㈠ 最新英语电影观后感!要有:电影名字,主角,感受,主要内容。希望带中文,不带也可以。一共要2篇而已!
《功夫熊猫》(《Kung Fu Panda》)的:
<1>
Funny!
I see this movie lastweek,
So terrfic,this film make me loving Kung Fu!
My liitle sister love the panda very much ,She ask me which kind annimal of Panda?
I told her its one of the cutiest animal in the world ,it only lives in China.
In this movie, Panda learns how to improve his level of Kung fu,many scence show that this cartoon is so funny,
You can see how things goes on with laugh,
I recommend this film to you.!
<2>
The film stars a panda named Po (voice of Jack Black), who is so fat he can barely get out of bed. He works for his father, Mr. Ping (James Hong) in a noodle shop, which features Ping's legendary Secret Ingredient. How Ping, apparently a stork or other billed member of the avian family, fathered a panda is a mystery, not least to Po, but then the movie is filled with a wide variety of creatures who don't much seem to notice their differences.
They live in the beautiful Valley of Peace with an ancient temple towering overhead, up zillions of steps, which the pudgy Po can barely climb. But climb them he does, dragging a noodle wagon, because all the people of the valley have gathered up there to witness the choosing of the Dragon Warrior, who will engage the dreaded Tai Lung (Ian McShane) in kung-fu combat. Five contenders have been selected, the "Furious Five": Monkey (Jackie Chan), Tigress (Angelina Jolie), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu) and Crane (David Cross). Tigress looks like she might be able to do some serious damage, but the others are less than impressive. Mantis in particular seems to weigh about an ounce, tops. All five have been trained (for nearly forever, I gather) by the wise Shifu, who with Dustin Hoffman's voice is one of the more dimensional characters in a story that doesn't give the others a lot of depth. Anyway, it's up to the temple master Oogway (Randall Duk Kim), an ancient turtle, to make the final selection, and he chooses -- yes, he chooses the hapless and pudgy Po.
The story then becomes essentially a series of action sequences, somewhat undermined by the fact that the combatants seem unable to be hurt, even if they fall from dizzying heights and crack stones open with their heads. There's an extended combat with Tai Lung on a disintegrating suspension bridge (haven't we seen that before?), hand-to-hand-to-tail combat with Po and Tai Lung, and upstaging everything, an energetic competition over a single mpling.
"Kung Fu Panda" is not one of the great recent animated films. The story is way too predictable, and truth to tell, Po himself didn't overwhelm me with his charisma. But it's elegantly drawn, the action sequences are packed with energy, and it's short enough that older viewers will be forgiving. For the kids, of course, all this stuff is much of a muchness, and here they go again.
电影《卢旺达饭店》
Hotel Rwanda ---- a story of an African Schinderler
Hotel Rwanda is a film about a man. It was based on a real story of a man who saved 1268 people’s lives in a madness genocidal, which happened in Rwanda, 1994. The film was directed by Terry George, 2004. The main actor Don Cheadle is not handsome but just an ordinary man. You probably will even not recognize him when you happen to meet him on the street. He acted a hero based on a true story, a man who was as simple as he is, Paul Rusesabagina. Paul is a hero, a real man, while a hero and a real man doesn’t always need to be handsome or attractive in the appearance. There are two nations in Rwanda, hutu and tutsi. Paul is a hutu manager working for a 4 stars hotel on town. The hutu army planed a genocidal to clear out all the tutsi people in ruwanda. The tutsi people were suffering a madness blood bath. Over 800,000 people had been killed within 100 days. Paul has a tutsi wife, in order to protect his wife, children and other tutsis; he took them to hide in the hotel Rwanda. There are many white people from all over the world lived in this hotel so the hotel is the safest place in Rwanda to hide. There are 80 UN soldiers in Rwanda but only 4 guarded in the hotel and all of them are not allowed to shot. If we say that Paul just wanted to save his wife at the beginning, after recognized that there is no one would come to help the tutsis, Paul throw himself into the breach. He bribed the hutu general by wine and gold, used out every coin of his to purchase the refugees’ lives, ten, a hundred, 2 hundreds, 3 hundreds… more and more tutsi refugees flee to the hotel wishing to survive. To them, Paul is an angel who keeps a hope for those hopeless people in the calamity. His goodness his mercy is the key to be alive.
