I watched the movie "Day After Tomorrow" has strong feelings. I think this is the advent of catastrophe is not only natural disasters, more importantly, the destruction of human beings to the earth. Warming of the Earth continuously, because of human emissions from non-stop, cut down trees. This is wrong. We must properly protect the earth, a variety of trees, love nature, love animals, do not let the earth be polluted! 行不？
⑵ 一篇英文电影评论 <<后天>>
1. This movie takes a big-budget, special-effects-filled look at what the world would look like if the greenhouse effect and global warming continued at such levels that they resulted in worldwide catastrophe and disaster, including multiple hurricanes, tornadoes, tidal waves, floods and the beginning of the next Ice Age. At the center of the story is a paleoclimatologist (a scientist who studies the ways weather patterns changed in the past), Professor Jack Hall (Quaid), who tries to save the world from the effects of global warming while also trying to get to his son, Sam (Gyllenhaal), who was in New York City as part of a scholastic competition, when the city was overwhelmed by the chilling beginnings of the new Ice Age. In addition to all of the other challenges Dr. Hall faces, he's also going against the flow as humanity races south to warmer climes, and he's nearly the only one going north...
2. When global warming causes world wide disasters and leads to an ice age, a climatologist named Jack Hall tries to rescue his son Sam who is trapped in New York. Jack must go from Washington D.C. to New York, but on the way some things happen. Can Jack rescue his son?
3. We humans are such sinners. We pillage and plunder our planet's natural resources, carelessly and indignantly burn our fossil fuels, and throw caution to the wind for our wanton irresponsiblity.
Well, to coin a classic phrase, "It's not nice to fool Mother Nature." And she's one broad you don't dare want to mess with, as the disaster-laden THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW attests. In a movie that must have environmentalists and tree huggers worldwide grinning from pierced ear to pierced ear, we humans are forced at last to atone for the sin of global warming--a sin that melts the polar caps and brings on another Ice Age (in about the time it takes to play a baseball game).
Forget the plot. It's worse than bad--it's trite, banal, hackneyed, threadbare, and worn-out all rolled into one. Dennis Quaid is the climatologist who predicts doom but is subsequently ignored by his greedy government; he also has a son who ends up trapped in New York. The beautiful Sela Ward plays the standard this-disaster-epic-must-have-a-female-lead-who-spends-her-time-wringing-her-hands-and-looking-worried-and-then-cries part. Ian Holm, for goodness sake, is Bilbo Baggins, not some Scottish scientist about to go into the deep freeze, and Jake Gyllenhaal, who plays Quaid's and Ward's son, has a constant smirk on his face that I could never figure out.
As I said, forget the plot. This movie's strength is its visual onslaught of destruction and disaster on a global scale--from tornadoes ravaging Los Angeles (Why do LA TV reporters feel compelled to cover a twister a stone's throw away on live TV?) to three cataclysmic "blizzard hurricanes" that devour the Northern Hemisphere. The special effects are well-done, and jarring; seeing a huge tidal wave overtake the Statue of Liberty and then sweep relentlessly into Manhattan (Why didn't Brooklyn and Queens get equal time?) is bone-chilling. Throw in a pack of hungry wolves escaped from the zoo and an eye of each storm that plunges the temperature minus 150 degrees in a matter of seconds, and you've got a virtual kitchen sink of gloom and doom. Our fearless government reluctantly acts; in a huge twist of irony, the U.S. is evacuated, with its citizens streaming into Mexico, and the northern states take on a popsicle effect. It's all great fun to watch.
THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW succeeds on the visual, and fails dismally on everything else. Now I've got to go get my twelve-pack out of the freezer. I want to see what frozen beer tastes like.
4. There's no two ways about it...filmmaker Roland Emmerich really despises New York...three of his last four films depict some level of destruction within the Big Apple. Why does he hate it so? I have no idea, but he also doesn't seem all that found of Los Angeles, either...
