『壹』 英語電影的英語觀後感五篇初一水平，字不用太多100以下
阿甘正傳觀後感（中英文對照）
阿甘有自己的堅持，他不斷地跑步，JUST RUNS. 他跑步不為任何理由。他說:"人要往前看，千萬不要被過去拖累。我想我跑步就是這個意義」和過去告別，不停留在原處。也許這世界上太多人隨撥逐流，很少人會堅持做一件事，阿甘堅持自己的堅持，於是他成了「神」。影片中還有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南戰爭中失去了雙腿。他說他的命運就是戰死。然而阿甘卻救他，讓他活了下來。失去雙腿後他開始憎恨生活，生活得很頹廢，責怪阿甘當初救了他。然而當他調整心態，去和阿甘一起捕魚生活，有了收獲後，開始感覺到生活的美好。感謝阿甘當初就了他。影片試圖通過這個角色告訴觀者生活總是美好的。烏雲後有彩虹，絕境後有重生。關鍵是看我們給不給自己一個好心態，一個機會去改變不好的現狀。影片試圖向觀者傳達這樣一個信息：或許做好我們該做的每一件事，生活就會給我們一個好的回饋。只要有一種堅持就會出現一個奇跡。
Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS.
He said: 「Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank that's the
meaning of my running.」 Say goodbye to foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many
people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing,
Mr. A Gan does and becomes 「GOD」. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his
legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him
and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life,
complaining that A Gan shouldn't save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing
with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gan's help. The movie is
intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always
after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportunity to
ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do
well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if
only there is perseverance.
Ice Age 冰河世紀 英語影評
It』s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001』s rollicking success, I wouldn』t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn』t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar』s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster』s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another 「extinction for kids」 movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it』s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It』s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we』re going for here, then I suppose I』m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I』m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It』s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story』s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano』s vocal talents aren』t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film』s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age』s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you』re under 5, you』ll be bored with everything else.
《冒牌天神2》觀後感:
This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.
Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.
It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.
『貳』 英語電影觀後感帕丁頓熊100字
電影《帕丁頓熊》是一部圓滿的聖誕合家歡影片，有萌熊有笑點有感動，起承轉合流暢，劇情的前後照應特別到位。找回自己身上失去的勇氣，給你一個家，這兩個情感點都很擊中。看完後最想說的還是，please look after this bear, thank you!下面小編給大家帶來的是電影《帕丁頓熊》觀後看。
帕丁頓熊觀後感
Paddington固然是優秀的賀歲電影，小熊很萌，Brown一家很萌，倫敦人民很萌，故事輕松而溫馨，取景經典好看，笑點很多，妮可演的棒(原來在博物館呆久了會變成這樣嗎…)，導演和音樂都滿分。除了賣萌以外還探討了家庭責任，適應環境等生活問題，溫馨感人。但這篇文章里，我想說的是一些煞風景的場景，一些細節，一些支線故事，一些歷史片段。從啟動「黑暗秘魯」大冒險的倫敦，到現在「Everybody feels at home」的倫敦宣傳。在這個故事裡也好，在故事之外的歷史里也好，會說英語的熊也好，不會說英語的人也好，黑人，黃種人，土著人，動物，都是西方文明的「他者」，直到上世紀七十年代才被動搖瓦解的「西方中心」與「人類中心」的殘片。
這個想法的線索，並不是開頭那可愛的黑暗秘魯大冒險。那時候我還沉浸在留學狗離家數年、渴望看世界又發現自己回不去的傷感中——題外話。Paddington來到倫敦，被善良又有童心的插畫家Brown太太撿回家(只有這樣的人才能畫好繪本!)，坐在閣樓上寫他的倫敦冒險和Brown一家的故事。典型的倫敦中產家庭。父親是風險分析師。大女兒Judy有語言天賦，她不光後來學會了熊語，還一直在學中文，夢想出去闖世界開家自己的小店。她還是個害怕新環境的姑娘。這個妙趣橫生人物介紹當時只以為是個無足輕重笑點，聯系故事整體，卻是個重要的呼應。導演相當細心地從一個小女孩捕捉到了倫敦人的心理。
倫敦排外嗎?誰都不跟小熊打招呼，大家趕著上班，在地鐵站橫沖直撞。開始誰都不待見小熊，女孩和父親看到母親跟火車站的小熊說話，覺得匪夷所思。大倫敦並不像探險家介紹的，給小熊一個warm welcome。倫敦很冷，一直下雨。然而，這就是倫敦的傲嬌(或者用大女兒的話來說：embarrassing!這是英國紳士小姐們恐懼的根源)。這個城市因為過去的自豪與榮耀、不可一世的地位被撼動，而陷入一種深深的矛盾中。小熊和他們不同，因而被冷眼相待，被鄰居和這個家庭當做危險「人物」。倫敦唐人街何嘗不是個危險「他者」的聚集地。女兒是這種傲嬌的縮影，她害怕並憧憬著新的環境，新的世界，學習中文，像小熊渴望去倫敦一樣，渴望離開倫敦去看世界。小熊捉賊之後，她也很快接受了它——倫敦在改變。
為觀眾們展示這改變的是Brown一家。只有母親，她有個奇特的古董店的朋友，並非土生土長倫敦人，操著奇特的口音，開著家一般倫敦小中產避之不及的「阿三店」。這樣的母親從一開始就維護小熊，並不光是善良友好，而是發自內心的對所有「他者」的包容。而Brown小兒子，新新人類，雖然被父親各種管教，也發自內心接受小熊，成為母親的擁護者。父親的角色不言而喻，他代表倫敦古舊、理性的一面，滿口的percentage，彷彿啟蒙時代(Enlightenment)的化身。Brown一家中上演著倫敦的各種心理矛盾、身份模糊、從不接受到接受，成長為一個真正包容「世界人民一家親」的倫敦。而這倫敦，從大航海時代直到今天，何嘗不是西方文明的縮影之一?
