电影人工智能英文简介

㈠ 求电影《人工智能》的英文简介

AI - Artificial Intelligence" is the hardest kind of movie to review-but it's also the most enjoyable kind of movie to watch. It's been over three weeks since my screening of Steven Spielberg's emotionally harrowing epic about a robot boy. Before writing my review, I wanted to let its themes, content, and characters sink into my head and make a solid impact. The film was based on an idea by Stanley Kubrick, but when he died in 1999, Speilberg took charge of the project. I could spend pages discussing the techniques of Kubrick's intentions and Spielberg's decisions, but I will not. Stanley Kubrick and Steven Spielberg are two of the greatest directors American cinema has to offer; it's pure pleasure watching their ideas clash and flow. I am not going to examine each indivial theme here, either. That would ruin the movie for you.

"AI - Artificial Intelligence" presents many themes on screen, but it's important to take what you get out of it. Whenever I read a review of Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" or "2001: A Space Odyssey" I feel influenced by the reviewer's interpretation of the movie's themes. Every time I watch either of those movies I get something new out of it. I hate it when other critics state the movie's themes on paper as if it's a fact. There is far too much room for interpretation to reveal this movie's message, or the message of any Kubrick film for that matter. Ask 100 people, and you might get 100 different answers. "AI - Artificial Intelligence" is that kind of movie-one of the year's best.

Critics and audiences alike have torn apart this movie's ending-a clear miscalculation by Spielberg. If Kubrick were in charge, the movie would have called it quits about twenty minutes earlier in an unsettling sequence that takes place in the ocean. But Speilberg, who always seems entranced by science fiction, injects an additional segment into the mix that does not work quite as well, but isn't so completely awful that it deserves such harsh criticism. It still leaves us with an open, startled emotional disorientation. I left the theater with tears in my eyes. The movie before the conclusion is so complex, moving, and involving in so many different ways the last twenty minutes didn't even come close to spoiling the movie for me.

"AI" transpires sometime in the near future after the polar ice caps have melted and flooded coastal cities and reced natural resources. Mechanical androids have become popular since they require no commodities. Reproction has also become highly illegal. Machines provide sexual services and if anyone wants a child, they will purchase a robot. However, the difference between a robot child and a living child is that robots cannot love. That's the task professor Hobby (William Hurt) of Cybertronics Manufacturing has solved. He has made a robot child that can love.

We can separate "AI" into two separate segments. I do not want to reveal too much about each plot because the pleasure of watching this movie evolves from the revealing of the connecting plots. I will, however, briefly say the first details a robot child's interaction within a family, and the second deals with the robot's estrangement from its family and the quest to regain the mother's love.

I can imagine the material in Kubrick's hands. The movie's opening scene has a female robot begin to undress in a public office. Speilberg cuts the action before she reveals any explicit nudity. Kubrick would have had various shots of full frontal nudity. Spielberg, never comfortable with sexual material, leaves out much of the motivation behind Kubrick's ideas. One of the biggest problems in "AI" is the lack of edge with the sexual content. Jude Law plays a robot gigolo who lives in a sex fantasy called Rouge City where people from everywhere come to seek sexual satisfaction. The central character, a robot boy played by Haley Joel Osment, motivates every action in the story except for the scenes in Rouge City. Why contain such a perverse character and setting when his entire existence simply displays a mood that has already been well established. Obvious, the filmmakers toned the aspects of "AI" down to warrant a gutless PG-13 rating-but why? The movie isn't appropriate for children anyway, and it's far too complex. Undoubtedly if Kubrick were in charge "AI" would have to be re-cut to avoid an NC-17 rating. Spielberg should have either taken advantage of the perverse material or completely eliminated it.

Here I am, doing exactly what I said that I wouldn't do, and at nearly 900 words, I still have not clearly expressed my own opinions on the film. I have many notes in front of my that display my reaction as I watched the film, but I am not going to use them-they reveal too much about the movie. "AI" is a very personal film, a deeply moving, scientific, careful, and harrowing motion picture that displays startling talent on screen and behind the scenes. The special effects are extraordinary. The performances are alarming-the immensely talented Haley Joel Osment may once again be up for an Academy Award nomination. Go see the movie, then talk about it with others. It's the kind of film that you can spend hours thinking about, then go see it again.