The hotel Rwanda is a dramatically and war film, ingeniously, there was almost no lens for slaughtering; however, the threatener of death was full filling with the whole movie. One of the tutsi asked Paul,
“Why they are so truculence?”
“ Hatred? Insanity? … I don’t know.”
The event is a humanitarianism disaster and Paul needs no reason to save the lives. When the world closed its eyes, he opened his arms. Facing a madness calamity and crazy crowds, the indivial’s power is far from enough. However, Paul saved more than 1000 people’s lives. Paul Rusesabagina is a hero, a real man, an African Schinderler.
㈡ 急求英文电影的英文观后感……各位帮忙啊……明天交啊……
《功夫熊猫》(《Kung Fu Panda》)的:
<1>
Funny!
I see this movie lastweek,
So terrfic,this film make me loving Kung Fu!
My liitle sister love the panda very much ,She ask me which kind annimal of Panda?
I told her its one of the cutiest animal in the world ,it only lives in China.
In this movie, Panda learns how to improve his level of Kung fu,many scence show that this cartoon is so funny,
You can see how things goes on with laugh,
I recommend this film to you.!
<2>
The film stars a panda named Po (voice of Jack Black), who is so fat he can barely get out of bed. He works for his father, Mr. Ping (James Hong) in a noodle shop, which features Ping's legendary Secret Ingredient. How Ping, apparently a stork or other billed member of the avian family, fathered a panda is a mystery, not least to Po, but then the movie is filled with a wide variety of creatures who don't much seem to notice their differences.
They live in the beautiful Valley of Peace with an ancient temple towering overhead, up zillions of steps, which the pudgy Po can barely climb. But climb them he does, dragging a noodle wagon, because all the people of the valley have gathered up there to witness the choosing of the Dragon Warrior, who will engage the dreaded Tai Lung (Ian McShane) in kung-fu combat. Five contenders have been selected, the "Furious Five": Monkey (Jackie Chan), Tigress (Angelina Jolie), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu) and Crane (David Cross). Tigress looks like she might be able to do some serious damage, but the others are less than impressive. Mantis in particular seems to weigh about an ounce, tops. All five have been trained (for nearly forever, I gather) by the wise Shifu, who with Dustin Hoffman's voice is one of the more dimensional characters in a story that doesn't give the others a lot of depth. Anyway, it's up to the temple master Oogway (Randall Duk Kim), an ancient turtle, to make the final selection, and he chooses -- yes, he chooses the hapless and pudgy Po.
The story then becomes essentially a series of action sequences, somewhat undermined by the fact that the combatants seem unable to be hurt, even if they fall from dizzying heights and crack stones open with their heads. There's an extended combat with Tai Lung on a disintegrating suspension bridge (haven't we seen that before?), hand-to-hand-to-tail combat with Po and Tai Lung, and upstaging everything, an energetic competition over a single mpling.
"Kung Fu Panda" is not one of the great recent animated films. The story is way too predictable, and truth to tell, Po himself didn't overwhelm me with his charisma. But it's elegantly drawn, the action sequences are packed with energy, and it's short enough that older viewers will be forgiving. For the kids, of course, all this stuff is much of a muchness, and here they go again.
电影《卢旺达饭店》
Hotel Rwanda ---- a story of an African Schinderler
Hotel Rwanda is a film about a man. It was based on a real story of a man who saved 1268 people’s lives in a madness genocidal, which happened in Rwanda, 1994. The film was directed by Terry George, 2004. The main actor Don Cheadle is not handsome but just an ordinary man. You probably will even not recognize him when you happen to meet him on the street. He acted a hero based on a true story, a man who was as simple as he is, Paul Rusesabagina. Paul is a hero, a real man, while a hero and a real man doesn’t always need to be handsome or attractive in the appearance. There are two nations in Rwanda, hutu and tutsi. Paul is a hutu manager working for a 4 stars hotel on town. The hutu army planed a genocidal to clear out all the tutsi people in ruwanda. The tutsi people were suffering a madness blood bath. Over 800,000 people had been killed within 100 days. Paul has a tutsi wife, in order to protect his wife, children and other tutsis; he took them to hide in the hotel Rwanda. There are many white people from all over the world lived in this hotel so the hotel is the safest place in Rwanda to hide. There are 80 UN soldiers in Rwanda but only 4 guarded in the hotel and all of them are not allowed to shot. If we say that Paul just wanted to save his wife at the beginning, after recognized that there is no one would come to help the tutsis, Paul throw himself into the breach. He bribed the hutu general by wine and gold, used out every coin of his to purchase the refugees’ lives, ten, a hundred, 2 hundreds, 3 hundreds… more and more tutsi refugees flee to the hotel wishing to survive. To them, Paul is an angel who keeps a hope for those hopeless people in the calamity. His goodness his mercy is the key to be alive.
