电影傲慢与偏见观后感1000字

❶ 傲慢与偏见电影影评论文

清新的画面
优雅的音乐
传统的故事叙述
全新的视觉表现
美丽的田园风光
美丽的爱情故事

看着看着就被这一切吸引，最后完全投入到剧情之中!<傲慢与偏见>真是一部制作很精致的电影,而且可以感觉到是女性视角的电影!

不象现在很多翻拍的影视作品,演员总带着现代人的气质或者都市人的浮躁，看着很别扭。而<傲慢与偏见>却不同，女演员都脱去了现代的特质,从她们的表演上看完全把我们带到了那个年代的人的状态!女主角把主人公的情感表现的很有分寸,很有激情!丝丝入扣,逐步深入,欢笑、悲伤、厌恶、惊喜、愤怒。。。。。，一切都恰倒好处！这样的文艺片考验的就是演员的表演功力。

除了演员有点“地包天”外，没别的毛病。她那清纯的笑脸，使她那么脱俗，在众多俗人中那么“独树一帜”，看来导演很有眼力。在姐妹们都在议论男人的财富、地位、外表的时候，只有她在追求着一中自然的情感！“爱情真是永恒的话题”，故事是发生在过去，那时的背景我们好象很陌生！但，他们对爱情的表白，其实，与现在没有多少不同！即使现在，有多少人可以外了真正的情感去爱一个人，而不去考虑他的外表、财富和势力呢？

电影的节奏有张有弛，逐步展开情节和冲突，耐人寻味！在现在快节奏的时代略显得缓慢，但，配合着优美的画面，那是欧洲典型的田园风光，在优美的音乐映衬下，使得电影表现的很精致，配上家庭影院的效果，真是享受啊！这样的电影，静下心来看，真的很舒服。

好久好久没有正式地看一场电影了，也好久没有回味过这些经典的作品了。《傲慢与偏见》还是在高中的时候看的。今天我看了奥斯卡的颁奖礼，才想到要做一些内心一点的，别那么浅表的事情。

我想不光是我自己，现在的社会中，我们身边的人们，谁还能一点杂念都没有地静下心来慰问一下自己？慰问一下自己可能已经很疲劳的心灵？一点功利心都没有地单纯地因为喜欢做点事情？反正我真的越来越发现，在表面的平静和欢乐下，我的心需要营养了，来自各方面的，一些高雅的、端庄的、一些爱，一些美好。

傲慢与偏见中的人们，离我们很远很远，我也不想绞尽脑汁把我的生活和内心活动与他们的联系在一起。不过，他们确实是一种营养，滋润了我。看这个小说，对我来说，是一种享受，是久违了的平静的欢乐，是发自内心安静的笑，也许只从眼睛里流露出一点温馨罢了。但是，这样的平静，我很怀念向往，我也好久没有这么享受过什么东西了。那种感觉就像是我在这本书里或电影里游泳，自由、舒展，漂浮、飘逸……

受够了速食的文化，厌倦了瞬间的刺激，那些恐怖片、惊悚片、犯罪片我真的喜欢吗？看完了以后我累、但是高兴吗？我受刺激，瞬间觉得不无聊了，但是仍然还是有些空虚。这些好象有点像化肥，短期内可以促长庄稼，但是土壤始终是枯竭的，而且愈加枯竭。赶流行，随大众，都是一个后果。我想，在我的心变成沙漠之前，用一些时间来思考、认真地回馈我的内心、我的思想，不仅仅是用那些可笑的专业知识，那些所谓理性的自我约束。当然，无论在专业还是在自制这两方面，我做的都不好，但是，我还是要规划出一段时间来丰富自己，充实自己，用人性化的关爱，在我变成甲状腺激素分泌不足或者强迫症之前。

