『壹』 《飛屋環游記》電影的觀後感
飛屋環游記 觀後感
《UP》怎麼會翻譯成《飛屋環游記》我是想不通的啦，不過看電影，「飛屋環游記」也還算貼切。
影片開頭，我就一直在猜誰將會是影片的主人公駕駛著飛屋去旅行，小男孩？小女孩？看著看著，怎麼味道變了？在不知不覺中，在一根根領帶的變換中，在儲蓄罐一次次的砸碎中，在高樓大廈一座座平地起中，心情時而歡喜，時而浪漫，時而憂傷，最後變得沉重，短短幾分鍾的影片，過完了人的一生。婚姻的忠誠、浪漫；生活的平淡、挫折在簡單的愛中詮釋盡。鋒迴路轉，這不是影片的結束，而是真正的開始。
由小女孩變成的老婆婆先離開由小男孩變成的小老頭，從此，老頭兒在充滿幸福回憶的小屋裡孤單地等候老去。除了回憶還是回憶，除了思念還是思念。
當四周的現代建築物即將吞噬掉這小屋時，老頭兒捍衛的不只是這小屋，更是對妻子、對以往幸福生活的懷念。面對社會的強勢，他選擇了逃離，去追尋和妻子共同的夢想——仙境瀑布。刺激的旅程開始啦——
有了追求，人才會有精神。老態龍鍾的糜糜老頭在屋子由幾千個氣球飛起來的剎那變得精神抖擻，意氣風發，充滿了力量，一下子好像年輕了許多。
貫竄整個影片的意念是——執著。對夢想的執著追求，契而不舍，何時行動都不算晚。小女孩的夢想是去仙境瀑布探險，夫妻倆的一生都在為這個夢想做准備。一次次的現實挫折讓他們的夢想一次次無限期的延後，最後只剩下老頭兒了，他依舊沒有放棄他們共同的探險夢想，老頭兒帶著角角落落都是幸福回憶的小屋一個人上路了。
小胖子小羅，也是一個執著的傢伙，從他出場自我介紹就可以看出這執著勁堪比老頭的固執。為了得到一個幫助老人的徽章他意外地被帶上了飛屋，跟著老頭一起探險。
孤獨。老頭兒很孤獨，小羅也很孤獨。老頭兒是因為沒了心愛的人而顯得特別孤單；小羅是因為沒有父母的陪伴而孤單，得到徽章只是為了能讓爸爸陪伴一會兒。兩個孤單的人一起互相陪伴，互相鼓勵，互相補充，世界才顯得圓滿、充實。一老、一少、一狗坐在街邊數汽車，這是電影的結束畫面，也是人類渴望的和諧。
拖了這么久，終於把《飛屋環游記》看了，也終於給出了今年暑期檔大片中第一個滿分。激動啊！真是部又感人又有趣，娛樂性強又內容充實的大傑作，今年我的個人TOP·10終於有冠軍了！內牛滿面~內牛滿面啊~
好了，擦乾鼻涕眼淚哈喇子，我們切入正題。兩遍，至少兩遍，像這樣在僅僅90多分鍾里壓縮了大量內容的經典，一遍是很難過癮的。在這短短的90分鍾里，高濃度地壓縮了大量內容，全片幾乎處處是亮點，既有感人的情感戲，又有搞笑的幽默戲，精緻的動作戲，科幻成分（比如那些很「哆啦A夢」狗項圈），密林探險，娛樂元素樣樣不缺，而且每一樣都如同被導演施了魔法，情感戲必定催淚，幽默戲必定搞笑，完全無一遺漏，每次必定命中紅心，一擊必殺。
而影片的內涵呢？讓我們先來回顧一下皮克斯近年的作品。眾所周知近年來皮克斯總會在動畫中加進些深邃的東西，使得影片富有韻味，老少咸宜。這在《美食總動員》和《機器人總動員》中可謂達到了極致。《美食總動員》中，通過雷米對夢想的追求引發人們對「何為人？」這一定義的思考，甚至牽引出了「勞動造人」這一恩格斯理論（雷米為騰出雙手做料理而直立行走）；《機器人總動員》通過讓瓦力長時間勞動後獲得人的感情這一情節，重申「勞動造人」這一觀點的同時，對科幻經典《2001太空漫遊》中的思想有了進一步的詮釋，從《太空漫遊》中猩猩拋向天空的骨頭，人類開始製造機器，到《機器人總動員》中胖船長站起來反抗機器，兩部作品完整地畫了一個圈，將內涵升華到「人類進化」的史詩層面上。
這些內涵之深邃，使得這兩部片子不論到何時都可以稱的上是經典，但問題就是這些東西雖好，但實在太哲學，太藝術，高度高得有些遠離生活了，換而言之，它們是「神」而不是「人」。在這一點上，《飛屋環游記》可以稱得上是皮克斯的回歸：影片的內容就像早年的《玩具總動員》一樣貼近生活，沒有深奧的哲學，沒有復雜的理論，有的是一段段有趣又感人的故事中，通過闡述「勇敢追逐夢想」的主題，從而迸發出一種振奮人心的力量。而這樣力量，正是在如今這個人們越來越不相信夢想的時代所需要的。從這一點上講，《飛屋環游記》是一部更加接近「人」的影片，也比《美食》，《機器人》更具觀賞性（注意這里單指觀賞性，與品質無關）。
