英语电影人工智能简介及观后感

㈠ 电影《人工智能》观后感怎样写

电影中，导演斯皮尔伯格以一个非人类为主角，讲述了一个机器男孩的心路历程。人工智能是人类科技的产品，人类一如既往地对自己的科技产品怀有敌意和偏见。虽然大卫探求与人类平等的情感的努力孜孜不懈，但最后仍以失败告终，片中包含了斯皮尔伯格对于科技如人类自身的一些反思：当科技力量已经足够强大的时候，科技是否只能为人类服务，还是能拥有和人类对等的地位？人类惧怕科技的毁灭性力量，但是毁灭人类的并不是科技而是人类对于科技的狂热与偏见。剧终时的温情毕竟留下了一丝希望：大卫终于能与人类母亲重会共叙天伦。在未来人的世界中，人类、机器人、仙女终于平等地相处在了一起。

㈡ 谁能给我一个英文剧情简介 关于电影《人工智能AI》

In the not-so-far future the polar ice caps have melted and the resulting raise of the ocean waters has drowned all the coastal cities of the world. Withdrawn to the interior of the continents, the human race keeps advancing, reaching to the point of creating realistic robots (called mechas) to serve him. One of the mecha-procing companies builds David, an artificial kid which is the first to have real feelings, especially a never-ending love for his "mother", Monica. Monica is the woman who adopted him as a substitute for her real son, who remains in cryo-stasis, stricken by an incurable disease. David is living happily with Monica and her husband, but when their real son returns home after a cure is discovered, his life changes dramatically. A futuristic adaptation of the tale of Pinocchio, with David being the "fake" boy who desperately wants to become "real".

㈢ 人工智能英语的 影评

The movie provides an example of failing to draw an audience into a story, and an example of story structure that takes away from a story.
AI is about the question, "What makes us human?" Can a robot (computer intelligence) ever be human? The boy robot David is created to be fully capable of human characteristics, even love. But he is quickly rejected by his family, and the rest of the story is about his quest to become human so he can regain his mother's acceptance and love.
The first twenty minutes of a film, the opening, are critical for engaging the audience. This story has an intriguing story line, great settings, nice special effects, and enough motivation and emotion in the opening, so why doesn't it emotionally engage the audience? Because we don't identify with the struggles of the people involved since there is no continuity of any single character's story.

㈣ 《人工智能》观后感怎么写

开头是一位博士，他想创造一个拥有感情的机器人。

于是，他把目标定为一个小孩腿残疾的家庭，他把机器人做成小孩的模样。一开始，小孩的母亲接受不了，回到家里就哭了起来。可后来，他们自己的小孩的腿好了，最后他们不得不把这个小孩丢到树林中，以免他被拆成废铁。

后来，他认识了一个超帅的情人机器人。他们到一个知识库中。最后，他们一起寻找到了“蓝仙女”。可那并不是真的，而是最先开始研制的机器人，特别像e。t。然而，他还是拥有了一个幸福的家庭。

他是独一无二的，他最后虽然没有找到“蓝仙女”。可他拥有一段美好的记忆。你相信在以后会有许多的机器人，它们会有自己的功能，服务于自己的客户。一部影片《人工智能》讲述的就是关于机器人的事。

世纪中期，由于温室效应，南北极冰川融化，地球上很多城市被淹没。此时，人类科技已经高度发达，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一，而且，机器人制造技术已经高度发达，先进的机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，还能感知自身的存在。

莫妮卡的儿子马丁重病住院，生命危在旦夕，为了缓解伤痛的心情，她领养了机器人小孩大卫——本故事的主角。大卫的生存使命就是爱她。马丁苏醒，恢复健康，回到了家里，马丁心思缜密想方设法的让大卫做错事，从而让大卫“失宠”，最后被莫妮卡抛弃。

在躲过机器屠宰场的残酷追杀后，大卫在机器情人——乔的帮助下，开始寻找自己的生存价值：渴望变成真正的小孩，重新回到莫妮卡妈妈的身边。我只看到这里，他到底能否重回妈妈身边呢

我虽然只看了一点，但我知道，如果答应一个人就要履行职责，不能放弃，要守信用。

㈤ 美国影片人工智能剧情祥细介绍

21世纪中期，由于温室效应，南北极冰川融化，地球上很多城市被淹没。此时，人类科技已经高度发达，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一，而且，机器人制造技术已经高度发达，先进的机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，还能感知自身的存在。