㈡ 跪求~~!关于机器人的电影的英文简介

Bicentennial Man

Rating:
Genre: Comedy
Movie Type: Domestic Comedy， Sci-Fi Comedy
Themes: Journey of Self-Discovery， Opposites Attract， Robots and Androids
Director: Chris Columbus
Main Cast: Robin Williams， Sam Neill， Wendy Crewson， Embeth Davidtz， Oliver Platt
Release Year: 1999
Country: US
Run Time: 131 minutes
MPAA Rating: PG
Plot
If a robot spends enough time around humans， can he learn to become one of them？ The Martin family purchases a domestic android as a servant and names him Andrew (Robin Williams). Andrew comes to know the man of the house as Sir (Sam Neill)， his wife as Ma'am Wendy Crewson， and their daughter as Portia (Embeth Davidtz)； before long， the Martins suspect that they do not have an ordinary robot on their hands. Andrew seems capable of expressing emotion and generating original thoughts， and the longer he stays with the Martins， the more strongly these human traits manifest themselves. Over the next 200 years， Andrew becomes less a machine and more a member of the family， until a mechanic (Oliver Platt) tells Andrew that he might be able to turn him into a human being. Based on a short story by renowned science fiction author Isaac Asimov (surprisingly， it's only the second Asimov story to be brought to the screen)， Bicentennial Man was directed by Chris Columbus， who previously worked with Robin Williams on Mrs. Doubtfire. ~ Mark Deming， All Movie Guide.

机器管家/变人 Bicentennial Man (1999)

导 演:克里斯·哥伦布 Chris Columbus
主 演:罗宾·威廉斯 Robin Williams 山姆·内尔 Sam Neill 艾伯斯·戴维斯 Embeth Davidtz 奥利弗·普莱特 Oliver Platt 海丽·凯特·艾森伯格 Hallie Kate Eisenberg Kevin Tiny Ancell Joe Bellan Merridee Book
上 映:1999年12月13日 ( 美国 )更多地区
地 区:美国 德国 ( 拍摄地 )
对 白:英语
评 分:6.1/10( 7330票 ) 详细
颜 色:彩色
声 音:DTS Dolby Digital SDDS
时 长:132 分钟
类 型:剧情 科幻 爱情
分 级:瑞典:Btl 澳大利亚:PG 英国:PG 阿根廷:13 德国:0 美国:PG 新西兰:PG 法国:U

剧情简介:
这部影片追随一个机器人的“生活”进行。罗宾·威廉姆斯饰演的机器人安德鲁被马丁一家作为家务机器人购买，他的程序只设置为完成仆人的任务。但没过几天他们发现安德鲁并不是一个寻常的机器人，因为他开始体验情感和创造思维。在一个跨越了两百年的故事里，安德鲁在阻止那些制造他的人销毁自己的过程中领会了人性的错综复杂。
这个机器人，是好莱坞喜剧天王、罗宾威廉斯最新的尝试。 擅长以温馨喜感演出取胜的、好莱坞影星，罗宾威廉斯，在新片《机器人》中，饰演的机器人，在经历两百年后，终于透过先进科技，变成真正人类的故事。
片中虽然大量使用电脑科技，强化视觉效果，不过影片的卖点，还是集中在人性情感的探讨上。罗宾威廉斯在影片中，将再度以感性的内心戏打动观众。罗宾威廉斯表示科幻片向来是他喜欢的.

