『壹』 珍珠港英文影评
Pearl Harbor is supposed to be a World War 2 based movie. Its the sort of movie anyone would expect to be an accurate enough dramatisation of events that actually happened.
Instead what we get is an attempt to make another Titanic by including a love triangle that is dominant over the whole history aspect. It just doesn't seem right.
Being a historic epic, they could have cut down on the whole love story and focused more on what would have been relevant such as the Japanese preparation of the attack and the situation President Roosevelt was finding himself in. The sequence of the actual attack on Pearl Harbour was spectacular! Perhaps if they extended it and made it a more major part of the film it would have been more worthy. Another major flaw with this movie is that after the attack sequence the movie dragged on for another hour trying to give an epilogue which was totally irrelevant.
『贰』 求一篇250到300词的珍珠港英文观后感
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the
『叁』 用英语评论电影《珍珠港》
Pearl Harbor is without a doubt the worst world war 2 film of the past decade! The plot was lackluster and unoriginal, the acting pathetic for the most part, and the history inaccurate.
It seems to be more preoccupied with portraying America in the best light than accurately depicting the facts. The love story is out of place and pathetic.
At the end of the film is a 5 minute rant about why America is supposedly great; it actually says "after pearl harbour all America knew was victory", obviously the writers had never heard of Vietnam.
The only good aspect was the special effects, but they could never make up for this absolutely dire film.
『肆』 珍珠港电影英语影评
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Pearl Harbor is a monstrous, costly and utterly disrespectful abomination of film with pretensions of serious emotional weight and proper historical context. With the cost of the movie comparable to the damage costs of the actual Dec. 7, 1941, attack, more attention should've been paid to the script and research instead of all the models and gasoline for an attack sequence that, while spectacular, was more appropriate for a Star Wars clone or a video game than an actual World War II-era film.
And that's about the only "positive," if you can call it that, of that hack Michael Bay's Oscar-t project. Many history buffs have ripped the movie from the angle of historical inaccuracy and omission. Assuming that Pearl Harbor is not meant to be a documentary, but a work of historical fiction, lack of historical accuracy and comprehensiveness is by far the least significant of Pearl Harbor's problems, per se, although such blatant historical carelessness certainly starts to say a lot about the movie as a whole.
But, if Pearl Harbor's aim was to be a work of fiction, it has also miserably failed at that. It fails as literature, and it fails as a film. Pearl Harbor tries to be an amalgamation of three past classic movies on the subjects it covers: 1) From Here to Eternity, a clever and well acted telling of the stories of several characters' romantic pursuits and personal struggles right before the attack on Pearl Harbor disrupted everything, 2) Tora! Tora! Tora!, a mostly factual, well balanced depiction of the planning and execution of the actual Pearl Harbor attack with vintage cinematography, and 3) Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, a meticulously detailed depiction of the Doolittle Raid with a schmaltzy but genuine love subplot involving one actual soldier and his wife. But Pearl Harbor falls far short of all three aforementioned films on not only their own terms, but simply as movies.
Instead of From Here to Eternity's clever dialogues and personal plot twists and romantic moments dripping alternately with irony and genuine warmth, Pearl Harbor wastes its first hour and a half of screen time setting up a sophomoric love triangle that could have been ripped straight from daytime television soap operas and trash talk shows.
The triangle involves two generically glamorous flyboys, played by Ben Affleck and Josh Hartnett, who have been friends since childhood. Even their names, Rafe McCawley and Danny Walker, are mundane. Rafe (Affleck) falls in love with a nurse who presides over his physical named Evelyn (played by Kate Beckinsale), who is also generically glamorous. Rafe and Evelyn spend the next hour or so exchanging pallid lines of dialogue that try too hard to hammer into the audience that, yes, they are in love. Sort of like Shakespeare or Petrarch without any brains and about four centuries too late. In any case, Rafe goes to Britain to fly for the Royal Air Force, where he faces serious butt-kissing from the Brits in a disgustingly patronizing depiction of both British and Americans, and gets shot down over London. But (who didn't see this coming) he lives.