從這點來看，與小熊、Brown一家相對的妮可(片中探險家Clyder的女兒)，現自然史博物館的女檔案員/標本師，也不僅是一個熱愛標本的變態，而是殖民時代權力的縮影。她不僅是反派人物。她和他父親，發現「黑暗秘魯」的探險家Clyder，是倫敦喜劇的黑暗面，真正的悲劇人物。老Clyder因為被熊叔叔所救，與他們交流，拒絕將他們製作成標本，因此被皇家地理家協會排擠。那段回憶殺是全片最富諷刺性、悲劇性與深意的一段——地理家紳士們問，標本呢?老Clyder說，他們不是熊，是人!他們是有智能和文明的!紳士們反問，文明?他們會說英語嗎?他們會打高爾夫嗎?他們會喝茶嗎?他們在學，他們吃果醬，他們有自己的語言，他們有自己的文明——這一切連Brown爸爸都沒法馬上相信，更何況當時那些紳士們。妮可父親對「文明」的理解是「西方中心論」的根基被動搖之後的理解，太穿越了，太超前了，not intelligible.
『叄』 求《肖申克的救贖》英語觀後感，100-150字。急！！！要原創！
當你的自由被束縛，當你對前途感到迷茫，當你還在懷念過往，舊事物讓你缺失方向，新起點正在等你啟程，這部電影對我啟發很大，很勵志，很感人，當一個幾乎被絕望包圍的人找到希望的突破口的時候，會是多麼的興奮加嚮往！我們何嘗不應該保持著這樣一顆美好的而又單純的心呢
『肆』 十部勵志英文電影觀後感（英文版）100次之內 易懂 初中水平 急用！謝啦！
The famous movie named The Lion King ,which becomes the most successful movie in Walt Disney and gains public attractions. In the movie, the little prince whom made the African savannah awaken was born when the sun rising from the horizon. As the the king's brother scar hated Simba because Scar wanted to become the king.Scar attempted many ways to kill Simba.The most impressive thing was a time when Simba was immediately killed by Scar , but Mufasa saved Simba's life .His father's death frustrated him. Finally Simba conquered many difficulties and defeated Scar. Simba was officially announced to own the regime within the chorus of his mother and his friends.The Lion King shows us a new grand world, letting us to experience the adventures of the love and the moving of life。
獅子王
『伍』 求大概100英語字左右的《國王的演講》的觀後感
「國王」兩目炯炯亮，卻是個結巴。沒有絕對的強者，太陽都有黑子，絕對的美好和絕對的殘缺都是理論上的存在，而那些在某些方面特殊傑出的人物便會成為豪傑、英雄、偉人。這些偶像級人物對於芸芸眾生的意義千千萬，其中最重要的一條便是可以拿來「勵志」，進行「心嚮往之」的期望、憧憬，當然還有行動。《國王的演講》中國王原型為喬治六世，根據史料的記載，片中提及的「幼年鋼板夾腿矯形」以及口吃、緊張等經歷均確有其事，而遜位的其兄正是那位大大有名的愛德華八世——不愛江山愛美人，對乎，錯乎，關乎風月，關乎政治，留於後人評說。生活從來比電影豐富，更厚重，然而電影卻始終以「管中窺豹」的角度，以杜康釀酒的提煉濃縮展現，力求集中。
一、弱者與強者
