1. 求《crash》——《撞车》的英文影评~或者随便几句也可以~
PART I 上帝眼中卑微的人
一个看似对母亲关心的人，不知道母亲真正想要的是什么，
一个在工作中发泄私人怨气的警察，在关键时候能临危不惧，
而对此格格不入的新警察，在最后犯下了大错，逃之夭夭，
看似弱者的韩国人，却是个蛇头，让老婆把支票快去兑换，
锁匠，却让自已的家人没有安全感，
智利店主，门坏了而不是锁坏了，人家好心指出，却对人产生怀疑，进而出事后去报复。
那对声名显贵的检查官夫妇。。。
那对侦探夫妇。。。
最后被追尾的说什么也不给那个警察父亲换医生的胖女人。。
种族歧视，非法移民，盗车，操纵选民，交通阻塞。。。
很少有片子能反映到这么多却又有好故事，这片子好似以上帝的视角来讲述人，种族，民族间的故事，上帝的眼中，每个人都那么可怜那么卑微。
PART II 关注人
Crash是一部以人与人之间关系（或者说人性）为主，以多个同时发生的独立故事穿插讲述为手法，以各个独立故事中看似毫无关系的角色们之间的联系为基础（每个角色都可以说代表一个阶级/种族，诸如白人，黑人，墨西哥/中美洲裔，亚/华裔，中东裔等）来反映诸如像种族问题这样的深刻问题。
片名叫"Crash"（虽然有撞车的意思，但对将片名直接以为“撞车”持保留态度），是因为在现在这个社会每个人都只顾自己的事情，没有时间关心/关注别人，更不要说另一个阶级/种族，我们每天忙忙碌的奔波，很多时间是在汽车这个小铁盒子里度过的（比较资本主义化的评论，hehe...），唯一能够让我们有机会跟别人接触的就是当出现交通事故的时候，结尾处大概也是为了应这个主题吧。 PART III 我们以为我们是谁？
GO坛上有人说，Crash是今年最好的电影“之一”，阿步说，Crash好闷，大闷片。XM说，如果说罪恶之城是形式主义的极端，那Crash就是内涵主义的极端，Crash的确是一个大杂烩，这部电影里让我们震撼的不是撞车，而是种族，文化，尊严，人格，亲情之间的撞击，每一次撞击都击在我的心中，一下一下，让人无言以对。
电影里的人物，每个人都像一颗珍珠，不是那种光芒四射圆润无暇的珍珠，而是有着一点瑕疵的不那么完美的珍珠。随着电影剧情的发展，一颗又一颗的珍珠被巧合和冲突连成一串，光鉴照人，掠人魂魄。虽然每颗珍珠都有一点瑕疵，但那瑕疵却替华丽增添了一份真实。
真实，什么样的人生才是真实？这个社会，压力太大，每个人都有说不出的苦，这苦被压抑被扭曲，反射出来的就是暴躁，激进，叛逆。人性本恶或是是人性本善？这个命题，不会有答案。任何人都有善的一面和恶的一面，视于观察角度的不同。在CRASH这部电影里更是如此，没有哪个人是绝对的好人，也没有哪个人是绝对的坏人，每个人都像我上文所说，有着不同的问题，都有着不同的罪恶，但每个人的罪恶都有其行成的原因，都能让人在感到厌恶的同时在心里的某个角落升起一丝的怜悯和同情。这就是这部电影的魅力所在，真实的反应了人性，反应了人性的两面性，人性的挣扎。自我的挣扎与矛盾，是另一种crash，这种crash，也许伤害最深。
暴力的警察可以是一个有着拳子之心的孝子，他的暴力是他为父亲所苦的发泄。他替父亲的遭遇而愤怒，他为父亲的结局而痛心，但是作为一个小警察，他没有力量来改变这个结局，他的力量微弱的看着父亲受苦却无能为力。他痛恨这一切，他认为父亲对黑人贡献了许多，可是父亲的贡献却没有任何回报，所以他变成了激进分子，种族主义者。在电影的前面部分，这个警察是十分让人讨厌的，但是看到他与父亲的故事后，我对他产生了怜悯之心。他并非没有血肉，他只是需要发泄。第二天，他在车祸现场抢救前天晚上被他侮辱的女人，他几乎是豁出命去救她，我想，这除了他的职业原因和人性本善之外，很大一方面也是为自己前一天晚上的行为赎罪。人的矛盾就在于善恶的挣扎，恶意的发泄过后，善的内疚和空虚也许就随之而来。生活中也有这样的人，在冲动、郁闷、愤怒中，做了伤害他人的事情，表面上看，好像这些人很威风，但事情过后，自我谴责、内疚和后悔，无法言语，无法补救，只留遗憾。
被侮辱感常常是自找的。比如那个每天抱怨种族歧视的少年，比如被洗劫一空的智利老头，比如那个为了面子宁愿受辱的电视导演。在少年眼中，世界上所有的一切都表明着对有色人种的歧视，他认为整个世界都带着有色眼镜，其实有色眼镜在他的心里。只见别人眼中有钉子，不见自己眼中有梁木。少年在埋怨的同时，忘记了自己正在做着引起人埋怨的一切。智利老头也是如此，怀疑周围的一切，怒气冲冲，不相信别人，最后害了自己。电视导演更是如此，为了自己在朋友前的面子，宁可妻子受辱，懦弱至极。他本意是保住面子，但结果却失去了尊严，而且是在自己心爱的女人眼里，他完全的失去了尊严。男人的尊严是很敏感的，尤其在心爱的女人面前，他妻子对他的指责对他是极大的打击，但是我丝毫不同情他，我认为他是自取其辱。第二天他遇到警察时的反应，让我有点想不通，忽然的勃发，为了什么，是突然的觉醒，还是长久压抑的崩溃，抑或是为了救车上的少年？我无法分析，只是觉得人是很难预料的，什么都可能发生。