The Day After Tomorrow (2004), written, proced and directed by Roland Emmerich stars Dennis Quaid (who'd been having a really decent run of good films, up until now, that is...), and Jake Gyllenhaal, who seems to bounce between really good movies (Donnie Darko) to really lousy ones (Bubble Boy, Highway). Also appearing is Emmy Rossum (who bares a remarkable resemblance, at times, to American Pie's Elizabeth Shannon), Jay O. Sanders (Daylight), Perry King (The Lords of Flatbush), Kenneth Walsh (Miracle), Sela `yowsa, yowsa' Ward, and Ian `Bilbo Baggins' Holm.
Okay...Jack Hall (Quaid) is a paleoclimatologist...what's that, you say? Well, apparently it's someone who studies the weather of the past, using ice core samples from the artic and sophisticated computer programs...more or less a glorified weatherman. During his research, he's found evidence to support the world is soon (soon meaning anywhere from 100 to 1,000 years) heading for another ice age, but no one is taking him too seriously, especially not the haughty Vice President (Walsh), probably e to the fact the weather reports we get on the TV are usually only right about half the time, so why should we jump through hoops for this clown? Surprise, surprise, it turns out Walsh is right (but his timing is way off...typical weatherman) as the poopie hits the fan...big time. Hail the size of footballs in Japan, tornadoes in LA, tide waves and crazy snow in New York (haven't they suffered enough?), all resulting in a global climate change, which doesn't sound all that bad, but basically the entire northern hemisphere is buried under ice and snow...a lot of ice and snow...and temperatures are dropping. Oh why didn't they listen to Hall? The fools...the frozen fools...
I will say this...The Day After Tomorrow sported some of the best special effects I've seen in awhile. The wide scale destruction of major cities was very intense (Irwin Allen, the master of disaster, the man who brought us all those wonderful 70's disaster movie, would have been proud)...also, I thought the acting was passable, which is sad, given the experienced cast involved, but they were just doing what they were told. If I were to rate this film on the special effects alone, it would be five stars, but I have to also consider the other aspects, the story, the dialog and such. It's these elements (or lack of) that ultimately derailed the film, for me at least. Emmerich seems to try and dazzle the audience with glossy special effects in hope we won't put too much thought into all the holes, large and small, that riddle the plot. I remember when I saw Emmerich's Independence Day (1996) for the first time, I was really taken with the film, but subsequent viewings revealed the paper thin construction, allowing the story to collapse in on itself...here, I need not watch the film again as the flimsy nature came through like a sledgehammer to the head...and Emmerich lays on the schmaltzy, maudlin sentimentality, disguised in the form of altruistic self sacrifice and heroism, about as thick as he lays the snows on New York...I would have thought it difficult to top the gushy, slushy, saccharine sweet goo presented in Independence Day, but I was wrong, as here, he turns it into an art form. The dialog was just awful...I was surprised some of the actors managed to get their lines out while keeping a straight face. Also, the dialog was entirely predictable, especially between the pregnant pauses meant to heighten the emotional level for the drivel soon to follow...I actually found myself speaking lines before they were spoken in the film, as it was that obvious as to what was coming. And the film seems inundated with a preachy smugness...yes, we consume fossil fuels and use resources from the Earth, but does that necessarily make us evil and deserving of the scenario played out in this film? I love it when Hollywood, in all of its shallow gloriousness, tries to teach the rest of the world what's wrong with us. This is a big difference between Emmerich and Irwin Allen...Allen made disaster films to engage and entertain, while Emmerich seems to use the medium as a means to tell us the error of our so called destructive ways, and showing the ruinous consequences that result. Ahh, I've stood on my soapbox long enough...here's some scenes to watch for...the one, after New York is frozen, with the homeless man teaching the rich kid, who normally wouldn't have given the filthy man the time of day, how to use newspapers and such to insulate himself by stuffing them in his clothes...can you see the irony here? The homeless, once a burden on our society, have now, after the disaster, found purpose in advising the uninitiated on how to survive, as they've had to do living on the mean streets. Everyone go out and befriend a homeless person now, before it's too late...okay, how about this scene...the kids, now stuck in the Manhattan library after the storm, are scrounging for food, and break into some vending machines. The homeless guy suggests looking in the trash cans, as there's always something to eat in trash cans (yeah, okay...I'll tell you what my stinky friend, I'll eat the potato chips and M&M's and you can have whatever edible, maggot infested morsels you find rummaging in the garbage)...again, infinitely invaluable advice from the homeless...
