英語電影人工智慧簡介及觀後感

㈠ 電影《人工智慧》觀後感怎樣寫

電影中，導演斯皮爾伯格以一個非人類為主角，講述了一個機器男孩的心路歷程。人工智慧是人類科技的產品，人類一如既往地對自己的科技產品懷有敵意和偏見。雖然大衛探求與人類平等的情感的努力孜孜不懈，但最後仍以失敗告終，片中包含了斯皮爾伯格對於科技如人類自身的一些反思：當科技力量已經足夠強大的時候，科技是否只能為人類服務，還是能擁有和人類對等的地位？人類懼怕科技的毀滅性力量，但是毀滅人類的並不是科技而是人類對於科技的狂熱與偏見。劇終時的溫情畢竟留下了一絲希望：大衛終於能與人類母親重會共敘天倫。在未來人的世界中，人類、機器人、仙女終於平等地相處在了一起。

㈡ 誰能給我一個英文劇情簡介 關於電影《人工智慧AI》

In the not-so-far future the polar ice caps have melted and the resulting raise of the ocean waters has drowned all the coastal cities of the world. Withdrawn to the interior of the continents, the human race keeps advancing, reaching to the point of creating realistic robots (called mechas) to serve him. One of the mecha-procing companies builds David, an artificial kid which is the first to have real feelings, especially a never-ending love for his "mother", Monica. Monica is the woman who adopted him as a substitute for her real son, who remains in cryo-stasis, stricken by an incurable disease. David is living happily with Monica and her husband, but when their real son returns home after a cure is discovered, his life changes dramatically. A futuristic adaptation of the tale of Pinocchio, with David being the "fake" boy who desperately wants to become "real".

㈢ 人工智慧英語的 影評

The movie provides an example of failing to draw an audience into a story, and an example of story structure that takes away from a story.
AI is about the question, "What makes us human?" Can a robot (computer intelligence) ever be human? The boy robot David is created to be fully capable of human characteristics, even love. But he is quickly rejected by his family, and the rest of the story is about his quest to become human so he can regain his mother's acceptance and love.
The first twenty minutes of a film, the opening, are critical for engaging the audience. This story has an intriguing story line, great settings, nice special effects, and enough motivation and emotion in the opening, so why doesn't it emotionally engage the audience? Because we don't identify with the struggles of the people involved since there is no continuity of any single character's story.

㈣ 《人工智慧》觀後感怎麼寫

開頭是一位博士，他想創造一個擁有感情的機器人。

於是，他把目標定為一個小孩腿殘疾的家庭，他把機器人做成小孩的模樣。一開始，小孩的母親接受不了，回到家裡就哭了起來。可後來，他們自己的小孩的腿好了，最後他們不得不把這個小孩丟到樹林中，以免他被拆成廢鐵。

後來，他認識了一個超帥的情人機器人。他們到一個知識庫中。最後，他們一起尋找到了「藍仙女」。可那並不是真的，而是最先開始研製的機器人，特別像e。t。然而，他還是擁有了一個幸福的家庭。

他是獨一無二的，他最後雖然沒有找到「藍仙女」。可他擁有一段美好的記憶。你相信在以後會有許多的機器人，它們會有自己的功能，服務於自己的客戶。一部影片《人工智慧》講述的就是關於機器人的事。

世紀中期，由於溫室效應，南北極冰川融化，地球上很多城市被淹沒。此時，人類科技已經高度發達，人工智慧機器人就是人類發明出來用以應對惡劣自然環境的科技手段之一，而且，機器人製造技術已經高度發達，先進的機器人不但擁有可以亂真的人類外表，還能感知自身的存在。

莫妮卡的兒子馬丁重病住院，生命危在旦夕，為了緩解傷痛的心情，她領養了機器人小孩大衛——本故事的主角。大衛的生存使命就是愛她。馬丁蘇醒，恢復健康，回到了家裡，馬丁心思縝密想方設法的讓大衛做錯事，從而讓大衛「失寵」，最後被莫妮卡拋棄。

在躲過機器屠宰場的殘酷追殺後，大衛在機器情人——喬的幫助下，開始尋找自己的生存價值：渴望變成真正的小孩，重新回到莫妮卡媽媽的身邊。我只看到這里，他到底能否重回媽媽身邊呢