The hotel Rwanda is a dramatically and war film, ingeniously, there was almost no lens for slaughtering; however, the threatener of death was full filling with the whole movie. One of the tutsi asked Paul,
“Why they are so truculence?”
“ Hatred? Insanity? … I don’t know.”
The event is a humanitarianism disaster and Paul needs no reason to save the lives. When the world closed its eyes, he opened his arms. Facing a madness calamity and crazy crowds, the indivial’s power is far from enough. However, Paul saved more than 1000 people’s lives. Paul Rusesabagina is a hero, a real man, an African Schinderler.
参考地址:http://iask.sina.com.cn/b/13524280.html
㈢ 用英语写一篇 英语电影的读后感 谢谢 要电影名
《gong with the wind》 飘(乱世佳人)
See the over movie 《 gong with the wind 》 , I am very to move for ruide this person image.The ruide is handsome and natural and unrestrained, the magic power is endless, humor and wit, the strength is brave, he is rich, respecting again female, to love faithful.He again is a person who can see what others cann't, again sharp insight with the person of the self-control dint, and have to do the standard ownly.He is limitless ocean in elephant, thick forest in elephant, and can make female dependent on.The sijiali becomes friends with the ruide empress knot over the two marriage,however, ruide has been having no to changes the slightest to her the original intention, liking this in love with attitude the ream is felt by me get a fright.The writer gave the great breadth of view in ruide, he tolerate other people's mistake, respecting other people's right always.In his in the mind, men and women are complete equal.I do not know that still had the more perfect than this image what kind of male.
《小妇人》电影观后感(英文)Little woman
Little Amy stealths the show. Absolutely. Words of wisdom just slips out of her mouth so effortlessly yet so inspiring. And considering of her age, she gives a new meaning to what little woman is all about. I like the way little Amy fly about the scene with her fancy theatric moves, it’s hard not to give your attention when she is around. To be fair, she is a little bit overactive for her part, but I don’t blame her. As for her grown-up, I find the scene where she turnes down Jo’s offer of affection and bashs his jeasousy quite amusing. In fact, this is the soul of the play where everyone’s fate hangs on it. Whether it’s covincing or not can make or break the play. it’s a great pleasure to hear smart people defending and arguing for their feelings, so that they end up realizing they are not smart at all. So funny, I can play the scene time and time again in my head.
I don’t like Jo in this play. They’ve got the wrong girl to say the least. Even her beautifual black eyes and masculine eyebrow is of no help to her. The trick is you can’t call that bad acting, just that she doesn’t fit well with Jo. She sets about striking you as daring, unworldly, not bound by rules and lacking in feminiety. But she is just a tomboy. They are bunch of them nowadays and what the fuss all about her?. Jo should be someone unusual, one of a kind, out of this world. In a sense, I wouldn’t mind to call Jo an American incarnation of Joan of Arc. I have seen better. Now I have to confess her predecessor(Kathrine Herpen) is really of something.
The encounter between this Jo and her German professor is like staged romance. A silly school girl stumbling into a knowlegeable scholar who happens to be not married. Why does she get so tighten up in his room and what is that section scene in the theatre for. it’s all so cliché, second-hand romance or acting ed from other people’s genius plays, exactly like what Teddy says. And the way she throw herself to her lover and being so ready to give her heart is the last straw for me. A reformed woman, you’ll say.
