A. 电影《寂静之地》(A Quiet Place)有哪些地方让你印象深刻,导致还想再看一次
传统恐怖片和惊悚片还是不一样,我觉得《寂静之地》属于后者。
传统恐怖片更侧重构筑神秘感与想象空间,后劲大;而惊悚片强调心理紧张与官能刺激,上头快。比如鬼片多是恐怖片,僵尸片多是惊悚片,也不能说哪种类型更吓人,还得看电影本身质量。
老妇人已被怪兽杀死,而老头看着死去的老伴,万念俱灰,一声嚎叫,让怪物杀死了自己。
这情节让我有些想法:
整部电影里最可怕的不是凶残的怪兽——光是主角一家就可以活蹦乱跳这么多年;
也不是完全死寂的生活环境,真正可怕的是在一个人无依无靠地生活在死寂的环境中。
选择影片的时候按照得奖情况来判断,是聪明而省力的做法。但是在评委目光所不能及的角落里,一样有多张胶片在闪闪发光。很多影迷可能会立即举出《肖申克的救赎(THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION)》作为例证,而在我看来,还有一部片子也和《肖申克的救赎》一样伟大而动人。
影片《生命因你而动听》英文原名为Mr. Holland’s Opus,这是我见过最贴切而典雅的译名之一。它还被译做《春风化雨1996》——想一想《肖申克的救赎》当年被为莫名其妙地翻译为《刺激1995》,则两片难兄难弟的情形可想而知。
在所有的学科中,有一样东西最没有实用价值,也最难教,这就是美。因为美不能被写在教案上,拥有它与否不能改变面包数量的多寡。而且,一个人进了美的殿堂后,往往变得拙嘴笨舌,或者自私无比,他很难退出来拉着你的手,带你进去一起参观,告诉你如何去欣赏。
幸运的是,我们有《生命因你而动听》里的霍兰德先生。听古典音乐打瞌睡?那么他会在键盘上敲击出爵士乐来刺激你萎靡的精神,然后一点点告诉你,这曲子和巴赫的名曲之间的关系。告诉你,你喜欢的流行音乐和那些你所畏惧的严肃音乐之间的传承关系。
喜欢演奏却没有天分?吹单簧管就像个肺痨患者一样四下走风变音?来,看看霍兰德先生是怎么教他的女学生的:他抢走了乐谱,告诉女孩说曲子都在心里,不需要再看了。当女学生依然毫无进展时,他问女孩子一个非常奇怪的问题:“你最喜欢自己脸上的哪一部分?”女学生回答是头发,因为她父亲说她的头发像是日落黄昏。于是,霍兰德先生在女学生耳边低语:“那么,吹奏日落吧!”这一次,女学生真的做到了。
而在一开始,霍兰德先生只想着尽快结束他的教学生涯,以完成他的作曲,成为一名伟大的作曲家。但是他最终没有那么做,却成为一名中学音乐教师,一生如此。他用音乐改变了无数学生的命运。更重要的是,他教会了他们什么是音乐之美,使生命不再是一个枯燥乏味的循环,而是闪烁着音乐的点点烛光。
生命如歌,如果说美也可以被教授和传承,霍兰德先生告诉了我们其中的一个原因:凭着爱。
Choose award-winning film in accordance with the situation to determine when it is intelligent and labor-saving approach. But in the eyes of the judges can not and corner, the same multiple-exposure film at the glittering. Many fans may immediately give "The Shawshank Redemption (THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION)" as an example, and in my opinion, there is also a film and "The Shawshank Redemption" as a great and touching.
The movie "Life is sweet of you" in English formerly known as Mr. Holland's Opus, which is most appropriate and elegant I've ever seen one of the translation. It is also translated do "Dead Poets Society 1996" - think "The Shawshank Redemption" as the year has been inexplicably translated as "to stimulate 1995", then the two fellow sufferers of the situation can be imagined.
