謊言之地電影的結局

⑴ 電影 《活埋》 結尾 疑問

看了這部片子兩遍，感覺意義很深刻。我同意樓主的第一個想法：美國政府並沒有真正的去解救男主角。理由如下：
一、電影細節中有這樣的片段，當男主角不停的向美國政府求救時，美方故作鎮定、煞有介事的詢問了一些問題，但是都未有什麼實質上的舉動；當聽到劫匪所要男主角的現時錄像時，美國政府方面的聲音才是真正的介意的聲音，因擔心一旦這樣的視頻傳播出去，對美國政府將在國際事務關繫上造成十分不利的影響。故在那之前的談話營救應屬虛造。
二、伊拉克的綁架者的動機並不是金錢，其處於自身的民族情結，向作為美國公民的男主角索取的是他在棺材的現狀視頻，意義就在於發泄民族仇恨和向世界公開本民族的報復，此伊拉克公民已將仇恨不局限於美國士兵軍官，而是擴展到了全體的美國公民。所以，即使最後此人拿到「贖金」、得到視頻，他也不會將男主角放過。以此可解釋為何最後男主角發了視頻卻未得到伊方消息的情節。
三、電影最後，棺材裡面不停的加速漏沙，同時，美國政府方面在電話中說正在挖掘，並且電話中傳出挖沙聲，男主角的希望再一次被點燃。然而，當男主角完全被沙掩埋、窒息無法應答時，電話對面的嘈雜聲戛然而止，最後一句是美國政府方面清晰的一句：I'm sorry.Paul.I' so sorry.毫無先前的喘息聲，沉著冷靜，一聽就是從辦公室那樣的安靜舒適環境里發出的，所以營救的聲音也是偽造的，並沒有救援隊過來營救男主角這樣的「平民」。
四、男主角先前打的各通電話都是從不同職業、不停人群的角度表現人世之冷漠，到了美國政府駐伊人質營救小組這通電話時，對方的嚴肅認真態度著實讓我們鬆了口氣，感覺到男主角真的能夠逃出苦海回到家鄉。但是細想一下，這部電影是要彰顯美國政府的偉大嗎？為何美國領事館都不會沾手一絲半點的事情，這個解救小組卻突然間來了個大轉彎呢？其實，解救小組的負責人只不過是在用他常用的方式來欺騙這個可憐的、已無生還希望的男主角，因為這種事情他已見多不怪了，起初說Mark沒死是為給這個可憐的人希望，不讓他做出聽從於綁匪的行為而傷害美國利益，最後「營救」時說是Mark，救錯了，也只不過是給男主角一點心理安慰：不只是他一個美國公民死於這樣的非命。
五、綁匪其實自己心知肚明，男主角拿不到錢，也得不到美國方面的幫助，因為先前的Mark已經足夠證明。他想要的就是那段視頻，之前的那些要求和恐嚇都是在給男主角施加心理壓力，從而能夠完全聽命於綁匪的要求。
六、電影的主題應為表現美伊戰爭後的雙方百姓的生活變化與影響。伊方的政治混亂及戰後蕭條，給電影中那位伊拉克人的所為提供了依據。而男主角是一個處處以自己利益為中心（影片中，可從美國領事館、CRT公司領導、各路接線員的態度上看出：事不關己，高高掛起；推脫推卸責任）的國家的公民，用他的悲劇來最好的詮釋這一主題思想再好不過。然而，直至最後美國政府都在進行著自己的謊言，騙人以希望，但最終選擇的仍是殘酷地、完全出自自身利益不顧及人道主義的解決方式，這恰好影射了美伊戰爭中，美國冠冕堂皇的各種發動戰爭的借口：不論話說得怎樣、理由找的又如何，做得事情終究是殘忍的。
整部電影，通過一部手機、幾段談話，反映出了一個國家、一個民族、甚至整個現實社會的影像，男主角最後由希望之巔猛跌到失望之谷，全然不知自己被玩弄欺騙，著實是個絕妙的諷刺！

⑵ 關於美國電影《謊言之下（WHAT LIES BENEATH）》劇情的問題！

Claire Spencer (Michelle Pfeiffer) enters a new phase of her life after a serious car accident leaves gaps in her memory. She is married to the renowned scientist Dr. Norman Spencer (Harrison Ford). Shortly after arriving in a new lakeside house in Vermont that once belonged to Norman's scientist father, her daughter Caitlin leaves home to go away to college. One day when Claire is working in the garden she hears loud sobbing coming from over the fence. It turns out to be her neighbor, Mary Feur (Miranda Otto). She seems terrified and Claire is very concerned, thinking that her husband is beating her. Norman tells her not to worry. Claire wakes in the middle of the night, and looks out of the window. She sees Mary's husband Warren (James Remar) dragging what looks like a body bag out into the boot of his car. By the time Claire had woken Norman, there was nothing left to see.