⑶ 谁知道 电影后天 的影评
本片子片头首先是一个较长的移动镜头，是航拍的，交代大的环境是在南极，然后紧接着就是冰川大裂缝的惊险情节，这一组快节奏的惊险镜头最后由一个大远景来结尾，展现了冰川大裂缝之大。这部电影的摄影善于运用前景来营造气氛，并且几乎每个镜头都是运动的，拍摄的外景喜欢用天空的夕阳作为后景，善于运用大自然赋予的美来增加构图的美。
在东京天空下冰雹的那组镜头，虽然我觉得冰雹有些大的夸张，但我感觉出一种美，像大块的水晶，给人们一种提问，明天我们的生活环境会不会出现这样的景象。如果出现该怎么样办。
“明天之后，你会在哪？”也许我们每个人都不知道答案。
当你看到《后天》电影DVD封面上的这醒目的提问时，会自问？如果我们真地在如此的挥霍自然，明天之后，我们会在哪里呢？
也许每个人都会说这是一部灾难片，我却不这样认为，只是灾难片会给人们这样的悸动吗？只是灾难片会这样引人深思吗？只是灾难片会让我们看到那么美好的“明天”吗？《后天》在我眼里是一部结合了亲情、爱情、友情、社会责任、人类文明的综合性电影。
《后天》中的主人公——古气候学家杰克·霍尔为了去营救被困于纽约的儿子，不惜冒着失去生命的危险在冰天雪地里前往纽约。这里体现的父子之情，是多么纯正——不论他们平时的相处时间是多么的少，无论杰克为了研究多么忽略他的家人，但在关键时刻，他做了保证，他前往，前往他儿子的身边。他的儿子森同样的爱他的父亲，当被问之最快乐的假期时，他的回答竟是和父亲一起遇难十多天。遇难可不是什么好事，可是能和爸爸在一起，那就是最美好的。当飓风眼袭击过后，通往“希望”的门被打开时，杰克和森面对面的那一刻，那种激动时不能言语的，不用说“我爱你”，只有一句“you make it”就能表达出全部的情感——欣慰，激动，无限的亲情，温暖的爱。
你会为了你喜欢的女孩冲向危险么？你会为了陪在她身边保护她么？至少森会。为了她，他可以参加他毫不感兴趣的学术会，只是为了能在她身边；在面临被洪水淹没的那一刻，是森跑回去救她；在她因感染面临生死难关时，是森凭借着智慧，在面对冰天雪地和饿极的狼匹的威胁下，在船中找到了治疗的药品。影片的最后，当他们得救了，她轻轻靠在了他的肩膀上，找到了一生的依靠。
《后天》之中友情、社会责任也随处可见，杰克研究所的朋友们，陪伴着他踏上了凶险而未知的旅途；森的朋友们，陪着他去寻找救命的药物；杰克的妻子——一名医生，在最后一刻都陪在她的病人身边；大量的研究人员在不懈的努力改善环境问题。
这一点一滴，都会让我体会到这部“灾难片”的深意，就像那个博士说的话一样：“重要的不是看着自己的孩子长大，而是他会长大”，是的，重要的不是明天会怎样，而是会有明天——有一个明天让我们创造。
回过头来，谈谈作为灾难片《后天》制作问题，东京街头的巨大冰雹、纽约市的滔天洪水、阻挡不了的超级龙卷风，这些在制作上可谓是做工精良，真实惊险。
本片的另一个特别的看点就是它不是发生在荒无人烟的沙漠而是在人员密集的城市——人们每天的生活场所，试想一下如果《后天》变成现实，恐慌、惊险、求生，流动的人潮，为了生存不顾一切的人们……一种人类共命运的真实感受会给人们带来某种欢喜，不仅仅是灾难，这里更有着与生存紧密关联的东西在里面。
《后天》是一部值得人们深思的影片，它教育我们要注重环保，真正做到人与自然的和谐关系。这确实也是现代社会的一个重大问题，无止境的索取、无止境的浪费，我们是为该真正的反思一下了。这部影片在叙事之间不时的会用抒情来平衡，特别是影片的后半部分被围困在图书馆的那段，表现的特别人性化，人的感情主宰着事态的发展也表现出了人在面对大自然时的弱小无助。抬起头，看着天空，希望我们天天头可以拥有蓝天，而不要等灾难发生后，像那个宇航员那样询问他的同伴：“你见过这么蓝的天吗？”
《后天》还有一个值得看的就是视觉效果，演员的表演几乎没有任何可圈可点之处。编剧导演将所有角色放在商业流水线上，打磨成统一尺寸的螺钉螺母，几乎放过了对任何可能出彩的剧情、对白、或对角色的琢磨。因此你不会看到那些面对浩劫灾难时本应变得复杂、叵测、意味深长的人性和人物关系，取而代之的是被处理得潦草苍白的爱情、亲情或者友情。它们在电脑特技造出的末世景象面前，虚假得如同一束塑料花儿。因此，当片中那两大团状如冰激凌的“风暴眼”在大气层上空缓慢移动，地球像一枚误放入冷冻室的柿子那样从外到里逐渐结满了冰碴儿的时候，我心想，这世界总算清净了……
还有一个另我难忘的镜头是在龙卷风刚刚过去之后，躲在办公楼里的那位男的怀着好奇心颤颤栗栗的走向那扇门，当他打开那扇门时，一刹那不止是他傻了，连我也愣了一下，天啊，他打开的是一扇天窗啊，是一片被扫荡过的狼狈的世界，后面还有正在示威的龙卷风，这时镜头给了一个拉远的大远景，有点世界末日的感觉。