In all disciplines, there is one thing most lacking in practical value, but also the most difficult to teach, this is beautiful. Because the U.S. can not be written in the lesson plans, the have it or not, can not be changed to the amount of bread. Moreover, a person entered the hall, after the United States often become clumsy Zuiben tongue, or selfish and extremely difficult for him to come out holding your hand, take you into the tour together, to tell you how to enjoy.
Fortunately, we have the "Life is sweet of you," Mr. Holland Lane. Fall asleep listening to classical music? Then he would hit a jazz Jianpanshangqiao to stimulate your spiritual malaise, and then a little bit to tell you that this song, and the relationship between Bach's music. To tell you, you like pop music and that you are afraid of the transmission of the relationship between serious music.
Like to play but not gifted? Blowing clarinet like a tuberculosis patient looked away as the wind changed tone? Come to see Mr. Holland taught him how female students: he stole music, telling girls that song in my heart, do not need to look at the. When the female students made no progress, he asked the girls a very strange question: "What is your favorite part of his face, what?" The answer is the hair of female students, because her father said her hair is like a sunset. As a result, Mr. Holland ears of female students whisper: "Well, playing the sunset bar!" This time, female students actually did.
In the beginning, Mr. Holland was only thinking to end his teaching career as soon as possible in order to complete his compositions became a great composer. But he eventually did not do it, it became a secondary school music teacher, and his case. He used music to change the fate of countless students. More importantly, he taught them what is the beauty of music, so that is no longer a boring life cycle, but the music, little candles flicker.
Life Cantabile, if America can also be teaching and tradition, Mr. Holland told us one reason: With Love.
C. 求《precious》 电影英文影评~
I should start out by emphasizing that I disagree with much of the criticism the film has been receiving. A common disparagement condemns the movie as "emotionally manipulative" and "superficially inspirational", much like other films that fall into the category of the "inspirational dramas" depicting stories of indivials overcoming obstacles and hardships that many people seem to hate. Well, I personally found that the film portrays a reality far too bleak and dismal and brutal for it to possibly be considered "inspirational"; in addition, while the film ends on somewhat of a high note, even that is laced with misery and becomes the lesser of two evils for the protagonist. Another criticism of the film – and of the book it is based on – is from the opposite end of the spectrum, and blames the film for portraying TOO bleak a situation to the point of exploitation. I personally found the scenario portrayed in the film to be strikingly realistic, and I think that people who are too ignorant to realize that such a grim existence can feasibly be led in 21st century America need a serious wake-up call.
One aspect of the film that deserves all the praise in the world is its cast, specifically the performances of its lead actresses and the surprising and unexpected quality of these performances considering the particular thespians involved. First and foremost, we have the breakout role of Gabourey "Gabby" Sidibe, portraying the overweight, twice-pregnant and illiterate protagonist, Precious. The performance is a revelation both because of how convincingly Sidibe reacts to and interacts with her brutal day-to-day existence, but also because of how completely removed it is from the first-time actresses' actual life. It's always impressive to see a performer convincingly convey difficult and profound emotions that they probably would never feel themselves in their real lives, but for a first-time actress to convey these emotions is particularly incredible. Precious' life is populated by three prominent alt characters; two of which see past her daunting exterior and genuinely want to help her, and one who does the exact opposite. Mariah Carey plays a social worker who takes a personal interest in Precious' case and, in the film's most dramatically gut-wrenching scene, makes a genuine attempt to bridge the gap between the teenager and her monstrous mother. Carey has only ever acted in two or three other films, including the atrocious vanity project "Glitter", but in this role, she de-glams, puts on a convincing and raspy accent and actually manages to deliver a surprisingly well rounded and convincing performance. Paula Patton plays another alternate mother figure in Precious' life, her teacher at her alternate school who takes a particularly personal interest in Precious, to the point of letter her stay at her home when she has nowhere else to go. Unlike Mariah Carey, Patton never did anything to totally remove my confidence in her acting abilities, but then again, she's never actually given what can really be considered a "good" performance, which is what makes her tender and genuine turn in this film most impressive. But the scene-stealer is without a doubt Mo'Nique, probably one of my LEAST favorite "comedic" performers who totally redeems herself and manages to deliver a frighteningly convincing performance, incredibly transforming herself into Precious' villainous, sadistic and purely evil mother. It is an incredible and difficult and extremely brave performance, and is even more impressive considering that it's coming from the star of "Phat Girlz".
