① 看英语电影爱国者2000的观后感
看了《爱国者》，很受感动。影片讲述的是一段美国独立战争的历史。主人公是一位议员和一群孩子的父亲。一家人过得还算和-谐。作为父亲，他在家里有着相当的威严，而一群孩子也不是吃素的，他们的顽皮让这位父亲吃尽苦头却又无可奈何。但因其反对对英国作战而被孩子们误解，他们都有着自己的参军梦，甚至远远听到枪炮声，他们也会熟练搬出枪以备不时之需。然而英军的的到来改变了一切。在家园被毁又即将失去第二个儿子时父亲终于爆发了，和两个小儿子一起歼灭了一股二十一人的英军，这让人联想到他当年的英姿，也让他找回了自己潜藏的勇气。在复仇和追求自由这两条主线的引导下，主人公带领着国民军逐步走向胜利。
影片花了很大的手笔来阐述美国对自由的向往和因此付出的沉重代价，从激烈的议会讨论，人们参军的热情，到家园的被毁，战场上的惨烈牺牲。相信看过该片的决不会忘记那些古老而又独特的战争场面，两军(正规军)对垒都是以人员和武器作为筹码，而这往往是英军占优，美军是即输场面又输战争，这看上去有点幽默的味道，完全是对现代战争的颠覆，看不到现代战争中的谋军布局。而国民军却也会玩游击战，有一段时间竟被英军称之为“幽灵”，很有点中国特色的味道。但这确实是一支杂牌军，就连教堂里的牧师也披装上阵，只是不知道他在杀人之前会不会念上一句“上帝保佑”，其最后的牺牲却也充满了悲剧色彩。
虽然这是一部战争片，但是导演在战争之外的细节上有很好的把握，除了宏大的战争场面外，也不失暖暖的温情，真实而感人。其中身为国民军上校的父亲与刚刚会说话的女儿的告别一段，导演处理得别具匠心，将主角在军队与家庭角色的矛盾和女儿对父亲的理解尽融于女儿的呼唤和转身的深情一抱之中，可谓感人至深。导演对种族矛盾的解构也是该片的亮点之一，最初白人对黑奴的歧视，通过战争的隐含功能最终达成了和解，“与你并肩作战是我的荣幸。”将这对不大不小的矛盾融于对自由不懈追求的主题之中，也是对黑人在美国独立战争中所做的贡献的一种认同，他们也是美国历史的创造者。
不能不说这是一部成功的影片，无论你对美国有如何的偏见，看了该片你却不由的对那些为自由而战的勇士们产生由衷的敬意，这确实是一个非凡的国度，这样的民族没有理由不屹立于世界强者之林。
然而相比之下，小时侯很喜欢的国产战争片，现在看来实在很少有深层次的东西，导演的思维极其狭隘，创作的影片只是对历史的一种简单重复。比如电影艺术大师斯皮尔伯格就将几条命救一条命的价值问题带入到影片〈〈拯救大兵瑞恩〉〉中，充满了对人性的深入思考，从而使影片脱离了战争本身而得以实现主题的升华，像这样的东西在中国的战争片里很难找到，不得不引起我们的反思。在根本上还得在思维的形式内涵上下一番工夫。
② 电影爱国者英文简介
The movie takes place in South Carolina in 1776. Benjamin Martin, a French-Indian war hero who is haunted by his past, is a patriot who wants no part in a war with Britian. Meanwhile, his two eldest sons, Gabriel and Thomas, can't wait to go out and kill some Redcoats. When South Carolina decides to go to war with Britain, Gabriel immediatly signs up to fight...without his father's permission. But soon, Colonel Tavington, British solder infamous for his brutal tactiks, captures Gabriel and sentences him to be hanged. As Gabriel is taken away, Thomas tries to free him, only to be killed by Tavington, in front of Benjamin. Now, seeking revenge for his son's death, Benjamin leaves behind his 5 other children to bring independence to the 13 colonies.