莫妮卡的儿子马丁重病住院，生命危在旦夕，为了缓解伤痛的心情，她领养了机器人小孩大卫（海利•乔•奥斯蒙特 饰），大卫的生存使命就是爱她。马丁苏醒，恢复健康，回到了家里，一系列的事情使大卫“失宠”，最后被莫妮卡抛弃。

在躲过机器屠宰场的残酷追杀后，大卫在机器情人乔（裘德•洛 饰）的帮助下，开始寻找自己的生存价值：渴望变成真正的小孩，重新回到莫妮卡妈妈的身边。谁也不知道他能否完成自己的心愿，脱胎换骨成为真正的人，等待他们的只是凶吉难料的旅程……

(5)英语电影人工智能简介及观后感扩展阅读

《人工智能》是由华纳兄弟影片公司于2001年拍摄发行的一部未来派的科幻类电影。由史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格执导，裘德·洛、海利·乔·奥斯蒙特主演。

1、大卫

演员海利·乔·奥斯蒙

作为第一个被输入情感程序的机器男孩，大卫是这个公司的员工亨利他妻子的一个试验品，然而和人类小孩一样天真可爱。

尽管大卫逐渐成了温斯顿夫妇的孩子，但大卫却因一系列的缘故不得不离开他们，走上寻求成人的路，险些被机器人猎人销毁，但他心怀梦想，身体和梦想都没销毁，依然坚持着梦想。他活得最久，经历最多。

2、乔

演员裘德·洛

大卫的患难之交，机器人舞男，他是在大卫寻找成人方法途中结交的机器朋友，和大卫一起渡过了许多生死岁月。最终却未能避免被人类抓走的命运。

3、莫妮卡

演员弗兰西丝·奥康纳

大卫的养母，是Cybertronics Manufacturing制作公司的员工亨利的妻子，马丁的母亲也是大卫的母亲，开始难以接受大卫，渐渐被大卫的单纯可爱感化，和大卫相处融洽，最后却不得不放弃了大卫。

4、亨利

演员萨姆·罗伯兹

大卫的养父，Cybertronics Manufacturing制作公司的员工，马丁和大卫的父亲，大卫开始是他的试验品，但大卫逐渐成了他的孩子，后来在大卫犯下一系列错误（实为被马丁暗算）后决定抛弃他。

5、泰迪

演员泰迪熊

马丁家的超级机器人，大卫的玩偶，可以说话和行动，后来和大卫一起走上了流亡的道路，是大卫忠贞不二的朋友，帮助大卫免遭一死，与大卫共同度过千年，和大卫一样心怀梦想。

㈥ 求电影《人工智能》的英文简介

AI - Artificial Intelligence" is the hardest kind of movie to review-but it's also the most enjoyable kind of movie to watch. It's been over three weeks since my screening of Steven Spielberg's emotionally harrowing epic about a robot boy. Before writing my review, I wanted to let its themes, content, and characters sink into my head and make a solid impact. The film was based on an idea by Stanley Kubrick, but when he died in 1999, Speilberg took charge of the project. I could spend pages discussing the techniques of Kubrick's intentions and Spielberg's decisions, but I will not. Stanley Kubrick and Steven Spielberg are two of the greatest directors American cinema has to offer; it's pure pleasure watching their ideas clash and flow. I am not going to examine each indivial theme here, either. That would ruin the movie for you.

"AI - Artificial Intelligence" presents many themes on screen, but it's important to take what you get out of it. Whenever I read a review of Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" or "2001: A Space Odyssey" I feel influenced by the reviewer's interpretation of the movie's themes. Every time I watch either of those movies I get something new out of it. I hate it when other critics state the movie's themes on paper as if it's a fact. There is far too much room for interpretation to reveal this movie's message, or the message of any Kubrick film for that matter. Ask 100 people, and you might get 100 different answers. "AI - Artificial Intelligence" is that kind of movie-one of the year's best.