If you want to know what good acting is about, just look at Meg, or the mother, though I think it’s too easy a case for Susan. Teddy’s role is delivered very well. He ‘s natural, and there’s no ambiguous thing about his feelings, so well done. Granted The problem with Jo and Teddy is in their characters, because they are of the same impulsive kind. They look at each other, and they see their own weakness, and the excitement challenging your own kind is quite childish, is’t? But the timing of self-awareness coming to you is also very important. Teddy finds his peace of mind in Amy, and Jo in professor. But I still think there’s no certainty about fate and character, not in real life, Teddy and Jo could have made the second best match. Nothing is perfect in the world, so why couldn’t they be part of it?
《阿甘正传》观后感(英文)
To be honest, this is the first time I ever write a review of a movie. And this beginning is a tough one—with an Oscar winner as its subject, surrounding which there is considerably controversy over the values it has questioned, the thoughts it tried to implicitly convey, and the art of the movie itself.
The following discussion will go on as a dissection of this movie into several aspects. This dissection is, however, necessarily incomprehensive, and I would just try to make it a original review in the eyes of a busy, yet inspirational student of science who, from time to time, glances at the palace of arts with admiration and, more importantly, love.
电影《卢旺达饭店》
Hotel Rwanda ---- a story of an African Schinderler
Hotel Rwanda is a film about a man. It was based on a real story of a man who saved 1268 people’s lives in a madness genocidal, which happened in Rwanda, 1994. The film was directed by Terry George, 2004. The main actor Don Cheadle is not handsome but just an ordinary man. You probably will even not recognize him when you happen to meet him on the street. He acted a hero based on a true story, a man who was as simple as he is, Paul Rusesabagina. Paul is a hero, a real man, while a hero and a real man doesn’t always need to be handsome or attractive in the appearance. There are two nations in Rwanda, hutu and tutsi. Paul is a hutu manager working for a 4 stars hotel on town. The hutu army planed a genocidal to clear out all the tutsi people in ruwanda. The tutsi people were suffering a madness blood bath. Over 800,000 people had been killed within 100 days. Paul has a tutsi wife, in order to protect his wife, children and other tutsis; he took them to hide in the hotel Rwanda. There are many white people from all over the world lived in this hotel so the hotel is the safest place in Rwanda to hide. There are 80 UN soldiers in Rwanda but only 4 guarded in the hotel and all of them are not allowed to shot. If we say that Paul just wanted to save his wife at the beginning, after recognized that there is no one would come to help the tutsis, Paul throw himself into the breach. He bribed the hutu general by wine and gold, used out every coin of his to purchase the refugees’ lives, ten, a hundred, 2 hundreds, 3 hundreds… more and more tutsi refugees flee to the hotel wishing to survive. To them, Paul is an angel who keeps a hope for those hopeless people in the calamity. His goodness his mercy is the key to be alive.
The hotel Rwanda is a dramatically and war film, ingeniously, there was almost no lens for slaughtering; however, the threatener of death was full filling with the whole movie. One of the tutsi asked Paul,
“Why they are so truculence?”
“ Hatred? Insanity? … I don’t know.”
The event is a humanitarianism disaster and Paul needs no reason to save the lives. When the world closed its eyes, he opened his arms. Facing a madness calamity and crazy crowds, the indivial’s power is far from enough. However, Paul saved more than 1000 people’s lives. Paul Rusesabagina is a hero, a real man, an African Schinderler.
〈撞车〉
After seeing this movie, I was able to really understand what "Six Degrees of Separation" means. There is a thread that weaves its way through the landscape of life connecting, influencing, and defining all. This movie is certainly thought-provoking, one cannot watch it without feeling either privileged to have become part of the fabric, or like a fly on the wall - seeing, yet unable to influence or guide. There is almost a sense of frustration at ones inability to be no more than an observer in this movie since it compels you to want to shout in warning, gasp in shock, cry in sorrow, and hold in comfort. "Crash" is definitely not a movie to use as a venue to escape life for a couple of hours, but it is a movie that certainly makes you take a second and third look at who you are within yourself. The actors are surprising not only for their depth of performance, but also because they do not play characters you think you know. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes drama, action, comedic relief, or just an appreciation for a well-thought out movie.