影片的出色，與導演彼特·道格特的才華是分不開的。影片的每一場戲，無論是溫情還是搞笑，都恰到好處，多一分嫌長，少一分嫌短。劇情之流暢，拿捏之准確，導演功力可謂到了爐火純青的境界。以「如彩虹般的氣球將小屋拽上天」這一意象將「夢想」具象化的手法更是讓人拍案叫絕。
當然還有出色的編劇。影片以老爺爺卡爾為主角，但故事卻並未因此而顯得暮氣沉沉，相反，從被迫遷居到勇敢追夢，我們在卡爾身上看到了夢想的偉大力量和一種即使是年輕人也未見得擁有的朝氣與活力，編劇聰明地運用了卡爾「年老體弱」這一特點，安排他下決心勇敢追夢後恢復活力，化弊為利地反過來襯托夢想的強大力量，用他的故事書寫「夢想永不褪色」的傳奇。而一老一少因「意外」結伴冒險，最後互相彌補了對方感情的缺失的故事，沒有刻意的煽情，卻在扎實敘事的過程中，逐步涌現出一種排山倒海的親情力量，好一出動畫版的《聞香識女人》！而兩人片尾感人至深的一抱，便如同阿爾·帕西諾搖下車窗，說出「過來，兒子！」時一樣偉大。
不僅如此，影片的每一個角色都可謂擁有靈魂，可愛逗趣的小胖小羅（這個中文譯名不知誰譯的，八成足球看多了），會說話的狗「豆豆」，大怪鳥「凱文」……沒有一個不出彩的角色，就連「老伴艾莉」那幾分鍾的出場都很搶眼。尤其是小羅啊~那個「哆啦A夢」似的身材啊~一張堆滿嬰兒肥的胖臉上「小巧」的五官啊~還有搞笑的語言動作~我的媽媽咪呀！太可愛了~嗚嘛~嗚嘛~兩邊臉蛋子各親一口，留下兩個大口紅印子~
影片的特效簡直驚世駭俗，明明是動畫片，卻幾乎和實拍看不出什麼區別，再輔以3D效果，簡直感覺深受就可以摸到飛屋。狗的毛發，小羅的臉蛋，「凱文」質感十足的羽毛，真的不敢相信這不是實拍的啊！！相比之下，《變形金剛2》那個被國人嚴重過譽，根本就是一坨坨鐵塊在那裡滾的特效，簡直應該找地方刨坑埋了！
影片也不是沒有遺憾：作為卡爾偶像的理查德，同樣是對夢想有所執著，和卡爾有許多共同的地方，「夢想的力量」這一主題在他身上也有所體現。而對他的處理，仍舊是簡單粗暴地一死了之，而不是像《美食總動員》，《蜘蛛俠2》那樣用夢想的力量去感化反派，令其從新審視自己的價值，從而完成對主題的第二次深化。就是因為如此，《飛屋環游記》僅以一步之遙，終究還是遜《美食總動員》一籌，不得不稱之為遺憾。
當然，我這里有些吹毛求疵了，遺憾畢竟不是瑕疵，無法阻止我給它滿分。對於這樣一部經典，我相信今年很難再有比這更好的影片了。相信在明年的奧斯卡頒獎典禮上，我們會看到《飛屋環游記》滿載而歸的英姿。
『貳』 求一篇飛屋環游記的英文觀後感和一本書的英文讀後感
書的讀後感
魯賓遜漂流記：
Robinson Crusoe is a beautiful novel that was written by Daniel Defoe, it was first published in 1719. It was arguably the first novel to ever be published which is no suprise given the date! The book really is superbly written throughout and I found it a real pleasure to read. The novel is about 270 pages and contains an epilogue. Daniel Defoe is seen by many to be one of the most famous writers in English Literature and after reading this novel it is easy to see why; I would really recommend it.