Benjamin Martin is a South Carolina planter who is still haunted by his notoriously brutal past as a soldier in the French and Indian War. When the American Revolution comes, he chooses not to fight for the Continental Army because he wants to protect his family. But when the British Colonel Tavington threatens their welfare and kills one of his sons, he chooses to enlist. Martin becomes the leader of a makeshift militia, which consists of peasants, slaves, a minister, and assorted other irregulars. During the war Martin and his men discover that they will pay a steep personal price for their rebellion. But thanks to their courage and bravery, they are also destined to pay a pivotal role in turning the tide against the Redcoats.
两种都是,请挑选.
③ 电影《爱国者》英文简介
这个是最精辟的，如果你想知道更多，和我联系 Peaceful farmer Benjamin Martin is driven to lead the Colonial Militia ring the American Revolution when a sadistic British officer murders his son.
④ 电影爱国者英文影评
ufiaixig，你是想问电影爱国者英文影评
这个你完全可以去搜索①吓 YYTvO影视 你就知道了，
zndeci41
一般人我还真不会告诉滴~ 你懂 的~
求采纳, 采纳不会有孩子滴~~
dvmugd90
⑤ 求爱国者影评，英文的，300字
Brig. Gen. Francis Marion, the historical person that Mel Gibson's character is loosely based on was a true war hero and patriot. The ones who are denigrating his legacy are mostly British `historians' and those who are too stupid or lazy to do their own research.
Actually, Mel Gibson's Benjamin Martin is a composite of 3 historical characters: one of course was Francis Marion the `Swamp Fox'; another was an illiterate backwoods general, Daniel Morgan, who encouraged the militia at the battle of Cowpens (final battle enacted in the movie) to stand their ground against the British; and the third was a cavalry officer, William Washington, who pursued Tarleton after Cowpens and fought him in hand-to-hand combat, which they both barely survived.
Gen. Marion used tactics that the Brits termed `ungentlemanly' for warfare, but he got the job done, just as the Viet Cong did 200 years later against our own GI's. Marion knew, because of his lack of manpower, equipment, and experienced soldiers, he couldn't take on the superior British forces using outmoded and quaint European-style warfare (in fact, this idiotic style of warfare continued up until WWI). The movie depicts this very well. So Gen. Marion wisely used the only tactics left to him – hit-and-run, which he learned from fighting the Cherokees ring the French and Indian Wars.
The movie's villainous Lt. Col. Tavington, who is also loosely based on Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton, is not too far from the truth, though a little over the top.
It was ring the retreat of Waxhaws that Tarleton came to symbolize British cruelty in the Revolutionary War. Tarleton was seen as a "butcher" when American forces under Col. Abraham Buford laid down their arms in an attempt to surrender yet the British continued their assault. From then on, his reputation grew and `Tarleton's quarter', in effect, came to mean "no quarter".
In the tradition of the day, after the surrender at Yorktown, American officers hosted the defeated Cornwallis and other British officers at their respective tables. But no American invited Tarleton nor would any eat with him. Tarleton asked if the omission was accidental, and he was told that, indeed it was not, because of his past atrocities.
Tarleton lived a long life, condoning his use of total war – burning houses, destroying crops, the end justifying the means. He also would never admit to any fault at Cowpens, saying he was `outnumbered' and received inadequate assistance from Cornwallis. He wondered, "how some unforeseen event" could "throw terror into the most disciplined soldiers".
I didn't go into this movie for a history lesson but to be entertained, and I was, but after reading some of the inaccurate and illiterate reviews, I found it necessary to give a `history lesson'! The movie wasn't perfect – it was cloying and obvious at times, but I give it high marks for effort and for bringing to the screen an important part of American history that has received disparate treatment in movies, and I think Devlin & Emmerich can now be forgiven for Godzilla.