分析了这么多，我觉得这部影片的成功之处是给我们敲了一次警钟，保护环境不是一个人的责任，也不是一个国家的职责，而是全世界人共有的责任，如果我们还继续破坏和污染生活环境的话，那么人类的后果就像在本片上演在屏幕上的一样，相信每个人都不希望电影中的灾难再在现实地球上上演一遍.
⑷ 急求电影《后天》英文观后感，翻译即可
I watched the movie "Day After Tomorrow" has strong feelings. I think this is the advent of catastrophe is not only natural disasters, more importantly, the destruction of human beings to the earth. Warming of the Earth continuously, because of human emissions from non-stop, cut down trees. This is wrong. We must properly protect the earth, a variety of trees, love nature, love animals, do not let the earth be polluted!
行不？
⑸ 一篇英文电影评论<<后天>>谢谢了，大神帮忙啊
1.Thismovietakesabig-budget,special-effects-ster,includingmultiplehurricanes,tornadoes,tidalwaves,.(),ProfessorJackHall(Quaid),ttohisson,Sam(Gyllenhaal),,..Hallfaces,he',andhe'snearlytheonlyonegoingnorth... 2.,.JackmustgofromWashingtonD.C.toNewYork,butonthewaysomethingshappen.CanJackrescuehisson? 3.Wehumansaresuchsinners.Wepillageandplunderourplanet'snaturalresources,,. Well,tocoinaclassicphrase,"It'snotnicetofoolMotherNature."Andshe'sonebroadyoudon'tdarewanttomesswith,asthedisaster-.ompiercedeartopiercedear,--(). Forgettheplot.It'sworsethanbad--it'strite,banal,hackneyed,threadbare,andworn-outallrolledintoone.hisgreedygovernment;.-disaster-epic-must-have-a-female-lead-who-spends-her-time-wringing-her-hands-and-looking-worried-and-then-criespart.IanHolm,forgoodnesssake,isBilboBaggins,,andJakeGyllenhaal,whoplaysQuaid'sandWard'sson,. AsIsaid,forgettheplot.Thismovie'--('sthrowawayonliveTV?)tothreecataclysmic"blizzardhurricanes".Thespecialeffectsarewell-done,andjarring;intoManhattan(Whydidn'?)isbone-chilling.,andyou'.;inahugetwistofirony,theU.S.isevacuated,,.It'sallgreatfuntowatch. ,.NowI'vegottogogetmytwelve-packoutofthefreezer.. 