我承认，回顾过去，我不是什么强者，尤其是在上大学之前，那时候的我知道什么啊？就知道学习好了就行了，天天看比赛，看电视剧最开心。直到来到人生地不熟的大学，我才知道，我什么都不太会，除了哭是真正擅长。但是我一直不认为哭是任何丢脸的事情，哭又怎么了？我一边哭着，我还一边坚持着呢！我什么也没有放弃啊！但是这样逼自己成长的过程就是矫枉过正的一个过程，就是感觉物质文明和精神文明没有共同进步似的，不均衡。总觉得忽略了自己内心的感性的东西。太浮躁,天天就跟一个秋千一样不停荡,在半空中忽悠,总有时间想要回归到平衡点，静止不动。现在就是这种情况。

写到这里，我意识到了这篇日志的名字叫做〈傲慢与偏见〉。如果老妈看见了我写成这样，她肯定要告诉我，你这片文章应该写〈傲慢与偏见〉这个小说写了什么，对你有什么触动，如果写成这样，就要改一个名字，叫什么两个文明两手抓两手都要硬什么的。呵呵~我还是不打算改了，就叫这个名字，写的东西呢，算是一些胡言乱语，用一句话就可以总结：我的生活应该更丰富一些，成熟的人即使做再多的事情也不会把自己累着，因为他们懂得用两个脚走路，并且同时不断地加强自己的心肺功能。

❷ 傲慢与偏见电影英文观后感

Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Ecation background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.

❸ 傲慢与偏见的读后感，1500字左右

《傲慢与偏见》是英国著名女作家简·奥斯丁的代表作，这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，作品描写傲慢的单身青年达西与偏见的二小姐伊丽莎白、富裕的单身贵族，彬格莱与贤淑的大小姐吉英之间的感情纠葛。其实这本书，在初一时已经接触过了，但当时对于剧情的繁杂很没有耐心，看了几章就没有了兴致，便一直搁在一旁，直至今日才重新拾起。不过再看开头几章时还是觉得很无趣，到后来明白才这里是在为以后的情景埋伏笔。一眨眼，三十几章已经过去了，人物的性格也很明显地被作者刻画出来了。

这本书中似乎只有两种人：聪明的和愚蠢的，没有绝对的好坏之分，骗子韦翰也许除外。他利用了自己巧妙的奉承能力以及一付“讨人喜欢”的仪表，迷住了伊丽莎白，不停地为自己洗刷冤情，中伤达西。可笑他的话里充满破绽，而聪明过人的伊丽莎白虽能与彬格来小姐辩驳，与咖苔琳夫人顶撞，却还是被韦翰牵着鼻子走。说实话，我并不认为伊丽莎白被骗说明他是一个”愚人”。人，总是先入为主，达西先生傲慢、无礼的样子早已进入伊丽莎白的头脑，还怎么对他产生好感？对于旁人的点评又怎能轻易的置若罔闻？对达西产生偏见是很正常的。我说的旁人自然就是指相貌堂堂的韦翰了。不可否认，韦翰长着一张英俊的脸，表面上也装得非常”绅士”。虽有”人不可貌相”、”知人知面不知心”之说可就连我这个活在二十一世纪，以旁观者的身份看这个故事，仍然对韦翰产生好感，又岂能怨伊丽莎白这一个生活在过去时代的姑娘？合上这本书，仔细地品味一番，方才发现，整部小说，之所以吸引人，完全是因为它轻松幽默的格调。伊丽莎白的嘲笑讽刺，正将那些自视绅士、淑女的贵族的本来面目暴露无疑。而伊丽莎白的父亲班纳特先生竟然以嘲笑太太、女儿为家庭快乐，幸哉？不幸哉？