我雖然只看了一點，但我知道，如果答應一個人就要履行職責，不能放棄，要守信用。

㈤ 美國影片人工智慧劇情祥細介紹

21世紀中期，由於溫室效應，南北極冰川融化，地球上很多城市被淹沒。此時，人類科技已經高度發達，人工智慧機器人就是人類發明出來用以應對惡劣自然環境的科技手段之一，而且，機器人製造技術已經高度發達，先進的機器人不但擁有可以亂真的人類外表，還能感知自身的存在。

莫妮卡的兒子馬丁重病住院，生命危在旦夕，為了緩解傷痛的心情，她領養了機器人小孩大衛（海利•喬•奧斯蒙特 飾），大衛的生存使命就是愛她。馬丁蘇醒，恢復健康，回到了家裡，一系列的事情使大衛「失寵」，最後被莫妮卡拋棄。

在躲過機器屠宰場的殘酷追殺後，大衛在機器情人喬（裘德•洛 飾）的幫助下，開始尋找自己的生存價值：渴望變成真正的小孩，重新回到莫妮卡媽媽的身邊。誰也不知道他能否完成自己的心願，脫胎換骨成為真正的人，等待他們的只是凶吉難料的旅程……

(5)英語電影人工智慧簡介及觀後感擴展閱讀

《人工智慧》是由華納兄弟影片公司於2001年拍攝發行的一部未來派的科幻類電影。由史蒂文·斯皮爾伯格執導，裘德·洛、海利·喬·奧斯蒙特主演。

1、大衛

演員海利·喬·奧斯蒙

作為第一個被輸入情感程序的機器男孩，大衛是這個公司的員工亨利他妻子的一個試驗品，然而和人類小孩一樣天真可愛。

盡管大衛逐漸成了溫斯頓夫婦的孩子，但大衛卻因一系列的緣故不得不離開他們，走上尋求成人的路，險些被機器人獵人銷毀，但他心懷夢想，身體和夢想都沒銷毀，依然堅持著夢想。他活得最久，經歷最多。

2、喬

演員裘德·洛

大衛的患難之交，機器人舞男，他是在大衛尋找成人方法途中結交的機器朋友，和大衛一起渡過了許多生死歲月。最終卻未能避免被人類抓走的命運。

3、莫妮卡

演員弗蘭西絲·奧康納

大衛的養母，是Cybertronics Manufacturing製作公司的員工亨利的妻子，馬丁的母親也是大衛的母親，開始難以接受大衛，漸漸被大衛的單純可愛感化，和大衛相處融洽，最後卻不得不放棄了大衛。

4、亨利

演員薩姆·羅伯茲

大衛的養父，Cybertronics Manufacturing製作公司的員工，馬丁和大衛的父親，大衛開始是他的試驗品，但大衛逐漸成了他的孩子，後來在大衛犯下一系列錯誤（實為被馬丁暗算）後決定拋棄他。

5、泰迪

演員泰迪熊

馬丁家的超級機器人，大衛的玩偶，可以說話和行動，後來和大衛一起走上了流亡的道路，是大衛忠貞不二的朋友，幫助大衛免遭一死，與大衛共同度過千年，和大衛一樣心懷夢想。

㈥ 求電影《人工智慧》的英文簡介

AI - Artificial Intelligence" is the hardest kind of movie to review-but it's also the most enjoyable kind of movie to watch. It's been over three weeks since my screening of Steven Spielberg's emotionally harrowing epic about a robot boy. Before writing my review, I wanted to let its themes, content, and characters sink into my head and make a solid impact. The film was based on an idea by Stanley Kubrick, but when he died in 1999, Speilberg took charge of the project. I could spend pages discussing the techniques of Kubrick's intentions and Spielberg's decisions, but I will not. Stanley Kubrick and Steven Spielberg are two of the greatest directors American cinema has to offer; it's pure pleasure watching their ideas clash and flow. I am not going to examine each indivial theme here, either. That would ruin the movie for you.

"AI - Artificial Intelligence" presents many themes on screen, but it's important to take what you get out of it. Whenever I read a review of Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" or "2001: A Space Odyssey" I feel influenced by the reviewer's interpretation of the movie's themes. Every time I watch either of those movies I get something new out of it. I hate it when other critics state the movie's themes on paper as if it's a fact. There is far too much room for interpretation to reveal this movie's message, or the message of any Kubrick film for that matter. Ask 100 people, and you might get 100 different answers. "AI - Artificial Intelligence" is that kind of movie-one of the year's best.

