1. 飞屋环游记英文影评
UP
Up is another must-see animated film from Pixar Animation Studios. It's about a cranky old man and an overeager Scout who fly to South America in a floating house suspended from helium balloons. Up is director Pete Docter's (Monsters, Inc.) second feature-length film, and features the voices of Edward Asner, Christopher Plummer, Bob Peterson and Jordan Nagai. It is the first Pixar film to be presented in Disney Digital 3-D.
Up is definitely one of the better Pixar efforts. It's about the grandeur and excitement of flight and adventure. The first ten minutes of the film about Carl Fredricksen and his life-long love Ellie are surprisingly touching. It's heartbreaking to see him lose his wife even at old age. With nothing left to do Fredricksen heads for South America, but he's not alone. Russell, a Wilderness Explorer trying to earn his "Assisting the Elderly" badge, has stowed away on the porch after being sent on a snipe hunt by Carl the day before. The relationship of father and son that forms between Fredricksen and Russell is completely believable. The filmmakers certainly know how to make a film with endearing characters. The animation is gorgeous. Several scenes in Up are some of the most memorable that I've ever seen in animated films. Like other Pixar films Up is also very funny. Thankfully, it's sweet humour instead of the gross humour that's present in many of today's Hollywood films. In conclusion, Up is another daring, unusual and beautiful animated film from Pixar that both children and alts will enjoy watching. I highly recommend it.
-----------------------------------------------
IMDB上观众的影评，可以根据自己的需要改一下
2. 求飞屋环游记的英语影评一篇
Lights go dark, the screen lights up, my left-hand side is the darkness.
Look at the screen in which right Liangxiaowucai slowly getting old, along with structures that are called home, cabin, along with running a tiny balloon business, along with the dream of travel in order to save money, but also have to face together the difficulties for some time and again The jar shattered that dream dress, but always smiling face, never once opening hand. There is love of people around, there is a dream to go to achieve, in fact, well-being has always been very simple. As a result, tears blurred his eyes.
I have always been a tangle of people, formalism, and attention to detail, seizing a bit small link, and love into a dead end, it is you said, is also true. At this time, all my thoughts went so far as just that, you will not join me in a sub-sub to the accumulation of a dream, it will not join me to make a living not hesitate to smash it. No matter how I asked, you do not do it, because you do not understand it, this little jar of coins can bring what one happy? You do not understand, it is important is not money, was a matter for the dream of saving money, throwing money to the jar and watched it slowly filled up, happiness will overflow, even if breaking open it, inside spill out from the debris or a happy feeling. So cute you do not mind, but I was so keen on such a happy, even if only a formality. This is why we dispute the reasons for every day, we're not happy culprits, we are among the most fundamental contradiction. We are so different two types of people, even in the face the same direction, you can see also different dimensional landscapes, how there may be a common dream?
So, I can not accompanied by Carl as Ellie, as accompany you slowly getting old together, even though, I love you. We will eventually be separated, in order to chase their dreams. But I will still sad, for example in such a time, watching people fall in love with, formed by couples bonded with, for well-being of the trivial little things, I will still sad. I probably should not keep you just upset with the old, right? Just that, for this form can not be achieved rather sad, not because of losing you,! In the final analysis, I have just a formalist, you know.
However, love, to the later, not to become only a formality Mody?
Even if they never made hand travel, they are happy because they loved each other with growing old. Until, she finally too old can no longer be accompanied at his side. Then he changed and became Gu Pi, becoming stubborn, become irritable, become inaccessible, and finally became a movie, novel, the most common kind of lonely and unhappy eccentric old man look. By way of his daily habit of wiping the old furniture, old furnishings, according to the order used to do everything, life becomes a habit, but rather the love for her, finally has become a formality, he doggedly guarding of their shared wooden stubborn to go to achieve that collective dream. One day, when this strange old man and his bad temper cottage, with the 10000, when the balloon going up, then launched into vacated, not love itself, ah, but only the District of love shell, only a formality only the. "The house to go into the waterfall in Wonderland" This thing has become a symbol, in any case, as long as the house to go into the waterfall wonderland, he has forgotten this symbol represents the dreams and love, his heart no longer remember well-being of the same again.