But Evelyn thinks he's dead. And so does Danny (Hartnett). After the token few minutes of mourning, Danny and Evelyn fly above Hawaii and then make it like rabbits under parachutes, invoking obvious parallels to Titanic's "I'm flying" scene followed by good ol' shagging in a car backseat. More faux-sonnet dialogue follows. Then, just like clockwork, Rafe comes back, poor Evelyn is caught in the middle, and Danny and Rafe fight Jerry Springer-style. Then it gets interrupted by the spectacular but oddly fake and inhuman money siphon ... er ... I mean, attack sequence characterized by CGI copies of trapped and screaming people.
Meanwhile, Pearl Harbor occasionally alternates to shots of somber-looking Japanese spies and soldiers planning the attack, all accompanied by evil-sounding music, going out of the way to make the Japanese look like devious souls out for revenge because America wouldn't give them their oil (convenient partial reasoning). Then, in an attempt to make the Japanese appear somewhat remorseful, the script calls for Admiral Yamamoto to utter his famous "brilliant man" and "sleeping giant" lines.
After the attack, Jon Voight does a wonderful impression of Peter Sellers' Dr. Strangelove. Only problem is, he was supposed to be Franklin D. Roosevelt.
O, and as for Rafe and Danny? They've sort of made up. Heck, ring the attack, they even team up to presumptuously usurp the roles of the two historical heroes of the Pearl Harbor attack, Lts. George Welch and Kenneth Taylor, who took to the skies and shot down anywhere from six to 10 Japanese planes.
Then our omnipresent plastic heroes listen in on a Top Gun-esquire rah-rah by Alec Baldwin's interpretation of Col. Jimmy Doolittle, which leads into a half-baked annotation of the historical Doolittle Raid, which has the threefold purpose of making sure our two heroes achieve good ol' American vengeance on the Japanese, to slap some convenient closure on our three-hour General Hospital episode (in case you couldn't figure it out, Danny dies, and Rafe and Evelyn live happily ever after with the parachute baby Danny Jr.), and to make me wonder why this movie was titled "Pearl Harbor" and not "Babes, Bombs and Butt-kicking," or something rather. Then the credits roll, accompanied by a pop song that sounds like a rejected idea for Titanic.
The title "Pearl Harbor" presumes that this movie is the ultimate cinematic authority on the attack. But instead it amounts to little more than a three-hour soap opera with putrid dialogue that has the gall to give credit to generic G.I. Joes for key historical roles. No other work of historical fiction has at the same time taken itself so seriously and managed to show such irreverence both for its subject and for the very craft of film-making.
『伍』 电影《珍珠港事件》英语读后感
On December 7, 1941 before dawn, Japan for eliminated the south boundexpanded war the main barrier, to beautifully attacked without priornotice, the date united fleets in commander Guanshan this 56 naviessenior general's planning with the direction under, its airplane andthe submarine suddenly attacked US Pacific fleet base Pearl harbor aswell as the United States Army and navy's in Hawaii all United Statesmilitary airport and many the naval vessel which anchored in Pearlharbor. Does not guard against US'S 12 battleships and other ships areattacked and sunk or wreck, 188 airplanes are destroyed, 2,400Americans lost life, only the Arizona number battleship explodes whenthe submersion has over a thousand dead. "The Pearl Harbor Incident"the matter sent after second days on December 8, US has abandoned "theisolated principle", Congress has carried unanimously the resolutionwhich declared war to the date. American President Roosevelt signedproclaimed the war declaration, and announcement on December 7 for US"national humiliation date". "The Pearl Harbor Incident" thoroughlyhas been involved in US Second World War.