Critics and audiences alike have torn apart this movie's ending-a clear miscalculation by Spielberg. If Kubrick were in charge, the movie would have called it quits about twenty minutes earlier in an unsettling sequence that takes place in the ocean. But Speilberg, who always seems entranced by science fiction, injects an additional segment into the mix that does not work quite as well, but isn't so completely awful that it deserves such harsh criticism. It still leaves us with an open, startled emotional disorientation. I left the theater with tears in my eyes. The movie before the conclusion is so complex, moving, and involving in so many different ways the last twenty minutes didn't even come close to spoiling the movie for me.

"AI" transpires sometime in the near future after the polar ice caps have melted and flooded coastal cities and reced natural resources. Mechanical androids have become popular since they require no commodities. Reproction has also become highly illegal. Machines provide sexual services and if anyone wants a child, they will purchase a robot. However, the difference between a robot child and a living child is that robots cannot love. That's the task professor Hobby (William Hurt) of Cybertronics Manufacturing has solved. He has made a robot child that can love.

We can separate "AI" into two separate segments. I do not want to reveal too much about each plot because the pleasure of watching this movie evolves from the revealing of the connecting plots. I will, however, briefly say the first details a robot child's interaction within a family, and the second deals with the robot's estrangement from its family and the quest to regain the mother's love.

I can imagine the material in Kubrick's hands. The movie's opening scene has a female robot begin to undress in a public office. Speilberg cuts the action before she reveals any explicit nudity. Kubrick would have had various shots of full frontal nudity. Spielberg, never comfortable with sexual material, leaves out much of the motivation behind Kubrick's ideas. One of the biggest problems in "AI" is the lack of edge with the sexual content. Jude Law plays a robot gigolo who lives in a sex fantasy called Rouge City where people from everywhere come to seek sexual satisfaction. The central character, a robot boy played by Haley Joel Osment, motivates every action in the story except for the scenes in Rouge City. Why contain such a perverse character and setting when his entire existence simply displays a mood that has already been well established. Obvious, the filmmakers toned the aspects of "AI" down to warrant a gutless PG-13 rating-but why? The movie isn't appropriate for children anyway, and it's far too complex. Undoubtedly if Kubrick were in charge "AI" would have to be re-cut to avoid an NC-17 rating. Spielberg should have either taken advantage of the perverse material or completely eliminated it.

Here I am, doing exactly what I said that I wouldn't do, and at nearly 900 words, I still have not clearly expressed my own opinions on the film. I have many notes in front of my that display my reaction as I watched the film, but I am not going to use them-they reveal too much about the movie. "AI" is a very personal film, a deeply moving, scientific, careful, and harrowing motion picture that displays startling talent on screen and behind the scenes. The special effects are extraordinary. The performances are alarming-the immensely talented Haley Joel Osment may once again be up for an Academy Award nomination. Go see the movie, then talk about it with others. It's the kind of film that you can spend hours thinking about, then go see it again.

㈦ 给我一篇关于电影《人工智能》的观后感吧，500-600字

观人工智能有感

今天看了人工智能这部电影。
之前也有看，
但是只是不完整的片段，
真的不清楚这部片子
是讲的什么，
今天看过真的很感动，
也有意一丝的遗憾。
正是这不算圆满的结局让我百感交
集。

似乎每一部描写未来的电影都有一样的情节，
人工智能超越了人类，
然后努力追求成为人
的过程——这其实是天马博士的故事吧。
裘德洛的冒险却不是，
但最后过了无数年，
到人类
都灭绝了，才由外星人用无法理喻的高科技给了他们真正的生命。那么真正的生命是什么
呢？或是生命存在的意义在于哪里呢？

小男孩
DA
VID
从被哈比博士制造出来到进入亨利的家，再在到被莫妮卡扔到外面自生自
灭，是一个描写关于信任和抛弃的故事。
DA
VID
经过不可能的艰辛最终找到属于他的蓝仙
女，一直看着她
2000
年，再次醒来看到蓝仙女那一刻无法比拟的惊喜。是关于坚持和梦想
的过程。
小心翼翼的触碰却摧毁了她。
蓝仙女破碎的瞬间是那样令人震撼！
我甚至可以感觉
到，就像打破了自己小心翼翼珍藏了多年的宝贝那样痛心。最后外星人帮助
DA
VID
实现了
他一直没有实现的愿望。故事最终定格在了不算太圆满的这刻。这一切都源于一个字——
“爱”
！