Fortunately, the end of the story is not the case. Hence we have that little boy, as well as the little boy brings big trouble. When he finally dropped him and that she did not hesitate to work together to build the furniture, she left him abandoned relics of the material form, and his happiness back. He finally once again experience the love, once again to experience and human exchanges, some companionship, care for others, help others, love other people's feelings, in the airship on the fight, that's the more over the cabin is not far from disappearing, is lonely ( Although Khan )...... huts no longer exist, has been dismembered in the form of love is gone, but the love last forever.
The screen go dark, lights light up, I left without you. But this, so what?
灯光暗下去，银幕亮起来，我的左手边是一片黑暗。
看银幕中那一对两小无猜慢慢变老，一起搭建那个叫做家的小木屋，一起经营小小的气球生意，一起为了梦想中的旅行攒钱，又一起为了一些不得不面对的困难一次一次打碎那个盛装梦想的罐子，却始终微笑面对，从来也不曾放开手。有爱的人在身边，有梦想可以去实现，其实幸福一直就很简单。于是，泪水模糊了眼睛。
我一直是个纠结的人，形式主义，专注细节，抓住一点小事不放，爱钻牛角尖，这是你说的，一点也没错。这时候，我所有的想法竟然只是，你是不会和我一起一分一分去积攒梦想，也不会和我一起为了生活毫不犹豫地去砸碎它的。无论我如何要求，你也不会去做，因为你不理解，这小小一罐子硬币能带来什么快乐呢？你不明白，重要的不是钱，是一起为梦想存钱这件事，往罐子里扔钱，看着它慢慢满起来，快乐便会溢出来，即使要砸开它，从碎片里洒出来的还是幸福的感觉。你没有那么可爱的小心思，而我却那么向往这样的幸福，即使，仅仅是形式而已。这就是我们每天争执的原因，我们都不快乐的元凶，我们之间最根本的矛盾。我们是如此不同的两类人，即使面对着同一个方向，看到的也是不同次元的风景，又怎么可能会有共同的梦想？
所以，我无法像Ellie伴着Carl那样，陪着你一起慢慢变老，即使，我爱你。我们终究必须分开，为了追逐各自的梦想。可我还是会难过，比如在这样的时候，看着别人相爱着，厮守着，为琐碎的小事幸福着的时候，我还是会难过。我大概只是难过不能陪你一起老吧?只是，为不能实现这个形式而难过，不是因为失去你吧！说到底，我也只是个形式主义者，你是知道的。
可是，爱，到了后来，不就变成了，只有形式而已么？
即使他们始终不曾牵手旅行，他们都是快乐的，因为他们相爱着老去。直到，她终于老得再也不能陪在他身边。然后他变了，变得孤癖，变得固执，变得暴躁，变得难以接近，终于变成了电影、小说中最常见的那种孤独的不幸福的古怪老头儿的样子。他每天按习惯的方式擦拭旧家具旧摆设，按习惯的顺序做每一件事，生活，变成了习惯而已，而对她的爱，最后也变成了一种形式而已，他固执地守护着他们共有的木屋，固执的要去实现那个共同的梦想。有一天，当这个古怪的坏脾气老头儿和他的小木屋，随着一万只气球拔地而起的时候，那腾空飞起的，不是爱情本身啊，而只是爱情的区壳，只是形式而已了。“把房子带到仙境瀑布去”，这件事，变成了一个符号，无论如何，只要把房子带到仙境瀑布去，他忘记了这个符号所代表的梦想和爱情，他的心已经不记得幸福的样子了。
幸好，故事不是这样结束的。所以才会有那个小男孩，以及小男孩带来的大麻烦。当他终于毫不犹豫地扔下他和她共同打造的家具，舍弃她留给他的物质形态的遗物，他的幸福回来了。他终于又一次体验了爱，又一次体验了和人交流，有人陪伴，关心别人，帮助别人，爱别人的感情，在飞艇上搏斗时，那越飞越远渐渐消失的不是小木屋，是寂寞（汗）......木屋虽然不在了，爱的形式已经肢解已经消失，但爱永存。
银幕暗下去，灯光亮起来，我的左手边没有你。可是这，又怎样？
3. 飞屋环游记 英文观后感 80 字翻译
I feel this is a very touching a cartoon! His wife is gone, he do more with cabin balloon to search for the slice of wonderland, has no intention of small and medium-sized Russell and he began the journey together. The hero Carl and ronaldinho have a moment of clinging to the heart. The last two people in trouble become good friends.