PS:中文介绍并非原英文介绍翻译。

㈢ 电影《人工智能》影片简介

21世纪中期，由于温室效应，南北极冰川融化，地球上很多城市被淹没。此时，人类科技已经高度发达，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一，而且，机器人制造技术已经高度发达，先进的机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，还能感知自身的存在。[1]
莫妮卡的儿子马丁重病住院，生命危在旦夕，为了缓解伤痛的心情，她领养了机器人小孩大卫（海利?乔?奥斯蒙特 饰），大卫的生存使命就是爱她。马丁苏醒，恢复健康，回到了家里，一系列的事情使大卫“失宠”，最后被莫妮卡抛弃。
在躲过机器屠宰场的残酷追杀后，大卫在机器情人乔（裘德?洛 饰）的帮助下，开始寻找自己的生存价值：渴望变成真正的小孩，重新回到莫妮卡妈妈的身边。谁也不知道他能否完成自己的心愿，脱胎换骨成为真正的人，等待他们的只是凶吉难料的旅程……

㈣ 《八月迷情》或《人工智能》的英文简介，控制在200词左右额。

说实话要短还真的很困难，需要中文吗？
人工智能那个简介专业术语比较多啊……

August Rush

From Ireland, tells the story of a young but talented bar singer with an extraordinary young woman, a cellist in New York City's Washington Square to meet and quickly fall in love, but now forced to be separated from the proct of two one-night stand - Auguste Rush has also become orphans.
10 years later, grown up only of Auguste living in the streets of New York show, and later as a result of the help to be a mysterious stranger, Auguste began to use their extraordinary musical talent to find the date of birth in their own forced separation of parents.

Artificial Intelligence

The mid-21st century, as a result of climate warming, melting ice caps north and south poles, the Earth many cities have been submerged in a vast expanse of water in the. At this point, the human science and technology has reached a very high level of artificial intelligence is that human beings invented the robot to cope with the worst one of the natural environment of scientific and technological means.
Advanced artificial intelligence robot can not only have a realistic human appearance, but also the same as the human perception of the existence of their own. David is a thinking, feeling small robot that he and 11-year-old David set foot on the mentality of a long, followed at his side, and there is another kind of robot Joe. Who do not know whether they can complete their own desire, reborn as a real person, waiting for their unpredictable凶吉only human nature to search for complex ... ...

㈤ 谁能给我一个英文剧情简介 关于电影《人工智能AI》

In the not-so-far future the polar ice caps have melted and the resulting raise of the ocean waters has drowned all the coastal cities of the world. Withdrawn to the interior of the continents, the human race keeps advancing, reaching to the point of creating realistic robots (called mechas) to serve him. One of the mecha-procing companies builds David, an artificial kid which is the first to have real feelings, especially a never-ending love for his "mother", Monica. Monica is the woman who adopted him as a substitute for her real son, who remains in cryo-stasis, stricken by an incurable disease. David is living happily with Monica and her husband, but when their real son returns home after a cure is discovered, his life changes dramatically. A futuristic adaptation of the tale of Pinocchio, with David being the "fake" boy who desperately wants to become "real".

㈥ 求：人工智能的英文影评

I saw A.I. on the first night it ran here and I must say I was disappointed in the size of the audience. How strange to see so few people show up for a Spielberg film. This film did not enjoy the normal hype that most of Spielberg's films enjoy, I think I know why. Lack of proct placement. They're may have been some somewhere but I didn't see them. A.I.'s story line and flawless visual effects reflect what I can only describe as the meeting of two great film makers. Kubrick (who started work on the project after he read the Aldiss book in '83),and Steven Spielberg who's long list of intelligent blockbusters made him the perfect person to bring this story to the screen. I could, I believe see the story boards and concepts Kubrick developed and I could also see the sensitivity that Spielberg added to scenes and characters. These two things are not entirely separate in good Science Fiction. All good science fiction has some human sensitivity in it otherwise it would just be a horror film. The script reflects some of the darkness and coldness that sometimes underlies each character human and machine, there is no fear of this in the story. This darkness draws us on in the story.