看完整部片子自己也想回到那样的年龄，
没有负担的爱，
很简单，
很平淡。
对梦想的执着，
无条件的信任似乎会只会定格在那个年幼的岁月。
也许只有如此单纯的情感才能反衬出成人
头脑中荒唐的欲望。
几十年就是我们对人生全部的理解，
其实生命的轨迹虽然远离却是不可
复制的。爱，也是唯一的存在，哪怕过了千百年。

对于感情，人类的理解就是依赖，安慰，安全感。但是对于机器人更过的付出，信任，当
然也需要回报。
这可能是导演在小男孩身上赋予了对人类感情的期许吧。
最初的爱恋总是无
附加美好且坚定的。我能理解莫里卡的选择，在最初和代替的选择中谁都会选择前者吧。

人类的自私，残忍相信已经是老生常谈，我不想对此再多说什么。但是在这部电影中我
看到更多的是“爱”
“希望”以及坚持所要付出的代价。我们都希望可以活在个完美的乌邦
式的世界，
付出和收获等价。但是现实中往往令我们失望，所以有了代替品—机器人。
但是
难道因为他不是真实的所以就不需要回报吗？！
记得在电影的开始，
研究人员提出了一个问
题“我们怎么保证他爱的人可以爱他们”
。我与他们都陷入了沉思。我们不能保证付出的爱
可以得到等价回报，
但是我们却可以像
一样，
坚持信仰，
不断的努力，
爱不可复制，
但是可以被唤起。
对爱的理解和寄望。真的很简单，仅仅是承认
和同等特别的存在。相信也是斯导对爱的注解。爱。其实很简单。

㈧ 求：人工智能的英文影评

I saw A.I. on the first night it ran here and I must say I was disappointed in the size of the audience. How strange to see so few people show up for a Spielberg film. This film did not enjoy the normal hype that most of Spielberg's films enjoy, I think I know why. Lack of proct placement. They're may have been some somewhere but I didn't see them. A.I.'s story line and flawless visual effects reflect what I can only describe as the meeting of two great film makers. Kubrick (who started work on the project after he read the Aldiss book in '83),and Steven Spielberg who's long list of intelligent blockbusters made him the perfect person to bring this story to the screen. I could, I believe see the story boards and concepts Kubrick developed and I could also see the sensitivity that Spielberg added to scenes and characters. These two things are not entirely separate in good Science Fiction. All good science fiction has some human sensitivity in it otherwise it would just be a horror film. The script reflects some of the darkness and coldness that sometimes underlies each character human and machine, there is no fear of this in the story. This darkness draws us on in the story.

The visual effects are stunning and come darn close to genius. The story line takes us in and the visuals make it almost real.
A.I. Is a good union of two great film makers., 1 July 2001
Author: John R. Armstrong ([email protected]) from Chicago
I wish I had Mr. Mannings grip of syntax, but all in all at the end of the day it's good science fiction and a good story too. I beleve that Stanley Kubrick's choice of asking Steven Spielberg to make this film was the kind of genius that Kubrick showed in all his work. It is a tribute to both men that they saw a vision of something and worked toward it's creation. I think they came to a great place in film making.

Future classic...?, 26 September 2001

Author: Chris Harrison ([email protected]) from Wiltshire, England

First of all, once again I think the critics have got it wrong. Like Blade Runner and 2001, this is a film that will be properly judged in 10/20 years or maybe more. Its way ahead of its time, the combination of Kubrick and Spielberg is unique, its unlikely we will ever see anything like this again.

Did I like it? The answer would have to be yes, the mix of styles will put many people off, but I found it to be unlike anything I have ever seen, and all the better for it. The story is by no means original but everything else about the film is so different that this can be forgiven. To get one thing straight, Kubrick decided Spielberg would be the better man for directing it, and I think this was a very wise decision, many of the ideas are pure Kubrick, but Spielberg has the neccassary attributes to direct such a film, and great credit has to go to Kubrick for handing it to him.

Haley Joel Osment is amazing, the robot/human emotion must be amazingly difficult to pull off effectively, but Osment does it with such relative ease to the point where you do believe he is a robot, not that he is just acting as a robot. Jude Law is excellent, and so to is Frances O'Conner.