4.There'snotwowaysaboutit.......Whydoeshehateitso?Ihavenoidea,buthealsodoesn'tseemallthatfoundofLosAngeles,either... TheDayAfterTomorrow(2004),written,(who',upuntilnow,thatis...),andJakeGyllenhaal,(DonnieDarko)toreallylousyones(BubbleBoy,Highway).AlsoappearingisEmmyRossum(,attimes,toAmericanPie'sElizabethShannon),JayO.Sanders(Daylight),PerryKing(TheLordsofFlatbush),KennethWalsh(Miracle),Sela`yowsa,yowsa'Ward,andIan`BilboBaggins'Holm. Okay...JackHall(Quaid)isapaleoclimatologist...what'sthat,yousay?Well,apparentlyit',....Duringhisresearch,he'(soonmeaninganywherefrom100to1,000years)headingforanothericeage,,(Walsh),thalfthetime,?Surprise,surprise,itturnsoutWalshisright(buthistimingiswayoff...typicalweatherman)asthepoopiehitsthefan...bigtime.HailthesizeoffootballsinJapan,tornadoesinLA,(haven'ttheysufferedenough?),,whichdoesn'tsoundallthatbad,...alotoficeandsnow...andtemperaturesaredropping.Ohwhydidn'ttheylistentoHall?Thefools...thefrozenfools... Iwillsaythis...'veseeninawhile.(IrwinAllen,themasterofdisaster,'sdisastermovie,wouldhavebeenproud)...also,Ithoughttheactingwaspassable,whichissad,,.,itwouldbefivestars,,thestory,thedialogandsuch.It'stheseelements(orlackof)thatultimatelyderailedthefilm,formeatleast.won',largeandsmall,thatriddletheplot.IrememberwhenIsawEmmerich'sIndependenceDay(1996)forthefirsttime,Iwasreallytakenwiththefilm,,...here,tothehead...andEmmerichlaysontheschmaltzy,maudlinsentimentality,,...,slushy,,butIwaswrong,ashere,heturnsitintoanartform.Thedialogwasjustawful...ightface.Also,,hedrivelsoontofollow...,....yes,,isfilm?IloveitwhenHollywood,inallofitsshallowgloriousness,'swrongwithus....,estructiveways,.Ahh,I'vestoodonmysoapboxlongenough...here'ssomescenestowatchfor...theone,afterNewYorkisfrozen,,whonormallywouldn',...canyouseetheironyhere?Thehomeless,onceaburdenonoursociety,havenow,afterthedisaster,,asthey'.,beforeit'stoolate...okay,howaboutthisscene...thekids,,arescroungingforfood,.,asthere'(yeah,okay...I'lltellyouwhatmystinkyfriend,I'lleatthepotatochipsandM&M'sandyoucanhavewhateveredible,)...again,...
⑹ 电影后天影评
《后天》是罗兰·艾莫里奇2004年的作品，作为04年一部耗资巨大的商业片，影片继承了罗兰一贯的风格（甚至到抄袭），灾难、人类文明、拯救、希望...
随着人类环保意识的增强,温室效应作为20世纪危险的产物,依然不断刺激着人们的神经.本片被定义为"环境灾难惊悚"而非"科幻片",也就是说,本片所展现的情景,是与现实有着密切联系,而非凭空编造的.