The novel is actually a fiction autobiography about the man named Robinson Crusoe. He is a man who is the sole survivor of a shipwreck just off Venesuila and he encounters many things across his journey before actually being rescued. He is stranded on an island that is no way near any ships and the island is completely unihabited. Robinson Crusoe can't stand it at first but he then manages to make this horrible island into a paradise of his own. He was stranded on this island for 24 years with out any company but he then one day rescued a prisoner and things change. The novel is supposedly based on facts and so is a fictional novel.
I really found the plot line to be superb throughout the novel and I found it easy to follow. The novel is beautifully written and very well structured really adding to the excellence. If you like tropical island get away novels or films rather like "The lord of the flies" I would really recommend this novel. I hope this was useful and thank you very much for reading.
飛屋環游記的英文觀後感
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for alts, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)
飛屋環游記的英文觀後感2
In its opening stretch the new Pixar movie 「Up」 flies high, borne aloft by a sense of creative flight and a flawlessly realized love story. Its on-screen and unlikely escape artist is Carl Fredricksen, a widower and former balloon salesman with a square head and a round nose that looks ready for honking. Voiced with appreciable impatience by Ed Asner, Carl isn』t your typical American animated hero. He』s 78, for starters, and the years have taken their toll on his lugubrious body and spirit, both of which seem solidly tethered to the ground. Even the two corners of his mouth point straight down. It』s as if he were sagging into the earth.
More About This Movie
Overview
Tickets & Showtimes
New York Times Review
Cast, Credits & Awards
Readers' Reviews Trailers & Clips
View Clip...Buy From Amazon Skip to next paragraph
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Pixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures
Carl Fredericksen checking out some new neighbors in 「Up.」
Multimedia
Interactive Feature
『Up,』 Inside and Out
Related
Well-Rounded Boy, Meet Old Square (May 17, 2009)
Pixar』s Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy (April 6, 2009)
Enlarge This Image
Pixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures
Along for the ride is Russell, voiced by Jordan Nagai.
Eventually a bouquet of balloons sends Carl and his house soaring into the sky, where they go up, up and away and off to an adventure in South America with a portly child, some talking (and snarling and gourmet-cooking) dogs and an unexpected villain. Though the initial images of flight are wonderfully rendered — the house shudders and creaks and splinters and groans as it』s ripped from its foundation by the balloons — the movie remains bound by convention, despite even its modest 3-D depth. This has become the Pixar way. Passages of glorious imagination are invariably matched by stock characters and banal story choices, as each new movie becomes another manifestation of the movie-instry divide between art and the bottom line.
In 「Up」 that divide is evident between the early scenes, which tell Carl』s story with extraordinary tenderness and brilliant narrative economy, and the later scenes of him as a geriatric action hero. The movie opens with the young Carl enthusing over black-and-white newsreel images of his hero, a world-famous aviator and explorer, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer). Shortly thereafter, Carl meets Ellie, a plucky, would-be adventurer who, a few edits later, becomes his beloved wife, an alt relationship that the director Pete Docter brilliantly compresses into some four wordless minutes ring which the couple dream together, face crushing disappointment and grow happily old side by side. Like the opener of 「Wall-E」 and the critic』s Proustian reminiscence of childhood in 「Ratatouille,」 this is filmmaking at its purest.
The absence of words suggests that Mr. Docter and the co-director Bob Peterson, with whom he wrote the screenplay, are looking back to the silent era, as Andrew Stanton did with the Chaplinesque start to 「Wall-E.」 Even so, partly because 「Up」 includes a newsreel interlude, its marriage sequence also brings to mind the breakfast table in 「Citizen Kane.」 In this justly famous (talking) montage, Orson Welles shows the collapse of a marriage over a number of years through a series of images of Kane and his first wife seated across from each other at breakfast, another portrait of a marriage in miniature. As in their finest work, the Pixar filmmakers have created thrilling cinema simply by rifling through its history.
Those thrills begin to peter out after the boy, Russell (Jordan Nagai), inadvertently hitches a ride with Carl, forcing the old man to assume increasingly grandfatherly ties. But before that happens there are glories to savor, notably the scenes of Carl — having decided to head off on the kind of adventure Ellie and he always postponed — taking to the air. When the multihued balloons burst through the top of his wooden house it』s as if a thousand gloriously unfettered thoughts had bloomed above his similarly squared head. Especially lovely is the image of a little girl jumping in giddy delight as the house rises in front of her large picture window, the sunlight through the balloons daubing her room with bright color.