As for the ending, as brave as an idea it may of been to end on a downbeat note at "the first ending" I think the slightly upbeat ending is much more appropriate.

All in all I would say A.I is a wonderfully unique film that should be judged for what it is, a film. Forget everything about the Spielberg/Kubrick "issue" and just sit back and take in a truely amazing film. You may hate it, you may love it, but no matter what, it will effect your emotions in some way and you will discuss the film afterwards.

This film will be truely judged in 20 years or so, when it can be assessed purely as a film, as with 'Blade Runner', '2001', and even 'The Thing', it will get better with age.

A.I.--A Film With Heart And Brains, 6 July 2001

Author: virek213 from San Gabriel, Ca., USA

Steven Spielberg's latest movie A.I.: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, which he took up at the encouragement of the late, great Stanley Kubrick, has caused widely divergent comments. And I can't help wondering if the most scathingly negative reviews of this movie aren't just an open desire to see Spielberg crash, as he had with "1941" and HOOK.

For my money, Spielberg has done it again with this futuristic science fiction drama, regardless of what the negative reviews say. Its story of a robot boy (Haley Joel Osment) who desires to be a real boy in a far future in which humans (Orgas) and machines (Mechas) exist side-by-side but not always in harmony is very much modeled on the Pinocchio story, though it is actually based on a 1969 short story by Brian Aldiss. It raises some interesting and sometimes unsettling moral dilemmas that few films of late have done. Can a parent love a child, even if that child is not real? What might happen if that child desired to be real? How will Man and Machine be able to co-exist?

Like all intelligent science fiction, such as Kubrick's own 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and Spielberg's own CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, A.I. forces us to ponder where we've been and where we might be going. It's an incredible combination of Kubrick's icy intellectual and clinical mind and Spielberg's emotional heart; and I think it works exceedingly well. But it forces the viewer to not leave their heart and brains at the door, which I think is why it is being so negatively received in this season of mindless summer movie fare. It may be too intelligent for its own good, and many don't have the 145 minutes of patience needed for the movie. I did, however; and I would call this an absolute masterpiece. Out of ten stars, give this one a 10.

A mind-blowing movie that will grow in stature, 6 March 2002

Author: Magnus ([email protected])

Wow! That was all I could say when I walked out of the theatre after my first helping of A.I. I wasn't sure whether I loved the movie or was disappointed by it, I just knew it had had a huge effect on me. Having seen it a further three times at the cinema, I still find fault with it, but I keep returning to it, thinking about it, discussing it, and it has left me with a feeling that, five months later, I've still not shaked. In many regards, this movie reminds me of Fight Club, not in terms of theme or emotional content, but e to it's level of craft, the daring nature of it's execution and the fact that I keep re-evaluating it. All the things that are possible to comment objectively on (if anything ever is) are handled expertly. The performances are top-notch, especially Haley Joel Osment as David, the little robot child that longs to be human. The effects are not only very impressive, but are integrated into the story rather than calling attention to themselves. Januz Kaminski's photography is, as one has come to expect, impressive, and the movie is unusually unpredictable for such a big-budget experience.

In my opinion, John Williams' score is among his most impressive. I listened to it on CD for three weeks before seeing the movie, and thought it was fantastic, but once the movie started rolling I completely forgot about the music. That says a lot about both the score and the film itself. I also liked the three-act structure, in which the tone and feel of the movie changes drastically as the story progresses. Part one, as one reviewer noted, feels like a cross between E.T. and The Shining, an odd, but very effective combination. The second part of the movie is awash with Spielbergian imagery, but with the darkness and coldness of a Kubrick movie. And the last part is a head-scratcher that has the intellectual resonance of most Kubrick-films, and the emotional tone of something like Cinema Paradiso. I purposely refrain from saying that it is as emotional as Spielberg-films, because I think the director's complexities, the dark aspects of his style, and the occasional subtleties of his work are often overlooked by critics.

It's difficult to discuss the themes of the movie without spoiling it, but while many people criticised the movie from having several false endings, I felt that each continuation added layers of though and complexities that the movie would have lacked had it ended sooner. I have come to the conclusion, over the past months, that I do love the movie and that it is my favourite film of 2001, even ahead of The Fellowship of The Ring and Amelie. In other words, buy it on DVD, it's more than worth it.

==============================================================
All of the above from IMDB.