Critics and audiences alike have torn apart this movie's ending-a clear miscalculation by Spielberg. If Kubrick were in charge, the movie would have called it quits about twenty minutes earlier in an unsettling sequence that takes place in the ocean. But Speilberg, who always seems entranced by science fiction, injects an additional segment into the mix that does not work quite as well, but isn't so completely awful that it deserves such harsh criticism. It still leaves us with an open, startled emotional disorientation. I left the theater with tears in my eyes. The movie before the conclusion is so complex, moving, and involving in so many different ways the last twenty minutes didn't even come close to spoiling the movie for me.

"AI" transpires sometime in the near future after the polar ice caps have melted and flooded coastal cities and reced natural resources. Mechanical androids have become popular since they require no commodities. Reproction has also become highly illegal. Machines provide sexual services and if anyone wants a child, they will purchase a robot. However, the difference between a robot child and a living child is that robots cannot love. That's the task professor Hobby (William Hurt) of Cybertronics Manufacturing has solved. He has made a robot child that can love.

We can separate "AI" into two separate segments. I do not want to reveal too much about each plot because the pleasure of watching this movie evolves from the revealing of the connecting plots. I will, however, briefly say the first details a robot child's interaction within a family, and the second deals with the robot's estrangement from its family and the quest to regain the mother's love.

I can imagine the material in Kubrick's hands. The movie's opening scene has a female robot begin to undress in a public office. Speilberg cuts the action before she reveals any explicit nudity. Kubrick would have had various shots of full frontal nudity. Spielberg, never comfortable with sexual material, leaves out much of the motivation behind Kubrick's ideas. One of the biggest problems in "AI" is the lack of edge with the sexual content. Jude Law plays a robot gigolo who lives in a sex fantasy called Rouge City where people from everywhere come to seek sexual satisfaction. The central character, a robot boy played by Haley Joel Osment, motivates every action in the story except for the scenes in Rouge City. Why contain such a perverse character and setting when his entire existence simply displays a mood that has already been well established. Obvious, the filmmakers toned the aspects of "AI" down to warrant a gutless PG-13 rating-but why? The movie isn't appropriate for children anyway, and it's far too complex. Undoubtedly if Kubrick were in charge "AI" would have to be re-cut to avoid an NC-17 rating. Spielberg should have either taken advantage of the perverse material or completely eliminated it.

Here I am, doing exactly what I said that I wouldn't do, and at nearly 900 words, I still have not clearly expressed my own opinions on the film. I have many notes in front of my that display my reaction as I watched the film, but I am not going to use them-they reveal too much about the movie. "AI" is a very personal film, a deeply moving, scientific, careful, and harrowing motion picture that displays startling talent on screen and behind the scenes. The special effects are extraordinary. The performances are alarming-the immensely talented Haley Joel Osment may once again be up for an Academy Award nomination. Go see the movie, then talk about it with others. It's the kind of film that you can spend hours thinking about, then go see it again.

㈦ 給我一篇關於電影《人工智慧》的觀後感吧，500-600字

觀人工智慧有感

今天看了人工智慧這部電影。
之前也有看，
但是只是不完整的片段，
真的不清楚這部片子
是講的什麼，
今天看過真的很感動，
也有意一絲的遺憾。
正是這不算圓滿的結局讓我百感交
集。

似乎每一部描寫未來的電影都有一樣的情節，
人工智慧超越了人類，
然後努力追求成為人
的過程——這其實是天馬博士的故事吧。
裘德洛的冒險卻不是，
但最後過了無數年，
到人類
都滅絕了，才由外星人用無法理喻的高科技給了他們真正的生命。那麼真正的生命是什麼
呢？或是生命存在的意義在於哪裡呢？

小男孩
DA
VID
從被哈比博士製造出來到進入亨利的家，再在到被莫妮卡扔到外面自生自
滅，是一個描寫關於信任和拋棄的故事。
DA
VID
經過不可能的艱辛最終找到屬於他的藍仙
女，一直看著她
2000
年，再次醒來看到藍仙女那一刻無法比擬的驚喜。是關於堅持和夢想
的過程。
小心翼翼的觸碰卻摧毀了她。
藍仙女破碎的瞬間是那樣令人震撼！
我甚至可以感覺
到，就像打破了自己小心翼翼珍藏了多年的寶貝那樣痛心。最後外星人幫助
DA
VID
實現了
他一直沒有實現的願望。故事最終定格在了不算太圓滿的這刻。這一切都源於一個字——
「愛」
！