In time Carl and Russell, an irritant whose Botero proportions recall those of the human dirigibles in 「Wall-E,」 float to South America where they, the house and the movie come down to earth. Though Mr. Docter』s visual imagination shows no signs of strain here — the image of Carl stubbornly pulling his house, now tethered to his torso, could have come out of the illustrated Freud — the story grows progressively more formulaic. And cuter. Carl comes face to face with his childhood hero, Muntz, an eccentric with the dashing looks and frenetic energy of a younger Kirk Douglas. Muntz lives with a legion of talking dogs with which he has been hunting a rare bird whose gaudy plumage echoes the palette of Carl』s balloons.
The talking dogs are certainly a hoot, including the slobbering yellow furball Dug and a squeaky-voiced Doberman, Alpha (both Mr. Peterson), not to mention the dog in the kitchen and the one that pops open the Champagne. And there』s something to be said about the revelation that heroes might not be what you imagined, particularly in a children』s movie and particularly one released by Disney. (Muntz seems partly inspired by Charles Lindbergh at his most heroic and otherwise.) But much like Russell, the little boy with father problems, and much like Dug, the dog with master issues, the story starts to feel ingratiating enough to warrant a kick. O.K., O.K., not a kick, just some gently expressed regret.
飛屋環游記的英文觀後感3
Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixar's cutting-edge output, the fact that the studio's 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldn't seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.
But what gives "Up" such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.
Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.
It's also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinema's past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of "It's a Wonderful Life" "The Wizard of Oz" and, more recently, "About Schmidt."
Boxoffice-wise, the sky's the limit for "Up."
Even with its PG rating (the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since "The Incredibles"), there really is no demographic that won't respond to its many charms.
The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the film's 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner).
Borrowing "WALL-E's" poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchino's plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.
Deciding it's better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included), determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
But he soon discovers there's a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai), and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.
Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter ("Monsters, Inc.") and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.
Between that Carl/Russell dynamic and Muntz's pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, "Up" ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably.
Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual "comin' at ya" razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.
There』s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar』s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.
It』s that good.
屋環游記的英文觀後感4
The film - which was written by Bob Peterson (Finding Nemo, Ratatouille) and directed by Peter Docter (Monsters, Inc.) - delivers all the things we』ve come to expect from a Pixar animated feature: gorgeous visuals, a strong story rife with moral lessons and (gasp) good character development; humor both low-brow (for the kids) and high-brow (for the grownups), with strokes of bold wit and a dash of sagely wisdom for good measure.
And yet, UP also delivers something quite unexpected: Pixar』s most alt-oriented story yet, slyly disguised in a fantastic adventure tale.
UP tells the life story of Carl Fredricksen (the unmistakable voice of Ed Asner), a shy little boy who grows up in (1930s?) America, an era in which people pack into movie theaters to watch news reels about adventurous explorers like Charles Muntz, who travels the world on one epic quest after the next.
Young Carl Fredricksen idolizes Muntz: He spends his lonely days roaming his neighborhood pretending to be Muntz until one day he runs into Ellie, an energetic and fearless young girl (everything Carl is not) who idolizes Charles Muntz just as much as Carl does. Ellie and Carl cross their hearts then and there and swear to be great adventurers like Charles Muntz, and with that oath, theirs is a match made in heaven.
After that fateful first encounter, we get a truly beautiful montage of Carl and Ellie』s life-long romance. We see the young kids grow into a teenage couple; see them get married and buy a house, working day jobs (balloon vendor) while saving up for the kind of adventures they fantasized about as kids. We watch the couple deal with the ups and downs, joys and tragedies of life; and graally we watch them grow into old age, Ellie』s 「My Adventures」 scrapbook still unfilled, even as her time on Earth ends.
With Ellie gone, Carl becomes a disgruntled old man desperately trying to hold on to a house, heirlooms and a lost-love he cherishes. A physical confrontation with neighborhood developers leads to Carl being forced into a retirement home for the rest of his days - but before the old man will give in he decides to honor the oath he and Ellie swore as kids and take one last shot at adventure! Carl ties an impossible number of balloons to his house (working a balloon cart at the zoo was his job for many years), rigs a steering system and UP he goes!