《永不妥协》
In a world where heroes are often in short supply, the story of Erin Brockovich is an nspirational reminder of the power of the human spirit. Her passion, tenacity and steadfast desire to fight for the rights of the underdog defied the odds .Her victory was made even more sweet by the fact that while helping others, she in turn helped herself. Erin Brockovich is a stirring, funny and unconventional drama.
Julia Roberts acts as the twice-divorced mother of three young children who sees an injustice, takes on the bad guy and wins. while working, Erin stumbles upon some medical records placed in real estate files. Confused, she begins to question the connection. She convinces Ed to allow her to investigate, where she discovers a cover-up involving contaminated water in a local community, which is causing devastating illnesses among its residents.
Although the local citizens are initially leery of becoming involved, Erin's persistence and the personal interest she takes in their lives makes them listen. A kindred spirit, Erin is one of them, and her ability to connect with them on their level makes them comfortable, ultimately earning their trust. Helping her out is her next door neighbor George , a Harley Davidson biker whose friendship and support allows her the time to pursue the case. Going door to door, she signs up over 600 plaintiffs, and Erin and Ed, with the help of a major law firm, go on to receive the largest settlement ever paid in a direct-action lawsuit in U.S. history..$333 million. By triumphing over insurmountable odds, she is able to prove herself, and reinvent her life.
㈣ 你们看完卢旺达饭店这部电影后有什么感想
感受:祖国真好
㈤ 求《卢旺达饭店》观后感
《卢旺达饭店》买了几个星期了,一直都没看,不是不舍得看,而是不敢看,因为知道这是一场人间惨剧,不知道电影会怎么来表达,面对每天繁忙的工作,不敢让自己的心情过于沉重,坚持到昨天晚上,才下决心看了。
看着电影,好几次,我禁不住都笑了,当然电影不是搞笑剧,而且这里处理得没有过多的血腥镜头,只是这里面的好多次入微的动作细节和语言,让我不由得想大声嘲笑现在这个世界,这个所谓的世界秩序和格局。