电影用很大一块笔墨描写了种族冲突和文化冲突，白人想做出平等尊重有色人种的姿态，但却在心里歧视黑人，黑人一面警惕着白人的歧视，另一面歧视着亚洲人，亚洲人同时也歧视着其他有色人种。头尾两次撞车的争吵十分有意思，第一次撞车，是亚洲人贩子的老婆和南美女侦探，两个人都骂对方的族裔，歧视对方的种族。片尾的撞车，诊所女接待遭遇保险公司理赔员，一个黑人一个亚洲人，两人一样的用对方的种族作为攻击对象。这种现象十分可笑，也十分可悲。这样的互相侮辱表现了他们的不自信，他们都努力的讨好主流社会。只有白人是高高在上的主流，可以说着伪善的话，像个慈善家一样有目的的施舍自己的平等，只是遇到利益，立马鉴出真章。就象那个伪善的法官，打着平等的旗号，实际上做着肮脏的勾当。
探长说，人与人太疏远了，我们都渴望撞击，只有撞击才能让人感受到真实的接触。平日风光无限的法官太太搂着女佣说，你才是我最好的朋友，辛酸毕露。人与人的沟通并为随着沟通方式的越来越多越来越便捷而有所改善，相反，沟通变得越来越难，越来越复杂。夫妻的沟通，母子的沟通，同僚的沟通，不同族裔的沟通，都可能对你的生活产生重要影响。人都知道沟通重要，却不知道，怎样能处理好这重要的事情。人善于将简单的事情变得复杂。复杂的社会让人无法简单的面对生活。人无法按照善恶标准来做事情，只能按照利益标准来行事。当探长对法官说出唯心的话，当年轻警察将男孩推出车子，他们都无奈的践踏了自己的良心，我听到他们心里的叹息。但是，又能如何，如果换成是我们，我们又能如何做？前几日看到有人在谈论，如果你是妻子被警察侮辱的那个电视导演，你在妻子受辱的当场会如何做，没有男人表态，没有男人正面回答这个问题。我想，答案就在这避而不答中，但是这种态度无可厚非也无可指责。
“你要干上几年才会明白过来。你以为你知道你是谁！”老警察对新警察如是说。
我们以为我们是谁？ PART IV 歧视
歧视到处都存在，尤其是反映在小人物和弱势群体身上，但关键的是你是否歧视自己，有的歧视是表面上的，比如老警察对老黑的歧视，老黑对亚裔的歧视，但更要命的是发自内心的不自知的歧视，比如最后的新警察，表面上和主观上反对 歧视，但内心深处却早已接受了对老黑的歧视。
“歧视”可能帽子太大了，用“偏见”可能会更广义一些，每个人都有偏见。每一个群体都有stereo type，stereo type在每个人的眼中形成了“偏见”，stereo type是有统计学基础的，偏见是有道理的，尽管我们应该单独的审视每一个个体。这部影片反映的人类的本性，不仅在美国，在哪个国家都有，不仅仅是肤色，而存在于不同的社会群体之间，用肤色只不过是更让人易于理解，而且比衣冠更容易分辨。想一想我们身边的 例子，都是黄皮肤，还不是有各种“偏见”。我认识个华裔小孩，才3岁不到，在美国上幼儿园，没有人告诉他什么叫歧视，但他就是觉得黑人小孩儿脏。
PART V：名词释义
种族歧视：racism
歧视：discrimination
偏见：prejudice
chinaman是带有歧视的对中国人的称呼，就像我们说“洋鬼子”。
为什么黑人总说 xxxx chinaman，是因为现在的亚裔人在美国已经被中国人所代表了，见到一个亚裔人，老黑都以为是中国人，就象很多年以前的日本人似的！试想如果你在国内，遇到一个白人，你能说出人家的准确国籍不？？
2. 关于电影《撞车》的影评 以及反映出的美国文化
人性的闪亮
撞车，人性的碰擦。是一部多个小故事聚集的电影。在两个小时的时间里导演巧妙地故事插在一起。
西班牙裔的修锁工，有一个五岁的女儿，可爱天真，由于以前的后遗症，害怕枪声，子弹，躲在床底睡觉。爸爸给她讲了一个故事：在他很小的时候遇见了一个仙女，给了他一件隐形的斗篷，使他什么都穿不透。女孩天真地听着这样的故事。爸爸郑重地对她说：现在要把他送给女儿。脱下一件隐形衣，交给女儿。从此女儿再也不怕任何子弹了。一个美好的故事，为了鼓励女儿摆脱子弹的阴影。
－－－闪亮之一，父爱的伟大。童话是善良的。
一个阿拉伯裔的杂货店老板。门锁坏了，找修锁工过来修，换了新锁，但没有用，其实是门坏了。与修锁工起了争执。第二天杂货店就被偷了。没有保险公司能够赔付。老板很气。于是他把所有的帐都算到修锁工的头上。于是他带着一把枪来到了修锁工的家门口。就在他拿着枪与修锁工争论时，他突然举起枪。而小女儿冲出来：爸爸没有隐形衣。她扑到爸爸的怀里帮他挡了那一枪。接着是父亲撕心裂肺的哭声，女孩勉强撑起微笑：爸爸，我可以保护你。很庆幸，女儿没有死。而开枪的老板也呆了，明明射中了，为什么？
－－－闪亮之二，女儿的爱。爱的力量大到一切，包括阻止子弹。
一个人呆在杂货店里，女儿多莉回来都不知道。老板对着女儿说: 我碰到仙女了，她是天使。是啊，确实是个善良的小天使。其实他不知道，他的女儿才是他的天使，女儿在买枪的时候，就买了一盒空弹。
－－－闪亮之三，女儿之爱，了解父亲，深爱着父亲。
黑人导演和妻子在回家的途中被一个白人警察找茬。白人警察借机侮辱妻子。作为丈夫，在面对这种情况下，他除了忍，没有什么能做的。然而妻子却讥讽他没有能力不能保护她。两人产生矛盾。其实妻子不知道，丈夫比他承受了更多。
－－－闪亮之四，有时忍是需要承受很多的。