『叄』 求一篇飛屋環游記的英文觀後感，100字左右感激不盡。
There is love of people around,there is a dream to go to achieve,in fact,well-being has always been very simple.Becuse the love,Eille had their house flied with the many ballons to make their dream come true.Selfish,obstinate and mercilessly,but it changes when a boy's appearance.Eille feel the different love about take care of others and help others.Even though the house was missing,but the love exist forever.
『肆』 求英文動畫片飛屋環游記的英文觀後感。大概在60詞左右。
There is love of people around, there is a dream to go to achieve, in fact, well-being has always been very simple.Becuse the love,Eille had their house flied with the many ballons to make their dream come true.Selfish,obstinate and mercilessly,but it changes when a boy's appearance.Eille feel the different love about take care of others and help others.Even though the house was missing,but the love exist forever.
『伍』 飛屋環游記 英文觀後感 80 字翻譯
I feel this is a very touching a cartoon! His wife is gone, he do more with cabin balloon to search for the slice of wonderland, has no intention of small and medium-sized Russell and he began the journey together. The hero Carl and ronaldinho have a moment of clinging to the heart. The last two people in trouble become good friends.
翻譯：我感覺這是一部很感人的動畫片！他妻子不在了，他弄好多氣球帶著小屋去尋找一片仙境，無意中小羅素和他一起開始了這段旅程。主人公卡爾和小羅都擁有著一刻執著的心。最後兩人在患難之中成為了好朋友。
『陸』 求一篇《飛屋環游記》的英文觀後感
Up is a slightly-left-of-center masterpiece. The emotional impact of the beautiful, wordless summation of Carl's life that opens the movie is the bass note that resonates through the whole film and is at least as affecting as the scene in Wall-E when he holds his own hands while watching Hello Dolly. The rest of the movie, of course, is breathtaking on just about every level, especially the tactile quality of all the characters and textures and the completely realized weather effects and action scenes. With no "new" technical milestones (fur in Monsters, Inc., water in Finding Nemo, realistic camera effects in Wall- E), the design is the main focus, from the hilariously stylized characters to the amazing setting of the tepui.
『柒』 飛屋環游記英文觀後感
Flying is not the house is lonely
Used a vulgar phrase is used to describe the film characters.
Karl, Male, nail households living alone. Russell, M, Debating the Boy Scouts Youth. If we must in these two seemingly opposite to find a common ground between the two characters, then it is lonely.
Movie starts, Carl and Allie, met boys and girls, men and women of love, old man and old woman's dependence, a sense of Xiepikesi, in less than 10 minutes in length in the story of a warm without losing the extraordinary twists and turns story. Disney's routine use, it has to end, here are the subtitles of happy forever. Unfortunately this is Pixar, such as the fleeting years, God taking away the Carl's ribs, that were together for many years into memory. Carl and Allie The two are complementary, the former made less stiff, which is lively, colorful language, less Allie's harmonization, Karl all the more reticent indivial, eccentric character has become, if not an unexpected turn of events He would like the snail in his room slowly into the st of time.
Compared to Carl, a fight that and Tang Monk scarf and some even liked a little overweight children. But as the plot slowly started, the audience found that the glossy surface of the egg also has numerous splice below the scars left by the lack of fatherly desire to use all kinds of juvenile behavior to attract the attention of his father. Russell has been hanging in the chest of people felt a sad Medal of Honor, a row of heavy medals not for four points of beauty, not for the top ten outstanding, just to be able to see his father side.
Flying is the ancient ideal of the human. From the earliest of the birds flight feathers stains who expect the power to use firecrackers tied to the whim of the chair, to the Wright brothers that go down in history in 12 seconds. Flying the film is achieved through numerous balloons, which more or less, and also when the best ideas about our childhood, I believe many viewers see the balloon will be pulling up the moment the house knowing smile - "It kinds of things, I also fancied the ah. " Balloon will not only pull the house, they take with initiator Carl, hiding away under the eaves of Russell, out of the city's noise and the fetters of this world, into the dream of "Shangri-La." Sunlight through the colorful balloon shed the shadow of a dream, yet also seemed to weave magic scene. At this moment, whether for the realization of a dream to be extremely excited about Carl, or for grasping sand cone birds and the sky somehow be brought Russell, have gained a new life.
The other side of the cloud, where agreement
"Adventure is out there" throughout the whole movie. Charlie is a fantastic young Ersimanci their idol, and his motto has naturally become the motto of youth. That is it, leads Carl met Allie, leads two lives, to guide the flying house later adventures.