这是一个根据真实故事改编的电影,一个卢旺达的高档酒店经理,保罗,胡图族人,在1994年种族冲突中救了1000多位难民的生命。当年比利时殖民者硬生生地把当地的土著人按照皮肤的深浅和鼻梁的高低分为胡图族和图西族,并在他们离开的时候把政权交给了图西族,从此也就造成了两族世世代代的恩怨。终于掌握了政权的胡图族人要向图西族人报复,纵容着民兵组织的仇视情绪,终于在一个总统被刺身亡的节点爆发了,“砍倒高高的树”,“胡图力量”,种族大屠杀开始了。
保罗所在的那家酒店是比利时老板高级休闲度假酒店,利用酒店经理的职位,他与那些军方上层人士,白人,联合国官员周旋着,啤酒,威士忌,香烟,紧张地巴结着,对于西方的强大和维护世界秩序世界和平的信念已经渗透到了他的每个血管里。他一直都相信着依靠那些以美国西欧国家为主导的联合国可以在卢旺达实现和平,至少那些白人朋友在需要的时候可以帮助他。但在战争爆发后的一系列事件,所有的希望都成了泡影,多年的经营只能换来一个生命的延续而已,最后也被迫背井离乡。这中间一系列努力在电影里看来只能是对现实的巨大嘲讽。
镜头一:战争爆发,屠杀开始,可怜的几个比利时籍联合国维和士兵只能顾上仅有的几个酒店和难民营,甚至有11个维和士兵被杀,虽然有枪,却不能开枪,维和将军的电话求救,数天的等待,随后等到的只是一个小队的维和官兵,在酒店避难的上千人欢呼雀跃,以为是和平的力量,生存的机会,可他们带来的却只是帮助所有联合国官员和所有外国人撤离的命令。维和将军告诉保罗,因为你们这些黑人,而且是非洲的黑人没有价值,不值得他们的政治角逐中的选票,所以没人会来真正关心他们的死活。哼哼,看到这里,我不禁点头,那些所谓维护和平的漂亮宣言在这里多么苍白无力啊!美国大兵们,在越南,在韩国,在伊拉克,在索马里到处出现,扮演着世界宪兵的角色,为什么,因为那里有他们的战略和经济利益,可怜的卢旺达,连这点仅有的利益都没办法实现,所以,他们自己的问题只能自己办。
镜头二:一个欧洲摄影记者,很正义的人,拼死在外面拍到了种族屠杀的画面,只是男人的花心总是没办法抑制的,在酒店搭上了一个当地图西族女孩。在撤离的时候,图西族女孩哭喊着希望他可以救她,而他可以做的却只是把钱(已经没用了的货币)给保罗希望他可以帮助,而保罗一直都是相信西方人可以救他们的啊。撤离的那天下着大雨,摄影记者走向大巴士的时候,酒店的侍者还在后面给他打着伞,他连声说着不要侍者却坚持,因为即使在那时,他们都还坚持着自己的专业—高级酒店的星级服务,记者无以自容,只能说羞愧两字。西方人给当地人洗脑,告诉他们什么叫品位,什么叫服务,却没有告诉当地人怎么振兴自己的民族,他们只是用这些来挣钱而已,在生死相关的时候这些东西就显得非常得无聊了。
镜头三:保罗对西方的信任无以复加,以至于很多次他救人竟然用非常可笑的一些借口,而事实是,这些借口竟然都帮他实现了救人的目的。在酒店里他一直在巴结一个胡图政府军队的将军,战乱当中要求将军的帮助除了贿赂,当然还需要一些威胁:一次保罗说美国人一直用卫星在监视,事后妻子问他是不是真有其事,他笑笑说他怎么可能知道,总不能说美国人躲在树上偷窥着,两人大笑,我也大笑;另一次他威胁将军说如果不去阻止屠杀,如果到时候美国人来抓战犯,他将不会替他辩护作证。真真可笑,可那个将军确实相信了,他希望如果真得有那个时候,还是多一个人替他说话的好,而且还是一个在白人圈子里混得还不错的人。一场屠杀避免了,不过不知道布什看到这里是为美国骄傲呢还是像那个摄影记者一样感到羞愧呢?
这部电影今年金球奖金熊奖都拿到了提名。这场人类的浩劫今天终于有部电影可以来记录了,只是不知道这些西方人看到这部电影后会怎么想?看来卢旺达人民应该好好学学中国人的近代史,靠别人是靠不住的,民族只有自立才能自强。
㈥ 求卢旺达饭店观后感300字左右的!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
《卢旺达饭店》买了,一直都没看,不是不舍得看,而是不敢看,因为知道这是一场人间惨剧,不知道电影会怎么来表达,面对每天繁忙的工作,不敢让自己的心情过于沉重,坚持到昨天晚上,才下决心看了。
这是一个根据真实故事改编的电影,一个卢旺达的高档酒店经理,保罗,胡图族人,在1994年种族冲突中救了1000多位难民的生命。当年比利时殖民者硬生生地把当地的土著人按照皮肤的深浅和鼻梁的高低分为胡图族和图西族,并在他们离开的时候把政权交给了图西族,从此也就造成了两族世世代代的恩怨。终于掌握了政权的胡图族人要向图西族人报复,纵容着民兵组织的仇视情绪,终于在一个总统被刺身亡的节点爆发了,“砍倒高高的树”,“胡图力量”,种族大屠杀开始了。