The performances are rich and incredible enough to hold up dramatic scenes, but not the narrative as a whole, which, as I mentioned before, suffers from a series of bad directorial choices made by director Lee Daniels. The film's biggest flow is emotional inconsistency: in an attempt to portray Precious' inner feelings, Daniels injects strangely conceived fantasy sequences at key dramatic moments in which Precious imagines herself as a glamorous and famous personality. While the intention of these sequences is clear, their abruptness just totally jolts the audience out of the emotional flow of the film, and they just seem out of place. For a similar reason, Daniels chooses to set grim and dramatic scenes to oddly inappropriate songs and musical cues, which once again just feel forced and out of place, and interrupt the emotional resonance of the scenes. Other than that, the film just seems poorly done at times, or simply unfinished: the cinematography is inconsistent and often features zooms and loss of focus that don't feel like stylistic choices but rather just like mistakes. In addition, the editing is quite disjointed at times, and many cuts interrupt musical cues in the middle or otherwise are just so sudden and jumbled that they completely ruin the dramatic flow. Finally, I just felt that while many separate scenes work wonderfully and are emotional and genuinely gut-wrenching, they are just too loosely connected for the film to actually carry a consistent dramatic arc throughout, as it jumps between Precious' brutal home life to her newfound support in her classroom to her day-to-day activities to her inner fantasies. For example, a major dramatic reveal near the end of the film end sup completely ignored and thus irrelevant to the dramatic arc. As I mentioned earlier, the performances are absolutely spectacular, but the inconsistencies in the film's tone and its jumbled and odd editing take away from what otherwise could have been a genuinely affective film.
有好几部电影都叫precious,你看看是不是这部,要是不对的话,把电影的年份和主演告诉我
D. 谁帮我翻译一下这篇影评啊 英语的 谢谢
呵呵,这么长,才10分,傻啊,帮你翻!自己出钱找翻译公司吧,白痴!
E. 求5篇英文电影的观后感100字 电影是5个英文的 观后感要中文的100字
哈利波特观后感
哈利·波特是一个系列的七个幻想小说由英国作家J.K.罗琳写的。书中记述的同名青少年巫师哈利·波特的冒险,加上韦斯莱和赫敏,他最好的朋友。中心故事是关于哈利的斗争,邪恶的巫师伏地魔,他征服了魔法世界杀了哈利的父母,之后他试图征服麻瓜(非魔法世界对他的统治)。
后天观后感
今天,我们看了一部电影,这部电影的名字叫做:后天。这部电影讲的是:世界发生了成为世界冷事务,播放的是什么等地区温度急剧下降在纽约电影中,几乎每个下降超过十度。天空依然下可怕的冰雹,还有更害怕的龙卷风,纽约城在一瞬间变成了破城被龙卷风穿过后,更使整个城市变成了一个没有结果。这真的让人触目惊心,使人的心不平静的一旦落在很长一段时间,虽然电影中十分夸张,可是我们现在还不是这样:全球变暖……所以请同学们从自己动手,环境保护起来,让我们的环境更美丽!
战马
战马是如此精彩的电影。这部电影超过了我的期望。它是移动的,情感的,美丽的,和如此感人。这一定会成为经典。你不必是一个马的爱人爱这部电影。没有太多的血,但你仍然可以看到战争的恐怖和士兵和马匹是多么强烈,以及平民。索姆河战役是特别强烈的场景。表演很精彩,摄影是美丽的,约翰威廉姆斯的得分是完美的,和马都受过良好的训练!斯皮尔伯格做了一个杰作!