The visual effects are stunning and come darn close to genius. The story line takes us in and the visuals make it almost real.
A.I. Is a good union of two great film makers., 1 July 2001
Author: John R. Armstrong ([email protected]) from Chicago
I wish I had Mr. Mannings grip of syntax, but all in all at the end of the day it's good science fiction and a good story too. I beleve that Stanley Kubrick's choice of asking Steven Spielberg to make this film was the kind of genius that Kubrick showed in all his work. It is a tribute to both men that they saw a vision of something and worked toward it's creation. I think they came to a great place in film making.

Future classic...?, 26 September 2001

Author: Chris Harrison ([email protected]) from Wiltshire, England

First of all, once again I think the critics have got it wrong. Like Blade Runner and 2001, this is a film that will be properly judged in 10/20 years or maybe more. Its way ahead of its time, the combination of Kubrick and Spielberg is unique, its unlikely we will ever see anything like this again.

Did I like it? The answer would have to be yes, the mix of styles will put many people off, but I found it to be unlike anything I have ever seen, and all the better for it. The story is by no means original but everything else about the film is so different that this can be forgiven. To get one thing straight, Kubrick decided Spielberg would be the better man for directing it, and I think this was a very wise decision, many of the ideas are pure Kubrick, but Spielberg has the neccassary attributes to direct such a film, and great credit has to go to Kubrick for handing it to him.

Haley Joel Osment is amazing, the robot/human emotion must be amazingly difficult to pull off effectively, but Osment does it with such relative ease to the point where you do believe he is a robot, not that he is just acting as a robot. Jude Law is excellent, and so to is Frances O'Conner.

As for the ending, as brave as an idea it may of been to end on a downbeat note at "the first ending" I think the slightly upbeat ending is much more appropriate.

All in all I would say A.I is a wonderfully unique film that should be judged for what it is, a film. Forget everything about the Spielberg/Kubrick "issue" and just sit back and take in a truely amazing film. You may hate it, you may love it, but no matter what, it will effect your emotions in some way and you will discuss the film afterwards.

This film will be truely judged in 20 years or so, when it can be assessed purely as a film, as with 'Blade Runner', '2001', and even 'The Thing', it will get better with age.

A.I.--A Film With Heart And Brains, 6 July 2001

Author: virek213 from San Gabriel, Ca., USA

Steven Spielberg's latest movie A.I.: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, which he took up at the encouragement of the late, great Stanley Kubrick, has caused widely divergent comments. And I can't help wondering if the most scathingly negative reviews of this movie aren't just an open desire to see Spielberg crash, as he had with "1941" and HOOK.

For my money, Spielberg has done it again with this futuristic science fiction drama, regardless of what the negative reviews say. Its story of a robot boy (Haley Joel Osment) who desires to be a real boy in a far future in which humans (Orgas) and machines (Mechas) exist side-by-side but not always in harmony is very much modeled on the Pinocchio story, though it is actually based on a 1969 short story by Brian Aldiss. It raises some interesting and sometimes unsettling moral dilemmas that few films of late have done. Can a parent love a child, even if that child is not real? What might happen if that child desired to be real? How will Man and Machine be able to co-exist?

Like all intelligent science fiction, such as Kubrick's own 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and Spielberg's own CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, A.I. forces us to ponder where we've been and where we might be going. It's an incredible combination of Kubrick's icy intellectual and clinical mind and Spielberg's emotional heart; and I think it works exceedingly well. But it forces the viewer to not leave their heart and brains at the door, which I think is why it is being so negatively received in this season of mindless summer movie fare. It may be too intelligent for its own good, and many don't have the 145 minutes of patience needed for the movie. I did, however; and I would call this an absolute masterpiece. Out of ten stars, give this one a 10.