妻子遇到车祸，被卡在车内。白人警察去救她。妻子怎么也不让白人警察碰她。因为上次的事情，心中仍存恐惧。白人警察实在受不了，朝女人吼了。这是性命攸关的事情。于是女人妥协了。带着不安，看着警察一步步帮着她把腿挪下来，把保险带割断。当人们把警察拉出车时，警察奋不顾身又回到车里把女人拉出来。女人出来第一件事就是抱着白人警察哭了。
－－－闪亮之五，不管以前的芥蒂，在生死之间，一切都没有拯救生命来得重要。
3. Crash 和 Babel两部电影的专业影评
这么专业复杂的东西，还没分，你以为都是慈善家啊
我改叫经理好不好？
4. 求<Crash>的英文影评
到IMDB网站上去找，很多影评~~
5. 《crash》观后感英文版
In Paul Haggis' Crash, an array of characters live in Los Angeles. Their lives intersect with each other, and they go through an unbearably straightforward series of melodramatic incidents, mainly e to a car crash. The movie as a whole is executed in a pretend-mythical style—astoundingly overused, absurdly glossy spiritual symbols, artificial, inlgent melodramatics instead of genuine humanity and insight. The characters are portrayed as either victimized angels or bigoted demons that repent to become victimized angels.
The movie itself is so clean, manufactured and mass-proced that it feels like a plastic shell. The characters are nothing more than pop abstractions that begin with little-to-none dimension and, paradoxically, lose dimension as they progress. The social and cultural tidbits portrayed here are illustrated in straight, bold, plain lines. Crash's formality feels so out-of-place, so uncomfortable, that even with any redeeming values, it's impossible to forgive.
Now, technically speaking, it's not the worst movie ever made, and it's not the worst of the decade, either. In fact, based on technical guidelines, it's not even the worst movie of 2005. However, in applying the Joe Queenan theory-—that the truly worst movies ever made are the ones that shot for the moon and offshooted; the movies that bugged you; the ones that stuck with you for a long, long time - Crash is really the worst of its year. It is also one of the worst of the decade (only The Village, The Passion of the Christ, Hancock and a few others fare worse). It's wildly visionary approach simply felt like a mammoth-scale failure. It got to me. It bugged me. The whimper this movie got out of such a fruitful idea was simply sad to watch. Any faint merits or respectable attempts for greatness made it seem all the more heartbreakingly terrible—this pretentious, cheap disaster seems so wasted.