赎罪
“赎罪”讲述了一个年轻女孩的故事(Saoirse罗南)谁证人一个可怕的事情,这改变了许多生活。什么是真实,什么是真理?“赎罪”在这些科目。乔Wright执导了一个辉煌的戏剧,美丽的风景和伟大的故事发挥最大的部分。由伊恩McEwan的精彩的小说是安装在银幕上飞驰。悬念是紧紧的抱着你对它的控制。音乐支持电影和触摸到了令人愉快的故事。铸造特别是杰姆斯麦卡沃伊罗比和年轻有为的Saoirse罗南布莱妮救他们的角色出现。凡妮莎雷德格雷夫的外观也大。情节场景技术是想象力和非常介意取笑是情节的一个非常重要的因素。这是非常令人惊讶,总监赖特没有得到奥斯卡提名为他的成就。克里斯托弗汉普顿的剧本在奥斯卡颁奖典礼也失去了。莱特和汉普顿做得很好。但这显然是一个年科恩兄弟,很好赚的课程。他很高兴达里奥获得最佳音乐艺术成就金像。\“赎罪”是一个聪明的,漂亮的,情感和感人的经验。绝对值得一看!
罗马假日 Roman Holiday (1953)的英文观后感
公主来到罗马有一个公共访问。作为一个年轻的女孩,她厌倦了不断的无味的活动。一天晚上,她悄悄地从她的起居室。当她来到罗马街上,她深受意大利普通生活的吸引。最后她太累了,睡在街上。一位美国记者乔无意中看到她把不幸的是她自己的公寓。当他得知自己的真实身份,一个有趣的和浪漫的旅程开始了。在真理之口所发生的是影片中最有趣的场景。虽然他们有一天呆在一起,他们的爱情会永恒。真正的爱情是不到多久你留在你的另一半。
F. 《无依之地》为什么被禁
导演赵婷的一些言论却引起了众多网友的愤慨,在此之后《无依之地》被撤档,相当于在大陆市场被禁播了。
《无依之地》是由赵婷执导,弗兰西斯·麦克多蒙德主演的剧情电影,该片于2020年9月11日在意大利威尼斯国际电影节上映。
该片改编自美国作家杰西卡·布鲁德的同名小说,讲述了在经济大萧条中失去了工作和家园的弗恩开始住在房车中,一边打工、一边旅游,并遇到了各色各样的人的故事。
剧情简介:
2008年金融危机下,美国内华达州昂皮尔小镇的重要经济支柱石膏厂倒闭,人去镇空,这里的邮政编码也被取消。丈夫去世后,几乎在在昂皮尔小镇度过了一生的弗恩(弗兰西斯·麦克多蒙德饰)无力独撑生活。
为了将生活成本压到最低,她将简陋的家当搬上了改装后的厢式货车,开始了一边打工、一边西行的公路生活。她在亚马逊流水线上、在游乐园的咖啡厅里、在国家森林公园做临时工。一路上,她和许多厢式货车寄居者相遇、相识,彼此帮助,并缔结了友谊。
G. 求两篇英语电影影评(一片要动画片)
《WALL.E》
影片的前40分钟——几乎没有对话,银幕上也几乎没有出现人类形象——是一出风趣优美的电影诗篇,观众要过许久才会深入它黑暗的隐喻之中。场景是一个杂乱的城市,密布着摩天大楼,除了一个破旧的勤快机器人和他忠心的蟑螂伙伴外,没有任何人类出现。朦胧的阳光透过灰尘,照着一片可怕的风景,显示“后启示录”的死寂。这是一个没有人类的世界,你或许可以说没有任何生机,尽管有过去生命存在的证据。