保罗所在的那家酒店是比利时老板高级休闲度假酒店,利用酒店经理的职位,他与那些军方上层人士,白人,联合国官员周旋着,啤酒,威士忌,香烟,紧张地巴结着,对于西方的强大和维护世界秩序世界和平的信念已经渗透到了他的每个血管里。他一直都相信着依靠那些以美国西欧国家为主导的联合国可以在卢旺达实现和平,至少那些白人朋友在需要的时候可以帮助他。但在战争爆发后的一系列事件,所有的希望都成了泡影,多年的经营只能换来一个生命的延续而已,最后也被迫背井离乡。这中间一系列努力在电影里看来只能是对现实的巨大嘲讽。
这部电影今年金球奖金熊奖都拿到了提名。这场人类的浩劫今天终于有部电影可以来记录了,只是不知道这些西方人看到这部电影后会怎么想?看来卢旺达人民应该好好学学中国人的近代史,靠别人是靠不住的,民族只有自立才能自强。
㈦ 电影《卢旺达饭店》从胡图族与图西族电影来写一个民族问题的观后感
一 政权合法性的思考
在比利时人的扶持下,图西族当政,然后人数居多的穷人胡图族造反,夺得政权,现在图西族又起来造反打内战,一个典型的后殖民主义时代的非洲国家而已。但是这件事情之所以搞得惊天动地,是因为有史以来最大规模的屠杀竟然发生在这里。
首先自白种人16、17世纪以来的殖民统治,无形中让非洲被动地建立了一种政治秩序。那么,白种人的走出非洲以后,便是一时间秩序的丧失与权力的真空,以及民族情绪中非理性的蔓延。
影片首先展示了非洲生活恬静和美好,胡图族极端分子的煽动一样,煽动人与人之间的仇恨。这种煽动起初并不奏效,和《卢旺达饭店》中的主角保罗.卢斯赛伯吉纳和他的雇员们一样,当时的人们认为这些完全是无稽之谈,一边喝着啤酒一边嘲笑政客们的无聊与狡诈,并且断言他们的煽动注定是徒劳之举。
1994年4月6日,卢旺达胡图族总统因飞机失事而命丧黄泉,空难在卢旺达国内引发了胡图族与图西族两族的互相猜疑,被胡图族种族主义者控制的电台煽动胡图族人铲除图西族人。极端分子所控制的报纸电台等媒体不但鼓吹暴力还煽动仇恨外国人。当卢国总统的座机被击落时,这些媒体渲染是图西族人串通西方人干的。当驻在卢国的比利时军队奉联合国之命保护卢国总理时,被宣传成帮助图西族人策划屠杀胡图族人,并残忍地杀害了被他们称为侵略军的比利时士兵。其目的是为了不受限制地屠杀,驱赶图西族人,以达到阻止图西族分享政府权力的目的。民族矛盾越演越烈, 1994年4月6日,由胡图族士兵组成的总统卫队杀害了卢旺达女总理和3名部长,在此后的100天里面,阳光明媚的卢旺达共有91万人被屠杀,其中94%是图西族人。
一个政权仅仅依靠暴力就能够维持一种持久稳定的秩序。一种统治能够得以维持,一种制度能够得以延续,还取决于该统治或该制度的权威性,即取决于民众对于该统治或制度一定程度的认可和接受。换句话说,政治统治必须以政治合法性为基础。政治权力的运用必须民众的认可,让民众认为政治行为具有合法性,即:政治必须合法。任何政府的有效统治都离不开合法性的支持。白种人的走出非洲以后,便是一时间秩序的丧失与权力的真空,政府合法性权威随即被民族主义取代而丧失。
二 民族情绪非理性蔓延
人类的全部历史只是一部从兽性到人性、从野蛮到文明的发展史。人的无意识有个体的和非个体(或超个体)的两个层面。前者只到达婴儿最早记忆的程度,是由冲动、愿望、模糊的知觉以及经验组成的无意识;后者则包括婴儿实际开始以前的全部时间,即包括祖先生命的残留,它的内容能在一切人的心中找到,带有普遍性,故称“集体无意识”。集体无意识的内容是原始的,包括本能和原型。它只是一种可能,以一种不明确的记忆形式积淀在人的大脑组织结构之中,在一定条件下能被唤醒、激活。
在电影里我们看到了混乱的景象,有点类似纳粹德国,但最相近的,是我们的文革。到处是情绪失控的群众和民兵。胡图族种族主义者控制的广播电台也为大屠杀的行为煽风助阵,他们叫嚣着“让一切郁积的爆发出来吧……在这样一个时刻,鲜血将滚滚而出”,失控的人群在失控的媒体号召下四处搜寻和杀死图西族人,空气中弥漫着血腥的味道。在集体愚忠般的狂怒中,也有少数人能够仍然保持清醒与良知,在历史凶险的狂潮中作出自己微弱但却实实在在的抵抗。比如电影的主人公。
从别人那里转过来的,供你参考!