尽管如此,影片中的大量情节仍被批作是"扯淡的".比如冰河期来去的速度、波及的范围，从科学意义上讲都是不可能的，可我觉得，科幻（我还是习惯称其如此）不是科普，尽管它很不严谨，但我们仍能体会出导演用夸张警示人们的用意。
少谈几点感情主线
《后天》摒弃了好莱坞以往一贯“明目张胆”的个人英雄主义，如果冰河期的到来与结束是影片的大背景的话，那父子情便是贯穿全片重要的情感主线之一。而这种感情，体现在父亲营救儿子的过程中。
从开头看，Sam与父亲的关系明显存在分歧与矛盾，这是许多美国家庭在此时期的普遍现象。当儿子面临危险时，父亲毅然北上，这不仅是勇气与毅力。更是一种可以战胜理智的情感——爱！
当冰河来临，困在图书馆的几人成为一个整体，他们在最绝望、最危险的时候相互依靠、相互鼓励，这是相当重要的一条线索，也有着以点带面的妙处。
当他们在选择用来燃烧取暖的书时，所发生的分歧可以显示出不同的人在危难时，对人类文明的态度。
一类赞成以生存为主，因为只有生存下去，也许才有可能重建人类文明；另一类宁死也要保存人类文明的痕迹，因为这是老祖宗千百年来留下的瑰宝，是人类智慧的结晶，他们期望有一天，也许在危难之后的某时，子孙能重拾那曾经险些毁灭的文明。一类对自己存有希望，充满生的渴望；另一类则对未来充满了末世关怀的宿命期望。
这一桥段，是导演提示着人们，展开了非常深刻的思考。
但最终，双方均作出让步，同时，彼此信任着、鼓励着，此刻，不会再有任何对权钱的贪欲，不再有个人的私利与争夺，因为此刻，人类文明基本被冰封的时刻，一切都显得无关紧要。他们清楚地认识到，此刻只有互相帮助，才能抓住生的希望，或许才有生的可能！于是，人类的情感在社会灭亡的边缘蜕化的单纯而真挚！而此刻，观众也会不禁思考，难道一定要等到灾难灭绝每人类才懂得蜕化？！
这一点，与之前一点，展现在同一时空环境下，构成了影片最深刻的两点人文主题。
故事的警示
影片的故事并没有显示出多少新奇的地方，总的来说，通俗易懂。我们暂且不论剧情的疏漏或场景的似曾相识，单看故事本身所要传达的思想，是发人深思的。
在气象学家发现洋面温度异常后，立即向总统申请全国向南转移。而总统说“请不要忘了我们的经济同我们的环境一样脆弱！”。此时，总统的形象代表了典型的大资产阶级，他们惟利是图，不愿浪费任何一点时间和精力在非赚钱的事物上，他甚至依然觉得，经济才是解决一切的万能钥匙，直到最后。
为了缓解温室效应，国际上有着《京都议定书》，而恰恰是美国，拒绝在和约上签字！本片无疑是对美国莫大的讽刺。那些自信的美国人向来喜欢指责别人，而他们自己做的，已经很差了！
当潮水来袭，林立的高楼瞬时倒下，龙卷风中的房屋、大桥、汽车...一一被毫不留情地卷上天,被摧毁、被撕碎、被吞噬！人们甚至还来不及作出反应，那些耗费人类大量金钱、智慧、劳动力的所谓“人类文明的杰作”，在自然的力量面前显得如此脆弱、渺小而不堪一击！那些有着“良好建筑技术”、“优秀建筑材料”的人类避难所，顷刻间化为乌有！被冰封的自由女神像，只残剩出奄奄一息的头。此刻，她高举向天的手不再示意着自由，那是在质问！在指责！在控诉！！
数十分钟灾难场景的连续体现，使人们坐在银幕前感受到了巨大而不可名状的恐惧与深思。
我们生于自然，长于自然，我们为了自己的文明不惜破换自然的平衡，最终，自然反过来向人类做了宣判，我们的一切文明，物质上的、精神上的，完全可以被她轻而易举地全部摧毁！在自然面前，无知的我们凭什么自豪于自己的“杰作”？！我们有征服、取代自然的资格吗？
影片中，由于温室效应导致全球洋面升高，整个北半球被全部冰封。这种假设是撼人的！恰巧那段日子全球气候极为异常，如欧洲六月降雪，阿尔卑斯山大量冰川融化、雪线上升...人们不禁警惕地问"后天不会明天到来,那明天的明天呢?"
但这毕竟是商业片,不会是绝望到底的.人类的最大优势就在于即使是在最为难的时刻也保留着"潘多拉魔盒"最后所剩--希望!正是如此,导演才在结尾让地球自行结束冰河期.
没错!自然永远都是一位母亲,在孩子犯错的时候,她只会或重或轻地惩罚,而不会毁灭我们!(其实我倒希望地球彻底发一次怒,让人类社会就此毁灭!!!)
⑺ 求电影《后天》的观后感，英文的，谢谢啦！
The Day After Tomorrow, while drenched with some of the richest special
effects seen since The Lord of the Rings, The Matrix, and Star Wars, is
rich in both character depth and plot quality. It is easy to be awed by
the movie magic but one must be careful not to overlook the important
message imbued within the movie. The political importance of the
concern with global warning is an undertone throughout the entire film
(in some scenes it is more prevalent) but it does not take away from
the grand scope of The Day After Tomorrow. Not since Stephen King's,
"The Stand" has a movie of global disaster done the genre justice.