看完整部片子自己也想回到那樣的年齡，
沒有負擔的愛，
很簡單，
很平淡。
對夢想的執著，
無條件的信任似乎會只會定格在那個年幼的歲月。
也許只有如此單純的情感才能反襯出成人
頭腦中荒唐的慾望。
幾十年就是我們對人生全部的理解，
其實生命的軌跡雖然遠離卻是不可
復制的。愛，也是唯一的存在，哪怕過了千百年。

對於感情，人類的理解就是依賴，安慰，安全感。但是對於機器人更過的付出，信任，當
然也需要回報。
這可能是導演在小男孩身上賦予了對人類感情的期許吧。
最初的愛戀總是無
附加美好且堅定的。我能理解莫里卡的選擇，在最初和代替的選擇中誰都會選擇前者吧。

人類的自私，殘忍相信已經是老生常談，我不想對此再多說什麼。但是在這部電影中我
看到更多的是「愛」
「希望」以及堅持所要付出的代價。我們都希望可以活在個完美的烏邦
式的世界，
付出和收獲等價。但是現實中往往令我們失望，所以有了代替品—機器人。
但是
難道因為他不是真實的所以就不需要回報嗎？！
記得在電影的開始，
研究人員提出了一個問
題「我們怎麼保證他愛的人可以愛他們」
。我與他們都陷入了沉思。我們不能保證付出的愛
可以得到等價回報，
但是我們卻可以像
一樣，
堅持信仰，
不斷的努力，
愛不可復制，
但是可以被喚起。
對愛的理解和寄望。真的很簡單，僅僅是承認
和同等特別的存在。相信也是斯導對愛的註解。愛。其實很簡單。

㈧ 求：人工智慧的英文影評

I saw A.I. on the first night it ran here and I must say I was disappointed in the size of the audience. How strange to see so few people show up for a Spielberg film. This film did not enjoy the normal hype that most of Spielberg's films enjoy, I think I know why. Lack of proct placement. They're may have been some somewhere but I didn't see them. A.I.'s story line and flawless visual effects reflect what I can only describe as the meeting of two great film makers. Kubrick (who started work on the project after he read the Aldiss book in '83),and Steven Spielberg who's long list of intelligent blockbusters made him the perfect person to bring this story to the screen. I could, I believe see the story boards and concepts Kubrick developed and I could also see the sensitivity that Spielberg added to scenes and characters. These two things are not entirely separate in good Science Fiction. All good science fiction has some human sensitivity in it otherwise it would just be a horror film. The script reflects some of the darkness and coldness that sometimes underlies each character human and machine, there is no fear of this in the story. This darkness draws us on in the story.

The visual effects are stunning and come darn close to genius. The story line takes us in and the visuals make it almost real.
A.I. Is a good union of two great film makers., 1 July 2001
Author: John R. Armstrong ([email protected]) from Chicago
I wish I had Mr. Mannings grip of syntax, but all in all at the end of the day it's good science fiction and a good story too. I beleve that Stanley Kubrick's choice of asking Steven Spielberg to make this film was the kind of genius that Kubrick showed in all his work. It is a tribute to both men that they saw a vision of something and worked toward it's creation. I think they came to a great place in film making.

Future classic...?, 26 September 2001

Author: Chris Harrison ([email protected]) from Wiltshire, England

First of all, once again I think the critics have got it wrong. Like Blade Runner and 2001, this is a film that will be properly judged in 10/20 years or maybe more. Its way ahead of its time, the combination of Kubrick and Spielberg is unique, its unlikely we will ever see anything like this again.

Did I like it? The answer would have to be yes, the mix of styles will put many people off, but I found it to be unlike anything I have ever seen, and all the better for it. The story is by no means original but everything else about the film is so different that this can be forgiven. To get one thing straight, Kubrick decided Spielberg would be the better man for directing it, and I think this was a very wise decision, many of the ideas are pure Kubrick, but Spielberg has the neccassary attributes to direct such a film, and great credit has to go to Kubrick for handing it to him.

Haley Joel Osment is amazing, the robot/human emotion must be amazingly difficult to pull off effectively, but Osment does it with such relative ease to the point where you do believe he is a robot, not that he is just acting as a robot. Jude Law is excellent, and so to is Frances O'Conner.