我们已经习惯了期待皮克斯的惊奇,但是《星际总动员》确实开辟了新天地。它带给我们G级(成年与儿童都适宜观看的)的、电脑产生的、我们潜在灭绝的图景。这不是近来投入此阴森主题的唯一电影。随着全球变暖,人类的消失成为一个热门话题,许多导演都对之关注,如史蒂芬-斯皮尔伯格(《人工智能》)、弗郎西斯-劳伦斯(《我是传奇》)、奈特-沙马兰 (《灭顶之灾》)以及维纳-赫尔佐格。在他最近的记录片《在世界尽头相遇》中,赫尔佐格先生沉思道“人类在此星球上的存在不会真正永续”,这个观点在《星际总动员》的下半部中几乎是逐字逐句地表达出来。当异想天开的皮克斯工程师和情绪化的德国导演发出同样的信息时,也许我们该报以注意了。
《星际总动员》并不全是阴郁和毁灭。毫无疑问地,它是一部郑重其事绝非简单化的生态寓言,但它还是一个令人沉醉的、甜蜜简单的爱情故事,感情的纯洁带着卓别林式的风格。在另一个层面,它带着科幻的色彩,提到了《2001太空漫游》、《异形》、《 酷狗宝贝:月球野餐记》中的一切。但是电影最公开、最坚持的引用对象是《俏红娘》,这部老旧的录影带为主角提供舞蹈和爱情方面的指导。那首古老的、快被人遗忘的音乐,随同Jerry Herman的歌词、Louis Armstrong的低声吟唱,成为瓦力(片中机器人)对我们的纪念。他是一个凹痕累累的苦力小机器人,已经过了计划的报废期,整天做着徒劳、机械的作业:收集、压缩垃圾。他的名字Wall-E是“废物安置装载运送者-地球类”的缩写。但是对于瓦力来说,并不是他发现的一切都没有价值。在他和蟑螂躲避尘暴的锈铁船中,他小心收藏了一些宝贝,包括芝宝打火机、炊事用具和一个魔方。
瓦力对一个失落文明工艺品的亲切珍视是可以理解的,毕竟他也是人类心智的产物。而《星际总动员》(由皮克斯的骨干Andrew Stanton导演、由Andrew Stanton和Jim Reardon编剧)的天才之处是,他提醒人们,创造和毁灭是硬币的两面。人类被致力于制造和消费更多物质的经济行为驱离家园——瓦力最终知道我们没有消失。但是人类产生的一些东西证明是有用、有趣、珍贵的。一些东西甚至能够创造出灵魂。
观察瓦力的周围环境,观众们了解到,在过去的某个时候,一家叫Bnl(英语“买N大”的缩写)的集团公司,用它的超大型商场和数以吨计的垃圾充斥了地球。最终公司把它的重要客户载到一个太空站上(舰长是Jeff Garlin),在那儿他们渐渐变成由新一代特殊机器人服务的、肥胖懒惰的群体。一个叫做伊夫的研究探查机器人(所有机器人的姓名均为缩写,性别均由仪表显示),降临地球,令瓦力动心。
他们的求爱过程带着一些熟悉的模式。如果把本片看作浪漫喜剧,情节类似于一个卑微的清洁工爱上了一位超模兼枪法精湛的顶尖科学家。(我承认对此有所顾虑,但电影片名让我释然。——译注:电影英文名Wall-E,是“废物安置装载运送者-地球类”的缩写。)瓦力是传统的老式盒子机器人,咯吱作响,布满铆钉,外表凹痕累累、锈迹斑斑。他意志坚定,但不够聪明,也不酷。而伊夫,身形犹如加长的蛋,就象下一代的iPhone一样酷,轻声细语,除了兴奋的时候能够毁灭一切。她和瓦力通过喳喳叽叽的声音交流,有时候能够拼成词语。不知怎么地,他们对于渴望、恼怒、不在乎、忠诚、焦虑的微妙表达,实现了一种超自然的修辞。
他们被赋予如此丰富的人性,是因为皮克斯标志性的细心造型设计和经典摄影剪辑。丰富的技术资源让瓦力轻而易举地跳离废弃的地球,来到空间站的纯净大气层中,这是与制作人员带给角色和主题的严格完整相一致的。