⑥ 关于电影《the patriot》爱国者的理解~帮忙回答下下面的问题~谢谢了
收到答案没？我也需要
⑦ 电影爱国者的观后感
看了《爱国者》，很受感动。影片讲述的是一段美国独立战争的历史。主人公是一位议员和一群孩子的父亲。一家人过得还算和谐。作为父亲，他在家里有着相当的威严，而一群孩子也不是吃素的，他们的顽皮让这位父亲吃尽苦头却又无可奈何。但因其反对对英国作战而被孩子们误解，他们都有着自己的参军梦，甚至远远听到枪炮声，他们也会熟练搬出枪以备不时之需。然而英军的的到来改变了一切。在家园被毁又即将失去第二个儿子时父亲终于爆发了，和两个小儿子一起歼灭了一股二十一人的英军，这让人联想到他当年的英姿，也让他找回了自己潜藏的勇气。在复仇和追求自由这两条主线的引导下，主人公带领着国民军逐步走向胜利。
影片花了很大的手笔来阐述美国对自由的向往和因此付出的沉重代价，从激烈的议会讨论，人们参军的热情，到家园的被毁，战场上的惨烈牺牲。相信看过该片的决不会忘记那些古老而又独特的战争场面，两军（正规军）对垒都是以人员和武器作为筹码，而这往往是英军占优，美军是即输场面又输战争，这看上去有点幽默的味道，完全是对现代战争的颠覆，看不到现代战争中的谋军布局。而国民军却也会玩游击战，有一段时间竟被英军称之为“幽灵”，很有点中国特色的味道。但这确实是一支杂牌军，就连教堂里的牧师也披装上阵，只是不知道他在杀人之前会不会念上一句“上帝保佑”，其最后的牺牲却也充满了悲剧色彩。
虽然这是一部战争片，但是导演在战争之外的细节上有很好的把握，除了宏大的战争场面外，也不失暖暖的温情，真实而感人。其中身为国民军上校的父亲与刚刚会说话的女儿的告别一段，导演处理得别具匠心，将主角在军队与家庭角色的矛盾和女儿对父亲的理解尽融于女儿的呼唤和转身的深情一抱之中，可谓感人至深。导演对种族矛盾的解构也是该片的亮点之一，最初白人对黑奴的歧视，通过战争的隐含功能最终达成了和解，“与你并肩作战是我的荣幸。”将这对不大不小的矛盾融于对自由不懈追求的主题之中，也是对黑人在美国独立战争中所做的贡献的一种认同，他们也是美国历史的创造者。
不能不说这是一部成功的影片，无论你对美国有如何的偏见，看了该片你却不由的对那些为自由而战的勇士们产生由衷的敬意，这确实是一个非凡的国度，这样的民族没有理由不屹立于世界强者之林。
然而相比之下，小时侯很喜欢的国产战争片，现在看来实在很少有深层次的东西，导演的思维极其狭隘，创作的影片只是对历史的一种简单重复。比如电影艺术大师斯皮尔伯格就将几条命救一条命的价值问题带入到影片〈〈拯救大兵瑞恩〉〉中，充满了对人性的深入思考，从而使影片脱离了战争本身而得以实现主题的升华，像这样的东西在中国的战争片里很难找到，不得不引起我们的反思。在根本上还得在思维的形式内涵上下一番工夫。
⑧ 爱国者电影观后感
谁没有年轻的生命？谁不珍惜这宝贵的年华？谁不渴望幸福的生活？可是在战场上，我们的英雄，却用他们年轻的热血与生命去换取了战斗的胜利。
电影《上甘岭》讲的是志愿军在朝鲜战场上抗击美帝侵略者的一次战役。在这场战役中，八连已经在山上抗道里坚持战斗了一个月。由于敌人的封锁，部队严重缺水，战士们的嘴唇都干裂了。上级领导派来送水的小分队，队员们一个个牺牲。为了保存实力，八连战士们又得下山去抢水。但是，战士们刚装好水，就被敌人的流弹打中了。后来，师长派人历尽千辛万苦才送上一些萝卜，并特意送给连长两个苹果。虽然连长自己是那样干渴，却把两个苹果分成许多片，分别送到全连每个战士的手上……
看到这里，我的眼睛湿润了。战士们在那样饥渴的情况下，没有忘记自己的战友，这种阶级友爱是多么高尚。他们真正做到了“我们的干部要关心每个战士，一切革命队伍的人都要互相关心，互相爱护，互相帮助。”
我静静地坐在电视旁观看。心里却久久不能平静，心好像被无数的钢针刺着一样疼。我想起自己平时对同学的态度不好，心里难受极了，感到自己脸红，羞愧。
过去，我在班上算得上一个“吵架、打架王。”我不是找这个吵嘴，就是找那个打架，根本谈不上团结友爱，互相帮助。记得有一次，一位同学在跑步的时候不小心踩了我一脚，他一边跑一边说：“对不起！”我却故意刁难他，把他一推，大声说：“对不起值几个钱，你把我的鞋子弄脏了，你赔！”那位同学一边道歉，一边说：“我不是有意弄脏你的鞋，我帮你洗。行吗？”可我还是要他赔，并举起拳头要打他。旁边的同学听到我的叫骂声，围了上来。了解情况后，个个都不满意，眼睛怒视着我，好象说：“如果你再欺负这个同学，我们就去告诉老师。我一看这吓人的架势，不敢再说什么，只好偷偷地溜跑了。
看《上甘岭》的英雄们互相关心、互相爱护、互相帮助的情景；我明白了一个道理，同学和同学之间要团结友爱，而像我平时那样，就会没有朋友，会变成“离群之雁“。
电视演完了，爸爸和妈妈津津有味地谈论《上甘岭》电影中的精彩情节，可是我这个平时爱闹的人，却在一旁默默地思考着……
⑨ 电影《爱国者》的英文影评（200字左右）
Speaking of the "Patriot" movie, had to mention the American constitutional system and the founding spirit of democracy. See today, the U.S. constitutional system of democratic practice is more successful ~.
At that time a religious, self-control, sacrifice and dedication of the position under the U.S. founding fathers adopted the Jefferson's "separation of powers" (America's democracy, human rights, equal rights), and President Washington's "re-election does not more than twice "idea - is a democratic constitutional system with a high degree of religious belief in the morality of self-made democracy, it is a power of supervision and local autonomy is respected, the political system. The American spirit of freedom and democracy is now the world should also be a model of spiritual civilization and advanced representatives - perhaps this is the most humane spirit of the origin of it, because it highlights a "human spirit" of victory - and this is "personal heroism," the inevitable result.