As for the ending, as brave as an idea it may of been to end on a downbeat note at "the first ending" I think the slightly upbeat ending is much more appropriate.

All in all I would say A.I is a wonderfully unique film that should be judged for what it is, a film. Forget everything about the Spielberg/Kubrick "issue" and just sit back and take in a truely amazing film. You may hate it, you may love it, but no matter what, it will effect your emotions in some way and you will discuss the film afterwards.

This film will be truely judged in 20 years or so, when it can be assessed purely as a film, as with 'Blade Runner', '2001', and even 'The Thing', it will get better with age.

A.I.--A Film With Heart And Brains, 6 July 2001

Author: virek213 from San Gabriel, Ca., USA

Steven Spielberg's latest movie A.I.: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, which he took up at the encouragement of the late, great Stanley Kubrick, has caused widely divergent comments. And I can't help wondering if the most scathingly negative reviews of this movie aren't just an open desire to see Spielberg crash, as he had with "1941" and HOOK.

For my money, Spielberg has done it again with this futuristic science fiction drama, regardless of what the negative reviews say. Its story of a robot boy (Haley Joel Osment) who desires to be a real boy in a far future in which humans (Orgas) and machines (Mechas) exist side-by-side but not always in harmony is very much modeled on the Pinocchio story, though it is actually based on a 1969 short story by Brian Aldiss. It raises some interesting and sometimes unsettling moral dilemmas that few films of late have done. Can a parent love a child, even if that child is not real? What might happen if that child desired to be real? How will Man and Machine be able to co-exist?

Like all intelligent science fiction, such as Kubrick's own 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and Spielberg's own CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, A.I. forces us to ponder where we've been and where we might be going. It's an incredible combination of Kubrick's icy intellectual and clinical mind and Spielberg's emotional heart; and I think it works exceedingly well. But it forces the viewer to not leave their heart and brains at the door, which I think is why it is being so negatively received in this season of mindless summer movie fare. It may be too intelligent for its own good, and many don't have the 145 minutes of patience needed for the movie. I did, however; and I would call this an absolute masterpiece. Out of ten stars, give this one a 10.

A mind-blowing movie that will grow in stature, 6 March 2002

Author: Magnus ([email protected])

Wow! That was all I could say when I walked out of the theatre after my first helping of A.I. I wasn't sure whether I loved the movie or was disappointed by it, I just knew it had had a huge effect on me. Having seen it a further three times at the cinema, I still find fault with it, but I keep returning to it, thinking about it, discussing it, and it has left me with a feeling that, five months later, I've still not shaked. In many regards, this movie reminds me of Fight Club, not in terms of theme or emotional content, but e to it's level of craft, the daring nature of it's execution and the fact that I keep re-evaluating it. All the things that are possible to comment objectively on (if anything ever is) are handled expertly. The performances are top-notch, especially Haley Joel Osment as David, the little robot child that longs to be human. The effects are not only very impressive, but are integrated into the story rather than calling attention to themselves. Januz Kaminski's photography is, as one has come to expect, impressive, and the movie is unusually unpredictable for such a big-budget experience.

In my opinion, John Williams' score is among his most impressive. I listened to it on CD for three weeks before seeing the movie, and thought it was fantastic, but once the movie started rolling I completely forgot about the music. That says a lot about both the score and the film itself. I also liked the three-act structure, in which the tone and feel of the movie changes drastically as the story progresses. Part one, as one reviewer noted, feels like a cross between E.T. and The Shining, an odd, but very effective combination. The second part of the movie is awash with Spielbergian imagery, but with the darkness and coldness of a Kubrick movie. And the last part is a head-scratcher that has the intellectual resonance of most Kubrick-films, and the emotional tone of something like Cinema Paradiso. I purposely refrain from saying that it is as emotional as Spielberg-films, because I think the director's complexities, the dark aspects of his style, and the occasional subtleties of his work are often overlooked by critics.

It's difficult to discuss the themes of the movie without spoiling it, but while many people criticised the movie from having several false endings, I felt that each continuation added layers of though and complexities that the movie would have lacked had it ended sooner. I have come to the conclusion, over the past months, that I do love the movie and that it is my favourite film of 2001, even ahead of The Fellowship of The Ring and Amelie. In other words, buy it on DVD, it's more than worth it.

==============================================================
All of the above from IMDB.