some alt topics (including some sexual innuendo). In spite of the above, I was pleased to see positive (albeit brief) references to Christian values. There is even a mention (and I quote) of “the Son of God”! There is a brief instance of prayer and a mention of the positive role that Christian monks played in the ecation of society. This does not excuse the negative and sometimes too frequent sexual innuendo (which many viewers did not even notice, however) but it was good to see Christianity displayed somewhat openly and positively!
“Ever After: A Cinderella Story”” was originally rated PG-13. However, the video version is slightly edited to make it a PG rating. Even with this in mind, however, some topics are better left alone with younger audiences. But otherwise a great film with some positive references to the Christian faith—perhaps you could use this to discuss your Christian faith with a friend!
6
Drew Barrymore as Cinderella? What a perfect fit for an update, like when Alicia Silverstone did a 1995 modern-dress version of Jane Austen's Emma in Clueless. But wait. Ever After doesn't step a toe out of the sixteenth century. Director Andy Tennant shot the film in France, with fairy-tale costumes by Jenny Beavan. Luckily, Barrymore is not the kind of actress who'd settle for a musty retread. The last time she and Tennant worked together, she was a hellcat Lolita in his TV version of The Amy Fisher Story. Barrymore's take on Cinderella is more Betty Friedan than Brothers Grimm. No prince would mistake her for a docile dolly.
Let's start with her attitude. As the orphaned Danielle, Barrymore is willing to take just so much shit from her stepmother, Rodmilla (Anjelica Huston). Danielle doesn't pine for a fairy godmother to solve her problems. Good thing: The script by Tennant, Susannah Grant and Rick Parks doesn't give her one. Danielle makes her own miracles, though she does get sound advice from Leonardo da Vinci (Patrick Godfrey) -- you heard me -- in handling her stepsisters (Megan Dodds and Melanie Lynskey) and Prince Henry (Dougray Scott), a handsome snob with a thing about servants; he recoils in horror when he finds out that Danielle is one.
Enough remains of the Cinderella myth -- masked ball, glass slipper -- to please purists. But it's the feminist spin that makes Ever After mischievous fun. The radiant Barrymore energizes Cinderella with a tough core of intelligence and wit. And Huston is a devilish delight, wringing laughs and a grudging sympathy from a role usually caricatured as pure evil. Shake off the cobwebs. These sisters are doing it for themselves
⑻ 看完电影后的 观后感
电影（海洋天堂）：主演：李连杰、文章、桂纶镁
90分钟的海洋天堂，像一部温情细腻缓慢而又充满感情的小说。我以冷眼淡漠的看着前80分钟的一个一个真实的生活细节，毫无动摇，甚至怀疑电影的索然无味，更无一点点感动涌上心头。然而这种感觉，在最后的10分钟内，让近乎无法抑制的泪水给了自己强烈的反击，虽然预料到的结局，却不曾预料到的情感爆发。
一个沉溺于自己世界的孤独症孩子，他开心时的笑脸，真诚的双眼，让人温暖。他幸福时修长的手指晃动在空气中欢快的摇曳，他寒冷时手掌渴望得到的真实的触摸感，他害怕无奈时大声的喊叫，他愤怒委屈时不停抽搐的身体以及在父亲身上留下深深地牙印儿，他失落时靠在麦当劳叔叔身上含在眼中的泪水，他自由时像鱼儿一样在海洋中的无拘无束...这一切都昭示了，他是一个和普通人一样有各种情感的孩子，只是他不知如何表达，只是他充满了惧怕，所以他选择本能的逃避了世界，逃避了他人，活在自己的世界里，留下孤独的自己。该怎么说明他是幸福的还是不幸的？纷乱的世界中只留下了孤单的自己，还不能像正常人一样生活，难道他是幸福的？可本就是活在自己的世界里，剩下自己又怎样?有那么伟大的父亲的爱，有海中一直陪伴自己的大海龟，有温暖的阳光，又宽广的大海，难道他是不幸的？
影片的最后，看着在父亲坟前蜷缩着身体，有手指触摸温暖的大福时，我是温暖的。在看到大福自己脱衣服，自己上下车，乖乖的把电视上的小狗拿掉，一步一步认认真真的拖地，自己煮蛋的时候，情感在冗长的沉睡之后，盛大的像自己扑来，眼泪无法抑制，也无法叙说真正哭泣的原因，文字的苍白与单薄被自己深深察觉。那些父母亲在琐碎的生活中给的点滴的爱，只有在一个人承受的时候，才会被自己察觉，才会猛然间醒悟，那些深沉，那些无私是多么弥足珍贵。审视自己，发现自己的自私，发现自己的渺小，发现那永远报答不完的深深的亲情。
海洋天堂，一个永远有自由，有父亲，有依靠的地方，那是内心最后的归宿，最舒适的栖息港湾。。。
这爱与孤独的矛盾，让我深陷...
⑼ 后天电影的观后感
世界都快末日了还有什么好想的。
珍惜当下，不要等到没有明天了，才去寻找生命的意义。
爱护环境从身边做起吧。