『陆』 求来一篇:《偷袭珍珠港》电影的观后感
二战是人类历史上"不可”治愈的创伤，身体的灾难给予了那个时代，而心灵的创伤如遗传一样，时代相传下去。所以对待历史，我们要以求知者的身份来倾听，来汲取教训。
前些天看了《珍珠港》这部反应战争的影片。一般我们会惯用“欣赏”这样的字眼来形容电影，的确，电影是给人看的。但是对于这部影片（推而广之所有反映战争的影片）我真的想不出用什么来形容。在观看的同时也揭开了人类的伤疤，就好像自己亲身经历战争灾难一样。仿佛自己是身处乱世的人，对战争的恐惧，对和平的期盼......让我熔入历史之中,那一刻历史就像是沧桑老人，像我们讲述那段不堪回首的往事！
对于珍珠港事件，是由日本帝国主义精心策划的，美国方面未给与充分重视的侵袭战争。对于珍珠港基地的重要性和日本进攻的可能性，美国没有给与足够的重视。政府在很长一段时间以轻敌姿势来对待这场无法规避的战争。结果这场战争几乎是在美军的睡梦中打响的，正犹如当头一棒，惊醒了沉睡中的美国。居安思危的潜危险意识在任何时候都是必须的，在新中国成立之初就以《义勇军进行曲》作为国歌的问题上，毛主席态度鲜明的指出了“中华民族到了最危险的时候”这句话不会过时。一种潜危险意识，就这样伴随着新中国的成长，强大。正所谓“富贵不能淫，威武不能屈，贫贱不能移”。
增加民族凝聚力，国家荣誉感是每个人应承担的责任，是每个人历史使命之所在。在任何情况下，拥有这种信仰的国家将无往而不胜！国家的灾难每个人都是实际的承担着，国家与个人的命运是相连的，就如珍珠港事件传到本土之后，美国各界纷纷动员，士兵，物资，源源不断的输往前线，民族凝聚力，责任感油然而生。在去年的汶川地震时，我国军民团结一致，众志成城，无不凸显了新时期的民族精神，和责任感！
战争的爆发是利益冲突所导致的，在利益冲突不断升级，达到一定的程度时就会发生。所以从某种意义上讲，战争也是出于协调利益矛盾。正义战争的目的在于不再战争。日本帝国主义出于自身的考虑发动了这场不义战争，是违历史之潮流，人类之期望。所以穷兵黩武的极端分子下场，注定要自己埋葬自己!
二战是帝国主义政治经济发展不平衡的阶段性产物，以日本为首的法西斯千方百计的转嫁国内经济危机，以求对内欺骗巩固统治，对外侵略扩大统治。战争成为他们“理想”的工具。然而，事实告诉我们和平发展才能实现富强与尊重，“力可以的天下，而不可得民心",但是“兴百姓苦，亡百姓苦”谁也不希望战争的爆发。当今世界正处于变革之中，在变化中充满宇多不确定因素，其最终也不乏战争因素，但是时代的主流是求和平，谋发展，基于此应该尽量避免不必要的战争。纵观历史战争不是解决矛盾的唯一手段，许多战争反而适得其反。时下更为微妙的是协商解决利益的冲突。“在战争中能取得的，谈判桌上也可以”和平应该成为人类之共同信仰！
虽然我们反对不义战争，但是我们可以牺牲一切可以牺牲的来维护，国家的荣誉，民族的尊严，就像美国人正常的生活秩序被打乱后，美国人民开始了为自由而战
正如前文所说的“战争的创伤是遗传的”但是有好多人基因变异了，有的变异结果是隐瞒，有的淡化，更有甚者美化！“在对待历史问题上，中国的态度是'以史为鉴，面向未来'，我们从来不认为历史上的日本人能军国主义对中国的侵略要日本人民承担，我们从不这样认为”，朱镕基的话不应该成为日本党政忘却历史的资本，而应该是中日世代友好的根本。针对日本否认侵略，偷袭珍珠港，南京大屠杀......无疑是铁的血证!