文中的所谓「傲慢」就是指出身富贵、教养颇高、眼光锐利的青年达西的个性弱点；而所谓「偏见」是指出身中产阶级、教养颇好、机智聪明的小姐－伊丽莎白的精神弱点。一个眼光锐利，一个机智聪明，都属人中杰，但却都难免人性的弱点的纠缠。他们在一次的家庭舞会上初次见面，却因对彼此的印象不佳，一个态度傲慢，另一个心怀偏见。第一个印象先入为主，以后又加上女人们在旁闲言碎语，而造成了两人之间的爱恨情仇。伊丽莎白曾对达西说过:“我们的性情非常相似,我们都不爱交际,沉默寡言,不愿开口,除非我们会说出话来语惊四座,像格言一样具有光彩,流传千古.”就是因为这思想上的一致,才在婚姻中百般受到阻碍,同时也是因为这才最后促成美满的婚姻.伊丽莎白:如果放到现实社会,可能是个女权主义者.但关心自己的姐妹.直接,偶尔不懂礼节,调皮一点.却是这样迷住了达西.最重要的是善于和敢于像比自己身份高的人说“不”。从小说看，伊丽莎白聪敏机智，有胆识，有远见，有很强的自尊心，并善于思考问题。就当时一个待嫁闺中的小姐来讲，这是难能可贵的。正是由于这种品质，才使她在爱情问题上有独立的主见，并导致她与达西组成美满的家庭。

这部小说中通过班耐特五个女儿对待终身大事的不同处理，表现出乡镇中产阶级家庭出身的少女对婚姻爱情问题的不同态度，从而反映了作者本人的婚姻观:为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的；而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。因此，她既反对为金钱而结婚，也反对把婚姻当儿戏。她强调理想婚姻的重要性，并把男女双方感情作为缔结理想婚姻的基石。书中的女主人公伊丽莎白出身于小地主家庭，为富豪子弟达西所热爱。达西不顾门第和财富的差距，向她求婚，却遭到拒绝。伊丽莎白对他的误会和偏见是一个原因，但主要的是她讨厌他的傲慢。因为达西的这种傲慢实际上是地位差异的反映，只要存在这种傲慢，他与伊丽莎白之间就不可能有共同的思想感情，也不可能有理想的婚姻。以后伊丽莎白亲眼观察了达西的为人处世和一系列所作所为，特别是看到他改变了过去那种骄傲自负的神态，消除了对他的误会和偏见，从而与他缔结了美满姻缘。伊丽莎白对达西先后几次求婚的不同态度，实际上反映了女性对人格独立和平等权利的追求。这是伊丽莎白这一人物形象的进步意义。

作品生动的反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。其社会风情画似的小说不仅在当时吸引着广大的读者，实至今日，仍给读者以独特的艺术享受。她是第一个现实地描绘日常平凡生活中平凡恩的小说家，在英国小说史上起了承上启下的作用。奥斯丁的小说尽管题材比较狭窄，故事相当平淡，但是她善於在日常平凡事物中塑造鲜明的人物形象，不论是伊丽莎白、达西那种作者认为值得肯定的人物，还是魏克翰、柯林斯这类遭到讽刺挖苦的对象，都写得真实动人。同时，奥斯丁的语言是经过锤炼的，她在对话艺术上讲究幽默、讽刺，常以风趣诙谐的语言烘托人物的性格特徵。这种艺术创新使她的作品具有自己的特色。傲慢与偏见正是文字魔力结合感情升华的最佳表现。若说《红楼梦》是东方的贵妇人.《傲慢与偏见》则是西方的清秀佳人。

❹ 傲慢与偏见影评

《傲慢与偏见》温暖人心、令人愉悦、浪漫。

该片最大限度地保留了原著的精华，在传承经典的同时又巧妙地融合了许多现代元素，好看且耐人回味，是一部难得的改编力作。

该片画面精致，从镜头的转换到原声音乐表现，清新，养眼的俊男美女与悦目的英国乡村风光更符合一部新世纪电影的感觉。

主要剧情

《傲慢与偏见》是根据简·奥斯汀同名小说改编，由焦点电影公司发行的一部爱情片，由乔·怀特执导，凯拉·奈特利、马修·麦克费登、唐纳德·萨瑟兰等联合主演。

该片讲述了19世纪初期英国的乡绅之女伊丽莎白·班内特五姐妹的爱情与择偶的故事。该片于2005年9月16日在英国上映。

❺ 傲慢与偏见800字左右的观后感

这部作品主要的特点就是作者讽刺艺术的应用，从头到尾无论是人物描写，语言还是旁白，都运用大量的讽刺，从而达到一种幽默效果。。
你可以参考下面这个链接谈谈自己的感受，不知道你要的是英文的还是中文的。。
http://wenku..com/view/5c4b404133687e21af45a90e.html?st=1
http://wenku..com/view/1bb4d1dd6f1aff00bed51ea9.html?st=1
http://wenku..com/view/51fd6386d4d8d15abf234e03.html?st=1