Everyone has had some lofty unrealistic ideals in the growth of these ideals in the real impact of graally fade, leaving only one last name, becoming synonymous with past regret. Go and live in Paradise Falls is a lifelong dream Carl couples, although many things have twists and turns, the time to go to Paradise Falls dragged valuable is that they never gave up the dream, even in the Ailey died Hou Kaer still untold and dangers in the post-arrival. "Flying Pixar" no Hollywood scene in the courage to save the world, not the main theme of the film made the image of higher grade, and no Korean in points and dragging points and the love tear gas, just like the same music on earth, cloud fine, light, exceptionally charming and fresh. Video is able to attract because it is beyond the general impression of the animation, not only do comedy for children, but alts can also appreciate and understand the fairy tale, nothing more than a firm conviction and unshakable commitment better move, in concrete under the repression of human nature seems numb.
Nirvana
Drawing attention to a finishing touch, the latter part of the film is the crowning touch to the series of tragedies. If Karl simply flew to heaven falls settled side, the movie can at best be quite creative, and not worthy of a place sublimation.
Kevin is a virgin forest of rare birds, because I like chocolate and and the odd old man, fat composition of the juvenile adventure team. And has lived in heaven is near the waterfall to catch Kevin Charles Ersimanci at all costs, in worship before him transformed as the big villain Carl. Mantz to fly in the burning house, the Carl Kevin chose to give up thoughts of the house to protect rally late wife. Own mysterious providence, paradise falls in lvl, Carl look at his dead wife left their adventure album, his surprise found Ellie in this adventure log covered with their happy marriage live photos, and some last words, "Thank you to bring my best life, now on your own journey right, love you Ellie." Looking back, though Carl and Allie has inspired dreams of their life, but life has graally become a burden to the burden Carl even gave up some of the good should enjoy Moreover, youth, adventure wish this would include with a trace of "Invincible Medic, brave fearless" means, as if the general insight, Carl no longer limited to the ideal year-round, set off the airship rescue Kevin Manz and Russell. Some el, the loss of buoyancy of the housing slowly fly into the clouds did not disappear. Although with a touch of nostalgia, but still, and Russell Carr said: "you know, it just a house" Remembrance into, but was already casting haze of confusion. More or less, and Karl has achieved the promise of the year, the following is the start of their own life.
Carl lost the old house has been flying airships, small Russell won the father and the feelings of friends, the house should fly the crash miraculously landed in a paradise waterfall. This is a play characters Nirvana, is also Pixar-style happy ending.
Outside the plot
Pixar 3D animation in the course of many years of accumulated rich technical background, in the "flying Pixar" in both dim light particle of effect, or many dynamic relationship between the balloon and the rain against the windows physical calculations, including animal hair of realism, they both looked beautiful. The audience while enjoying the plot obtained visual enjoyment.
『捌』 飛屋環游記英文影評
UP
Up is another must-see animated film from Pixar Animation Studios. It's about a cranky old man and an overeager Scout who fly to South America in a floating house suspended from helium balloons. Up is director Pete Docter's (Monsters, Inc.) second feature-length film, and features the voices of Edward Asner, Christopher Plummer, Bob Peterson and Jordan Nagai. It is the first Pixar film to be presented in Disney Digital 3-D.
Up is definitely one of the better Pixar efforts. It's about the grandeur and excitement of flight and adventure. The first ten minutes of the film about Carl Fredricksen and his life-long love Ellie are surprisingly touching. It's heartbreaking to see him lose his wife even at old age. With nothing left to do Fredricksen heads for South America, but he's not alone. Russell, a Wilderness Explorer trying to earn his "Assisting the Elderly" badge, has stowed away on the porch after being sent on a snipe hunt by Carl the day before. The relationship of father and son that forms between Fredricksen and Russell is completely believable. The filmmakers certainly know how to make a film with endearing characters. The animation is gorgeous. Several scenes in Up are some of the most memorable that I've ever seen in animated films. Like other Pixar films Up is also very funny. Thankfully, it's sweet humour instead of the gross humour that's present in many of today's Hollywood films. In conclusion, Up is another daring, unusual and beautiful animated film from Pixar that both children and alts will enjoy watching. I highly recommend it.
-----------------------------------------------
IMDB上觀眾的影評，可以根據自己的需要改一下
『玖』 飛屋環游記的英語觀後感、不少於200字
飛屋環游記的英文觀後感
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for alts, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)