翻译：我感觉这是一部很感人的动画片！他妻子不在了，他弄好多气球带着小屋去寻找一片仙境，无意中小罗素和他一起开始了这段旅程。主人公卡尔和小罗都拥有着一刻执着的心。最后两人在患难之中成为了好朋友。
4. 飞屋环游记的英语观后感、不少于200字
飞屋环游记的英文观后感
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for alts, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)
5. 飞屋环游记英文观后感
Flying is not the house is lonely
Used a vulgar phrase is used to describe the film characters.
Karl, Male, nail households living alone. Russell, M, Debating the Boy Scouts Youth. If we must in these two seemingly opposite to find a common ground between the two characters, then it is lonely.
Movie starts, Carl and Allie, met boys and girls, men and women of love, old man and old woman's dependence, a sense of Xiepikesi, in less than 10 minutes in length in the story of a warm without losing the extraordinary twists and turns story. Disney's routine use, it has to end, here are the subtitles of happy forever. Unfortunately this is Pixar, such as the fleeting years, God taking away the Carl's ribs, that were together for many years into memory. Carl and Allie The two are complementary, the former made less stiff, which is lively, colorful language, less Allie's harmonization, Karl all the more reticent indivial, eccentric character has become, if not an unexpected turn of events He would like the snail in his room slowly into the st of time.
Compared to Carl, a fight that and Tang Monk scarf and some even liked a little overweight children. But as the plot slowly started, the audience found that the glossy surface of the egg also has numerous splice below the scars left by the lack of fatherly desire to use all kinds of juvenile behavior to attract the attention of his father. Russell has been hanging in the chest of people felt a sad Medal of Honor, a row of heavy medals not for four points of beauty, not for the top ten outstanding, just to be able to see his father side.
Flying is the ancient ideal of the human. From the earliest of the birds flight feathers stains who expect the power to use firecrackers tied to the whim of the chair, to the Wright brothers that go down in history in 12 seconds. Flying the film is achieved through numerous balloons, which more or less, and also when the best ideas about our childhood, I believe many viewers see the balloon will be pulling up the moment the house knowing smile - "It kinds of things, I also fancied the ah. " Balloon will not only pull the house, they take with initiator Carl, hiding away under the eaves of Russell, out of the city's noise and the fetters of this world, into the dream of "Shangri-La." Sunlight through the colorful balloon shed the shadow of a dream, yet also seemed to weave magic scene. At this moment, whether for the realization of a dream to be extremely excited about Carl, or for grasping sand cone birds and the sky somehow be brought Russell, have gained a new life.
The other side of the cloud, where agreement
"Adventure is out there" throughout the whole movie. Charlie is a fantastic young Ersimanci their idol, and his motto has naturally become the motto of youth. That is it, leads Carl met Allie, leads two lives, to guide the flying house later adventures.
Everyone has had some lofty unrealistic ideals in the growth of these ideals in the real impact of graally fade, leaving only one last name, becoming synonymous with past regret. Go and live in Paradise Falls is a lifelong dream Carl couples, although many things have twists and turns, the time to go to Paradise Falls dragged valuable is that they never gave up the dream, even in the Ailey died Hou Kaer still untold and dangers in the post-arrival. "Flying Pixar" no Hollywood scene in the courage to save the world, not the main theme of the film made the image of higher grade, and no Korean in points and dragging points and the love tear gas, just like the same music on earth, cloud fine, light, exceptionally charming and fresh. Video is able to attract because it is beyond the general impression of the animation, not only do comedy for children, but alts can also appreciate and understand the fairy tale, nothing more than a firm conviction and unshakable commitment better move, in concrete under the repression of human nature seems numb.
Nirvana
Drawing attention to a finishing touch, the latter part of the film is the crowning touch to the series of tragedies. If Karl simply flew to heaven falls settled side, the movie can at best be quite creative, and not worthy of a place sublimation.