The next day, Claire decides to investigate by taking a basket of flowers and wine to the house as a "Welcome Gift". After nobody answers the door she walks round the side of the house and makes a startling discovery; a woman's sandal with a dark stain on it... She collects the sandal, and returns to the front door to leave the basket there. Warren returns as she is leaving the basket, and Claire explains why she was there and asks where Mary is. Warren gives a vague answer which leaves Claire even more worried.

Mysterious events begin to happen in Claire's house when Norman is not there - a picture falling off the window sill, doors opening and closing themselves and the computer screen typing 'MEF MEF MEF' (Mary E Feur).Throughout the film a framed news paper clipping of Claire and Norman at a awards ceremony keeps mysteriously falling off tables and the glass breaks. At one point, Claire is running a bath and as she looks into the water she sees a second reflection over her shoulder. Claire then believes that Mary is dead, and is now haunting her.This prompts her to visit her husband at work in his lab. She chats to one of the scientists who explains the drug halothane which they are using in the lab. It paralyzes but leaves the victim completely conscious. Norman, of course, thinks that Claire is feeling a bit empty since Caitlin is at university and this is just an excuse to grab attention. Desperate for closure, Claire invites her best friend Jody to join her for a séance in her bathroom where she had seen the reflection of Mary. Claire proces the sandal she had earlier taken from Mary's house, and places it on the table. The Ouija board does not move, but a candle starts to flicker, then goes out. The dial on the Ouija board then starts to move slowly from M to F. Nothing else happens, so Claire and Jody break the Ouija circle and Claire puts the Ouija board in a cupboard downstairs under some sweaters, and asks Jody not to tell Norman about the séance which Jody tifully does not.

Claire returns to Norman's workplace, where she informs Norman of what she and Jody had done. Norman tells her that she is going crazy, and decides to take her home. As they are crossing a bridge, they meet Warren, and Claire starts accusing him of killing Mary. When Warren looks confused, a lady comes over and asks him what the problem is. It turns out to be Mary Feur, leaving Norman and Claire very embarrassed.

When Claire is once again downstairs in the dark, the picture falls off the windowsill again, and Claire removes the newspaper cutting from the broken frame. She notices the back of the cutting, where a missing person's report is. Half way down the report, a name is mentioned - Madison Elizabeth... The end is cut off as it was only a cutting from the newspaper. Claire searches the missing persons records for Madison Elizabeth F. There her name was - Madison Elizabeth Frank, MEF. She looks at the picture on the record, and it looked like the reflection that Claire had previously seen in the bath. As Madison had been a student at the University where Norman had been a lecturer, Claire decides to investigate by visiting Madison's mother. It turned out that Madison had never been found. Claire finds a lock of hair in Madison's room, and takes it, and also sees a photo proving that a strangely shaped key she had found at home was Madison's.

Claire returns home to Norman, and behaves to him as if she were Madison trying to sece him. She then looks into the mirror and sees herself drenched, standing in the doorway. She realizes she can see herself before the car accident, when she had caught Norman with one of his students. She is distraught and goes to stay with Jody who tells her that she had seen Norman with a young woman in a bar in the local arty town of Adamant just before the accident, but then decided it would be better not to tell Claire. After an unhappy phone call, Claire decides to go home. She finds Norman in the bathtube, apparently electrocuted, but he turns out to be alright. As he denies ever having been in Adamant, she visits the town and guesses the key unlocks a jewelery box she sees in a shop window. Diving into the lake by her house she finds the box. As she steps back into the house, Norman sees her. he notices the box and has to tell her everything.