❻ 求《傲慢与偏见》读后感1000字左右

<傲慢与偏见>这本书，在初中时已经接触过了。只是当时只是看到了男女主角之间的感情纠葛，起起落落的心情，让人沉浸在其中，几年之后，再次翻阅，别有一番风味。
班纳特家有5个女儿均未出嫁，而班纳特太太是一个神经质虚荣心十足的女人，将每个女儿嫁出去是她这一生唯一的大事却从不费心管教女儿的举止，而班纳特先生是个顾家的老绅士，却放任妻子和女儿的不得体行为，宁愿躲进图书室寻求平静。简·班纳特是班纳特家的大女儿，容貌美丽、性情温柔、沉静；伊莉沙白·班纳特是班纳特家的二女儿，个性活泼大方、聪慧与美貌并俱；三女儿玛丽容貌不若其它姊妹出色，因此便在品德及知识上用功，但也造成她的自大态度；排行第四的凯蒂个性浮华，与么妹丽迪雅最热忠跳舞，举止常失礼而不自知；么女儿爱慕虚荣、注重享乐、跳舞和与军官斗闹取乐是她生活的唯一目的。有一天他们家附近的搬来了一个有钱的单身男子彬格莱·查尔斯，他是一个个性温和、做人真诚不拘泥小节的富家青年，在一个宴会彬格莱却恋上了班纳特家的大女儿简，与简·班纳特相互爱慕；而彬格莱的好朋友达西·费茨威廉个性拘谨严肃，不善言词常给人自大傲慢的印象，在不知不觉中喜欢上班纳特家的二女儿伊莉沙白，但是因为班纳特一家本身并不是得体的家族令这两段恋情受到障碍，伊莉沙白一开始就对傲慢的达西存有偏见，主要就是描述他们这段关系的转变过程。
书中的时代背景会造就许多不同的爱情观：“彬格莱先生仪表堂堂，大有绅士风度，而且和颜悦色，没有拘泥做作的气习。达西立刻引起全场的注意，因为他身材魁伟，眉清目秀，举止高贵，于是他进场不到五分钟，大家都纷纷传说他每年有一万磅的收入。男宾们都称赞他的一表人才，女宾们都说他比彬格莱先生漂亮得多。”人们就是以财富来衡量一个人的。在达西与伊莉沙白的年代是趋于保守的，也会有贵族与平民的上的障碍；相较于现代这样的情形就会比较少发生。在我看法里我认为爱情是很美好的，两颗心的距离并不一定会因为形体的接近或分开而有所改变，青春和爱情，都是天底下最容易消逝的东西；一个女人在一生中能够被一个男人深深爱过，是一种怎样的幸福呢？或者说，一个女人在一生中错过一个深深爱她的男人，是一种怎样的遗憾？傲慢和偏见，就属于人类弱点中最常见的两种。而人性又太容易被扭曲、被异化，一不小心，或一旦陷入盲目，失去公正和理智，被感情所操纵，就会出毛病，伊莉沙白和达西也只是一个代表而已。而出身、财产、地位、教养、一旦沾上上流的边，就容易染上傲慢的毛病，对贫穷、低下、粗俗的人瞧不上眼；而地位低、财产少的人，出于人类的一种自尊心，则以偏见对抗骄傲的优越者，这自然是另一种被扭曲的傲慢。不过《傲慢与偏见》与另一部《爱玛》中都以婚姻为其中心议题。就书中的人物而言，婚姻并非意味着男女间无法控制的热情而是双方与社会间的契约产物。小说人物全然融入其社会现实，依循社会规则，谱出故事情节。由于明白婚姻关系可提供阶级提升与经济改善的机会，财力与社会地位为决定结婚对象的相关条件。