Stanton先生并没有把这个环境剧变的寓言变成一个责骂他人、自我满意的训斥,他熟知在使用大众电影媒体进行企业消费文化批判时固有的矛盾。空间站的居民,习惯了被机器人照顾,退化成了类似巨婴的物种,面部柔软、躯干圆滚、四肢弱小。消费资本主义分析任何潜在需要、让顾客使用尽可能方便,具有一种将消费者幼儿化的力量。但是当这些空间居民靠在躺椅上,眼睛盯着显示屏,从巨大的杯子里获取卡路里,这些过度发育的太空巨婴看上去就象电影院里的观众。
换句话说,他们就是我们。而和我们一样的是,他们也不尽坏。来自瓦力的悖论是:驱动社会发明新事物,改进旧事物,从而产生销售、购买、制造、收集行为,创造潜在灾难的同时也发现了规避灾难的可能。或者说,创造瓦力这个垃圾世界(我们的世界)的冲动,同时也通过艺术让世界变得美好。
《达芬奇密码》
从原著小说被翻译成44种语言、在全球销量超过5000万本的热潮,到作者丹-布朗被指剽窃掀起的轩然大波,再到被西方教会目为反基督的异端电影遭到梵*蒂*冈的抵制,《达芬奇密码》(The Davinci Code)从面世的那一天起便注定要对传统的基督教带来颠覆性的冲击,值得庆幸的是教会掌握政权的日子早已成为历史,无须再担心打着耶稣幌子的黑色恐怖瘟疫会再次蔓延,多元化的社会里,基督教不可一世的地位终于露出了平凡的一面。
自己一向对宗教文化不感冒,之所以能坚持看完原著多半是因为丹-布朗精妙的文笔与高潮迭起的悬念情节,不过对把原著搬上荧光幕的商业行为持怀疑态度,毕竟文字带来的想象空间与视觉、听觉等多重感知形成的复杂认知截然不同,许多东西一旦具体形象化往往就容易失去原有的吸引力,尤其是《达芬奇密码》这类靠制造悬念、解读复杂西方宗教历史神学符号、营造心理惊悚的作品。结果虽然有Ron Howard、Tom Hanks和Audrey Tautou携手合作,虽然作为电影艺术最高殿堂嘎纳电影节的开幕电影,《达芬奇密码》依然差强人意,只是费力不讨好的制造了120分钟的沉闷悬疑。
即使宽容的看待电影,把是否忠于原著放在一旁,《达芬奇密码》也缺乏连贯的紧迫感和抽丝剥茧的惊悚元素,Tom Hanks和Audrey Tautou在影片中的角色本来注定他们不是《职业特工队》式的“Superman”,过多的火爆场面只会起到喧宾夺主的反效果,可影片开始Ron Howard偏要安排Audrey Tautou来一段超“辣”的车技Show,这马上就将一个弱智女流定位成超凡脱俗的强者,Hollywood式的娱乐标准即霸道又惹人生厌。按照小说的风格与结构,《达芬奇密码》应该是一部充满文艺悬念的电影,如何把复杂的谜题化繁为简,让观众参与到解迷中,可以说是影片成功与否的关键。可惜零散的剧情、苍白的人物塑造,单纯依靠Tom Hanks比手划脚就解开神学符号,未免太过儿戏,尤其是最后“Apple”的解密过程简直就是大话西游,令人啼笑皆非。Tom Hanks的力不从心、Audrey Tautou的不入戏,两人无法擦出预期的火花,加上巴黎伦敦浓郁的艺术气息、以及宗教的神圣、膜拜气氛又只是停留在表面的走马观花,都成为《达芬奇密码》空有包罗万有的野心,却有漏洞百出的臭皮囊一样,成为食之无味的“鸡肋”。