This time, the "Patriot" is indeed completed a "Root asked the source" of the classical regression. Because the spirit of American freedom and democracy after all, is "personal heroism" nurture the soil.
First, it should be said, the film's screenplay written pretty good, with plenty of lyrical narrative plot to seize the audience's sympathy for justice. Is a typical "driven to revolt" type of story. Benjamin Martin colonel who was once the wounds of war, trying to make up the moral standards of the past to suppress themselves and their families, expect the war to neutral survival. But in the current war in the form below, any person who holds to this idea only alleys; Moreover, the influence of patriotism by the eldest son Jeb Rio has decided to join the army, father, like son. Thus the father and son made some foreshadowing later guerrilla organization. The guerrilla war is undoubtedly more than the film "heinous" in conventional warfare (read some of these subjects who shared the movie ~) more emphasis on teamwork, operational skills and flexibility. So, after another exciting chapter ..., Colonel Martin to a fight for peace, national independence and freedom of the war caused a sensation.
The film further reflected the spirit of American freedom and democracy, and below this is a reminder issued by the public mind with personal heroism. And "public spirit" is the Western liberal democracy. The heroine of this film, not only in silent support behind the front men of their families. This seems to highlight the most "personal heroism," a feature film, is always to highlight the role of women in male roles, and set off. ("True Lies" is an exception).
The only drawback is the film's soundtrack very plain, the melody of the film subject's response is not perfect. In addition, the film is how to obtain R-rating? Another question might be worth a little look. Here I will not say more ~. ^ _ ^
"Lang," said the film should be magnanimous. For me, though the film back to life would have been sufficient. However, the image behind the return of human nature is the most exciting and gives a revelation. To the guitar lessons when QUE teacher this semester so that we really view films intended to show it, this has caused a number of people thinking.
Hope that the times in the context of her once again been confirmed.谷歌了一份，很粗糙，你可以修改一下