Movies such as "Deep Impact" and "Armageddon" fall far short in their
attempts to lure the audience in with the promise of a cataclysmic
event, only to find that the heroes come through in the eleventh hour
to save the world from dire calamity! In The Day After Tomorrow, the
heroes do not save the day for everyone in the world, or, more
specifically, in the Northern Hemisphere. While there is a bit of stark
heroism intertwined with the plot, it is not so trite as to be tacky.
The Day After Tomorrow is well worth the wait and should serve as a
benchmark for future disaster movies to come.
⑻ 求电影后天的英语影评
After years of warning about global warning, Jack Hall is horrified to find all his predictions coming true much faster than he could have imagined. Hail stones the size of footballs decimate cities, typhoons destroy Los Angeles and New York becomes flooded. As the big freeze crosses the northern hemisphere, a small group of survivors try to fend off the cold as the world prepares for a dramatic change in the world order.
This film may be a modern blockbuster but in almost everyway it is a 1970's disaster movie where an event happens after some build up and we then spend the rest of the film watching the survivors trying to, well, survive. In that regard the film carries all the usual problems that the genre carries but happily benefits from the fact that the effects are much better than 1970's movies could manage. For this reason the first hour is great – it has dramatic pace, is involving and looks fantastic even if we have seen it before in different variations (how many times has New York been destroyed now?). However after the sheer global terror is pretty much finished we suddenly become much more small scale and the film looses much of it's impact and it's pace. After the initial danger has passed the film uses illogical and silly plot devices to put the survivors at risk – a cold eye of a storm, blood infections, creeping ice and wolves are among the problems. While this is OK on a genre level it doesn't compare to the first hour and it gets a little ll and plodding at times.
The clichés are all present and correct: the politicians, the upright scientists, the sacrifice, the daring rescues and so on. It's fair to say that if you are looking for more than a basic script then you will be looking in the wrong place here. All this film does is to provide spectacle and moments of dramatic action – if you want to think about it then you will only hurt your enjoyment of the action. The film tries to deliver an environmental message but in a way this film will not help the environmental movement because it is too exaggerated to be taken seriously (like the idea of Celtic and Man Utd reaching the Champions League final – ring this season? Please!), however it does include several surprisingly barbed attacks on the US administration (could the VP look any more like Cheney?). Just a shame that the film message is delivered with all the subtlety that Segal showed when he did something similar in his environmental action film On Deadly Ground.
The script doesn't really create characters either and it means we don't care that much about what happens to them in the final hour (countless millions are dead for goodness sake!). The dialogue in the first hour is nicely gruff and scientific and very genre but the second hour is more human and the lines aren't suited for that – not even in the hands of an impressive number of good actors. I like Quaid and he is a good lead here, he gets the good scientific stuff and only is lumbered with the rather silly notion of walking to New York from Washington. Gyllenhaal must have upset legions of cult fan boys by appearing in a big budget movie but he does OK with the role (despite looking too old to be in school). The rest of the cast are fairly mixed but, as with the genre, they are just filled even if some are good. Welsh is good even if he was cast for his similarity to Dick Cheney, Holm adds a small bit of dignity in his role as well as being supported by the very fine actor Lester in a minor role. Faces like Sanders, Mihok and a few others don't really matter as they are merely victims waiting for their turn to be used for dramatic effect.
Overall the first hour of this film is good on a blockbuster level, but it blows it's wad too early (don't ya hate it when that happens?!) and is left with a second hour that is right out of the 1970's with all the weaknesses that that entails. Generally I enjoyed the film because I was just expecting a big noisy movie to pass a few hours – bad script, no characters and lots of clichés? Why would I be surprised by that? It's par for the course and you should not watch this if you know these aspects will annoy you. As it is, it's an average film but one that is noisy and spectacular enough to pass muster in the summer blockbuster stakes.
一些难的句子可以跳过>M<
⑼ 电影《后天》英文观后感，要有阐述自己的观点，翻译的可以，语法要正确，不用太长。
请求帮忙翻译：我看了电影《后天》感触很深。我觉得这个巨大灾难的来临不仅是I watched the movie "Day After Tomorrow" has strong feelings. I think