He explains that he slipped, just once. He began a relationship with Madison and soon after realized his mistake: he loves Claire much more. But Madison was unstable and she threatened Norman that she would tell Claire, or worse, kill her. One day soon after the accident Norman came home to find her dead of an overdose of pills and a letter to Claire explaining everything. He put everything into her car and pushed it into the lake, burning the letter. He wanted to save his marriage, and his career. He and Claire then agree he should call the police and close the case. Norman makes a call from the house phone and goes off for a shower. Suspicious, Claire checks through the phone and the last called number is not the police. At that moment Norman presses a cloth containing halothane into her face and she is paralyzed. He places her into the running bath, for her to drown, unable to move, but completely conscious while she is paralyzed. He gives Jody a call, explaining that he would be sleeping at the lab overnight, so could she check on Claire in the morning? He leans over her to give her one final kiss, and notices a chain around her neck. He spins it around, and his face goes pale as he recognizes the pendant around her neck. A paranormal ghost jumps, making Norman scream and fall back into the mirror behind him. He collapses slowly on the floor, grasping at the bath on the way down. Claire pulls the plug out of the plughole with her foot, as the drugs are wearing off.

As she pulls herself up to the edge of the bath, Norman had vanished. Claire starts to crawl down the stairs, but there is still no one there, just blood marks all over everything. She picks up the phone, but it had been disconnected. The drug had almost all worn off by now. Claire starts walking towards the front door, picking up the keys to the truck on the way. She walks past Norman's body on the floor. As she gets in the truck, Norman starts running towards the door. Claire starts driving, but Norman manages to grab onto the edge of the truck. Claire needs to get to the middle of the bridge to get a signal on her mobile phone. As she reaches the middle of the bridge, he jumps into the front of the truck, and grabs the wheel. The truck veers into the lake. Claire can see the car where Madison's body is lying. Norman grabs Claire's leg so that she cannot escape, but the paranormal figure grabs Norman, dragging him to the bottom of the lake, and making him let go of her leg so she can float to the top and be safe.

In the Near Future: It is Winter and Claire is seen placing a single red rose on the grave of Madison Elizabeth Frank, but not the grave of Norman.

⑶ 《謊言偵探》全結局是什麼

結局內容：紹清殺了何曉磊，因為三年前何曉磊4人在戚紅梅唱歌比賽那天晚上，撞了紹清戀人的車（紹清是同性戀），並叫王廣興來頂罪（因何曉磊沒有駕照，但會開車），之後因為發現紹清戀人吸毒，於是便把把死因歸到她自己身上，但紹清仍然覺得是何曉磊的責任。紹清殺了何曉磊以後，改頭換面，再別的地方重新開始生活了。

游戲評價：

作為AVG游戲，首先這個游戲的玩法是有創新的，它由兩大部分組成：一是作為一個中間人（喵）通過類似微信的工具同游戲中多達910個主要角色聊天推進故事；二是閱讀主人公的報告和日誌，本游戲有兩條主線，對應兩位主人公，他們會隨著聊天的進行更新文章來交代故事的進展，通過閱讀文章找出其中的關鍵詞，再利用關鍵詞繼續詢問相關人員獲得信息。

游戲將兩大部分有機結合往復更替推進流程，游戲內文章篇章眾多篇幅也不小，使玩家彷彿在閱讀一本互動長篇懸疑小說，忽略兩位主人公不管何時何地都會更新報告給玩家看的不合理性，

游戲在完全沒有劇情推進選擇權的情況下通過使用這樣的游戲方式成功的提高了玩家的代入感和參與度，游戲的UI設計中規中矩但人設很不錯，9個主要角色的人設插圖和性格相得益彰使人物形象生動活潑。

⑷ 美劇《大小謊言》的結局到底說明了什麼

砸了丈夫的所有玩具和收藏品之後，雷娜塔還欠多少錢？

《大小謊言》的大結局還有什麼地方是你沒看懂的嗎？

⑸ 謊言的結局是什麼

謊言，是為了達到某種目的，隱瞞事實真相，獲取某種利益而說的話。
其不同點是：
1、釋義不同。
善意的謊言往往是為了別人的利益，目的是取得一個好的效果；例如：親人患了不治之症，為了減輕他的精神壓力編造謊言。
真實的謊言一般是為了自己的利益，故意隱瞞真相，以達到混淆視聽，混水摸魚的目的。例如：有的同學逃學，編造謊言欺騙家人或老師。
2、心理不同。
善意的謊言是在不得已心理狀況下被動的編造的，沒有精神壓力，不用擔心被戳穿的後果。
真實的謊言是在一種心虛的心理狀況下主動地完成的，有很強的精神壓力，非常擔心被戳穿的後果。
3、表現不同。
善意的謊言在說出口的時候起定神閑，神態自若；
真實的謊言在編造時顯得蒼白、慌亂。
4、後果不同。
善意的謊言被戳穿後也可以被人理解，甚至增加好感；
真實的謊言被戳穿後不但不能得到人們的理解，反而會增加對編造者的憎恨和厭惡