本文以社会女性主义观点切入，检视奥斯汀的社会背景，探索社会环境如何影响女性在面临婚姻时，内心的焦虑与挣扎。就社会女性主义者而言，物质环境为塑造女性婚姻意识的决定因素。事实上，婚姻，就小说人物而言，为一个阶级交换与经济交流的市场。为了达成结婚的目的，女性人物擅于把自己转化成商品，展示其外貌与才艺，吸引男性目光。此一时期女性受到社会价值的鼓励，利用其女性特质来赢得婚姻伴侣。然而，奥斯汀的女性人物在面临婚姻伴侣的抉择时往往呈现对婚姻无意识的不安。爱情是一条主线，然而婚姻与爱情还是有差别的，其中一点诚实，男女主人公就太缺少了。正因为如此才使得女主角不安。
人，总是先入为主，达西先生傲慢、无礼的样子早已进入伊丽莎白的头脑，再加上骗子韦翰利用了自己巧妙的奉承能力以及一付”讨人喜欢”的仪表，迷住了伊丽莎白，不停地为自己洗刷冤情，中伤达西。不可否认，韦翰长着一张英俊的脸，表面上也装得非常”绅士”。使得伊丽莎白完全相信了韦翰的花言巧语，可能于伊丽莎白的年纪有很大的关联，即使她是家中最居理智的女儿，毕竟年轻，对于一个人是好是坏，还只是看浅表的。最主要的可能是丽萃太过于在乎她在别人眼中的形象，她非常不希望在别人眼里看来她是一个无知而虚荣，又没有教养的女人，可她也只是一个处在那种时代的而不甘于做一个配件的女人而已，她希望的伴侣能在心灵上与之共鸣，对于这个人的品格的要求超过了财富的要求，这一点是值得赞赏的，毕竟是在有一个爱钱的母亲的教育下长大的。不过对于这样一个母亲，她还是感到了自卑，才会在面对韦翰的谎言时，盲目的相信那个“高高在上”的达西是个卑鄙的人，从而使自己在他面前时的自卑心得到解脱。 不过幸运的是伊丽莎白没有被这些真正的蒙住双眼。
傲慢与偏见，在书中是男女主角爱情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。人的缺陷太多，首先是心灵上的陷阱。要想在一生中成一番事业，无论是知识、教养、还是爱情、事业，都需要同自己心灵的种种浅浮的陷阱或阴影做斗争，经过各种误解和长时间的反复的认识过程，慢慢由心灵克服各自弱点和毛病，而走向开放、洒脱、自由的必然结果。扰扰尘世，做人不易；茫茫人海，佳偶难见。然而没有爱情不要勉强人结婚，只要人品正直，追求美德，不放松向喜之心，不苟且、贪图一时之利欲，追求两心之和谐、相应，运用彼此的智慧，克服心灵上的缺点，终得如愿以偿。人和人之间的相处总会有一些小小的摩擦，而这些摩擦，往往就是自己内心中所潜藏的弱点或毛病，要和别人能够更愉快的生活，就必须先了解到自己的缺点，并磨去他，其次是了解别人的内心，最后再互相深入彼此，如此一来，你会发现到社会上每一件人、事、物都是如此美好、光明，更进一步激发出你内心深处的感动，发挥出自己的专长去替这个社会、这个国家、这个世界服务，毕竟我门是万物之长，如果人们不再用心去关怀身边的人，不再去付出自己的一臂之力，那么还有谁要去完成这个任务呢？所以从现在开始，我们就应该将自己原先所存有的毛病给除去，换上一个全新的自我，为崭新的未来打拚吧