當國王還是王爺時，伯蒂口吃地一塌糊塗，在公眾面前的出醜似乎已經是家常便飯，這樣的人生中貴族的身份以及職責都成為沉重的負擔。片中第一次的診療過程中，伯蒂滿口滿口的玻璃球，在醫生極力的催促下，努力地發出了幾個含混不清的音節，繼而難過地低下頭，又迅速地揚起，無奈焦慮地看了醫生一眼，忍耐，忍耐，終於一口吐出了所有的玻璃球，暴怒而去。在這個場景里，醫生始終站立，伯蒂坐在椅子上，多個仰拍醫生的鏡頭和俯拍伯蒂的鏡頭形成了鮮明的對照，伯蒂其實是極端無助的，他的暴怒既是對這種壓力和痛苦的反抗，也是對自我的一種保護，所以他才會不時地看向後方的妻子和旁邊醫生。他像一個溺水者，掙扎呼吸，等待救援。
「無照行醫者」萊昂納爾的出現正扮演著救贖者的角色，他迅速成為伯蒂的拯救者。兩人的密切聯系由醫者與患者的簡單溝通開始，進而復雜升華為朋友與知己。在口吃者和治療者這一層面，萊昂納多是絕對的強者，他一再地強調：「我的地盤，我的規則。」（一下子想起周董的歌兒，「在我地盤這兒，就得聽我的」，酷呵。）伯蒂必須服從。然而伯蒂的身份卻賦予了伯蒂凌駕於萊昂納爾之上的尊嚴和權利，對於伯蒂第一次的拒絕治療和第二次的拂袖離去，萊昂納爾都無能為力。當萊昂納爾的妻子偶遇已經成為國王、王後的伯蒂夫婦時，這位平時生活中游刃有餘、頗能掌控的女人也有些手足無措起來。而伯蒂對萊昂納爾的信任既給予了後者機會，也給予了後者榮耀。因此，二者的強弱關系始終是雙向的。（這點類似於《女人香》中上校和大學生二者之間的雙向拯救。）
二、瀟灑與責任
愛德華的角色拒絕了對王室責任的承擔，選擇了自己的愛情，雖然說愛情依然是一種責任，但是影片的濃墨重彩更在於國王對於國家民族的責任。因此愛德華的瀟灑率性只在於愛情，伯蒂的隱忍堅持對於大眾和人民更具意義。這里，筆者不做進一步的評判。
三、有聲與無聲
片中的伯蒂對白並不少，他一直在近乎努力地說，正是這種執著，凸顯了這位國王的人格偉大。古羅馬哲學家塞捏卡說：「真正的偉大，即在於以脆弱的凡人之軀而具有神性的不可戰勝。」海明威說：「人生來不是要給打敗的，你可以毀滅他,但是不可以打敗他。」他並非無法發聲，而是不能流暢地說，這種斷斷續續惹人嘲笑，令伯蒂難堪，更嚴重地是，無法履行王子和國王的責任。影片中對伯蒂緊張時的結結巴巴的刻畫以及對那些顫抖到幾乎無法發聲的細節描繪正達到了「於無聲處聽驚雷」的效果。白居易有詩：「別有幽愁暗恨生，此處無聲勝有聲。」結巴的伯蒂和基本不結巴的伯蒂都有震撼人心的效果，前者在於努力，後者在於持久地，長期地努力。片尾的伯蒂在萊昂納爾的「圈圈點點」中略顯緩慢地艱難演說，幾乎沒有結巴，這是一個奇跡，當然也是全片的高潮段落。無論前面崎嶇坎坷了多久，這最後的高潮總讓我等H了起來！所以觀眾並不厭倦高潮，關鍵在於片子能不能讓大家真正地緊張、糾結、感動。
四、嚴肅與活潑
小學時校門上左右各書四個大字：「團結緊張，嚴肅活潑。」當時很費解，團結緊張啥，嚴肅咋活潑？後來聽人說這是毛爺爺老人家說的，再後來才知道這是說的不同層面。《國王的演講》是部嚴肅的片子，這點毋庸置疑。對歷史的尊重是嚴肅的，演員的表演是經典級別的，片中所講的責任與承擔、掙扎與成長也是嚴肅的。能稱得上活潑節奏的場景屈指可數，一是36分鍾至37分鍾萊昂納爾對伯蒂進行結巴治療時的肌肉訓練，二是萊昂納爾夫人偶遇國王夫婦的一場，剩下的也僅有伯蒂夫婦重新上門就醫並道歉的那句：「等一個國王來道歉是需要很長時間的。」總體而言，這個貴族man確實是一個「嚴肅的男人」
在壓抑、痛苦、掙扎之後，他涅盤重生，成功地讓自己成為真正的國王，而不是笑柄。影片的最終，伯蒂輕吐一口氣，帶著王後和女兒們走向群眾，揮手致意。這個男人仍然有些拘謹，有些緊張，可能永遠不能成功地活潑起來，但是無妨，因為他畢竟超越了自己，履行了責任。
『陸』 電影奇跡男孩英文觀後感100字
1. Reflecting on the English-language film "Wonder Boy," one's impression is that while children's films can sometimes descend into clichés, with overly cute characters and inappropriate humor targeting young audiences, this movie transcends such stereotypes. It not only unfolds a complex narrative but also shares the experience of confusion, loneliness, and fear with the viewers.