A mind-blowing movie that will grow in stature, 6 March 2002

Author: Magnus ([email protected])

Wow! That was all I could say when I walked out of the theatre after my first helping of A.I. I wasn't sure whether I loved the movie or was disappointed by it, I just knew it had had a huge effect on me. Having seen it a further three times at the cinema, I still find fault with it, but I keep returning to it, thinking about it, discussing it, and it has left me with a feeling that, five months later, I've still not shaked. In many regards, this movie reminds me of Fight Club, not in terms of theme or emotional content, but e to it's level of craft, the daring nature of it's execution and the fact that I keep re-evaluating it. All the things that are possible to comment objectively on (if anything ever is) are handled expertly. The performances are top-notch, especially Haley Joel Osment as David, the little robot child that longs to be human. The effects are not only very impressive, but are integrated into the story rather than calling attention to themselves. Januz Kaminski's photography is, as one has come to expect, impressive, and the movie is unusually unpredictable for such a big-budget experience.

In my opinion, John Williams' score is among his most impressive. I listened to it on CD for three weeks before seeing the movie, and thought it was fantastic, but once the movie started rolling I completely forgot about the music. That says a lot about both the score and the film itself. I also liked the three-act structure, in which the tone and feel of the movie changes drastically as the story progresses. Part one, as one reviewer noted, feels like a cross between E.T. and The Shining, an odd, but very effective combination. The second part of the movie is awash with Spielbergian imagery, but with the darkness and coldness of a Kubrick movie. And the last part is a head-scratcher that has the intellectual resonance of most Kubrick-films, and the emotional tone of something like Cinema Paradiso. I purposely refrain from saying that it is as emotional as Spielberg-films, because I think the director's complexities, the dark aspects of his style, and the occasional subtleties of his work are often overlooked by critics.

It's difficult to discuss the themes of the movie without spoiling it, but while many people criticised the movie from having several false endings, I felt that each continuation added layers of though and complexities that the movie would have lacked had it ended sooner. I have come to the conclusion, over the past months, that I do love the movie and that it is my favourite film of 2001, even ahead of The Fellowship of The Ring and Amelie. In other words, buy it on DVD, it's more than worth it.

==============================================================
All of the above from IMDB.

㈦ 电影人工智能内容的概括

链接:

《人工智能》是由华纳兄弟影片公司于2001年拍摄发行的一部未来派的科幻类电影。由史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格执导，裘德·洛、海利·乔·奥斯蒙特主演。影片于2001年6月26日在美国上映，讲述21世纪中期，人类的科学技术已经达到了相当高的水平，一个小机器人为了寻找养母，为了缩短机器人和人类差距而奋斗的故事。

㈧ 求一篇介绍关于机器人电影的英文简介

变形金刚 （英文简介，你去网上搜查）

㈨ 急需电影《人工智能》和《勇敢的心》的英文剧情介绍

勇敢的心 braveheart
资料一：
Unfortunately, I have yet to find a film of quite this caliber again. Braveheart contains elements of Romance (several heart- wrenching and warming instances), Epic/Action (spectacular scenes), Mystery (can take a few viewings to put it all together), History (albeit romanticised) and of course Drama (perfectly unravelled). This level of uncompromised multi-tasking allows the film to move you to laugh and cry, love and hate or even to think and be taught. I'm trying to avoid the clichés of glowing reviews (almost as bad as entirely negative ones) - but this is one of the few movies that I feel deserves one.

The witty banter between friends/foes/lovers/relatives is, in my opinion, flawless and aids the film's claim as a true classic. The soundtrack is similarly top-notch and encapsulates and refracts the patriotic theme ring several key moments. The political sub-plot and gorgeous scenery also serve as refreshers ring otherwise heavy areas of the story. Perhaps Braveheart's only flaw (but if you share my sentiments it's actually a bonus) is its length so you'll want to prepare a comfy seat and maybe even two pots of tea (complete with cosies!).

I suppose it's also relevant to touch on the historic inaccuracies as I expect this is what people might dislike most about this film. However, "History is written by those who have hanged heroes"; also, the overall sketchiness of such periods coupled with the right of artistic license are enough for me to personally dismiss such thoughts. On that note, I hope you also enjoy what, to me, is the greatest film created (so far).