❼ 加分！求电影《傲慢与偏见》的观后感

是一部文艺片，伊丽莎白与达西先生的爱情故事！起初，伊丽莎白对达西很傲慢，达西对伊也有偏见。后来经过磨合发现了对方的闪光点走到了一起。这是一个灰姑娘与白马王子的故事~~
影片和书本出入较大，建议先看书！！

❽ 电影《傲慢与偏见》的观后感 ，要求对电影的艺术性方面感受多一些。字数2000字左右。

“Any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen”, when this words about Jane Austen given by Mark Twin first came upon to me, I was, just in your expectation, a little bit surprised. Graally, however, when I know more about the characteristics of her works, I think the judgement of Mark Twin makes sense in some degree. Especially after I have finished her work Pride and Prejudice and compared it with the contemporary proction The Red and the Black written by Stendhal. Less reflection and exposure on social conflicts among different classes is a big pity for Austen’s works, as well as for the readers. Still, however, Austen’s unique interpretation towards marriage is the distinguished feature of her literary accomplishment. And I want to give some reflection on the different kinds of relationships and marriages in Pride and Prejudice.

Five different types of relationships or marriages, as far as I am concerned, are presented in this book.

The first type, undoubtedly, is the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley. They met at a party and almost fell in love with each other just after their first encounter. Bingley’s wealth and courtesy, Jane’s beauty and tenderness, and the similarities in their personality are all the factors that contribute to the relationship. So, though I believe, actually, there is some kind of love between the young lady and the gentleman, it is not the pure and true love, their combination is not for no intention but for some certain desire. So I would like to call their relationship as “Secular Love”.

Contrasting to the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley, the marriage between Charlotte and Mr.Collins is much less romantic, or no romance at all. One is the Cinderella in reality equipped with no prince, the other is a priest, old and ugly. Their marriage, of course, has no love but compromise. Even Elizabeth thinks “Charlotte the wife of Mr. Collins, was a most humiliating picture!” But what could she do? Just as she said, she is not romantic and she asks only a comfortable home, and this is within Mr. Collins ability. Comparing with being a 27-year-old burden to her family,at least for her, marrying Mr. Collins is the best choice. So as for them, I call “Rational Love” or rather------ “Rational Combination”.

Another couple is Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Bennet. Just in the first chapter, I wondered why two people with such different characteristics could live together for 23 years. The wonder disappeared when the explanation was offered by Austen in Chapter 42 about Mr. Bennet’s attitude towards his wife. Captivated by youth and beauty, he married her and very early in their marriage, after knowing the disposition of her, ended his affection and used her ignorance to contribute his amusement, having impropriety of his behavior as a husband. Neither for Mr. Bennet nor for Mrs. Bennet this marriage is quite fair or contented, but both of them should pay, and had already paid the bill of their “Hasty Love”.

Lydia’s relationship with Wickham, to some extent, is similar with her parents’. Mr. Bennet was captivated by the beauty of his wife and Lydia was fascinated by the handsome appearance of Wickham. Compared with her parents’ marriage, however, Lydia’s relationship with Wickham would only turn out a much more unpleasant one, for their marriage is based on the fulfillment of vanity and the desire of property. So I consider their relationship as “Orectic Incorporation”

And finally here comes the relationship between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. When I first finished the movie of Pride and Prejudice, I still wondered why there is a love flame between them. One is so proud and the other full of prejudice, but when I read more details about this work, the answer has emerged. “Love”, a word we are so familiar with, but what is love? In Austen’s work, I graally know that love is not just as abstract as we often regard. Take Elizabeth, for example, her love for Daisy is based on two things: respect and gratitude. She respects his valuable qualities: nobility and kindness, and even Wickham had done something so bad to him and his sister, he still didn’t blame him before others or let him lose all dignity in public. Also, she is grateful to Mr. Darcy, for his love, for his forgiveness about her bad manners when she rejected him, for his help to her sister’s marriage and her family’s fame. And finally, these turned out her attachment, affection and love for him. As for Darcy, his attention to Elizabeth was first on her eyes, full of liveliness, thoughts and pursuits and unlike any other ladies, she is such a unique girl that she didn’t flatter him at all, so for him she is so extraordinary and attractive. And Elizabeth got his respect and love because of her own independence, liveliness and uniqueness. And I regard their relationship as “Spirit Love”.

Austen’s attitude towards marriage, love, status and property can still be used as a reference. Nowadays, fast food culture derives fast-food-style love, although we are in the era of fast changes, it’s better for us to love rationally and independently. Hope everyone has his real, unique love.