2. The plot of the movie revolves around Auggie Pullman, a young boy with a facial difference who has been homeschooled by his mother e to his condition. In fifth grade, he finally has the opportunity to attend a regular school. Initially, Auggie faces bullying and teasing from his classmates because of his appearance. However, with the support of his father, mother, sister, teacher, and a close friend, he finds his confidence and manages to change the perceptions of others around him.
『柒』 英語電影觀後感(100字)
在我看過的所有影片中,《肖申克的救贖》是最能打動我的一部影片。特別是劇中的男主人公在一個風雨交加的黑夜，沖破監獄的圍牆越獄成功後，伸出雙臂擁抱自由的經典畫面，更是深深的震撼著我的心靈。這是對自由的渴望，更是對生命的致敬！
影片《肖申克的救贖》一般被認為是一部勵志片。但是，在我看來，它不僅僅是一部勵志片，更是一部探討生命，自由以及人處於逆境中所迸發出來的超乎想像的潛能的影片。
影片故事集中發生在一個叫肖申克的監獄中，四面都是高牆柵欄，只有抬頭仰望天空時，才會發現外面還有另一個世界。主人公因為法庭的的誤判而被監禁在這里。或許，許多觀眾都會認為主人公的後半生都會在這里度過了。對於監獄里的其他犯人來說，這里或許就是他們以後的歸宿。他們好像已經接受了命運的安排，整天就是打架，賭錢，絲毫不在意大牆內外的不同世界。在他們的內心深處，已經不存在監獄這堵牆了。他們已經放棄了對生命和自由的渴望，但是，對於主人公來說，他沒有放棄……
起初，主人公表現的與其他犯人沒有兩樣，只是一直比較沉默寡言。然而，不再沉默中爆發，就在沉默中滅亡。孰知這長久的沉默是為那最後瞬間的爆發而積蓄著巨大的能量。主人公憑借自己的聰明才智給監獄長洗錢而受到重用，而後又堅持每周給監獄上級寫信，要求撥款在監獄建圖書館。在堅持了幾年的每周寫信後，監獄上級終於同意撥款建圖書館。就這樣，主人公一步一步，悄無聲息的實施著自己的計劃，終於在一個雷雨交加的黑夜，主人公終於沖破了監禁他20年的監獄.。當監獄長看到那幅畫底下的那個大窟窿時，一切都真相大白了。觀眾無不為主人公的聰明智慧所折服，真是大快人心！
20年的時間足以摧毀一個人的意志，消磨一個人的耐心。但是，影片中主人公卻沒有被時間所摧毀，卻顯示出了更強的生命鬥志。當人處於逆境中時，人的潛能到底有多大，誰也不知道。但是，當你對生命和自由有強烈的渴望和追求時，積聚在你內心深處的巨大潛能就會迸發出來，這就是生命的力量，讓我們向生命致敬！
可能有點長，你再刪減一下！！
『捌』 5篇100字左右的英文電影的觀後感，要用英語啊
變形金剛
I honestly don't know where to start with this movie. I will say however, that - like many other people - this is the film I've been waiting 20 years to see.
I suppose it's sensible to start with what should be the foundation stone of any cinematic experience - the script. It's cheesy, cliché-ridden, and poorly-structured. Characterisation (especially of the Autobots/Decepticons) is non-existent. Optimus Prime uttering the words "My bad" must go down in history as one of the worst moments in movie history. Actually scratch that - the "lubricating" scene is definitely worse. The writing of human characters is lazy at best, sticking with stereotypes such as the beautiful code-breaker, fat computer whizz, bumbling government agent etc etc. The performances (Shia aside) are instantly forgettable, but a great deal of that comes down to the script and direction. Megan Fox may be a great actress for all I know, but she may as well be a stripper for the purposes of this movie.
The effects are incredible (although not helped by Bay's erratic editing style), but when you've no reason to care about them it results in an empty experience. Effects DON'T MAKE A MOVIE.
With Spielberg as part of this project I allowed myself a little optimism, but it's patently clear that Bay and Co. had no understanding or respect for the Transformers franchise. GIANT "FLIPPING" ROBOTS BLOWING "STUFF" UP this may be, but it is most certainly not Transformers.