Kevin is a virgin forest of rare birds, because I like chocolate and and the odd old man, fat composition of the juvenile adventure team. And has lived in heaven is near the waterfall to catch Kevin Charles Ersimanci at all costs, in worship before him transformed as the big villain Carl. Mantz to fly in the burning house, the Carl Kevin chose to give up thoughts of the house to protect rally late wife. Own mysterious providence, paradise falls in lvl, Carl look at his dead wife left their adventure album, his surprise found Ellie in this adventure log covered with their happy marriage live photos, and some last words, "Thank you to bring my best life, now on your own journey right, love you Ellie." Looking back, though Carl and Allie has inspired dreams of their life, but life has graally become a burden to the burden Carl even gave up some of the good should enjoy Moreover, youth, adventure wish this would include with a trace of "Invincible Medic, brave fearless" means, as if the general insight, Carl no longer limited to the ideal year-round, set off the airship rescue Kevin Manz and Russell. Some el, the loss of buoyancy of the housing slowly fly into the clouds did not disappear. Although with a touch of nostalgia, but still, and Russell Carr said: "you know, it just a house" Remembrance into, but was already casting haze of confusion. More or less, and Karl has achieved the promise of the year, the following is the start of their own life.
Carl lost the old house has been flying airships, small Russell won the father and the feelings of friends, the house should fly the crash miraculously landed in a paradise waterfall. This is a play characters Nirvana, is also Pixar-style happy ending.
Outside the plot
Pixar 3D animation in the course of many years of accumulated rich technical background, in the "flying Pixar" in both dim light particle of effect, or many dynamic relationship between the balloon and the rain against the windows physical calculations, including animal hair of realism, they both looked beautiful. The audience while enjoying the plot obtained visual enjoyment.
6. 求一篇飞屋环游记的英文观后感和一本书的英文读后感
书的读后感
鲁宾逊漂流记：
Robinson Crusoe is a beautiful novel that was written by Daniel Defoe, it was first published in 1719. It was arguably the first novel to ever be published which is no suprise given the date! The book really is superbly written throughout and I found it a real pleasure to read. The novel is about 270 pages and contains an epilogue. Daniel Defoe is seen by many to be one of the most famous writers in English Literature and after reading this novel it is easy to see why; I would really recommend it.
The novel is actually a fiction autobiography about the man named Robinson Crusoe. He is a man who is the sole survivor of a shipwreck just off Venesuila and he encounters many things across his journey before actually being rescued. He is stranded on an island that is no way near any ships and the island is completely unihabited. Robinson Crusoe can't stand it at first but he then manages to make this horrible island into a paradise of his own. He was stranded on this island for 24 years with out any company but he then one day rescued a prisoner and things change. The novel is supposedly based on facts and so is a fictional novel.
I really found the plot line to be superb throughout the novel and I found it easy to follow. The novel is beautifully written and very well structured really adding to the excellence. If you like tropical island get away novels or films rather like "The lord of the flies" I would really recommend this novel. I hope this was useful and thank you very much for reading.
飞屋环游记的英文观后感
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for alts, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)
飞屋环游记的英文观后感2
In its opening stretch the new Pixar movie “Up” flies high, borne aloft by a sense of creative flight and a flawlessly realized love story. Its on-screen and unlikely escape artist is Carl Fredricksen, a widower and former balloon salesman with a square head and a round nose that looks ready for honking. Voiced with appreciable impatience by Ed Asner, Carl isn’t your typical American animated hero. He’s 78, for starters, and the years have taken their toll on his lugubrious body and spirit, both of which seem solidly tethered to the ground. Even the two corners of his mouth point straight down. It’s as if he were sagging into the earth.
More About This Movie
Overview
Tickets & Showtimes
New York Times Review
Cast, Credits & Awards
Readers' Reviews Trailers & Clips
View Clip...Buy From Amazon Skip to next paragraph
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Pixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures
Carl Fredericksen checking out some new neighbors in “Up.”
Multimedia
Interactive Feature
‘Up,’ Inside and Out
Related
Well-Rounded Boy, Meet Old Square (May 17, 2009)
Pixar’s Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy (April 6, 2009)
Enlarge This Image
Pixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures
Along for the ride is Russell, voiced by Jordan Nagai.
Eventually a bouquet of balloons sends Carl and his house soaring into the sky, where they go up, up and away and off to an adventure in South America with a portly child, some talking (and snarling and gourmet-cooking) dogs and an unexpected villain. Though the initial images of flight are wonderfully rendered — the house shudders and creaks and splinters and groans as it’s ripped from its foundation by the balloons — the movie remains bound by convention, despite even its modest 3-D depth. This has become the Pixar way. Passages of glorious imagination are invariably matched by stock characters and banal story choices, as each new movie becomes another manifestation of the movie-instry divide between art and the bottom line.