资料二：
The movie begins in the small town of Elerslie, Scotland. William lives with his father, who is not named in the film, and his older brother Malcolm. William's father and older brother are called to a meeting a few miles from their home where they find the entire nobility of Scotland hanging. Malcolm and his father then go to a battle between the British and their clan, both die tragically. At the funeral William meets his uncle Argyle who fought in the battle with Malcolm and his father. He takes him away to live with him. The scene then cuts to an alt William on his horse. William later runs into a girl he knew before he went to live with Argyle, her name, Murron, we discover that Lords have the right to sleep with brides on their wedding night, so William marries Murron in secret. Murron is the assaulted by a British guard, the guard is killed by William, a fight ensues, and eventually Murron is killed by the lord. This enrages Wallace who then build himself a fine army entering city's and killing all Englishman within. Wallace prepares to move on to Sterling where he prepared for his greatest battle yet, in the forest he realises that he must find a way to beat the heavy cavalry from the ground, he decided to create spears twice as long as men. These were used in the battle to kill the entire heavy cavalry raised at the last minute to kill the on coming horses. Eventually Wallace reaches York, the most important military city he gains control. Williams final battle at Falkirk ends in his betrayal by two nobles, whom he later kills. William is betrayed by the leper father of Robert the Bruce, is captured and refuses to bow down as a loyal subject of the king Edward I, Longshanks. Therefore, instead of mere beheading William Wallace is subject to being Hung, hung within an inch of death. Drawn, being stretched by his ankles and wrists and then having his insides shown to him before he died. Then Quartered, he was beheaded and his head was put on the London Bridge his body was torn into for pieces one sent to each corner of Britain as a warning to the citizens. After Wallace's death we see Robert the Bruce led the battle of Bannockburn the last battle for Scotland's freedom.

资料三：
In 14th Century Scotland, William Wallace leads his people in a rebellion against the tyranny of the English King, who has given English nobility the 'Prima Nocta'.. a right to take all new brides for the first night. The Scots are none too pleased with the brutal English invaders, but they lack leadership to fight back. Wallace creates a legend of himself, with his courageous defence of his people and attacks on the English.

——————————————————————
人工智能 artificial intelligence A.I
资料一：
In the not-so-far future the polar ice caps have melted and the resulting raise of the ocean waters has drowned all the coastal cities of the world. Withdrawn to the interior of the continents, the human race keeps advancing, reaching to the point of creating realistic robots (called mechas) to serve him. One of the mecha-procing companies builds David, an artificial kid which is the first to have real feelings, especially a never-ending love for his "mother", Monica. Monica is the woman who adopted him as a substitute for her real son, who remains in cryo-stasis, stricken by an incurable disease. David is living happily with Monica and her husband, but when their real son returns home after a cure is discovered, his life changes dramatically. A futuristic adaptation of the tale of Pinocchio, with David being the "fake" boy who desperately wants to become "real".

资料二：
The "literalists" are clearly not happy with A.I. So now is a good time to recall that "2001: A Space Odyssey" was greeted upon release with derision, confusion, dismissive reviews, public consternation, and, oh yeah, some thought it was an absolute masterpiece. Beyond the monolithic influence of that film (think of Han Solo's jump to lightspeed, etc.), the symbols of "2001" -- TO THIS VERY DAY -- cannot be decoded using anything but the most personal, interpretive language. The obelisks, the message of the obelisks, the Star Child, Cosmonaut Dave's "room", HAL-9000's true motivation – all these things remain in our collective subconscious as indelible images that refuse to be concretely defined between or among viewers. WHAT CAUSES THIS CONFLICT OF PERCEPTION? IS IT INTENTIONAL? Again and again, Kubrick's films take us to a No-Man's Land of narrative and moral ambiguity, stranding us, forcing us to make decisions, demanding interpretation (or we can judge the surface, walk away, hate the film). To my perception, Kubrick is the only, true "Brechtian" film director. The device Brecht proposed is "Alienation Effect", or put simply, Leading the audience down two, divergent paths at once. My favorite example is "Barry Lyndon". Being the adventures of a young man, handsome, virtuous, well-meaning, ambitious, full of promise. Yet in every scene, the camera "pulls-back" revealing Barry (but never to himself) to be womanizing, self-absorbed, criminally inclined, socially inept, not very bright, morally bankrupt, and at last, a broken shell of a man. Or let's consider "Strangelove": Did Kubrick really create a headbanger, slapstick comedy about nuclear proliferation, mass destruction, and military/political incompetence? The real question is "Who else could have?" Well, that's my take on Kubrick's artistic sensibility, and, without daring to presume Spielberg's motivation, it's what drew them both to "A.I." Pinocchio, the Blue Fairy, cuddly Teddy Bears on one hand, but on the other hand – social institutions are faltering forever -- parenthood, childhood, science, instry, sexuality -- all distorted beyond repair. And Humans, the ultimate A.I. protagonist, seem blissed-out, in denial, more interested in creating "Davids", "Darlenes" and "Gigolo Joes" than in rising water levels and the imminent threat of extinction. Therefore, I believe A.I. is getting precisely the response all Kubrick films "INITIALLY" get. Spielberg's reputation and career can withstand anything that public perception might bring to his films, but I keep thinking that A.I. is the riskiest moment of his artistic life.