美国军队在收到命令之后，迅速集结，快速行动，体现了军人的使命和天职。胡锦涛主席提出的“忠诚于党，热爱人民，报效国家，献身使命，崇尚荣誉”当代军人的核心价值体系，是中国特色建军之路的有益探索。我军是文明之师，威武之师，文明之师，革命战争年代中国共产党和中国人民，靠这支铁骑，历尽艰难困苦终于建立了华族江山，彪炳千古。和平时期，这支雄狮为捍卫国家独立与主权，维护世界和平建立了卓越功勋。新时期，新变化，中国军队更是彰显了核心价值体系！
忽视过去的人，在未来的行程中，将是一个缺乏准备的思想准备de匆匆过客，忽视过去的国家，面对世界变局将不会有成熟的选择，甚至有迷失方向的风险。 和平年代，回首那段沧桑岁月，使我倍加珍惜来之不易的和平，历史留下了许多。让那些沧桑岁月来激励我们向前吧!
『柒』 哪位老兄帮忙找一篇《珍珠港》的影评，内容多一点，分析要客观，感情要真实
简单的爱情，世俗的感动闲看《珍珠港》 影评
可是我还是认为《珍珠港》做得不好，而且最大的缺陷同样在剧本。但不是在前面，而是在后面。首先女主角的塑造不够彻底，思路有变。怎么看那些女主角同男二号在一起的缠绵片断也可以让观众认为她是爱上了男二号的。可是男一号回来后，她的痛悔的表现立马就把前面的一切推翻了，她并没有爱上男二号，她始终爱的是男一号。那么前面的缠绵还有其必要吗？剧情的三心二意使得这个原本与传统相比有些不同的女主角叛逆得不够彻底，她就不可以同时爱上两个男人吗？主流的观众说不，于是导演也就硬生生地把一个原本有点深度的女性角色塞回了传统花瓶的轨道。而这时女主角已经怀上了不爱的那个男人的骨肉，于是我就猜到两男必需有一个要死了。那就让他们在轰炸中互相该原谅的原谅，该告别的告别，该死去的死去吧，这样灾难与爱情两条线才能得以融合和贯通，才够干脆果断啊。可是还是为了照顾美国主流观众的情绪，咱不能只挨打不还手啊，让咱在珍珠港事件里展开大的还击虽然是最好的，可美国人也不敢如此公然地篡改历史呀？于是导演只好画蛇添足地在轰炸后又加上了美国报复的一幕，本该在轰炸中解决的感情危机也就只好安排在后面的报复行动中来了，以保持悬念。可是此时纵有未了的感情挣扎和精彩的空中战斗那也是无力回天了，在经历了四十多分钟精彩轰炸后的观众已经是精疲力竭、无意欣赏了，此时都盼着你结束呢。本身就也精彩不过大轰炸的结尾“高潮”戏也就只能给人一种高潮后的感觉，沦为鸡肋似的东西了。
近三小时的大片《珍珠港》就这样闲闲地看完了，有反感的地方，但大多时候还是看得很投入，而且很多地方还是很感动的。其中有音乐的迷人因素，有演员的自然表演，甚至有剧本的某些小心思。但是也不能忽略了还有摄影的大气和漂亮，很多地方的摄影都极具心思，比如日军军舰上用的那个从高空滑过的镜头，就非常干脆漂亮，气势十足。而一对情侣共乘飞机在天上遨游的时候不禁让人想起《走出非洲》中的经典爱情，在这里天空的颜色和飞机转圜时的镜头切换以及刹那的光线都是做足功夫的，更别提大轰炸时的场面调度和摄影技巧的全面运用了。而作为好莱坞的专长的美工同样也毫不逊色。那种四五十年代特有的挺拔干净、温文尔雅的服饰在清冷的街景和金黄的阳光下是如此的怀旧。
不过我想我对《珍珠港》的好感，最主要的还是来自于起初对它的期望值的极低。人往往就是这样，当你把所有的渴望降到最低点时，你才能感觉到让你欣喜的东西的。一部商业片就应该用世俗的眼光去看，能感动最好，不能感动那一笑置之就行，反正没指望它能走入你的生命和情感，放轻松的时候是我们最写意的时候。如果看累了沉重思考的严肃电影，那么不妨世俗地去感动感动简单的爱情与生命吧!
其他影评还有:
http://www.chinacity.com/blog/user1/2895/archives/2005/30058.shtml
http://yezhanpai.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!93F55BA913250760!997.entry
http://www.mtime.com/movie/12601/comment.html