In “Up” that divide is evident between the early scenes, which tell Carl’s story with extraordinary tenderness and brilliant narrative economy, and the later scenes of him as a geriatric action hero. The movie opens with the young Carl enthusing over black-and-white newsreel images of his hero, a world-famous aviator and explorer, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer). Shortly thereafter, Carl meets Ellie, a plucky, would-be adventurer who, a few edits later, becomes his beloved wife, an alt relationship that the director Pete Docter brilliantly compresses into some four wordless minutes ring which the couple dream together, face crushing disappointment and grow happily old side by side. Like the opener of “Wall-E” and the critic’s Proustian reminiscence of childhood in “Ratatouille,” this is filmmaking at its purest.
The absence of words suggests that Mr. Docter and the co-director Bob Peterson, with whom he wrote the screenplay, are looking back to the silent era, as Andrew Stanton did with the Chaplinesque start to “Wall-E.” Even so, partly because “Up” includes a newsreel interlude, its marriage sequence also brings to mind the breakfast table in “Citizen Kane.” In this justly famous (talking) montage, Orson Welles shows the collapse of a marriage over a number of years through a series of images of Kane and his first wife seated across from each other at breakfast, another portrait of a marriage in miniature. As in their finest work, the Pixar filmmakers have created thrilling cinema simply by rifling through its history.
Those thrills begin to peter out after the boy, Russell (Jordan Nagai), inadvertently hitches a ride with Carl, forcing the old man to assume increasingly grandfatherly ties. But before that happens there are glories to savor, notably the scenes of Carl — having decided to head off on the kind of adventure Ellie and he always postponed — taking to the air. When the multihued balloons burst through the top of his wooden house it’s as if a thousand gloriously unfettered thoughts had bloomed above his similarly squared head. Especially lovely is the image of a little girl jumping in giddy delight as the house rises in front of her large picture window, the sunlight through the balloons daubing her room with bright color.
In time Carl and Russell, an irritant whose Botero proportions recall those of the human dirigibles in “Wall-E,” float to South America where they, the house and the movie come down to earth. Though Mr. Docter’s visual imagination shows no signs of strain here — the image of Carl stubbornly pulling his house, now tethered to his torso, could have come out of the illustrated Freud — the story grows progressively more formulaic. And cuter. Carl comes face to face with his childhood hero, Muntz, an eccentric with the dashing looks and frenetic energy of a younger Kirk Douglas. Muntz lives with a legion of talking dogs with which he has been hunting a rare bird whose gaudy plumage echoes the palette of Carl’s balloons.
The talking dogs are certainly a hoot, including the slobbering yellow furball Dug and a squeaky-voiced Doberman, Alpha (both Mr. Peterson), not to mention the dog in the kitchen and the one that pops open the Champagne. And there’s something to be said about the revelation that heroes might not be what you imagined, particularly in a children’s movie and particularly one released by Disney. (Muntz seems partly inspired by Charles Lindbergh at his most heroic and otherwise.) But much like Russell, the little boy with father problems, and much like Dug, the dog with master issues, the story starts to feel ingratiating enough to warrant a kick. O.K., O.K., not a kick, just some gently expressed regret.
飞屋环游记的英文观后感3
Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixar's cutting-edge output, the fact that the studio's 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldn't seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.
But what gives "Up" such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.
Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.
It's also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinema's past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of "It's a Wonderful Life" "The Wizard of Oz" and, more recently, "About Schmidt."
Boxoffice-wise, the sky's the limit for "Up."
Even with its PG rating (the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since "The Incredibles"), there really is no demographic that won't respond to its many charms.
The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the film's 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner).
Borrowing "WALL-E's" poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchino's plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.
Deciding it's better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included), determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
But he soon discovers there's a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai), and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.
Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter ("Monsters, Inc.") and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.
Between that Carl/Russell dynamic and Muntz's pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, "Up" ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably.
Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual "comin' at ya" razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.
There’s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar’s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.
It’s that good.
屋环游记的英文观后感4
The film - which was written by Bob Peterson (Finding Nemo, Ratatouille) and directed by Peter Docter (Monsters, Inc.) - delivers all the things we’ve come to expect from a Pixar animated feature: gorgeous visuals, a strong story rife with moral lessons and (gasp) good character development; humor both low-brow (for the kids) and high-brow (for the grownups), with strokes of bold wit and a dash of sagely wisdom for good measure.