㈩ 美国影片人工智能剧情祥细介绍

21世纪中期，由于温室效应，南北极冰川融化，地球上很多城市被淹没。此时，人类科技已经高度发达，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一，而且，机器人制造技术已经高度发达，先进的机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，还能感知自身的存在。

莫妮卡的儿子马丁重病住院，生命危在旦夕，为了缓解伤痛的心情，她领养了机器人小孩大卫（海利•乔•奥斯蒙特 饰），大卫的生存使命就是爱她。马丁苏醒，恢复健康，回到了家里，一系列的事情使大卫“失宠”，最后被莫妮卡抛弃。

在躲过机器屠宰场的残酷追杀后，大卫在机器情人乔（裘德•洛 饰）的帮助下，开始寻找自己的生存价值：渴望变成真正的小孩，重新回到莫妮卡妈妈的身边。谁也不知道他能否完成自己的心愿，脱胎换骨成为真正的人，等待他们的只是凶吉难料的旅程……

(10)电影人工智能英文简介扩展阅读

《人工智能》是由华纳兄弟影片公司于2001年拍摄发行的一部未来派的科幻类电影。由史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格执导，裘德·洛、海利·乔·奥斯蒙特主演。

1、大卫

演员海利·乔·奥斯蒙

作为第一个被输入情感程序的机器男孩，大卫是这个公司的员工亨利他妻子的一个试验品，然而和人类小孩一样天真可爱。

尽管大卫逐渐成了温斯顿夫妇的孩子，但大卫却因一系列的缘故不得不离开他们，走上寻求成人的路，险些被机器人猎人销毁，但他心怀梦想，身体和梦想都没销毁，依然坚持着梦想。他活得最久，经历最多。

2、乔

演员裘德·洛

大卫的患难之交，机器人舞男，他是在大卫寻找成人方法途中结交的机器朋友，和大卫一起渡过了许多生死岁月。最终却未能避免被人类抓走的命运。

3、莫妮卡

演员弗兰西丝·奥康纳

大卫的养母，是Cybertronics Manufacturing制作公司的员工亨利的妻子，马丁的母亲也是大卫的母亲，开始难以接受大卫，渐渐被大卫的单纯可爱感化，和大卫相处融洽，最后却不得不放弃了大卫。

4、亨利

演员萨姆·罗伯兹

大卫的养父，Cybertronics Manufacturing制作公司的员工，马丁和大卫的父亲，大卫开始是他的试验品，但大卫逐渐成了他的孩子，后来在大卫犯下一系列错误（实为被马丁暗算）后决定抛弃他。

5、泰迪

演员泰迪熊

马丁家的超级机器人，大卫的玩偶，可以说话和行动，后来和大卫一起走上了流亡的道路，是大卫忠贞不二的朋友，帮助大卫免遭一死，与大卫共同度过千年，和大卫一样心怀梦想。