The movie is a deformed pastiche of political blindness, soullessness and emptiness. It appeared to me as a lifeless, rushed scam - a movie that feeds off mass consensus of opinion without trying anything revolutionary itself.
Crash is a movie that gives itself the undeserved assertion that it really is revolutionary-—yet it pathetically follows the crowd while it obnoxiously assumes it is leading. This movie could have been so much more—something modest, something in-touch, something relevant--or, at the very least, something tolerable.
6. 英文介绍crash 这是一部电影 谢
Crash is the action of high speed object colliding with each other or running into each other.
7. 那位仁兄给我一下<Crash>的英文影评
Like Altman's classic Short Cuts, and Anderson's Magnolia, Crash, by writer/director Paul Haggis weaves a tale of multiple characters through the web of streets we have come to know as Los Angeles. Unlike those other two films this one has a very specific theme to explore. From the opening line uttered by Don Cheadle we know this is to be a film about how people relate, and from the interchange that follows between Jennifer Esposito and Alexis Rhee (pretty sure she plays the Korean female driver who rear-ended her) how people relate tends to be ruled by first impressions or prejudice.
Race is paramount in this film, and all our preconceptions of who people are get twisted and turned through the intricate plot. With each new additional character we find another assumption, another stereotype, and then watch as that preconception is obliterated as the character develops. It is a credit to the deftly written script, tight direction and exceptional acting talent that every one of these many characters is fully realized on screen without ever feeling one-dimensional.
I would love to discuss some of the details of what happens to explain how well it is done, but part of the magic of this film is allowing yourself to be taken on this ride. Mind you, this isn't a ride of pleasure. The first half of this film is unrelentingly in its ferociousness. I could literally feel my rage at some of the characters forming to a fever pitch. The fear and hatred I was confronting wasn't just on the screen, but in the pit of my stomach. And in one absolutely brilliant moment I was literally sobbing at the expectation of horror unfolding, only to be cathartically released in a most unexpected way.
Mr. Haggis was in attendance at the screening I saw and explained that the idea for this film came to him one night sometime after 9/11 at about 2a.m. when his own memories of a car- jacking experience from 10 years before wouldn't leave him alone. Clearly this film was his way of relieving those demons of memory, using the catharsis of his art to unleash them and in doing so has given to all viewers of cinema an opportunity to examine our own preconceptions about race relations and how we treat each other and think of ourselves. He mentioned in the discussion after-wards that he likes to make films that force people to confront difficult issues. Films that ask people to think after the film has ended and not just leave saying: "that was a nice film".
This isn't a "nice" film, and I would expect that it will provoke many a discussion in the ensuing weeks when it opens nation-wide. It's a discussion long overe for this country, and it took a Canadian to bring the issue to the fore in this brilliant, thought provoking film.
=================================
不够还有：
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375679/
8. 关于英文影片撞车（CRASH）的五个问题，英文回答。在线求答
1，Nowadays,people always do their own things without communication with other people in the world.It likes that, people always stay in their own car except a car accident occurs.
2, Different characters in this film represent different kinds of people, like black man and white man, or Asian-Pacific and American-
Pacific.
3,people always think that black people are very dangerous and white people are more dependable.
4,Even though that there is no perfect man in the film, but they are realistic.
5, "the Joy Luck Club" is talking about the relationship between their own family. but "crash" describe a story between person and person in the society.
9. 哪位大侠帮忙翻译一下《Crash》影评啊 ——————急啊，在线等求！！！~谢了！！！
这不是中文吗？还要翻译？你理解不了其中的意思？
10. 求写电影《撞车》英文影评，，谢谢各位了
The message at the heart of Paul Haggis' "Crash" is admirable and true: as human beings, we are all afflicted with racial biases and a tendency to stereotype those who are different from us, consciously or unconsciously, and this demeans and distorts a great many of our relationships. Thus, we are always ennobled by overcoming our prejudices. I whole-heartedly agree with this message and I believe it is worthy of respect. Unfortunately, in art, no matter how good a message is, it doesn't justify mangling the means used to express it.
The means of a story are character and plot. Strong characters can sometimes save a weak plot, and a compelling plot can sometimes support weak characters, but no story can succeed when both of these elements are dysfunctional. In "Crash," the characters are little more than collections of cultural attitudes: more character types than real human beings. They interact in a highly contrived plot made up of preposterously unlikely coincidences. These coincidences converge in various dramatic scenes which are well performed by excellent actors, and occasionally they even have some good dialogue to work with. But since the characters aren't fully developed, and many of the situations are so pat and improbable, there is no verisimilitude in many of the critical scenes, and thus, no sympathy for the characters, and so, no real drama.
"Crash" has good intentions. In this case, they paved the road to, if not mediocrity, then a more fashionable suburb close by.