全片最光芒四射的应该是苦行僧Silas这个角色,他背负的罪恶感,他心灵上承受的痛苦远甚于伤痕累累的切肤之痛,在狂热的宗教信仰和冷酷的眼神中,我们读到了很浓厚的悲剧味道,Ron Howard在他身上着墨不多,但却显示了深厚的功力,无论镜位还是背景音乐的烘托,他赤裸的身体充满神秘感与强烈的威慑力,远比两位主角更具有感染力。
对于宗教信仰的问题不想讨论太多,如果像我般对晦涩的西方宗教观点束手无策的话,《达芬奇密码》的电影会比小说更生动也更通俗,这个故事有点像野史,可以触动人们骨子里先天的好奇心(其实也就是八卦),康斯坦丁大帝的“丰功伟绩”在我看来最能代表宗教的本质,说穿了只不过是统治者的工具和谎言而已,基督教清除“女巫”的运动倒让我想起电影大师德莱叶的《愤怒之日》,人性的残忍与黑暗,即使冠以堂皇的借口,依然令人触目惊心。
H. 如何评价电影《无依之地》
《无依之地》不是一部打着公路电影旗号,或者以此做背景的商业剧情片,影片远离戏剧化的叙事,在美国的独立制作中独具一格。无论是记录性质的生活场景,还是高度艺术化的剪辑叙事和诗意画面,都是为了展示美国现代游牧一族的真实经历和生存状态。
得益于主演弗兰西斯·麦克多蒙德对角色精准的拿捏,影片带给观众悲喜交加、起伏波动的饱和情绪。没有居高临下的怜悯,没有悲凉和眼泪,镜头敏锐地捕捉到现代游牧人的开朗坚韧、慷慨互助,他们享受着自由和小小的快乐。
无论主动还是被动,当这个群体远离喧嚣的都市、接受路上的艰苦时,也和广袤的大自然融为一体。既会面对狂风暴雪,也有夕阳日落相伴。人和自然的相处与依托,正是导演赵婷作品中一直都有所探讨的主题。
(8)无依之地电影英文影评扩展阅读
剧情简介
2008年金融危机下,美国内华达州昂皮尔小镇的重要经济支柱石膏厂倒闭,人去镇空,这里的邮政编码也被取消。丈夫去世后,几乎在在昂皮尔小镇度过了一生的弗恩(弗兰西斯·麦克多蒙德饰)无力独撑生活。
为了将生活成本压到最低,她将简陋的家当搬上了改装后的厢式货车,开始了一边打工、一边西行的公路生活。她在亚马逊流水线上、在游乐园的咖啡厅里、在国家森林公园做临时工。一路上,她和许多厢式货车寄居者相遇、相识,彼此帮助,并缔结了友谊。
I. 赵婷成首位获金球奖最佳导演亚裔女导演,获奖的这部电影是讲述什么故事的
赵婷成首位亚裔金球奖最佳导演在美国举办的第78届金球奖让大家见证了历史性的一刻,那就是中国导演赵婷凭借着电影《无依之地》获得了最佳导演奖的荣誉,成为了史上第一位获得金球奖最佳导演的亚裔女导演,这部电影也拿下了剧情类最佳影片奖。在此之前这部电影就获得过第77届威尼斯电影节金狮奖、第21届美国电影学会奖、第24届美国在线影评人协会奖和第45届多伦多电影节人民选择奖,可以说是横扫了各大颁奖季,同时也是今年4月奥斯卡的夺奖大热门。在获得金球奖后赵婷接受了视频连线,对于得奖她难掩激动之情,在视频中她感谢《无依之地》团队以及男友和家人,还有激发她灵感的“游牧族”,因为是他们帮助自己创造了这部影片的核心人物。谈到电影时赵婷认为《无依之地》的核心就是“一场悲伤和治愈的朝圣之旅”,这部电影就是献给每一位经历过这段艰辛而美丽旅程的人们,据悉电影《无依之地》将于4月在国内上映,电影迷们可以好好期待一番。
J. 纽约影评人协会奖颁出,赵婷为何获奖
因为赵婷作为影评人,非常的公正,评价也非常的受大众喜欢,对协会贡献突出