And yet, UP also delivers something quite unexpected: Pixar’s most alt-oriented story yet, slyly disguised in a fantastic adventure tale.
UP tells the life story of Carl Fredricksen (the unmistakable voice of Ed Asner), a shy little boy who grows up in (1930s?) America, an era in which people pack into movie theaters to watch news reels about adventurous explorers like Charles Muntz, who travels the world on one epic quest after the next.
Young Carl Fredricksen idolizes Muntz: He spends his lonely days roaming his neighborhood pretending to be Muntz until one day he runs into Ellie, an energetic and fearless young girl (everything Carl is not) who idolizes Charles Muntz just as much as Carl does. Ellie and Carl cross their hearts then and there and swear to be great adventurers like Charles Muntz, and with that oath, theirs is a match made in heaven.
After that fateful first encounter, we get a truly beautiful montage of Carl and Ellie’s life-long romance. We see the young kids grow into a teenage couple; see them get married and buy a house, working day jobs (balloon vendor) while saving up for the kind of adventures they fantasized about as kids. We watch the couple deal with the ups and downs, joys and tragedies of life; and graally we watch them grow into old age, Ellie’s “My Adventures” scrapbook still unfilled, even as her time on Earth ends.
With Ellie gone, Carl becomes a disgruntled old man desperately trying to hold on to a house, heirlooms and a lost-love he cherishes. A physical confrontation with neighborhood developers leads to Carl being forced into a retirement home for the rest of his days - but before the old man will give in he decides to honor the oath he and Ellie swore as kids and take one last shot at adventure! Carl ties an impossible number of balloons to his house (working a balloon cart at the zoo was his job for many years), rigs a steering system and UP he goes!
7. 求一篇《飞屋环游记》的英文观后感
Up is a slightly-left-of-center masterpiece. The emotional impact of the beautiful, wordless summation of Carl's life that opens the movie is the bass note that resonates through the whole film and is at least as affecting as the scene in Wall-E when he holds his own hands while watching Hello Dolly. The rest of the movie, of course, is breathtaking on just about every level, especially the tactile quality of all the characters and textures and the completely realized weather effects and action scenes. With no "new" technical milestones (fur in Monsters, Inc., water in Finding Nemo, realistic camera effects in Wall- E), the design is the main focus, from the hilariously stylized characters to the amazing setting of the tepui.
8. 电影飞屋环游记英文影评200单词左右
Up is another must-see animated film from Pixar Animation Studios. It's about a
cranky old man and an overeager Scout who fly to South America in a floating
house suspended from helium balloons. Up is director Pete Docter's (Monsters,
Inc.) second feature-length film, and features the voices of Edward Asner,
Christopher Plummer, Bob Peterson and Jordan Nagai. It is the first Pixar film
to be presented in Disney Digital 3-D.
Up is definitely one of the better
Pixar efforts. It's about the grandeur and excitement of flight and adventure.
The first ten minutes of the film about Carl Fredricksen and his life-long love
Ellie are surprisingly touching. It's heartbreaking to see him lose his wife
even at old age. With nothing left to do Fredricksen heads for South America,
but he's not alone. Russell, a Wilderness Explorer trying to earn his "Assisting
the Elderly" badge, has stowed away on the porch after being sent on a snipe
hunt by Carl the day before. The relationship of father and son that forms
between Fredricksen and Russell is completely believable. The filmmakers
certainly know how to make a film with endearing characters. The animation is
gorgeous. Several scenes in Up are some of the most memorable that I've ever
seen in animated films. Like other Pixar films Up is also very funny.
Thankfully, it's sweet humour instead of the gross humour that's present in many
of today's Hollywood films. In conclusion, Up is another daring, unusual and
beautiful animated film from Pixar that both children and alts will enjoy
watching. I highly recommend it.
望采纳
9. 求英文动画片飞屋环游记的英文观后感。大概在60词左右。
There is love of people around, there is a dream to go to achieve, in fact, well-being has always been very simple.Becuse the love,Eille had their house flied with the many ballons to make their dream come true.Selfish,obstinate and mercilessly,but it changes when a boy's appearance.Eille feel the different love about take care of others and help others.Even though the house was missing,but the love exist forever.