不會礙於誠信

⑹ 美國影片《謊言背後》到底結局是什麼

結局是男主角被鬼魂拖下了湖底 女主角遊了上來 得救了 這就是惡有惡報

記得採納啊

⑺ 電影《不忠誘罪》的結局

看完《不忠誘罪》（又名《出軌》），不禁在想一個問題：心靈的背叛真的大於肉體的背叛嗎？？肉體的背叛可以接受嗎？？
男主人公愛德華一家的結局，恐怕每個看完的人都會在心理上都是沉痛本來的一家三口，丈夫朴實，孩子天真可愛，一家人其樂融融，而一切，都因為女主人公的出軌，成為了天外雲煙。沒了，一切都沒了…… 她在心靈上背叛了嗎？沒有，她愛著自己的男人，愛著自己的孩子，愛著他們的家，可是……卻一而再，再而三的和另外一個男人鬼混，而且還「不知廉恥」的將一個騙局繼續下去，僅僅是為了滿足肉體上的一時之樂！ ?!
什麼是愛？愛是一種責任，不是嘴上說說，更不是曾經的山盟海誓，是要用實際行動去表示的！又聯想到現在的女孩子：往往只限於男朋友的能說會道，所有不負責任的表現都被美麗的謊言堂而皇之所掩蓋，在我接手（或者接觸）的離婚案子中，短婚期的離婚率越來越來高，在訴狀中的理由，都是「了解不夠」（當然包括一點法律的因素在裡面，具體看《婚姻法》）。我在這里也不是說在戀愛中不能浪漫，我承認我不是一個浪漫的人，而且現在還是單身，我只想向朋友們提一下：戀愛是美好的，但是，戀愛在某中意義上也是危險的游戲。在體驗浪漫的時候，一定要保留一點理智。 最後，男女主人公在」激烈的「交鋒」中，男主人公吼到「我盡心盡力地付出……，為了這個家，你又做了什麼？你像是毫無要緊地將它丟棄一旁，為什麼？為了這該死的傢伙……以為我太了解你了……康妮，我了解你，卻也該死的恨你，我不想殺他，我想殺的是你！」看著男主人公的淚水，我的心裡也在流淚，誰說「男子有淚不輕彈「？」只是未到傷心時呀，愛情的神聖在哪裡？這還是愛嗎？

⑻ 電影不忠誘罪的結局是什麼

因為他們停車的路口是警察局，是個開放式結局。

愛德華（李察·基爾）和康妮（戴安·萊恩）結婚11年、孩子9歲，依舊保持了相愛、默契、溫馨的關系，可謂模範夫妻、幸福婚姻。一次龍卷風中的偶遇，使康妮受到了來自年輕書商的性誘惑，幾番思想斗爭之後，終於放縱了情慾。

愛德華了解書商和自己妻子偷情的始末。最後，他崩潰了，錯亂之中，舉起水晶球砸向書商。警察兩次去家中調查，愛德華和康妮默契配合。最後，愛德華去警察局自首。車在警察局門口停下，康妮再次阻攔，兩人擁抱，影片結束。

電影賞析：

從故事層面看，這個電影的主題很簡明：不忠很可怕，後果很嚴重。這樣的主題難免太過主流、太過概念化。幸虧故事的情節安排用了心，敘述節奏掌握得好，演員的表演也很有層次感，加上男主角帥、女主角美，使得電影還有不少可看之處。

在愛德華和康妮關於是否去自首的理由爭論中，說來說去都是他們的婚姻、家庭、孩子，竟然沒有一句關乎到書商生命價值的話。似乎，書商就是個該死的道德祭物。這倒是合了某些中國人對於「第三者」的道德義憤。只不過，這里的「第三者」是男性而不是女性。