㈧ 以观看卢旺达饭店这部影片引起对我国民族问题的思考(急,2000字)
你会感慨啊,还是中国好啊,别的咱不敢说,民族问题解决的还行
㈨ 卢旺达饭店的影片评价
影片中没有对恐怖血腥的屠杀场面进行刻意的描写,而是转而刻画保罗铤而走险的紧绷的心弦和住宿在卢旺达饭店的旅客们面对层出不穷的紧张态势随时引发的新的恐慌。影片似乎有意淡化真实事件的残酷性,从视觉角度来说似乎削弱了整体的穿透力和表现力,这也正是该片的缺憾之处 。(搜狐娱乐评)
导演特瑞·乔治选择去表现了人们面对随时可能失去的生命之时的行为、神态和心理,重点刻画了保罗行为变化后的心理。酒店环境的选择也帮助影片避免了表现屠杀的恐怖画面。
部分观众将《卢旺达饭店》评为2004年最真诚与最有力量的电影,这种力量当然是来自于它所取材的真实故事,影片表现出一个平凡的人在非常的环境下所迸发出的非凡举动。这个基于真实故事的影像并不只是一个提供了解和回忆的入口,希望观众不应只有为人性光辉所感动,还应有对和平的期盼 。(新浪娱乐评)
㈩ 谁能给一份关于电影“卢旺达饭店”的英文介绍包括剧情简介,评论
“Hotel Rwanda” is a devastating masterpiece, about a massacre and society that far too few know about.
Mention Rwanda to most people and they will know vaguely that something horrible happened there. Tell them that a million people were murdered as the world looked the other way, and they either get quiet or defensive.
This fact is important, and relevant, because “Hotel Rwanda” is a movie with a message, made by people who are not just perplexed about America’s questionable foreign policy, but irate. This is a drama made to stir up the pot, elicit sympathy, anger and guilt, and given what happened ring 1994, and our country’s neglect of Congo and Sudan last year, it is not all that difficult to do.
In Rwanda, more than a million people were slaughtered as the Tutsi and Hutu tribes squabbled over control of the country. Encouraged by bigotry, racist radio personalities and the assassination of the country’s leader, the Hutu started destroying their counterparts as mob rule prevailed. But unlike so many cases of genocide, where there are clear religious or racial differences, the Tutsi and Hutu are nearly identical, only differentiated by the previous colonial government, which taught one group to hate the other.
And so as friends attack friends, neighbors kill neighbors and children become the target for the Hutu who seek to kill the next generation of the Tutsi, Paul Rusesabagina (Don Cheadle) realizes that his home, as he knew it, is gone forever. Rusesabagina is the manager of an elite resort in Rwanda, where the tourists come for vacation, and where the country’s elites come for a free drink and good conversation.
Once the slaughter starts, his hotel quickly becomes an island in a sea of destruction/ Within days, United Nations peacekeepers have set up camp outside his front door, hundreds of desperate Tutsis rush to him looking for shelter and safety, and he soon finds his family, as well as 1,200 Rwandans under his care as they hide from the hell that exists only miles away.
“Hotel Rwanda” is really the story of this firestorm as seen through Rusesabagina’s eyes. In a decision that has angered critics of the film, who see “ Rwanda” as a sugar-coated story of mass-murder, we see what Rusesabagina sees and exist within his sphere of hope and persistence.
But as a movie, this is a stunningly effective and heart-wrenching perspective. How many movies have we seen in the past year, where the intimacy of a single story was lost amid a sea of faceless and nameless victims? “ Rwanda” is distinctly a story of Rusesabagina’s plight, made all that much more suspenseful because he had a chance at surviving. And when he emerges from his oasis, seeing road after road littered with bodies, the scope of the atrocities is not lost in the slightest.
The film rests solely on the shoulders of two actors. Cheadle, as Rusesabagina, projects a quiet dignity, putting on the same suit and smile every day, that makes his rare emotional outbursts and desperation that much more striking.
And the other is Nick Nolte, as a U.N. official, who is the focal point of the film’s political messages surrounding the apathy and ignorance of the West. In one haunting speech, he tells Rusesabagina that no one cares about his poor, black country, and that his life is a lost cause.
There are flaws in “ Rwanda,” Rusesabagina’s death-defying escapes coming to resemble each other, echoing the same pattern of tension, chaos and release. But it is the film’s steadfast conviction, when a powerful message emerges unfiltered and unhindered, that makes “ Rwanda” stand out.
This is the kind of film that makes you sad, then makes you mad, and leaves you breathless, realizing that the reality of what occurred is surely far more horrifying than anything that can be captured on film.