6部英文电影的影评英文版

⑤ 求一部电影的英文影评

Romantic comedy has never had a strong basis in logic and this was never more apparent than in "Kate & Leopold", Meg Ryan's mb but enjoyable return to the romantic comedy fray.

Ryan plays Ally McBeal-alike Kate, a career-orientated New Yorker with romance issues. She lives in an apartment below her ex, Stuart (Schreiber), a scientist who discovers - as you do - a time portal just off the Brooklyn Bridge. Travelling back to 1876, Stuart accidentally brings Leopold (Jackman), an English ke, back to the present day with him.

Kate clashes with Leopold initially, only to be won over by his dashing English charm (the English being big on charm in the 19th century, of course). But, as he's Stuart's great-grandfather, Leopold must return to his own time to keep the family line intact, leaving Kate to decide between a future in the present or the past.

With its mostly nonsensical plot, "Kate & Leopold" is the kind of sentimental flight of fancy where romance and chivalry preside over narrative logic. Never mind how the time travel works, if you care enough about the fate of these two likable leads, then common sense is irrelevant to the film's enjoyment factor.

Enjoying more success here than in his previous romantic comedy "Someone Like You", Hugh Jackman has the looks, decorum, and comic timing to capture Leopold's persona. He's the highlight of the film, and some of the most amusing scenes are between Leopold and Kate's brother, Charlie (Meyer), an unemployed actor who thinks Leopold's anachronistic persona is an extreme form of method acting.

Hilarious at times, unbearably soppy at others, "Kate & Leopold" is comfortable viewing for old romantics.

⑥ 求几部电影的观后感（英文版）

功夫熊猫
Or the dream factory has always been the high standard, the screen exquisite detail, vivid characters vivid, touching story twists and turns, the most important thing is it in the most simple and easy to understand that the way of a token, that is - there is no shortcut to the world and Cheats, the only winning Famen is believe in themselves.

More do not want to repeat the story, because it really well. Look at the process, appeared frequently Huiyi people laugh, the whole atmosphere is relaxed and go. This film has done very authentic, a little bit by the Westerners did not interpret the feeling, no matter which story or convey the moods, whether the screen or the details are all the way east; only special is probably the Speaking of modern, such as, for example ok

中文意思
还是一贯的梦工场的高水准，画面精致细腻，人物生动传神，故事情节曲折动人，最重要的是它以最简单易解的方式说明白了一个道理，那就是——世界上没有任何捷径和秘籍，唯一的制胜法门就是相信自己。

不想再说更多的剧情，因为它真的很出色。看的过程中，频频出现人们会意的笑声，整个氛围相当的轻松和惬意。这个片子做得非常地道，一点儿也没有是由西方人演绎的感觉，不论是故事还是其中传达的意境，不论是画面还是其中的细节，都是东方式的；唯一特别的可能就是出现的现代的口语，比如ok之类的。

⑦ 关于经典英文电影的影评

《百万英镑》给我印象深刻的是它的幽默滑稽的手法，生动有趣又入木三分地展现了金钱社会的世态炎凉。具有讽刺意味的是，差不多一个世纪过去了，片中描写的种种现象都存在于现实社会中，让人联想到当今社会中人们的感慨，“钱不是万能的，但没钱是万万不能的”，极具批判现实意义 。派克在片中颓废加调侃的表演和他在银幕上大多数严肃正义的君子形象迥然不同，显示了他塑造不同类型人物的功力和演技。

⑧ 求一篇英文电影的英文影评

Pride & Prejudice (2005)
傲慢与偏见 凯拉奈特莉版
The story is based on Jane Austen's novel about five sisters - Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty and Lydia Bennet - in Georgian England. Their lives are turned upside down when a wealthy young man (Mr. Bingley) and his best friend (Mr. Darcy) arrive in their neighborhood.
Jane Austen's tale of love and economics reaches us once more with the energy of a thorough novelty. "Pride and Prejudice" has been a favorite novel of mine since I first read it and I've seen Laurence Olivier and Greer Garson, Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle and now Matthew MacFadyen and Kiera Knightly. Amazingly enough I've never been disappointed. The material seems to be full proof. Colin Firth's Darcy, in many ways, is the Darcy I've always imagined. He's been an actor I've followed feverishly since his glorious Adrian LeDuc in "Apartment Zero", Matthew MacFadyen was totally new to me but he managed to create that sense of longing that makes that final pay off so satisfying. Kiera Knightly is a ravishing revelation. I must confess, I didn't remotely imagined that she was capable of the powerful range she brilliantly shows here. The other big surprise is Joe Wright, the director, in his feature film debut which is more than promising, it's extraordinary. The photography, the art direction and the spectacular supporting cast, in particular Donald Sutherland and Brenda Blethyn, makes this new version of a perennial classic a memorable evening at the movies

⑨ ！！！！急求英语电影的英语影评

简爱
Kent
State
University's
school
of
theatre
and
dance
performed
a
rendition
of
the
classic,
Jane
Eyre
this
month.
The
show
was
a
musical
with
all
of
the
necessary
elements
to
lift
you
from
your
seat
and
submerse
youinto
a
society
in
nineteenth
century
England
from
the
time
the
cell
phone
shut-off
announcement
was
made
until
the
last
note
at
the
curtain
call.
The
recurring
arches,
darkened,
soft
lighting,
and
the
use
of
a
classic
chorus
to
go
along
with
them
alluded
that
a
sinister
underbelly
of
social
status
and
reputation
were
present
in
the
performance.
One
of
the
first
things
that
an
audience
member
noticed
was
the
grandeur
of
the
set.
It
was
composed
of
a
gothic-style
foreground
with
rustic
twigs
of
a
root-like
earthy
appearance.
There
were
grand
arches
for
windows
and
entries
as
well.
Also,
the
background
was
a
large
arch
with
the
silhouette
of
roots.
There
were
also
two
matching
greek-style
pillar
arches
on
either
side
of
the
stage.
They
added
a
lot
to
many
messages
of
the
show.
For
one,
they
were
grand
structures
that
were
barren
inside
which
is
much
like
Mr.
Rochester
himself.
He
was
a
man
of
high
social
stature
but
felt
enslaved
by
his
trick
of
a
marriage
and
his
grand
yet
incomplete
(without
a
true
love)
home.
The
arches
also
suggest
the
importance
of
reputation
with
the
same
sort
of
fundamental
grand
image
yet
emptiness.
The
way
that
people
are
enslaved
yet
scramble
to
ascertain
that
solid
image
amongst
their
peers.
The
arches
were
almost
inviting
the
audience
to
come
inside
to
reveal
their
secret,
the
thing
that
was
hidden
deep
inside
that
could
send
the
structure
crumbling
in
ruin.

⑩ 求经典外国电影影评---要英文版本的

珍珠港的影评

pearl harbour film review

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.

Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?

If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.

Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions